On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:10:17PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:47:35AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Bad idea (says someone who owns 150 packages). I don't feel like
> > getting 150 bugzilla mails and having to (mass) close them each
> > release.
>
> OK; add a fedora-p
Hey, can someone take a look at this bug report on Bugzilla ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556073
Carl
Quoted from Michael Schwendt :
The package is in need of an update because it does not adhere to
the guidelines for packaging static libraries:
http://fedoraproject.org/wik
I am going to build libxklavier 5.0 in rawhide, which bumps the soname,
and also contains a small api change. The following packages will have
to be rebuilt:
gnome-settings-daemon
gdm
control-center
kdebase-workspace
libgnomekbd
gnome-applets
xfce4-xkb-plugin
gnome-screensaver
python-xklavier
xfce
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:46:27 -0700, Kevin wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I'd like to find some folks interested in co-maintaining or just fully
> maintaining gpsdrive. It's a nifty gps app that lets you download maps
> and follow progress and publish your location.
>
> This package requires a good bi
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:47:35AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Bad idea (says someone who owns 150 packages). I don't feel like
> getting 150 bugzilla mails and having to (mass) close them each
> release.
OK; add a fedora-packager script that mass-closes bugs; or use the
bugzilla web interface t
Hi,
On 01/16/2010 03:50 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:13:32AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> It's a more fundamental problem, though. The AWOL-process is for people,
>> not for packages. The people may still be active (and even known to be
>> active somewhere) and not AWOL
Am Samstag, den 16.01.2010, 22:25 +0100 schrieb Ola Thoresen:
> Have a look at this bug for instance:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=531343
> It was closed two months ago as "WORKSFORME", still ABRT adds more and
> more users to the Cc-list.
>
> Obviously something is not wo
Have a look at this bug for instance:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=531343
It was closed two months ago as "WORKSFORME", still ABRT adds more and
more users to the Cc-list.
Obviously something is not working for someone, but ABRT seems to ignore
the fact that the bug is closed
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:09:46 -0500, Tom wrote:
> Note: I haven't seen the submitter's end of ABRT yet, just the bug
> reports. Maybe it does ask for more info ...
Sort of. The final dialogue contains two text edit areas below the
summary of what will be sent:
http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 10:59 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> You know we have a procedure for this it is called the awol maintainer
> procedure and it would be nice if FESco would follow its on procedures
> here.
>
> Ah well I guess the rules don't apply to those who make them :(
>
>
The non-respo
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 11:08 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Simply blocking the ones which FTBFS bugs were not
> fixed from F-13 inclusion would have been the appropriate response
> (as documented in our procedures), not
> some adhoc almost random response.
We are blocking them. Every release we r
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 13:09 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:45:24PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> >
> > But what's the benefit of alternatives for this? Is the intent to provide
> > sysadmins a way to change which python version of an app would be the
> > system
> > d
Christoph Wickert writes:
> I know that APRT is still very young technology, but after 2 months it's
> time for a interim conclusion [ to wit, it sucks ]
Yes. The primary problem I'm seeing is that even when it gives you a
useful backtrace, the bug report consists *only* of the backtrace, which
Greetings.
I'd like to find some folks interested in co-maintaining or just fully
maintaining gpsdrive. It's a nifty gps app that lets you download maps
and follow progress and publish your location.
This package requires a good bit of work, and I just haven't had the
time to sit down and poke
Hello All!
2010/1/13 Jesus Bustos :
> Hi There
>
>
> I am also happy to help with any of the three packages or co-maintain the
> three.
You're welcome too. Actually, nagios is a very valuable for community
tool, so i think it's a generally good idea to have many trustees
here.
--
With best re
Hello All!
2010/1/13 Peter Robinson :
>> I can take nagios and nagios-plugins. Anyone else volunteering?
Ok, I just added myself as a maintainer.
> I'm quite happy to be a co-maintainer of all of the above.
Peter, you're welcome :)
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing lis
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:45:24PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
> But what's the benefit of alternatives for this? Is the intent to provide
> sysadmins a way to change which python version of an app would be the system
> default?
>
> If not, why not just pick what we want to be the default for
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:13:32 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It's a more fundamental problem, though. The AWOL-process is for
> people, not for packages. The people may still be active (and even
> known to be active somewhere) and not AWOL, but the packages which
> are assigned to them would stil
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:08:30 +0100
Hans de Goede wrote:
> I don't see who the orphaning without following proper procedure is
> appropriate at all. Simply blocking the ones which FTBFS bugs were not
> fixed from F-13 inclusion would have been the appropriate response
> (as documented in our proce
Am Samstag, den 16.01.2010, 16:01 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
> I know that APRT is still very young technology, but after 2 months it's
> time for a interim conclusion. For me the conclusions are:
>
> Pro:
>
> * abrt is a help for developers: I received one positive feedback
>
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:39:54 +0100
Till Maas wrote:
> > Indeed. I don't see much activity from them.
> > Have you tried sending them an email?
> > If not, I can.
>
> No, please go ahead.
I took the liberty right after I posted.
(Hopefully Ian doesn't mind me passing this along:)
Ian Burre
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:12:03AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> >> widelands-0-0.13.Build13.fc11.src.rpm
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511430
> >> xpilot-ng-4.7.2-16.fc11.src.rpm
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511717
>
> Ah, how nice, these 2 are orphaned
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:39:17PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:13:29AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 01/15/2010 08:17 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Unfortunately, this has proven to be hard/impossible so far.
> >
> > >> perl-Class-InsideOut-1.09-2.fc11.src.rpm
> > >>
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 08:50:14AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:13:32AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > With nobody handling the incoming bugzilla tickets. With some bug
> > reports having been killed in an automated way at dist EOL. And
> > worse if it turns out that
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:13:29AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> perl-Class-InsideOut-1.09-2.fc11.src.rpm
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539136
>
> I intended to take this one, but the packagedb doesn't offer me an
> option to take it:
>
> C.f.:
> https://admin.fedoraproje
On 01/15/2010 01:37 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 09:52 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> We are discussing the complete removal of pkgconfig support from openmpi
>> (and never including it in mvapich and mvapich2 which are ready for
>> Fedora package review submission). The proper way to in
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > unifdef-1.171-8.fc11.src.rpm
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511553
i fixed this, but i think we should still remove it because it has been
superceded by the superior sunifdef.
regards, kyle
--
devel mailing list
d
Unfortunately, i haven't had spare time to spend on maintaining
EFL/E17 for a while already, so i handed over maintainership to (back
then) interested guthrie. It's pretty sad if he's also out of time =(
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> E17 components are outdated since a wh
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 03:22:32PM +0100, Christoph H?ger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently playing with gobject to learn some of this boilerplate
> stuff. For my small application I'd like to be able to write plugins
> that are derived from an abstract class.
Not answering you main question, but d
I know that APRT is still very young technology, but after 2 months it's
time for a interim conclusion. For me the conclusions are:
Pro:
* abrt is a help for developers: I received one positive feedback
from a developer: The backtrace looks "interesting" but cannot
be fixed
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:13:32AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It's a more fundamental problem, though. The AWOL-process is for people,
> not for packages. The people may still be active (and even known to be
> active somewhere) and not AWOL, but the packages which are assigned to
> them would
Hi,
I am currently playing with gobject to learn some of this boilerplate
stuff. For my small application I'd like to be able to write plugins
that are derived from an abstract class.
I can enumerate those plugins with g_type_children(), but only after
they have been instantiated.
Is there a way
Le samedi 16 janvier 2010 06:41:36, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 04:03 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> > > Because we don't set up Fedora's menu structure to have submenus, at
> > > present.
> >
> > These submenus existed on FC6!!!
> > I can provide photographies (not screenshots)
Hi,
Le samedi 16 janvier 2010 11:17:42, Hans de Goede a écrit :
> >> Why I get no submenu in the Utility menu?
> >>
> >> Pourtant...
> >>
> >> cat /usr/share/applications/kde4/kcalc.desktop | grep Categories
> >> Categories=Qt;KDE;Utility;X-KDE-Utilities-Desktop;
> >>
> >> cat /usr/share/applicat
Am Freitag, den 15.01.2010, 23:22 -0500 schrieb Matthew Miller:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> > I had attempted to package it, since it would be probably of interest
> > for the Design Suite, but building currently fails due to [1]. I'm not
> > sure wheth
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:59:56 +0100, Hans wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 09:01 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > What about the other packages of these maintainers? E.g. in the
> > recordmydesktop case, there were four bugs open with working patches
> > attached for that package. I did not yet check the other p
On Saturday 16 January 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:14:53AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Friday 15 January 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > Alternatives is system wide, but it can be per application.
> >
> > Per application alternatives, as in alternatives(8)? How?
>
>
Hi,
On 01/16/2010 02:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 02:25 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
>
Putain ! Mais c'est pas possible !
C'est à se cogner la tête contre les murs !!!
Un vrai dialogue de sourds...
Please, is there a french speaking fedor
Hi,
On 01/15/2010 08:17 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
>> since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These
>> are the oldest non-building packages in
Hi,
On 01/16/2010 12:14 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 22:58 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
>> But what about the other packages by these maintainers that do not fail
>> to build but are probably as unmaintained as the packages that fail to
>> build?
>>
>
> Because this isn't a fully pr
Hi,
On 01/15/2010 09:06 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:01:20PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, h
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:14:53AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Friday 15 January 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> > Alternatives is system wide, but it can be per application.
>
> Per application alternatives, as in alternatives(8)? How?
If two versions of each application with different sheb
Hi,
On 01/15/2010 09:01 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>>> The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
>>> since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:13:32AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:13:29 +0100, Ralf wrote:
>
> > On 01/15/2010 08:17 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > >
> > > At today's FESCo meeting, it was agreed that all the below packages
> > > would be marked orphan.
> >
> > Well, if FESCO
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Alain Portal wrote:
> As I show you in my previous message with the "cat" command, these
> (sub)categories exits in each desktop file in F-12, but there isn't subsequent
> submenu, as there are in FC-6
Alain, please, as I already told you, try adding games-menus a
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:05:04PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:58:54 +0100
> Till Maas wrote:
> > > perl-SVN-Mirror iburrell (fixed by Till Maas; spot says kill it)
> > > perl-SVN-Simple iburrell
> >
> > There is a minor error: I fixed the -Simple package with a patch
> >
On Friday 15 January 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Alternatives is system wide, but it can be per application.
Per application alternatives, as in alternatives(8)? How?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:13:29 +0100, Ralf wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 08:17 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> >
> > At today's FESCo meeting, it was agreed that all the below packages
> > would be marked orphan.
>
> Well, if FESCO thinks this was a good idea ... I think you guys stopped
> half-ways: You better
48 matches
Mail list logo
