On Monday 11 January 2010, Charley Wang wrote:
We also need (and would appreciate help with) the
linking of failed build logs to their package owners.
If you want just an e-mail address per package, use packagename-
ow...@fedoraproject.org. If you want more than that, see /usr/bin/fedoradev-
- Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Monday 11 January 2010, Charley Wang wrote:
We also need (and would appreciate help with) the
linking of failed build logs to their package owners.
If you want just an e-mail address per package, use packagename-
This is a bit suspicious:
2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla
orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla10
Why is it necessary for xquilla to distribute the source for xerces-c?
Why is a simple dependency on xerces-c-devel not sufficient?
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:29:40 -0500
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/10/2010 02:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
pjones:BADURL:dumpet-2.0.tar.bz2:dumpet
Should be fixed now (forgot to push the tarball to hosted)
ok.
pjones:BADURL:syslinux-3.83.tar.bz2:syslinux
Not really seeing
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:43:32 +
Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
This is a bit suspicious:
2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla
orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla10
Why is it necessary for xquilla to distribute
I have been following the end of life process documented here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
The very last step contains a link to file a ticket asking rel-eng to
block the package. Clicking on that link takes me to a page that
says:
Forbidden
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:21:15 +0100, Richard Zidlicky r...@linux-m68k.org
said:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:03:00 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet
nathan...@gnat.ca said:
NDN So it seems it is related to thunderbird. I have the preference set to
NDN play a sound when new mail arrives. After it has,
Charley Wang wrote:
Please note that many of the packages may be failing because of a few
DSO's. Further exploration is needed to evaluate this possibility so
we can apply one patch to the source of the problem instead of dozens of
superfluous patches. We also need (and would appreciate help
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
I also think that this change will probably force us to ship .la files. The
only reason we didn't need them so far was that implicit linking feature.
[ scratches head... ] How so? AFAICS the only change here is that
programs now have to explicitly
On 12.1.2010 01:14, Kevin Kofler wrote:
semantics) hitting so many packages is a very bad idea and that it's
unrealistic to get them all fixed for F13.
+ 1...speaking as somebody who's fixed dozens of packages after the F11
and F12 mass rebuilds and looking at the loong list referenced
10 matches
Mail list logo
