On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 02:40:41PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> ...snip...
> >
> > Would that be possible?
>
> I don't think it currently is... but sounds like a reasonable RFE to
> koji to me.
>
> The way koji
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230505.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230506.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 67
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 14.67 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 06-05-2023 15:36, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Is there an easy way to find out the reverse dependencies of a
package (PyPDF2)? Should I contact the maintainers of these reverse
dependencies to inform them? PyPDF2 has been renamed back to pypdf.
It is unclear to me why renames in either
On 06-05-2023 16:29, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
sudo fedrq whatrequires python-PyPDF2
does not list pdf-stapler as a reverse dependency, however it does
include python3-staplelib which is part of the pdf-stapler
packaging.
It lists python3-staplelib for me:
fedrq wr python3-PyPDF2
On 06-05-2023 16:41, Sandro wrote:
On 06-05-2023 16:38, Sandro wrote:
sudo fedrq whatrequires python-PyPDF2
does not list pdf-stapler as a reverse dependency, however it does
include python3-staplelib which is part of the pdf-stapler
packaging.
It lists python3-staplelib for me:
fedrq wr
Right, but not pdf-stapler. I would have thought that that might be included
too. Anyway, I am the maintainer for pdf-stapler so I can make myself aware,
but I hope I will not be missing others.
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 09:38:32 AM CDT, Sandro
wrote:
On 06-05-2023 16:29, Globe
On 5/5/23 10:20, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:14 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
I've submitted a test version of autogenerating mingw pkgconfig provides
and reqs here:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2504
This generates provides like:
Provides:
On 06-05-2023 18:48, Ben Beasley wrote:
I don’t think the PyPI parity rule needs to apply to the base package name,
since this is primarily an application package and thus falls under the general
naming guidelines[1]. You could make a case for renaming the python3-staplelib
subpackage to
On 06-05-2023 16:44, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Right, but not pdf-stapler. I would have thought that that might be
included too. Anyway, I am the maintainer for pdf-stapler so I can
make myself aware, but I hope I will not be missing others.
Well, looking at the spec file of pdf-stapler
Strange that
sudo fedrq whatrequires python-PyPDF2
does not list pdf-stapler as a reverse dependency, however it does include
python3-staplelib which is part of the pdf-stapler packaging.
But how do I inform all the other maintainers about this change in a package
name? I guess my concern is
Thanks, Sandro!
The reason stapler was published as pdf-stapler was that there was then a
package called stapler on Fedora, so it was suggested to me that I use
pdf-stapler, which is any case better because it emphasizes that the software
is for pdfs. However, the name stapler itself is quite
Hi,
On 5/6/23 06:47, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Did you find a co-maintainer for xfig? I use this package on and off and I
> would not like to lose it.
No I did not find a co-maintainer for xfig yet.
Perhaps you can help co-maintain it, it is not a lot of work and I'm available
for
On 5/5/23 22:30, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 5/5/23 21:31, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm just starting to look into the mingw packages and building mingw
executables with them - and in particular static building. I'm hoping
someone can clarify some things for me.
For "regular" libs we seem to
On 06-05-2023 16:38, Sandro wrote:
sudo fedrq whatrequires python-PyPDF2
does not list pdf-stapler as a reverse dependency, however it does
include python3-staplelib which is part of the pdf-stapler
packaging.
It lists python3-staplelib for me:
fedrq wr python3-PyPDF2
On Sat, May 6, 2023, at 10:58 AM, Sandro wrote:
> Moreover, pdf-stapler package itself should probably be renamed to
> python-stapler to comply with the PyPI parity requirements [2] of the
> packaging guidelines. The package is published on PyPI as 'stapler'.
>
> [1]
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 01:13:18 AM CDT, Paweł Marciniak
wrote:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages
Thanks!
Is there an easy way to find out the reverse dependencies of a package
(PyPDF2)? Should I contact the maintainers
Sorry, forgot the BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 12:36:20 PM CDT, Globe Trotter
wrote:
Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after F35, and
I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up. It
Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after F35, and
I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up. It was tentatively
approved, but never finally done so. Thanks!
On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 02:43:00 PM CST, Björn Persson
wrote:
Ben
On Sat May 6, 2023 at 16:38 +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 06-05-2023 16:29, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> > sudo fedrq whatrequires python-PyPDF2
> >
> > does not list pdf-stapler as a reverse dependency, however it does
> > include python3-staplelib which is part of the pdf-stapler
> > packaging.
Thank you for this. I got:
fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/oclock-1.0.4-4.fc37.src.rpm
Removing no longer used file: dead.package
Could not execute import_srpm: This package or module is retired. The action
has stopped.
so I guess I have request unretirement. I thought I did it sometime ago, but
On 06-05-2023 19:26, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
The reason stapler was published as pdf-stapler was that there was
then a package called stapler on Fedora, so it was suggested to me
that I use pdf-stapler, which is any case better because it
emphasizes that the software is for pdfs. However,
On 06-05-2023 19:36, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after
F35, and I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up.
It was tentatively approved, but never finally done so. Thanks!
Looks like the package is approved. The
On 06-05-2023 23:43, Sandro wrote:
On 06-05-2023 19:36, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after
F35, and I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up.
It was tentatively approved, but never finally done so. Thanks!
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
51 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-44ff2475c4
apptainer-1.1.8-1.el8
4
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-18a0e3fa23
apptainer-1.1.8-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c1088e0644
tinyproxy-1.8.4-2.el7
0
26 matches
Mail list logo
