Hi,
On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
Hi all,
I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0
(https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were running
5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug fixes from 5.3.0 and
5.4.0 (see release notes)
One high level
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:27 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 18. 06. 20 21:22, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > The introduction
> > > of default module streams was a direct result of wanting to help
> > > customers that are used to running
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:51 PM Adrian Reber wrote:
> mozc:
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-2.23.2815.102/dictionary/user_dictionary_storage.h:77:7:
> error: cannot derive from ‘final’ base
> ‘mozc::user_dictionary::UserDictionaryStorage’ in derived type
> ‘mozc::UserDictionaryStorage’
>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:03:31AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 23. 06. 20 8:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >Hi Josh, Miro,
> >
> >I think there has been a misunderstanding. I'm pretty sure Miro's
> >question is about "default modules" not "default streams"
> >(i.e. "modules enabled
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:39 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:31 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Personally, I have long wanted burst-to-cloud or the ability for
> > others to donate hosts to the Fedora build system without having to
> > physically ship hardware. Koji is somewhat
On 23. 06. 20 13:29, Josh Boyer wrote:
(It*may* be possible to automatize this, but not as easily as with
singular packages. And considering that non-modularized packages
need to be handled too, there will be at least two paths.)
- (hypothetically) if we have default modules in eln,
Sorry, can't access your posted links.
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200623.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 06. 20 13:29, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>(It*may* be possible to automatize this, but not as easily as with
> >>singular packages. And considering that non-modularized packages
> >>need to be handled too, there will be at
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 07:12:09AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:32 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:27 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 18. 06. 20 21:22,
On 23. 06. 20 14:30, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams despite
their failure in Fedora, whether this decision is final and what was the
reasoning
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 06. 20 13:43, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23. 06. 20 13:29, Josh Boyer wrote:
> (It*may* be possible to automatize this, but not as easily as with
>
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 09:24, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 (
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were
> running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 12:32, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 23. 06. 20 v 9:23 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0
> >> (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We
> >> were
On 23. 06. 20 15:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
AFAIK Stephan and Igor
Sorry, I've meant Stephen.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2020, 12:41 + schrieb Martin Gansser:
> Sorry, can't access your posted links.
> Regards
> Martin
A solution for this problem was posted in one of the links by Jonathan
Wakely:
> I believe in most cases this can be fixed by changing
> to and adding "using
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:42 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 06. 20 14:30, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams
> despite
>
On 23. 06. 20 13:43, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 06. 20 13:29, Josh Boyer wrote:
(It*may* be possible to automatize this, but not as easily as with
singular packages. And considering that non-modularized packages
need to be
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams
> >> despite
> >> their failure in Fedora, whether this decision is final and what was the
> >> reasoning behind it.
> >
> >
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > >> I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams
> > >> despite
> > >> their failure in Fedora, whether
On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams despite
their failure in Fedora, whether this decision is final and what was the
reasoning behind it.
That's an interesting question. I think for the purposes of this
discussion, we
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 12:11, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:58 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 (
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were
> running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the
On 6/23/20, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 15. 06. 20 v 21:47 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
>
> I am moving back this proposal.
>
> I want to thank all of
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:44 PM Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:19:33PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:51 PM Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > mozc:
> > >
> > > /builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-2.23.2815.102/dictionary/user_dictionary_storage.h:77:7:
> > >
On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 10:51 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:51:32AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a
> > rebuild
> > of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to
> > rebuild. The following
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:19:33PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:51 PM Adrian Reber wrote:
> > mozc:
> >
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-2.23.2815.102/dictionary/user_dictionary_storage.h:77:7:
> > error: cannot derive from ‘final’ base
> >
Dne 23. 06. 20 v 9:23 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0
>> (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We
>> were running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug
>>
Dne 15. 06. 20 v 21:47 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
>
> == Summary ==
> All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
I am moving back this proposal.
I want to thank all of you for the feedback. I was surprised by lots
On 23.06.2020 10:39, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> A tool which will give user a list of packages that can/should be removed.
dnf -C list extras
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:58 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0
> (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were
> running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug fixes from
> 5.3.0 and 5.4.0 (see release notes)
>
>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 05:04:09AM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild
> > of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to
> > rebuild. The following packages are failing:
> >
> > clementine
> >
The package aqute-bnd version 4.3.0 has changed the license from (ASL
2.0, some parts being under EPL-2.0) to (ASL 2.0 or EPL-2.0).
As the package was built in as a part of module, the license should be
changed in this .spec file:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:32 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:27 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18. 06. 20 21:22, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > The introduction
> > > > of default module streams
On 23. 06. 20 8:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi Josh, Miro,
I think there has been a misunderstanding. I'm pretty sure Miro's
question is about "default modules" not "default streams"
(i.e. "modules enabled by default" vs. "the stream of a module to use
when a different one is not
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> We know within RHEL we have teams that will likely continue using
> default streams. We also know that some teams will not. Further we
> know that somes teams will likely not use modules at all, just as
> teams in RHEL 8 did not use
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > We know within RHEL we have teams that will likely continue using
> > default streams. We also know that some teams will not. Further we
> > know that somes
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:14 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22. 06. 20 21:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > >> I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:31 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > What makes RHEL so different that the failure is not relevant to it? Is it
> > the
> > stable nature of RHEL content? Is it the limited scope of RHEL content? Is
> > it
> > the less
Hi,
We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new
service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant
data: FTBFS/FTI status (from both Bugzilla, Koschei and health check),
orphan warnings, bugzillas, pull requests, active overrides and
updates - at a
On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 18:26 +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using
> setuptools at
> buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This
> only works
> because python3-devel (transitively) depends on
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:31 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > What makes RHEL so different that the failure is not relevant to it? Is
> > > it the
> > > stable nature of RHEL content?
On 23. 06. 20 18:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
IMBW, but I think I recall the Python packaging guidelines specifically
said that you could or should (I forget which) just BR python-devel and
not BR python-setuptools at some point. At this point there seems to be
no explicit mention, but the sample
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> qemu amitshah berrange bonzini crobinso dwmw2 ehabkost
> jforbes lkundrak quintela rjones
This package depends on python3-devel. However the last build.log:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200622.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200623.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 142
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 625.77 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 08:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 04:55:10AM +0200, clime wrote:
> > >> > > Hello Josh,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > you can change the artifact type while keeping interface the same and
> > >> > > it would be a _HUGE_ win because it would make
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:12 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Congratulations to all of you, this is very useful and beautifully
> made. I almost got a panic attack when I saw all the bugs, but I
> quickly realized that most of them were for packages from groups I am
> a member of. Everything is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:33 PM clime wrote:
>
> So I don't really get even after almost five years where modularity is
> going or what it wants to achieve. I don't understand its use-case for
> any of Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS because disabling
> parallel-installability to allow parallel
Hello Fedora Community!
I would like to start a dedicated thread to focus on the “why” and use case
contexts to help clarify past and future decision making related to
Application Streams and Modularity. As I follow some of the Fedora mailing
list threads and Pagure issues, I have noticed a
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 20:59, Terry Bowling wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:33 PM clime wrote:
>>
>>
>> So I don't really get even after almost five years where modularity is
>> going or what it wants to achieve. I don't understand its use-case for
>> any of Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS because
It's awesome, but for some reason my profile not showing here. Just gray
background. :(
https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/atim
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:36 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote:
> >
> > We've been discussing this in the other thread about nodejs, but I
> > figured I'd post this here. I've already taken mocha, and I plan to
> > take the following 41 nodejs
Congratulations to all of you, this is very useful and beautifully
made. I almost got a panic attack when I saw all the bugs, but I
quickly realized that most of them were for packages from groups I am
a member of. Everything is pretty self explanatory and in the long run
it is going to save us a
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:36 AM Miro Hrončok
> We've been discussing this in the other thread about nodejs, but I
> figured I'd post this here. I've already taken mocha, and I plan to
> take the following 41 nodejs packages (at least temporarily...)--
> these appear to be the common
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> This package depends on python3-devel. However the last build.log:
>
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/qemu/5.0.0/2.fc33/data/logs/...
>
> does not contain the substring /setupto/ anywhere. Nor does the
>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 06. 20 21:11, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > Thanks Miro, much appreciated!
>
> You are welocme.
>
> However, I am afraid I have some bad news. The recent report in
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt still mentions another 40
>
On 24. 06. 20 1:07, Ben Rosser wrote:
Some of my nodejs packages are an artifact of a failed attempt to
package quassel-webserver [1], which I eventually gave up on, and so
those could probably be safely retired. But looking at the orphans
report, I'm not confident I correctly separated out the
On 24. 06. 20 1:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 06. 20 1:07, Ben Rosser wrote:
Some of my nodejs packages are an artifact of a failed attempt to
package quassel-webserver [1], which I eventually gave up on, and so
those could probably be safely retired. But looking at the orphans
report, I'm not
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 24. 06. 20 1:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 24. 06. 20 1:07, Ben Rosser wrote:
> >> Some of my nodejs packages are an artifact of a failed attempt to
> >> package quassel-webserver [1], which I eventually gave up on, and so
> >> those
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:15 PM Artem Tim wrote:
> It's awesome, but for some reason my profile not showing here. Just gray
> background. :(
> https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/atim
>
>
There were some caching/data consistency issues on the server due to
overload, I've manually fixed your
Yay, thanks a lot!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
On 06/23/2020 09:28 AM, Josef Skladanka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new
> service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant
> data: FTBFS/FTI status (from both Bugzilla, Koschei and health check),
> orphan warnings,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS235
= Binutils 2.35 =
== Summary ==
Rebase the binutils package from version 2.34 to version 2.35.
== Owner ==
* Name: Nick Clifton [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Nickc]
* Email: ni...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
Switch the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonExtras
== Summary ==
The Python RPM dependency generator (that generates
python3.Xdist(foo) requirements) will be adapted to also
generate requirements on
[https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0508/#extras Python extras] (e.g.
python3.Xdist(foo[bar]))
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC232
== Summary ==
Switch glibc in Fedora 33 to glibc version 2.32.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:codonell|Carlos O'Donell]]
* Email: car...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The GNU C Library version 2.32 will be released at the beginning of
August
Hi there
Thanks for the clear posting.
I have updated dblatex with the BR in rawhide. I guess it's enough to trickle
this down to other branches when they need a rebuild anyways.
The hit on portmidi is a false positive: while it allows to be built with
setuptools it by default does not, and
CVC 1.8 is out, and it has a new dependency.
kissat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850262
utop 2.6.0 is out and brings ocaml 4.11 compatibility with it, so
we'll need this version soon. It has a new dependency, which has a
new dependency, which has a new dependency:
ocaml-trie:
As soon as the kissat review is done (see my previous email about
review swaps), I intend to build cvc4 1.8 in Rawhide, which entails an
soname bump. As far as I can tell, there are no consumers of cvc4's
library interface in Fedora, so no other builds are necessary.
--
Jerry James
Thank you, that fixed the problem.
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 6/23/20 5:35 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 23.06.2020 10:39, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
A tool which will give user a list of packages that can/should be removed.
dnf -C list extras
Nice, thanks for finding this --- but it also lists all the
debugsource/debuginfo packages, and for
On 6/23/20 9:26 AM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
Hello everyone,
there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at
buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only
works because python3-devel (transitively) depends on python3-setuptools.
We would
Also from me a big thank you, this is very useful for getting a quick
overview!
Cheers,
Dan
Josef Skladanka writes:
> Hi,
>
> We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new
> service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant
> data: FTBFS/FTI
On 6/23/20 12:26 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit
> BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used.
> nonamedotc python-nmrglue python-rope spyder
I have added buildrequires on setuptools for these three packages.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:53 AM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:34 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 11:29 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:09 PM Stephen Gallagher <
> > > sgall...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > The Node.js SIG is very
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:24 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:53 AM Ben Rosser wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:34 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 11:29 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:09 PM Stephen Gallagher
On 23. 06. 20 21:11, Ben Rosser wrote:
Thanks Miro, much appreciated!
You are welocme.
However, I am afraid I have some bad news. The recent report in
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt still mentions another 40 packages:
tc01: nodejs-optimist, nodejs-burrito,
On 23. 06. 20 21:58, Michael J Gruber wrote:
The hit on portmidi is a false positive: while it allows to be built with setuptools it
by default does not, and the spec does not override the default. Is there a way to
specify this (other than patching out anything "setuptools" from the source)?
Nice!
Is the ourobolos (the snake eating its own tail) supposed to animate
all the time? To me, that kinda sorta means something is working - but
what? Hovering over it gives no clue.
Or should I just wait a bit longer for it to finish? (I already waited
a few minutes)
Cheers
Bob
On Wed, 24
Notification time stamped 2020-06-23 08:12:30 UTC
From a2518807110e9474602c2d269ed226d3bc6b8073 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 23 2020 08:12:24 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-namespace-sweep.spec b/perl-namespace-sweep.spec
index
Notification time stamped 2020-06-23 08:12:31 UTC
From a6be3135949216cfa58d566999361feb753c0900 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 23 2020 08:12:24 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec
index
Notification time stamped 2020-06-23 09:29:26 UTC
From b0870a1b6d067f95c61be10486952f72d265c03d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 23 2020 09:29:19 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Ref-Util-XS.spec b/perl-Ref-Util-XS.spec
index 99f5086..496904e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849342
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-91e8735192 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-91e8735192
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849342
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f3b47f7af8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f3b47f7af8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Notification time stamped 2020-06-23 10:32:07 UTC
From 696874ad4ab4fe2c6996f88def0118474dd350ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 23 2020 10:31:53 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-MCE-Shared.spec b/perl-MCE-Shared.spec
index 5ffdd83..8cb4c6b
Notification time stamped 2020-06-23 11:01:45 UTC
From a511160e4e556346a5631b0ad7182f78ef0db5b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 23 2020 11:01:38 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Validation-Class.spec b/perl-Validation-Class.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849996
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850027
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849996
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-cd0ff64b3c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cd0ff64b3c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849996
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4e08d6a0c7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4e08d6a0c7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849996
Bug ID: 1849996
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.46 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849996
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850027
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850027
Bug ID: 1850027
Summary: perl-IPC-SysV-2.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IPC-SysV
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849304
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850027
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Notification time stamped 2020-06-23 08:15:29 UTC
From f0f1b813d7fdf04388740c11a20235f56063b1ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 23 2020 08:15:22 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.spec
Notification time stamped 2020-06-23 09:47:37 UTC
From fed230954e2d537007d83d07e9bedd74113f325a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 23 2020 09:47:30 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Extract-Use.spec b/perl-Module-Extract-Use.spec
index
Notification time stamped 2020-06-23 11:03:10 UTC
From 53f94ec8f8850dfbea8884c920d8389be5ebb2cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 23 2020 11:03:06 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec
b/perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings.spec
Notification time stamped 2020-06-23 08:16:17 UTC
From d92ab1a635466525f09f879a361ce198b2f52257 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 23 2020 08:16:11 +
Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-Std-Fast.spec b/perl-Class-Std-Fast.spec
index
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
