Joining the test days for this today :)
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:19 PM Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Fedora Linux 35 Beta was released today [1]. Our Fedora CoreOS `next`
> stream
> has been migrated to Fedora Linux 35 content. Existing nodes on the `next`
> stream will update as normal over
Hi All,
`gocryptfs` is still an amazing encrypted overlay filesystem, however my
personal needs have changed and it is almost completely unused by me in
Fedora. As a result of this and a personal time crunch, I am orphaning it
and some dependencies it requires. The full list is below.
I think
Hi
Ever since building mingw-qt6-qt*-rc1 in a side tag and then merging it,
I have the problem that occasionally builds fail (i.e. [1]) with
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'mingw32-qt6-qtbase = 6.2.0'
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'mingw64-qt6-qtbase
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211001.0):
ID: 1010874 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 02/10/21 15:35, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 03:48, Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>> Recently I've started seen a strange behavior of dnf while downloading
>> RPMs updates: some packages are downloaded at the usual speed of my
>> connection (ca. 10MBps), while other
Help needed for reviewing this trivial python package
python-ansible-pygments: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010045
--
*Chedi Toueiti*
* Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be
responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff.
Hi,
Want to play with python packaging? I am still looking for some assistance
here :)
Thank you.
regards,
bex
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:01 PM Brian (bex) Exelbierd
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added python-mailmerge to Fedora Linux as it was super important to
> large parts of my work as FCAIC. In
On 03. 10. 21 10:59, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Ever since building mingw-qt6-qt*-rc1 in a side tag and then merging it, I have
the problem that occasionally builds fail (i.e. [1]) with
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'mingw32-qt6-qtbase = 6.2.0'
DEBUG util.py:444: No
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/141 (aarch64), 1/204 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211002.n.0):
ID: 1011544 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1011544
ID: 1011547 Test: aarch64
Hi,
I want to help you
Thanks
Titouan
Le dimanche 03 octobre 2021 à 13:34 +0300, Onuralp SEZER a écrit :
> Hello Brian, I would like to step-up.
>
> Thank you
> Regards
>
>
> Onuralp S.
>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 11:36 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Want to play with
Robert-André Mauchin kirjoitti 2.10.2021 klo 19.02:
On 7/19/21 18:17, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WirePlumber
== Summary == PipeWire currently uses a simple example session
manager. This proposal is to move to the more powerful WirePlumber
session manager.
==
OLD: Fedora-35-20211002.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211003.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 14
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 13/206 (x86_64), 14/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211002.n.0):
ID: 1011053 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso
Hello Brian, I would like to step-up.
Thank you
Regards
Onuralp S.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 11:36 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Want to play with python packaging? I am still looking for some
> assistance here :)
>
> Thank you.
>
> regards,
>
> bex
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:01
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210927.0):
ID: 1010983 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010983
ID:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211002.0):
ID: 1010890 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 03.10.21 12:19, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 10. 21 10:59, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Ever since building mingw-qt6-qt*-rc1 in a side tag and then merging
it, I have the problem that occasionally builds fail (i.e. [1]) with
DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211002.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211003.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 48
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 20.83 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Sat, Oct 2 2021 at 09:35:40 AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
dnf uses the same mirror until there is a complete timeout or a not
found. It will then switch to another mirror
My solution for when a mirror is going slow: Ctrl+C dnf and run dnf
again. This doesn't always work, but it's
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211002.0):
ID: 1011753 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1011753
ID: 1011767 Test: x86_64
This includes a soname bump. The following dependent packages will be
rebuilt in a side tag:
blender
luxcorerender
notcurses
OpenColorIO
openshadinglanguage
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-08-23 19:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Hello all,
As a member of the VMware Tools team since 2016, I have actively participated
in the publication of granular change updates to the branches of
https://github.com/vmware/open-vm-tools/. For the past year I have been
responsible for committing the changes to GitHub as well as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009728
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Math-BigInt-1.999826
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009792
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Math-BigRat-0.2619 is |perl-Math-BigRat-0.2620
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009833
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009939
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009939
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009728
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009939
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-43d070fc9c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-43d070fc9c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-fa1336ac8e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fa1336ac8e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-24503ffc01 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-24503ffc01
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-fa1336ac8e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fa1336ac8e
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009747
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010107
Bug ID: 2010107
Summary: Provide perl-Mail-RFC822-Address for EPEL-8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-RFC822-Address
Assignee:
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora` that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Mini` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
add provides for an executable
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Mini/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009747
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-bignum-0.61 is |perl-bignum-0.62 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009747
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009728
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009939
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-3b71a1285b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-24503ffc01 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-3b71a1285b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007855
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Calendar-Juli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-24503ffc01 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009986
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-fa1336ac8e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
shlomif commented on the pull-request: `add provides for an executable` that
you are following:
``
Thanks, @jplesnik !
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Mini/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008958
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2007499
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
54 matches
Mail list logo
