Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:51 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hello packagers, > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on > them anymore. > So, we're looking for someone to take better care of them,

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositorieso

Hi, I think we lost your message when you sent it. The only thing that came through was a quote of the previous few messages. - - John Harris ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then unretired and they still fail to build from source. Following the policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ I kindly ask

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

On 10. 09. 19 13:35, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then unretired and they still fail to build from source. Following the policy:

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:24 AM John M. Harris Jr. wrote: > > On Monday, September 9, 2019 10:29:23 AM MST Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 14:52:07 -, > > vvs vvs wrote: > > > > >May be there are more interested people that we know, but they are not > > >reading that

Re: New release of Mock (fixes and subscription-manager support)

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:20 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > 2) Mock now supports subscription-manager, which allows you to build > packages for RHEL with cost-free developer license. > No need to wait for CentOS 8. > Does this work when using Fedora as the base system? subscription-manager is

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On 9/9/19 6:06 PM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:02, David Sommerseth wrote: >> >> On 09/09/2019 23:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they >>> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know

Re: New release of Mock (fixes and subscription-manager support)

On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 3:13:01 PM CEST Avram Lubkin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:20 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > 2) Mock now supports subscription-manager, which allows you to build > > packages for RHEL with cost-free developer license. > > No need to wait for CentOS 8. > > >

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

* vvs vvs [10/09/2019 11:41] : > > And the primary reason why that SIG initiative never worked is that the > project didn't put any significant efforts to make that happen. I'm going to disagree with you here. Back in 2017, we went through a very long discussion which lead to the creation of the

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositorieso

On Mon 9. Sep 2019 at 21:45, DJ Delorie wrote: > > "vvs vvs" writes: > > Ok, now I see that Fedora is just for activists. If I'm not one ofn > > them then I don't deserve any possibility to use it and should blame > > myself. Thanks for explaining it to me. > > I think you're overreacting a

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

No, of course I didn't mean that it was some random developer's fault. By "the project" I definitely meant PR and HR in a broad sense. Expecting such casual participants like me to self-organize is a wild idea. Even placing some advertisement on Fedora's landing page would be a big help. I

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Minimization Team Meeting on 2019-09-11 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 GMT At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora Minimization Team Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9598/

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:06:39 +0300 Vascom wrote: > It is not dependency for pulseeffects. It's a dependency for pulseaudio-equalizer. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: is this update stuck? Ceph-14.2.3-1.fc32

On 9/10/19 1:12 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:56:05AM +0300, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >>[1]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f5be50fd9 >>Two other ceph updatest submitted around the same time moved to testing >>okay. >>If it is stuck,

orphaning subdownloader

Hi, I'm orphaning subdownloader becasuse Python3 version still and perhaps will stay forever in a pré beta version . And still have many bug which make it unusable . However I checked today and we have some new commits [1] . Anyway I decide focus my time in others projects ,,, Best regards,

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

> You are welcome to use the koji buildroot repo for that. > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f30-build/latest Thanks. That would be just splendid, but won't it cease to exist after Fedora 30 EOL? Then it's just a temporary workaround. ___

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

On 9/10/19 12:08 PM, vvs vvs wrote: >> You are welcome to use the koji buildroot repo for that. >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f30-build/latest > > Thanks. That would be just splendid, but won't it cease to exist after Fedora > 30 EOL? Then it's just a temporary workaround. Yes,

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

On 9/10/19 7:55 AM, vvs vvs wrote: Did I? I thought that I've said that I'm using x86_64 kernel right now and that I have my memory stretched to the limits already. But yes, I've experimented with x86_64 userland some time ago, I don't remember exact numbers but I think that I've lost 100-200

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190910.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190909.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190910.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:9 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 133 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.16 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Drop of PlayOnLinux package (Rawhide)

Also, I have feeling that Lutris is far superior alternative, at least for games :) On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:01 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 9/10/19 8:35 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > This will lock me in the Steam only:) > > We ship wine-staging, which should handle any Windows game. >

Re: Drop of PlayOnLinux package (Rawhide)

I can recommend Lutris, it's really good and I think somebody is working on flatpak version for it. Regards, Michal Konecny On 9/10/19 4:11 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: Also, I have feeling that Lutris is far superior alternative, at least for games :) On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:01 PM

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 11:23 AM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:51 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hello packagers, > > > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > > maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our packages depend on > > them

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then > > unretired and they still fail to build from source. > > > > Following the policy: > >

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

Did I? I thought that I've said that I'm using x86_64 kernel right now and that I have my memory stretched to the limits already. But yes, I've experimented with x86_64 userland some time ago, I don't remember exact numbers but I think that I've lost 100-200 MB of memory. And I have not much

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:00:52 -0400 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:24 AM John M. Harris Jr. > wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 9, 2019 10:29:23 AM MST Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 14:52:07 -, > > > vvs vvs wrote: > > > > [...] > > >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

It BuildRequires gcc, which BuildRequires dblatex, which BuildRequires python-which. I'm rebundling python-which in dblatex, so that should go away. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d.

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 9:44 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 02:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > openvswitch aconole, chrisw, orphan, 0 weeks ago > > > tgraf, tredaell > > > > This one is a

Re: Drop of PlayOnLinux package (Rawhide)

On 9/10/19 8:35 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: This will lock me in the Steam only:) We ship wine-staging, which should handle any Windows game. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-Rawhide-20190910.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED:

Drop of PlayOnLinux package (Rawhide)

Hello everyone, I was a maintainer of PlayOnLinux on Fedora for some time and now is the time to say goodbye to the PlayOnLinux package. It won't be shipped anymore on Rawhide (Fedora 32)[0]. Reason is: It's python 2 only, it won't be migrated by upstream and there will not be any python 2 on

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

Thanks. I wouldn't say there is a "hostility" here. It might be hubris at a time, but mostly indifference. Though, that might frustrate anyone as well. It's good to know that there are people like you here. But I'm afraid that the cost of bureaucratic barriers is too high for any single

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

Excellent. Thanks for the help. Steve On 9/10/19 9:47 AM, Anne Mulhern wrote: > Look at the full report: > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-09-09.txt > > kicad uses asciidoc, which depends on python-which. > > - mulhern > > > > - Original Message - >> From:

Re: New release of Mock (fixes and subscription-manager support)

That's how I got it to work on Fedora. So yes, it appears to. On 9/10/19 7:13 AM, Avram Lubkin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:20 AM Miroslav Suchý > wrote: > > 2) Mock now supports subscription-manager, which allows you to > build packages for RHEL with

Re: Drop of PlayOnLinux package (Rawhide)

Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 9/10/19 8:35 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> This will lock me in the Steam only:) > > We ship wine-staging, which should handle any Windows game. crossover and wine-* are orthogonal to PoL (and Lutris) which are game/instance managers. crossover has its own

Re: Some Java packages in need of new permanent maintainer(s)

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:23 PM Dridi Boukelmoune < dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 6:51 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > Hello packagers, > > > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > > maintenance for some Java packages, and none of our

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 at 06:46, John M. Harris Jr. wrote: [...] > While most users on Intel/AMD based systems are now running x64 > kernels, I might agree with the above... > most proprietary software released for various GNU/Linux distros are > 32 bit. ... but not with this. Most of

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

Look at the full report: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-09-09.txt kicad uses asciidoc, which depends on python-which. - mulhern - Original Message - > From: "Steven A. Falco" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:39:17 AM >

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

Dne 09. 09. 19 v 21:01 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > The koji buildroot repo will continue to be available if you want to > copy something, but as far as work to be done to move back to > distributing a i686 set of trees? I guess doing the release blocking > tests on i686 at Beta and Final might be a

Re: Drop of PlayOnLinux package (Rawhide)

Dne 10. 09. 19 v 13:34 jkone...@redhat.com napsal(a): > Hello everyone, > > I was a maintainer of PlayOnLinux on Fedora for some time and now is > the time to say goodbye to the PlayOnLinux package. It won't be shipped > anymore on Rawhide (Fedora 32)[0]. :( Sadly, Crossover does not support

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

I built pulseaudio-equalizer directly from github today and it doesn't seem to be able to parse it's own config files? Which is a pain because I'd prefer something lighter than pulseeffects for a simple EQ. Regards, Ryan On Tue, 10 Sep 2019, at 4:10 PM, stan via devel wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep

Fedora-Rawhide-20190910.n.1 compose check report

: fedora.Workstation-boot-iso.x86_64.64bit - compose.install_default MISSING: fedora.Workstation-boot-iso.x86_64.uefi - compose.install_default Failed openQA tests: 21/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20190910.n.0): ID: 447358 Test: x86_64 universal

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190910.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190910.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190910.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 134 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 18.75 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Self Introduction: rufo

Hi everyone, My name is Rufus and I'm a developer from the UK. I'm just beginning my journey into Fedora packaging, although I've been a happy end-user since the days of Red Hat 9. I'm currently learning about the packaging process and guidelines, so I can better contribute to a couple of

Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week

On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 22:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. Rawhide > only. > > As for now, nothing should break, except python2-debug will exist no more. > > Packages (build)requiring python2 or python2-devel should continue to

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

Yes, I've already answered that. It's surely possible, but my experience shows that putting too much efforts in a too broad customization doesn't pay off in the end. Every time you'll upgrade to a new version it breaks. As for using another desktop, I should seriously consider it. Probably I

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

* vvs vvs [10/09/2019 21:07] : > > I suppose that SIG is a much formal entity than just a bunch of > individuals performing some non-regular activities. The PHP SIG is barely more than one person, the Perl SIG has no regular meeting and the mailing list activity is not representative of the work

Re: translucent gnome top bar gone in F31?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:41 AM John M. Harris Jr. wrote: > Further, nothing in that email is what I > would describe as "uncivilized". I'm not asking people to necessarily > agree > with me, everyone is welcome to their own opinions, I simply provided mine > and > that of the users I work

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

But that's actually the same that I was trying to say. Meeting that activity statistics is the essence of such formal group. But grass-roots enthusiasts don't have such commitments. They can do some work occasionally if time allows but there is no strict agenda. This contradicts those

failing push for un-orphaned package

What to I need to do to be able to push to the repo of something I've got un-orphaned? I currently see: $ fedpkg push Counting objects: 10, done. Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done. Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 877 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 7 (delta 4), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: Branch

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

On 9/9/19 9:34 PM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote: > > There's no reason to drop x86 kernel builds either. Sure there are... from the change page: "The i686 kernel is of limited use as most x86 hardware supports 64bit these days. It has been in a status of "community supported" for several Fedora

Re: Drop of PlayOnLinux package (Rawhide)

Michal Konecny writes: > I can recommend Lutris, it's really good and I think somebody is working > on flatpak version for it. Indeed: https://github.com/flathub/net.lutris.Lutris It's currently available on flathub-beta. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: failing push for un-orphaned package

On 9/10/19 8:58 AM, Dave Love wrote: > What to I need to do to be able to push to the repo of something I've > got un-orphaned? I currently see: > > $ fedpkg push > Counting objects: 10, done. > Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done. > Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 877 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done. >

Workstation and Basic Video Driver - Provide way to switch to the normal driver?

Hi, recently, I've seen few users running Fedora with nomodeset. They didn't know about that and were just complaining about poor resolution and/or performance (and those systems worked just fine without nomodeset). Also, sometimes, users choose basic video driver because something is broken, but

Re: Workstation and Basic Video Driver - Provide way to switch to the normal driver?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:37 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > Hi, > > recently, I've seen few users running Fedora with nomodeset. They didn't know > about that and were just complaining about poor resolution and/or performance > (and those systems worked just fine without nomodeset). Also,

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

On 9/9/19 2:15 PM, vvs vvs wrote: > And why people are not reading all the answers? That was a rhethorical > question. > > I said it already several times, that I don't need volunteers to fix things > for me! I just need an already built repository which I could just use and > fix things

is this update stuck? Ceph-14.2.3-1.fc32

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f5be50fd9 Two other ceph updatest submitted around the same time moved to testing okay. If it is stuck, can someone with appropriate privs please kick it. Thanks, -- Kaleb ___ devel mailing list

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

> On 9/9/19 12:47 PM, vvs vvs wrote: > > > Having read the thread, you seem to miss the point that's been > repeatedly made: the packages occasionally fail to build, and someone > has to fix them.  That act, fixing packages when they don't build is the > "support" that someone has to provide.

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 at 06:47, Raphael Groner wrote: > > My package requires libxslt. > > You're obviously not alone with this issue. The better question is > *why* the package as a commonly used library got orphaned, propably > silently without warning (at least I can not find any

Re: is this update stuck? Ceph-14.2.3-1.fc32

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:56:05AM +0300, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >[1]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f5be50fd9 >Two other ceph updatest submitted around the same time moved to testing >okay. >If it is stuck, can someone with appropriate privs please kick it. It

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

It is not dependency for pulseeffects. пн, 9 сент. 2019 г. в 20:10, Guido Aulisi : > > I'd like to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins in rahwide, f31 and f30, > because it is a dependency of some packages I maintain: > > ams > jamin > > It's a dependency of pulseeffects too. > > I will file a review

libxslt (was: Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week))

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 07:43:49AM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 10.09.2019 o 06:47, Raphael Groner pisze: > > Hi, > > > >> My package requires libxslt. > > > > You're obviously not alone with this issue. The better question is *why* > > the package as a commonly used library got

Re: Self Introduction: alciregi

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 19:02:50 +0200, alcir...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello. > My name is Alessio. > FAS: alciregi > I work as an unpretentious sysadmin, mostly as the "IT guy". > I've been a long-time user/administrator of *nix systems, starting with > Red Hat Linux 6 in 1999. I've been a user of

Re: Self Introduction: alciregi

On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 10:21 +0200, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Welcome to the -devel ML Alessio! (Feels a bit funny given how long > we've known you for on other community channels XD) :-D > I think you already know how most of it works ;) but please feel free > to > ping me on the many channels we

[Bug 1750388] perl-Image-Sane-2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750388 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Image-Sane-2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1747714] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747714 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-9bbea44813 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9bbea44813 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1750685] New: Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.29

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750685 Bug ID: 1750685 Summary: Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.29 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext Assignee:

[Bug 1750686] New: Upgrade perl-Text-Template to 1.57

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750686 Bug ID: 1750686 Summary: Upgrade perl-Text-Template to 1.57 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Text-Template Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-54cf4d603d seamonkey-2.49.5-1.el6 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-0ba49c0abc nsd-4.2.2-1.el6 5

[Bug 1750685] Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.29

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750685 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-189427bc99 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-189427bc99 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1748104] Please build perl-XML-SAX-Writer for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748104 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Version|epel7 |epel8 -- You are receiving this mail

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2019-09-11 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL #topic

[Bug 1748039] Please build perl-Test-XML for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748039 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1748104] Please build perl-XML-SAX-Writer for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748104 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1750388] perl-Image-Sane-2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750388 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1750685] Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.29

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750685 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1747714] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747714 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[EPEL-devel] Re: New release of Mock (fixes and subscription-manager support)

Dne 10. 09. 19 v 15:13 Avram Lubkin napsal(a): > Does this work when using Fedora as the base system? Yes, it works. > subscription-manager is available in the Fedora repos and a Fedora > system can be registered to RHN, but that doesn't seem sufficient to access > the repos through mock. Can

[Bug 1750685] Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.29

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750685 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1746553] build of perl-Time-Duration for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746553 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 1746553] build of perl-Time-Duration for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746553 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lkund...@v3.sk |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are

Please help proofread the Fedora Loves Python brochure

Hello Pythonistas, the new Fedora Loves Python brochure is getting finalized. I'd appreciate if you could help proofreading it (check both facts and grammar/typos). Fedora Design ticket: https://pagure.io/design/issue/541 Link to the PDF: https://pagure.io/design/issue/541#comment-596434 If

[EPEL-devel] Re: New release of Mock (fixes and subscription-manager support)

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:20 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > 2) Mock now supports subscription-manager, which allows you to build > packages for RHEL with cost-free developer license. > No need to wait for CentOS 8. > Does this work when using Fedora as the base system? subscription-manager is

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-09-11 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/09/11/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.0-20190910gitdb876c6.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1750388] perl-Image-Sane-2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750388 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Image-Sane-2-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] please help with epel8 branches

The epel8 branches were not properly created for hypre and superlu_dist. They were apparently made in the PDC, but they don't exist in pagure. What to do now? Thanks. -- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX:

[Bug 1748857] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Test-Needs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748857 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1750082] perl-Archive-Zip-1.65 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750082 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Archive-Zip-1.65-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week

On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 22:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. Rawhide > only. > > As for now, nothing should break, except python2-debug will exist no more. > > Packages (build)requiring python2 or python2-devel should continue to

[Bug 1747170] perl-Date-Manip-6.78 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747170 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1747549] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.067 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747549 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1747726] perl-Git-Repository-1.324 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747726 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1748104] Please build perl-XML-SAX-Writer for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748104 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1750686] Upgrade perl-Text-Template to 1.57

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750686 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1750388] perl-Image-Sane-2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750388 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1750388] perl-Image-Sane-2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750388 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-e49bacabfa has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e49bacabfa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1750388] perl-Image-Sane-2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750388 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-741ad82cd9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-741ad82cd9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1750388] perl-Image-Sane-2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750388 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-f4555a1770 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f4555a1770 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1747714] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747714 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED CC|