https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793917
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Dear Maintainer,
your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 32.
Action is required from you.
If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799856
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Release Engineering ---
Dear Maintainer,
your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 32.
Action is required from you.
If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
18 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 80/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811368
Bug ID: 1811368
Summary: perl-Log-ger-0.033 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Log-ger
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
571 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
312 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
310
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 22:55, Leigh Scott wrote:
[..]
> > Just checked that patch and looks like still something is wrong because
> > test suite is partially failing.
> >
> I get the same in f31 without the patch
Please repeat that test running "xvfb-run -a make check" (test suite
needs $DISPLAY)
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1a1caa3eb5
opensmtpd-6.6.4p1-1.el8
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-47a203cb95
openfortivpn-1.12.0-1.el8
5
Hi all,
WHAT IS IT ALL ABOUT
On 2020-02-13, FPC approved a rewrite of our fonts packaging
guidelines.
The previous guidelines were more than a decade old, technically
outdated, relying on packages dropped from Fedora, and badly damaged
during wiki to asciidoc migration.
The new guidelines
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 18:35, Leigh Scott
>
>
> Just checked that patch and looks like still something is wrong because
> test suite is partially failing.
>
I get the same in f31 without the patch
make[4]: Entering directory
'/home/leigh/rpmbuild/BUILD/cogl-1.22.4/tests/conform'
Key:
ok =
One of the reasons my contributions to Fedora have slowed down is
because my blog was censored from Planet Fedora
I'd like to ask if people would like this censorship to stop
As this was done shortly after the death of my father, things like this
leave a scar.
It is very, very wrong and I
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.8.0.
The following packages are affected -
- qalculate-gtk
- plasma-workspace
- step
- cantor
I will rebuild all these packages on rawhide.
qalculate-kde will also affected but this is already FTBFS. So, I won't
touch this.
Mukundan.
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 21:10, Leigh Scott wrote:
[..]
> > Still some long term cogl nad clutter solution needs to be applied.
>
> > As I wrote it is now separated (staticly linked) cogl and cutter copy in
> > mutter
>
> It isn't statically linked, they are renamed private libs.
>
> ldd
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 11:47 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 07/03/2020 10:32, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> > In any case, Fedora is a more bleeding edge distro than Debian/Ubuntu
> > (First one of the foundations), so I am not sure how realistic it is to
> > be waiting for Debian/Ubuntu to include
Hi all,
WHAT IS IT ALL ABOUT
On 2020-02-13, FPC approved a rewrite of our fonts packaging
guidelines.
The previous guidelines were more than a decade old, technically
outdated, relying on packages dropped from Fedora, and badly damaged
during wiki to asciidoc migration.
The new guidelines
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 4:42 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 15:05 Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> Are the broken source dependencies real?
>>
>> python-pyside2 (src):
>>
>> qt5-qtwebengine-devel > 5.13
>>
>> I just checked koji and qt5-qtwebengine 5.13.2 is in f32 which should meet
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:04:07 +
> Paul Howarth wrote:
> > I've been looking after the ancient Gnome 1 library stack for the last
> > decade as I had a local use for the libraries. That is no longer the
> > case so I'm planning to orphan the following packages, none of which
> > appear to be
Hello,
recently I've announced on this mailing list, that I implemented
Pagure support for :Gbrowse command in Vim. If you are not familiar
with this feature, it allows you to open a current file or line
selection on a remote hosting platform such as GitHub, GitLab, Pagure,
etc. Then you can
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 18:35, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Fixed https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bcd6554797
>
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cogl/c/a0efb472ea19505f100effde4d60a6182fd3161d?branch=master
Just checked that patch and looks like still something is wrong because
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 18:35, Leigh Scott
>
>
> Thx. However as I wrote that is only short term solution.
>
I agree but I think cogl is considered legacy since the gnome devs moved it to
mutter.
> Still some long term cogl nad clutter solution needs to be applied.
> As I wrote it is now
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 18:35, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Fixed https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bcd6554797
Thx. However as I wrote that is only short term solution.
Still some long term cogl nad clutter solution needs to be applied.
As I wrote it is now separated (staticly linked)
Il giorno sab, 07/03/2020 alle 10.11 -0800, er...@ericheickmeyer.com ha
scritto:
> On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 19:04 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> > Hi Erich,
> > I took lv2-x42-plugins, because I've been maintaining it for the
> > latest
> > time, I'm currently maintaining some audio relatede packages,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 11:00:40PM +0530, Harsh Jain wrote:
> I did dnf grouplist -v and the output was
>
> Available Environment Groups:
>Fedora Custom Operating System (custom-environment)
>Minimal Install (minimal-environment)
>Fedora Server Edition (server-product-environment)
>
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 09:47:03AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Trying to follow the direction for a bug report against kernel, and install
> the latest kernel from rawhide.
>
> The Bugzilla template says:
>
> 5. Does this problem occur with the latest Rawhide kernel? To install the
>
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 02:51:21PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I think Fedora Koji has major issues with build overrides now.
>
> Previously I waited only 5-10 minutes and then started building my
> packages. But during the last month I need to wait more than 2 hours
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200305.0):
ID: 536139 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 6:30 PM Harsh Jain wrote:
>
> I did dnf grouplist -v and the output was
>
> Available Environment Groups:
>Fedora Custom Operating System (custom-environment)
>Minimal Install (minimal-environment)
>Fedora Server Edition (server-product-environment)
>Fedora
Fixed https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bcd6554797
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cogl/c/a0efb472ea19505f100effde4d60a6182fd3161d?branch=master
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 18/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200306.n.1):
ID: 536042 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/536042
ID: 536094 Test: x86_64 universal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797039
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 19:04 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> Hi Erich,
> I took lv2-x42-plugins, because I've been maintaining it for the
> latest
> time, I'm currently maintaining some audio relatede packages, so we
> could collaborate.
>
> Ciao
> Guido
>
> FAS: tartina
Thanks, Guido
You beat me
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 09:47 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I did an upgrade last week, with:
> > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32
> > Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some
Il giorno sab, 07/03/2020 alle 09.08 -0800, er...@ericheickmeyer.com ha
scritto:
> Hi Brendan,
>
> On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 09:10 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the following packages have been orphaned and require a primary
> > maintainer. Feel free to take them over
> >
> > Add64
I did dnf grouplist -v and the output was
Available Environment Groups:
Fedora Custom Operating System (custom-environment)
Minimal Install (minimal-environment)
Fedora Server Edition (server-product-environment)
Fedora Workstation (workstation-product-environment)
Fedora Cloud
OLD: Fedora-32-20200306.n.1
NEW: Fedora-32-20200307.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 47
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:183.05 MiB
Size
Hi Brendan,
On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 09:10 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> Hello,
> the following packages have been orphaned and require a primary
> maintainer. Feel free to take them over
>
> Add64
> aj-snapshot
> ambdec
> dssi
> dssi-vst
> gluidsynth
> fluidsynth-dssi
> freq-tweak
> fst
> giada
>
Hi,
*Disclaimer*:
The main propose of this email is only to flag some issues or to form some
vectors/conclusions /necessary actions.
*1) cogl does not build*
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1434712
Looks like cogl library is more or less dead or at least kind of dead
On 07/03/2020 10:32, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 06.03.2020 o 19:21, Daniel Pocock pisze:
>>
>>
>> On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
>>> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
>>>
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 15:05 Richard Shaw wrote:
> Are the broken source dependencies real?
>
>
>- python-pyside2 (src):
> - qt5-qtwebengine-devel > 5.13
>
> I just checked koji and qt5-qtwebengine 5.13.2 is in f32 which should meet
> the requirement.
>
This looks like a case of either
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 32 Branched 20200307.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Trying to follow the direction for a bug report against kernel, and install
the latest kernel from rawhide.
The Bugzilla template says:
5. Does this problem occur with the latest Rawhide kernel? To install the
Rawhide kernel, run “sudo dnf install fedora-repos-rawhide“ followed by
“sudo
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 9:02 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> W dniu 07.03.2020 o 13:53, Neal Gompa pisze:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
> >> from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of
Are the broken source dependencies real?
- python-pyside2 (src):
- qt5-qtwebengine-devel > 5.13
I just checked koji and qt5-qtwebengine 5.13.2 is in f32 which should meet
the requirement.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list --
W dniu 07.03.2020 o 13:53, Neal Gompa pisze:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0. Even
if you patch for the issue, it may be completely
Hello all.
I think Fedora Koji has major issues with build overrides now.
Previously I waited only 5-10 minutes and then started building my
packages. But during the last month I need to wait more than 2 hours for
a single build override. This is absolutely unacceptable.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
> from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0. Even
> if you patch for the issue, it may be completely untested upstream.
> That is why it is so
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> > Hello everyone,
> > I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. We are planning to
> > deliver a module stream or a COPR repo during Fedora 33 development for
> > early adopters and tool developers and we're hoping in getting a stable
> > version into Fedora 34.
> >
>
> Can it be:
>
On 07. 03. 20 0:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
#topic #2346 Python 2 exception for IceCat
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2346#comment-629268
(blanket Python 2
Hi Fabio,
On 3/6/20 9:13 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> librealsense (maintainers in CC) bumped the SONAME of its shipped
> library with the latest update, and (at least some) dependent packages
> have not been rebuilt (including fawkes, maintainers in CC).
Thanks for the
On 07.03.20 00:33, Sandro Mani wrote:
I highly suspect this is a python3 incompatibility in the SConstruct
file shipped by mingw-nsis [1], as even replicating exactly the same
commands which are executed for this debian package build [2], I'm
stuck with this error. The difference that sticks
W dniu 06.03.2020 o 19:21, Daniel Pocock pisze:
On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1
I have rebuilt all asio's
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811138
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Clipboard-0.24-1.fc30.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42279002
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811138
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1668281
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1668281=edit
[patch] Update to 0.24 (#1811138)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811138
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Clipboard-0.23 is |perl-Clipboard-0.24 is
Hello,
the following packages have been orphaned and require a primary maintainer.
Feel free to take them over
Add64
aj-snapshot
ambdec
dssi
dssi-vst
gluidsynth
fluidsynth-dssi
freq-tweak
fst
giada
gnome-guitar
harmony-seq
hexter-dssi
jackctlmmc
jmeters
ladish
libinstpatch
lv2-artyfx-plugins
56 matches
Mail list logo
