On my Silverblue system, the main offender for this is podman.
As soon as I have a toolbox running, conmon holds up the reboot for a very
long time because it refuses to shutdown properly.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hello,
On Friday, January 6, 2023 9:33:12 AM EST Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 05.01.23 20:17, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > I work on RHEL security problems. I have been looking into a number of
> > exploits and I think we have a problem that has an easy fix. We are not
> >
On Do, 05.01.23 20:17, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I work on RHEL security problems. I have been looking into a number of
> exploits and I think we have a problem that has an easy fix. We are not using
> the CONFIG_STATIC_USERMODEHELPER_PATH kernel config option. There are
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230105.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230106.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 144
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 18.03 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 17:47, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 1/5/23 11:08, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> >
> >> Of course, but the benefit is to fix performance bugs in applications
> >> or maybe the desktop itself. [...]
> >
> >>> Let's be firm in testing this empirically rather than
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 10:24:39AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> But they should be measurable, right? If profiling can't actually
> measure performance and track improvements in performance, the change
> isn't useful. So it should be possible to show the benefits over the
> next release or two.
Hi
licensecheck-3.3.1 grew two new dependencies, reviews here:
perl-Feature-Compat-Class:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2158741
perl-Feature-Compat-Try:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2158742
Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks
Sandro
On Fri, Jan 6 2023 at 11:06:26 AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
(a) Specific services want longer timeouts.
This can already be configured via existing configuration mechanisms,
so I think it's safe enough to ignore this problem. E.g. if a quick
shutdown will brick your Pinephone modem or
On Fr, 06.01.23 10:10, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Friday, January 6, 2023 9:33:12 AM EST Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Do, 05.01.23 20:17, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > I work on RHEL security problems. I have been looking into a number of
> > >
Hello,
On Friday, January 6, 2023 10:10:21 AM EST Steve Grubb wrote:
> One approach to solving this is to use selinux policy. I was informed
> overnight that policy 38.2-1 should now enforce kernel transitions to
> specific helper applications. So, maybe this is solved well enough?
I can verify
On 2023-01-06 02:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Aside: could the change proposal please be updated to show *how* to
opt out, not just state it can be done trivially?
I shouldn't have to find
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/231#request_diff
to know whether the right
Am 30.12.22 um 10:42 schrieb Peter Boy:
Am 30.12.2022 um 06:59 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia :
Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
It is a good idea to make the timeout configurable. But the default timeout
for servers must remain unchanged.
My problem is not "defined timeouts" it
On Fri, Jan 6 2023 at 09:47:29 AM -0500, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
On my Silverblue system, the main offender for this is podman.
As soon as I have a toolbox running, conmon holds up the reboot for a
very long time because it refuses to shutdown properly.
Maybe instead of SIGKILL, we should
Hi everyone!
My name is Omar Sandoval. Davide Cavalca just sponsored me as a packager
and suggested that I introduce myself here.
I am a Software Engineer on the Linux Kernel team at Meta. These days I
spend most of my time on the debugger I created, drgn
(https://github.com/osandov/drgn), as
I posted the same article on Fedora Discussion.[1] However let me
share it again on the devel@ to tell it to many people.
This is interesting news about RISC-V this week. Perhaps, it’s time to
prepare to add the RISC-V CPU to the Koji build system?
Google wants RISC-V to be a “tier-1” Android
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 12:24 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > For what it's worth, frame pointers are required on other operating
> > systems for precisely this reason
>
> What operating systems REQUIRE frame pointers? GCC supports
> -fomit-frame-pointer basically
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The problem is you're confusing general gains and gains in
> specific scenarios.
But the thing is that a gain in some specific scenario is a lot less useful
than a general gain. And the latter is usually not had through profiling,
but through improvements in
Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
>> This is why I think the change is implicitly just for x86_64.
>
> Definitely not intentionally, might be just a bias of what we had most
> hands-on experience with.
Well, that is why it is so bad that you forced through this change behind
the toolchain team's back.
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 8:30 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> On 03/01/2023 18:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> >* AGREED: APPROVED (+6,1,-1) This Change is implemented for Fedora
>> > Linux 38 and we evaluate whether to retain it by Fedora Linux 40.
>> >
Neal Gompa wrote:
> GCC is not the official compiler on Windows or macOS. Both platforms
> require frame pointers on all supported architectures with their
> official compilers (MSVC for Windows, Clang for macOS).
Frame pointers are not required by the operating system if you can compile
working
Hi -
> The thing is that perf + flamegraphs makes your whole system much more
> visible and so it's much easier to find these kind of gains in
> specific scenarios.
(There are exist other profiling tools and techniques that do not
require frame pointer recompilation, but whatever.)
> Frame
Autotrace supports building against GraphicsMagick, so I sent a pull
request to switch it to that.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/autotrace/pull-request/3
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 3:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> The initial rebase of ImageMagick to v7 is landing in Rawhide now:
>
Neal Gompa wrote:
> For what it's worth, frame pointers are required on other operating
> systems for precisely this reason
What operating systems REQUIRE frame pointers? GCC supports
-fomit-frame-pointer basically everywhere.
Kevin Kofler
___
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 04. 01. 23 17:29, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 09:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>>
>>> = New business =
>>>
>>> #2923 Re-vote for Change proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to
>>> #default
>>> compilation flags
>>> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2923
>>
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 2:42 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/6/23 16:19, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> > I posted the same article on Fedora Discussion.[1] However let me
> > share it again on the devel@ to tell it to many people.
> >
> > This is interesting news about RISC-V this week. Perhaps,
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 1:31 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > GCC is not the official compiler on Windows or macOS. Both platforms
> > require frame pointers on all supported architectures with their
> > official compilers (MSVC for Windows, Clang for macOS).
>
> Frame
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Also, for MSVC, /Oy- is documented to be supported on everything except
/Oy actually. /Oy- is the default (= -fno-omit-frame-pointer), /Oy is the
equivalent of -fomit-frame-pointer. But both are documented as unsupported
only for "x64 compilers".
Kevin
Hello team,
Could someone investigate the failure to build ispc [1] with the recent LLVM[2]
?
References:
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ispc
[2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95826442
___
devel mailing list --
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Benchmarks probably won't improve.
And that alone is enough to make Fedora look bad and lose users to other
distributions that cater to the Phoronix crowd.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list --
PS:
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> The way this was done is so wrong:
> * There was a vote. You were not happy with the outcome.
> * So you first tried to complain in the original ticket about this. It was
> clear that the consensus in that ticket was to not reconsider at this
> time.
> * So
First breakage seems to be here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95811080
Related to lua loading of otf fonts
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello, Omar.
On Friday, 06 January 2023 at 21:23, Omar Sandoval wrote:
[...]
> Fedora was the first Linux distro I ever tried back in high school,
> and I've been using Linux exclusively ever since. I distro hopped a
> bit over the years, but even when I wasn't using Fedora, I always
> admired
Hey all,
The initial rebase of ImageMagick to v7 is landing in Rawhide now:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9d3e9afbfd
Most packages in the reverse dependency chain were rebuilt, though a
few are still left to fix and will be addressed separately.
The ones remaining are:
*
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:41 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
> First breakage seems to be here:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95811080
>
> Related to lua loading of otf fonts
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158837
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:20 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 4 2023 at 11:46:26 PM -0500, Tom Callaway
> wrote:
> > Despite the size, I don't think TL updates have ever gone through
> > that process before. Not opposed to doing it though, do we need to
> > revert those builds from
On Wednesday, 04 January 2023 at 13:20, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Just to let everybody know, Ruby 3.2 has landed in Rawhide [1]. The binary
> packages have been rebuilt, but there might be other compatibility issue.
>
> From top of my head, I know that sdformat will be FTBFS:
>
> Am 06.01.2023 um 18:06 schrieb Michael Catanzaro :
>
> ...
>
> I think most of the feedback on this change can be summarized as:
>
> (a) Specific services want longer timeouts.
>
> This can already be configured via existing configuration mechanisms, so I
> think it's safe enough to ignore
On 1/6/23 16:19, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
I posted the same article on Fedora Discussion.[1] However let me
share it again on the devel@ to tell it to many people.
This is interesting news about RISC-V this week. Perhaps, it’s time to
prepare to add the RISC-V CPU to the Koji build system?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157223
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157223
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-16c89da0bf has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-16c89da0bf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157223
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-cda359a4bb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-cda359a4bb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-generators` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.16 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-generators/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157213
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ppi...@redhat.com |
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157213
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-78dd5d5d0a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-78dd5d5d0a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157213
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3aee38fae0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3aee38fae0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154396
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157223
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Elemental-PerlMung
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157233
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158767
Bug ID: 2158767
Summary: perl-DBD-CSV-0.60 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-CSV
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155545
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157233
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-6c4c2d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6c4c2d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157233
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-9ca015a237 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9ca015a237
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158767
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155539
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155545
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2f51814cf7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2f51814cf7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157222
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157222
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-dfce51ac98 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-dfce51ac98
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157222
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-e6ad5a4196 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e6ad5a4196
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157233
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158758
Bug ID: 2158758
Summary: perl-Config-Perl-V-0.35 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Config-Perl-V
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155539
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-161d4da366 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-161d4da366
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Modern-Perl-1.20230106
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157213
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158091
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |epel9
Product|Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157222
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158853
Bug ID: 2158853
Summary: perl-System-Info-0.063 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-System-Info
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155545
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155539
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157213
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157223
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157223
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-cda359a4bb has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157222
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157233
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157213
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-78dd5d5d0a has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157233
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-9ca015a237 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157222
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-dfce51ac98 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158940
Bug ID: 2158940
Summary: perl-IO-Zlib-1.13 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Zlib
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
78 matches
Mail list logo
