There is a BZ to track this too
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151833
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 10:50, Clement Verna wrote:
> The last working build [1] had only the aarch64 image. Since the rawhide
> images are pushed to the registry everyday that probably explain why you
> can't
Hello everyone,
for some time CPE (Community Platform Engineering) team is working on
automating Fedora SCM requests [0]. The automation is currently live on
staging. You can see the output (closed tickets) in Fedora SCM requests
staging repo [1].
The automation is done using a plugin in
The last working build [1] had only the aarch64 image. Since the rawhide
images are pushed to the registry everyday that probably explain why you
can't pull rawhide images on non aarch64 arch.
I ll try to look at why we did not have the other arches builds.
[1] -
Hi
Like so?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95082476
Sandro
On 08.12.22 10:38, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Hi all,
the package "cgnslib-common" contains libs necessary to do some
calculations i.e. Libreoffice
Openshot, Shotcut etc. etc.
It comes packed with some UI Apps,
Hi all,
the package "cgnslib-common" contains libs necessary to do some
calculations i.e. Libreoffice
Openshot, Shotcut etc. etc.
It comes packed with some UI Apps, that look like something from the
80ties and are most likely never used
as cgnslib-common is a just a dependency install and
Dne 06. 12. 22 v 13:01 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
Can I put the new tags in the same macro, e.g.:
```
%global foundry ADF
-%global fontlicense GPLv2+ with exceptions
+%global fontlicense GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Font-exception-2.0
Yes please.
Miroslav
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> 臘 A full-blown, 71 MB compressed (!) web browser just to show the UI for
> the installer!
PS: And I guess we will then also need to ship the langpacks, which are
another 42 MB compressed! (And in one monolithic package for all languages.)
Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 07:57 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> It has all the targets in it. As it's for JIT, we'd only need one
>> target.
>
> That sounds interesting, though of course the details of how to
> implement it could be a bit tricky, I guess...
Build
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 11:02 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
> There is a BZ to track this too
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151833
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 10:50, Clement Verna wrote:
>>
>> The last working build [1] had only the aarch64 image. Since the rawhide
>> images are
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:42 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> Hi folks! Today I woke up and found
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 , which diverted me
> down a bit of an "installer environment size" rabbit hole.
>
> As of today, with that new dep in webkitgtk, Rawhide's network
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, at 11:10 AM, Michal Konecny wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> for some time CPE (Community Platform Engineering) team is working on
> automating Fedora SCM requests [0]. The automation is currently live on
> staging. You can see the output (closed tickets) in Fedora SCM requests
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221207.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221208.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 121
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 106.91 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Tomáš Popela wrote:
> firefox, because that's what the web based installer should/will use in
> the end
臘 A full-blown, 71 MB compressed (!) web browser just to show the UI for the
installer!
IMHO, the web-based UI is a major mistake and should never be shipped in
Fedora. It is good as a
Michael,
On 2022-12-03 14:30, Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
Michael,
On 2022-12-03 05:06, Michael Dawson wrote:
Great to see all the interest so far. Will continue to point people to
this thread to collect those who are interested in being involved and
will look to get the SIG rolling
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 08:15, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:42 AM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks! Today I woke up and found
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 , which diverted me
> > down a bit of an "installer environment size" rabbit hole.
>
Ups, of course it should be Fedora 38
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 4:25 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> On 12/7/22 09:14 AM, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > Fedora 36 will continue to receive updates until approximately one
> > month after the release of Fedora 37.
>
> Shouldn't that be "until approximately one
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:07:01PM +0100, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, at 11:10 AM, Michal Konecny wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > for some time CPE (Community Platform Engineering) team is working on
> > automating Fedora SCM requests [0]. The automation is currently live on
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:58 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> I've done a few passes, dropping a bunch of older firmware upstream
> that are no longer supported in any stable kernel release, also a
> bunch of de-dupe and linking of files rather than shipping of multiple
> copies of the same firmware.
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 16:04 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 3:54 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Dne 08. 12. 22 v 13:58 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > > Ideas on how to solve that problem welcome.
> >
> > Do we need - at install time - firmware for:
> >
> > * v4l
> >
> >
On Thu Dec 8, 2022 at 17:29 +, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> > Do we need a mailing list? My initial gut feeling is no, but I'm
> > interested in what other people think.
>
> I think we don't. Tracking conversations and issues is much easier with a
> tracker than mailing lists.
I think it's
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:42:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! Today I woke up and found
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 , which diverted me
> down a bit of an "installer environment size" rabbit hole.
snip
> Why does this matter? Well, the images being large
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:06 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> It already *is* compressed, which is why it doesn't get any smaller in
> the compressed filesystem image, unlike the other things I mentioned.
> Check for yourself - look under /lib/firmware and you'll see only
> things ending in .xz.
Hi all,
I would like to kick of a Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG that meets
regularly and has IRC meetings.
Our flatpaks have gotten some bad rep recently and I think for a good
reason. We don't have a lot of them and we only have a handful of people
working on them. We also have a fairly obvious
Dear Daniel,
Thanks for your feedback!
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 2:55 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 01:48:48PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> > The problem we expect is that after reverting the patch we can lose the
> > remote access to the hosts because sshd will
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 3:51 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 03:41:32PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> > Dear Daniel,
> > Thanks for your feedback!
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 2:55 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 01:48:48PM +0100,
Dne 08. 12. 22 v 13:58 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
Ideas on how to solve that problem welcome.
Do we need - at install time - firmware for:
* v4l
* dvb
* cameras
?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 03:41:32PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 2:55 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 01:48:48PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> > > The problem we expect is that after
Once upon a time, Dmitry Belyavskiy said:
> Drafted here, to be published:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHKeySignSuidBit
I guess the original idea was to reduce the setuid footprint (which is a
good goal). I though host-based auth was deprecated at this point
anyway - it's not
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:31 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> IMHO, the web-based UI is a major mistake and should never be shipped in
> Fedora.
As I am sure you are aware, it seems a number of distros
are experimenting with their next gen installer. OpenSUSE
has their new web based
[Responding from alias that's actually registered to devel@]
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:25 AM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 3:04 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:58 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > * Release engineering: Mass rebuild required
> >
> >
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 3:54 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 08. 12. 22 v 13:58 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > Ideas on how to solve that problem welcome.
>
> Do we need - at install time - firmware for:
>
> * v4l
>
> * dvb
>
> * cameras
No, and we're looking at splitting those out, but the fact
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 12:58 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> I've done a few passes, dropping a bunch of older firmware upstream
> that are no longer supported in any stable kernel release, also a
> bunch of de-dupe and linking of files rather than shipping of multiple
> copies of the same
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 16:51 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:58 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > I've done a few passes, dropping a bunch of older firmware upstream
> > that are no longer supported in any stable kernel release, also a
> > bunch of de-dupe and linking of
> Please put your name in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Flatpak if
> you are interested and I'll try to organize a poll for a weekly meeting
> time. I'd suggest to start the meetings on the second week of January
> when the holidays are over.
Done! Thanks for starting that.
> Some
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 08:53 +0100, Tomáš Popela wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:30 AM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 03:28 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:42 AM Adam Williamson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi folks! Today I
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 08:26 -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> >
> The only ideas I have seen which 'work'* is to ship a minimal set of
> drivers for some 'chosen' hardware and then you have a bloated kitchen-sink
> iso which has all the drivers in it. The chosen hardware could be a
> 'defined'
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 17:10 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:06 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > It already *is* compressed, which is why it doesn't get any smaller in
> > the compressed filesystem image, unlike the other things I mentioned.
> > Check for yourself - look
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:29 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> It shouldn't be too hard to try this out - it's just one setting in
> lorax somewhere, but I gave up on this alleyway before figuring out
> exactly where to set it.
Well, a *very* unscientific (a few random files)
showed a mostly small
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:42:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! Today I woke up and found
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 , which diverted me
> down a bit of an "installer environment size" rabbit hole.
>
> As of today, with that new dep in webkitgtk, Rawhide's
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 12:50 -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:42:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi folks! Today I woke up and found
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 , which diverted me
> > down a bit of an "installer environment size" rabbit
On Thursday, December 8, 2022, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 12:58 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > I've done a few passes, dropping a bunch of older firmware upstream
> > that are no longer supported in any stable kernel release, also a
> > bunch of de-dupe and linking of
On Thursday, December 8, 2022, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 07:59:20PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 8, 2022, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 12:58 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
Once upon a time, Daniel P. Berrangé said:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 07:59:20PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > That would be very crazy, as you will have a degraded user experience
> > (laggy UI, wrong resolution, ...) to save a couple of megabytes that are a
> > non issue for today's hardware.
>
>
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 6:30 PM Timothée Ravier
wrote:
> > Please put your name in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Flatpak if
> > you are interested and I'll try to organize a poll for a weekly meeting
> > time. I'd suggest to start the meetings on the second week of January
> > when the
This is fixed now, happy containering :-D
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 13:55, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 11:02 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> > There is a BZ to track this too
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151833
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 10:50,
On Thursday, December 8, 2022, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Daniel P. Berrangé said:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 07:59:20PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > > That would be very crazy, as you will have a degraded user experience
> > > (laggy UI, wrong resolution, ...) to save a couple of
Once upon a time, drago01 said:
> Again there is no reason why everything on the disk image had to be loaded
> into memory in the first place. Same way when you boot your installed
> system, not everything on disk is loaded into memory. If you don't need the
> firmware, it should stay on the
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 13:00, Maxwell G via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu Dec 8, 2022 at 17:29 +, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> > > Do we need a mailing list? My initial gut feeling is no, but I'm
> > > interested in what other people think.
> >
> > I think we don't.
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 19:59 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Thursday, December 8, 2022, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 12:58 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > I've done a few passes, dropping a bunch of older firmware upstream
> > > that are no longer supported in any
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 07:59:20PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Thursday, December 8, 2022, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 12:58 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > I've done a few passes, dropping a bunch of older firmware upstream
> > > that are no longer supported in
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 14:39, Onuralp SEZER
wrote:
> Hello Kalev,
> Please see pagure IRC is place for new channels and etc :
> https://pagure.io/irc (that is a better place for track IRC stuff as
> well)
>
>
My apologies.. I sent Kalev to the wrong place.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 20:23 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > Please bear in mind the difference between bare metal and virtual
> > machines. The bare metal machine may have 32 GB of RAM, making a
> > 800 MB install image a non-issue. For a public cloud virtual
> > machine
> > though, this could bump your
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> This is the direction Daniel was thinking down. I'm waiting for someone
> with more expertise to reply, but I suspect the reply is going to be
> along the lines of "yes, we *can* do that, but it's somewhat tricky
> work that involves thinking about lots
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 20:43 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Thursday, December 8, 2022, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > Once upon a time, Daniel P. Berrangé said:
> > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 07:59:20PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > > > That would be very crazy, as you will have a degraded user experience
> >
Hello Kalev,
Please see pagure IRC is place for new channels and etc :
https://pagure.io/irc (that is a better place for track IRC stuff as well)
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 10:31 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 6:30 PM Timothée Ravier
> wrote:
>
>> > Please put your name in
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:45 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 14:39, Onuralp SEZER <
> thunderbir...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello Kalev,
>> Please see pagure IRC is place for new channels and etc :
>> https://pagure.io/irc (that is a better place for track IRC stuff
David Cantrell wrote:
> Broadly speaking, a lot of the growth came from converging the runtime
> environment for the installer with the installed system. In Fedora Core 8
> and previous releases, the "installer environment" was a unique and
> stripped down install. This was frustrating because
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 12:50 -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
>> If mesa-dri-drivers is not required for installation, it could be removed
>> from the installer environment.
>
> It is required - we don't get any graphics without it.
Is that because of the use of GNOME Shell?
Voting in the Fedora Linux 37 elections is now open. Go to the
Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on
Thursday 22 December. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when
you cast your ballot. Links to candidate interviews are in the
Elections app and on the Community
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHKeySignSuidBit
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> As I am sure you are aware, it seems a number of distros
> are experimenting with their next gen installer. OpenSUSE
> has their new web based D-installer, and Canonical is
> writing an installer in flutter.
And most of the others have stopped reinventing the wheel and
Timothée Ravier wrote:
> If possible, as this is a new channel, I'd recommend going Matrix only.
> This makes things simpler.
But it locks out IRC users. So this is a bad recommendation.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list --
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:28:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It shouldn't be too hard to try this out - it's just one setting in
> lorax somewhere, but I gave up on this alleyway before figuring out
> exactly where to set it.
You can use an un-documented lorax config file to set things,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 10:46 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 07:57 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> It has all the targets in it. As it's for JIT, we'd only need one
> >> target.
> >
> > That sounds interesting, though of course the details
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Cookies` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Cookies/pull-request/1
___
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-LaTeX` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-LaTeX/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Cookies` that
you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Cookies/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Pod-LaTeX` that
you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Pod-LaTeX/pull-request/1
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151307
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Hello everyone,
for some time CPE (Community Platform Engineering) team is working on
automating Fedora SCM requests [0]. The automation is currently live on
staging. You can see the output (closed tickets) in Fedora SCM requests
staging repo [1].
The automation is done using a plugin in
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-SNPP` that you
are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-SNPP/pull-request/1
___
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-DistManifest`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-DistManifest/pull-request/1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151949
Bug ID: 2151949
Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-8.10.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-SNPP` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-SNPP/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-DistManifest`
that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-DistManifest/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Module-Install-AuthorTests` that you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Install-AuthorTests/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Module-Install-AuthorRequires` that you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Install-AuthorRequires/pull-request/1
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Module-Install-AuthorRequires` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Install-AuthorRequires/pull-request/1
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Module-Install-AuthorTests` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Install-AuthorTests/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that
you are following:
``
Fix requires packages in *-tests package
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/22
___
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Fix requires packages in *-tests package
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/22
___
perl-devel
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse` that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Database-DumpTruck` that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck/pull-request/3
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Database-DumpTruck`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck/pull-request/3
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Package-Constants`
that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Package-Constants/pull-request/1
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Package-Constants`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Package-Constants/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-LWP-Protocol-https` that you are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-LWP-Protocol-https/pull-request/1
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-LWP-Protocol-https`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-LWP-Protocol-https/pull-request/1
Voting in the Fedora Linux 37 elections is now open. Go to the
Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on
Thursday 22 December. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when
you cast your ballot. Links to candidate interviews are in the
Elections app and on the Community
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHKeySignSuidBit
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149242
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.12-1.e |perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.12-1.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149242
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.12-1.e
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-735d1baeca
brotli-1.0.9-10.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-10049c7b14
libbsd-0.11.7-2.el7
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152046
Bug ID: 2152046
Summary: perl-Module-Build-0.4232 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-Build
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149242
Bug 2149242 depends on bug 2149271, which changed state.
Bug 2149271 Summary: Add flamegraph to EPEL 8/9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149271
What|Removed |Added
97 matches
Mail list logo
