I updated libfabric-1.8.0rc1 for fedora rawhide. please rebuild
packages depends on libfabric, as library version bump.
thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Could this ugly hack work?
>
> %{endif __with_rebar3}
>
> Assuming the %endif macro would ignore any parameters.
This won't work... But RPM could "learn" this syntax and let spec
writers add that kind of comment inside the macro.
A bit far-fetched, I won t disagree :)
Dridi
Have you read the packaging guidelines how to properly set version for
pre-release?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_versioning_prereleases_with_tilde
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:08 AM Honggang LI wrote:
>
> I updated libfabric-1.8.0rc1 for fedora rawhide.
On 6/19/19 6:59 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
I'm getting new build failures on the autotools macros that had been working
for years. rpmbuild doesn't like
them anymore in rawhide. The macros are (or were) in the file
Hello, Philip Kovacs via devel.
Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:28:10 + (UTC) you wrote:
> I notice I am still using the `__make` macro in my specs. While they
> still work, should we proactively replace them with `make` ?
You can use %make_build and %make_install instead.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly
Dne 18. 06. 19 v 21:50 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> == How To Test ==
>
> This will be tested as part of the upstream crypto-policies testsuite.
I think this section should describe, how I, as a Fedora user, am
supposed to test this. E.g.
1) Get this test package
2) Modify this file
3) Run this
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:48:49AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I again completely disagree. There is no reason for weeks of breakage.
> > Most of the issues that break composes are unannounced abi bumps where
> > just rebuilding dependent packages fixes it. Or broken deps
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:44:41 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The last rawhide compose that completed was 2019-06-09 (10 days ago now).
A lot of the incomplete composes are actually usable for updates and I have
been getting systems updated and things have worked reasonably for the most
I use those macros wherever possible, but sometimes I need a raw `make`in
order to specify uncommon targets.
I'll just replace `__make` with `make` for now. No harm there.On
Wednesday, June 19, 2019, 12:06:44 PM EDT, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
Hello, Philip Kovacs via devel.
On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 6:27:31 PM CEST Philip Kovacs via devel wrote:
> I use those macros wherever possible, but sometimes I need a raw `make`in
> order to specify uncommon targets. I'll just replace `__make` with `make`
> for now. No harm there.
$ rpm --eval %make_build
> On 19 Jun 2019, at 17:28, Philip Kovacs via devel
> wrote:
>
> I notice I am still using the `__make` macro in my specs. While they still
> work, should we proactively replace them with `make` ?
Is there any downside in replacing it?
>
> The additional message I am getting here is that
None that I can tell. Years ago when I was writing my specs to add the
packages I now maintain, I recallsomeone recommended to me the use of these
macros as Fedora "tribal knowledge."
I am happy to remove mine if their use is unnecessary and could lead to
breakage. On Wednesday, June
I notice I am still using the `__make` macro in my specs. While they still
work, should we proactively replace them with `make` ?
The additional message I am getting here is that the under-under macros might
be subject to removal.
ThanksPhil___
devel
Greetings everyone.
I thought I would send out a rawhide status email to catch everyone up
to whats going on there. I should have sent it sooner, but I was on
vacation, then in a set of meetings, etc.
The last rawhide compose that completed was 2019-06-09 (10 days ago now).
There's been a
> At this point, the drpm library is the only blocker for zstd payloads,
> since createrepo_c needs to be able to handle zstd drpms.
I looked into the drpm library and I should be able to add the zstd support
(and make sure it works with createrepo_c)
Working on it now.
On 6/19/19 1:51 PM, Aleš Matěj wrote:
At this point, the drpm library is the only blocker for zstd payloads,
since createrepo_c needs to be able to handle zstd drpms.
I looked into the drpm library and I should be able to add the zstd support
(and make sure it works with createrepo_c)
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:07 AM Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> > "JP" == Jens-Ulrik Petersen writes:
> I install a generic minimal system via kickstart (booted using the
> Server PXE images and using the Everything repositories) and then after
> the reboot, ansible runs (via ansible-pull)
Thanks Miro. That's basically what I had in mind. I am waiting now to see how it
will be but the most probably we switch to the original upstream. It seems that
they will continue with versioning of the currently used upstream, so epocha
will
not be needed. Currently there is some syncing of
Le 2019-06-19 12:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen a écrit :
Hi
And yes as Nicolas also said maybe we need: langpacks-ko-fonts and
langpacks-ko-input-methods, etc.
I's much more than input methods, it's anything you need to read/write a
language (input, spell/grammar, fonts, etc)
Though the whole
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 10:51 +, Aleš Matěj wrote:
> > At this point, the drpm library is the only blocker for zstd payloads,
> > since createrepo_c needs to be able to handle zstd drpms.
>
> I looked into the drpm library and I should be able to add the zstd support
> (and make sure it works
Hello,
Back when [Django 2.0] was released in Fedora 28, I took over Django
1.11 LTS as some important (to me) packages depended on it. I'm no
longer interested in maintaining it, so I've orphaned it.
Let me know if you want to take it. If no one does, it may be removed
from Rawhide in 6
On 6/19/19 11:40 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:21:38AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 01:18, Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
OK, my builds are back in order having removed those macros and replaced them
with commands.
I
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 12:38 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 18. 06. 19 v 21:50 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> > == How To Test ==
> >
> > This will be tested as part of the upstream crypto-policies
> > testsuite.
>
> I think this section should describe, how I, as a Fedora user, am
> supposed to test
Dne 19. 06. 19 v 12:00 Tomas Mraz napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 10:19 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 18. 06. 19 v 21:50 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CustomCryptoPolicies
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>> This new feature of crypto-policies allows system
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 19:42, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> This has all worked just fine in the past, before it was decided to make
> basically every single broken dependency fail the entire Rawhide compose.
> Soname bumps did not even have to be announced, they would get
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 12:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 19. 06. 19 v 12:00 Tomas Mraz napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 10:19 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Dne 18. 06. 19 v 21:50 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CustomCryptoPolicies
> > > >
> > > > ==
Le 2019-06-19 14:32, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le 2019-06-19 12:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen a écrit :
Hi
And yes as Nicolas also said maybe we need: langpacks-ko-fonts and
langpacks-ko-input-methods, etc.
I's much more than input methods, it's anything you need to read/write
a language (input,
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 13:35 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:44:41 -0700,
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The last rawhide compose that completed was 2019-06-09 (10 days ago now).
>
> A lot of the incomplete composes are actually usable for updates and I have
> been getting
On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 3:54:41 PM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 18. 06. 19 v 11:42 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> > * COPR -- no idea
>
> Not yet. Koji use patched version of Mock (Igor discovered one issue after
> release). In Copr we will wait for Mock
> 1.4.17 and once it will hit Fedora
On 6/17/19 8:27 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and
DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide.
Change Page:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
Example of real build:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 8:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Voting is now open for the Fedora 30 election cycle. You can vote in
> the Elections app[1]. Interviews with candidates are available on the
> Fedora Community Blog[2], with links available in the Elections app.
> Voting ends at 23:59 UTC on 20
On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 9:38:40 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 3:54:41 PM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 18. 06. 19 v 11:42 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> > > * COPR -- no idea
> >
> > Not yet. Koji use patched version of Mock (Igor discovered one issue after
> >
On 6/19/19 1:14 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Ok, f30 infra is still brokne -- but Mirek submitted regular update for
Fixed.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-06-20 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-06-20 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2019-06-20
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 10:19 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 18. 06. 19 v 21:50 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CustomCryptoPolicies
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > This new feature of crypto-policies allows system administrators
> > and
> > third party providers to
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:21:38AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 01:18, Philip Kovacs via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > OK, my builds are back in order having removed those macros and replaced
> > them with commands.
> >
> > I expect that many package maintainers will
Dne 18. 06. 19 v 21:50 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CustomCryptoPolicies
>
> == Summary ==
> This new feature of crypto-policies allows system administrators and
> third party providers to modify and adjust the existing system-wide
> crypto policies to enable or
Dne 18. 06. 19 v 16:54 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:31 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:21 AM Aleksandra Fedorova
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:29 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 18. 06. 19 v 16:54 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:31 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:21 AM Aleksandra Fedorova
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa
On Tuesday, 18 June 2019 04.31.35 WEST Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Built in rawhide. Modular updates submitted for F30 and F29.
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-917b958a40
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-fe2f378273
In order to update in
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 17:45, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:54 AM Viktor Ashirov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:30 AM Simon Pichugin wrote:
> >
> > Hi team,
> > I'm in the process of creating a Vagrant file which is close to the
> > customer's ENV.
> > It is
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-de51ed6706
drupal7-uuid-1.3-1.el6
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d5dca753d6
GraphicsMagick-1.3.32-1.el6
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722166
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722166
Bug ID: 1722166
Summary: perl-Dancer2-0.208000 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Dancer2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50456
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 6/12/19 1:48 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12. 06. 19 8:14, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just for your information.
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-enterprise-linux-77-beta-now-available
>>
>>
>> Python 3.6 is there in 7.7
>>
>>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:20:26AM +0200, William Brown wrote:
>
>
> > On 18 Jun 2019, at 17:45, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:54 AM Viktor Ashirov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:30 AM Simon Pichugin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi team,
> > > I'm in the
On 19. 06. 19 12:24, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
We have an interesting request for python3-rpm-macros to depend on python3.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563789
Highlights:
- users who build for Python 3 are told (in the
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> We have an interesting request for python3-rpm-macros to depend on python3.
>
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563789
>
> Highlights:
>
> - users who build for Python 3 are told (in the guidelines) to BR
> python3-devel
On 19. 06. 19 14:36, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 8:09 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 06. 19 12:24, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
We have an interesting request for python3-rpm-macros to depend on python3.
See
On 19. 06. 19 19:22, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 6/12/19 1:48 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12. 06. 19 8:14, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
Hi,
Just for your information.
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-enterprise-linux-77-beta-now-available
Python 3.6 is there in 7.7
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 8:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Voting is now open for the Fedora 30 election cycle. You can vote in
> the Elections app[1]. Interviews with candidates are available on the
> Fedora Community Blog[2], with links available in the Elections app.
> Voting ends at 23:59 UTC on 20
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/06/20/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.4-20190619git5c0198d.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-de51ed6706
drupal7-uuid-1.3-1.el6
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d5dca753d6
GraphicsMagick-1.3.32-1.el6
0
We have an interesting request for python3-rpm-macros to depend on python3.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563789
Highlights:
- users who build for Python 3 are told (in the guidelines) to BR python3-devel
(that brings in both python3 and python3-rpm-macros)
- the
55 matches
Mail list logo
