On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:25:02 +0300
Ionuț C. Arțăriși maple...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hello,
I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm orphaning
it. I fell behind on bugzilla, too.
Beware, it
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
12M hanazono-fonts-20100222-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
48M
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:14:58AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
6.2M
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 22:47 -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Fedora only has one branched, yet unreleased release at a time. Can we
recycle the same tag(s) for every release instead of creating new ones
every time?
We
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:14:58 -0400,
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
12M hanazono-fonts-20100222-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
48M xmoto-0.5.3-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
260M wesnoth-data-1.8.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
318M openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
I
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20376/F-13
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Log Message:
Initial import of perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma
Index: .cvsignore
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20376/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Log Message:
Initial import of perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma
Index: .cvsignore
And so what ?
In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
* 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
* 0.8.1: 10/31/2008
You can't blame OpenArena's maintainer for that, do you ?
The same goes for Wesnoth, 1.8.1 maintenance release was issued 2 May
so less than two weeks ago (1.8 was released 1st april !)
Best
On 05/11/2010 11:44 AM, James Antill wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
12M
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
6.2M
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14088
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2.027-1
- update version
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:56 +0530, arvind iyer wrote:
USB-MODEM from Huawei (Model: Huawei EC1261 ) does not work with
fedora-12 (kernel 2.6.32.11-.fc12.i686.PAE)
However an older version (Model: Huawei EC1260) works on the same
kernel.
The following are the output of
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Thomas Janssen
thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
What was that for? To start another flamewar including the challenge
for a explicit person?
Quite, a possibly valid point losing out to a flamebait codicil.
-Cam
--
devel mailing list
Compose started at Tue May 11 03:30:24 UTC 2010
Updated Packages:
mojito-0.21.7-4.fc13
* Mon May 10 2010 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com - 0.21.7-4
- Fix epoch in -devel requires
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Modified Packages: 1
--
devel mailing
On 05/11/2010 09:56 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:56 +0530, arvind iyer wrote:
USB-MODEM from Huawei (Model: Huawei EC1261 ) does not work with
fedora-12 (kernel 2.6.32.11-.fc12.i686.PAE)
However an older version (Model: Huawei EC1260) works on the same
kernel.
The
It is not part of a default package set.
Even if it were, blocking bugfixes in order to reduce updates size is
nothing but stupid.
We have presto/deltarpm for that (since these packages mostly contain
unchanged binary data like images, it should work pretty well).
What's the point in having new
Hello,
rpm automagically add some other requirements from your rpm, but
in this case I'm not sure from where. Also I didn't find
the correct 'indent' on cpan.
You can upload your srpm on web and ask on perl-devel list for help.
Maybe someone would know what's wrong with this package.
Best
On 05/11/2010 02:00 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
It is not part of a default package set.
Even if it were, blocking bugfixes in order to reduce updates size is
nothing but stupid.
We have presto/deltarpm for that (since these packages mostly contain
unchanged binary data like images, it should
On 10 May 2010 22:15, Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com wrote:
According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435625#c21
policykit doesn't allow the yum backend of PackageKit (which is running as
root) to mount devices.
That was the case a long time ago, but that's not been true for
On 11 May 2010 07:14, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
I wonder what the number is for
On 11 May 2010 04:23, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
and a devel ack. Should a bug receive these acks, the blocker flag
would automatically move from ? to + and we'd have ourselves a blocker!
Some of you may find this familiar if you've dealt with RHEL products.
I use this daily
* Richard Hughes [11/05/2010 11:05] :
I wonder what the number is for packages on the desktop spin? I guess
that's a bit more reasonable.
I'm left wondering what problem we're trying to solve here. I'm gussing
it's one of :
* there are too many updates (for whom? how is this a problem?)
* the
On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
OpenArena. The maintainer has not
2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
OpenArena. The maintainer has not responded
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/11/2010 06:37 PM +9:00:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 20:23 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
So, I know a lot of you out there hate bugzilla flags, but I think we
have problem with the current way we manage release blocker issues, and
flags offer a potential solution.
First the problem:
Right now, anybody can propose a
On 05/11/2010 03:26 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Xavier responsed to rubygem-json related bug recently:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589801
So I guess trying to re-contact him is better.
And meanwhile leave the unaddressed security issues and prominent bugs
open for more days?
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 03:29:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:26 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Xavier responsed to rubygem-json related bug recently:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589801
So I guess trying to re-contact him is better.
And meanwhile leave
Here I forward the summary report written by James:
Greetings folks,
First ... awesome work to all involved with bringing the number of OPEN
F13Blocker bugs down to 0. This allowed F-13-RC1 to be delivered on
schedule [1] to QA for verification. Second, also in the awesome
category, several
Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 02:14 -0400 schrieb James Antill:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64,
This number is kind of irrelevant as nobody will
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
CVE should the maintainer not be responsive enough wrt the severity of
the security problem ? We
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mamoru Tasaka
mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/11/2010 06:37 PM +9:00:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
yeah, over 750 MB where 584 MB belongs to wesnoth and openarena. So without
these two games it's
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
CVE should the maintainer not
Compose started at Tue May 11 08:15:07 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I don't think either wesnoth or openarena are on the desktop spin.
They are probably only on the games spin. So the impact of those,
really should not be that big. (Compared to say the effect an openoffice.org
would have.)
... and wesnoth multiplayer doesn't work on
On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
12M
On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
OpenArena. The maintainer has not responded
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:18:23 +0200,
Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr wrote:
* Richard Hughes [11/05/2010 11:05] :
I wonder what the number is for packages on the desktop spin? I guess
that's a bit more reasonable.
I'm left wondering what problem we're trying to
Hi Fedora paackager community,
Marc asked me to forward this to the list because of some mail account
issues. He's released ownership of the packages listed below.
Paul
- Forwarded message from Marc Wiriadisastra -
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:59:27 +0800
From: Marc Wiriadisastra
To:
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
CVE should the maintainer not be responsive
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-DSA/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv777
Modified Files:
perl-Crypt-DSA.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Crypt-DSA.spec
===
RCS
Hello,
I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
perl-Acme-PlayCode
perl-Apache2-SOAP
perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper
perl-Archive-RPM
perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope
perl-Calendar-Simple
perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-Random/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4480
Modified Files:
perl-Crypt-Random.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Crypt-Random.spec
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input?
From whom it was gathered?
What was the question?
What was the answer?
- Gilboa
Most likely by reading or participating in the various threads on
Yesterday I got this dependency error from yum on Fedora 12:
Error: Paquete: usb_modeswitch-1.1.2-3.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
Necesita: usb_modeswitch-data
Did I perhaps cause something to break in F-12 with my F-11 update?
I don't remember building anything for F-12. The last F-12
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Buffer/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3325/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Data-Buffer.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Data-Buffer.spec
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Buffer/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3325/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Data-Buffer.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Data-Buffer.spec
On 05/11/2010 03:42 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Hello,
I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
perl-FreezeThaw
... builds after having upgraded it (package is in rawhide, but not in
perl-f14-perltest, yet).
perl-Gnome2
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Digest-MD2/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29674/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Digest-MD2.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2.03-14
- Use %{?perl_default_filter} for provides filter
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Digest-MD2/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29674/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Digest-MD2.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2.03-14
- Use %{?perl_default_filter} for provides filter
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Date-Simple.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Date-Simple.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Date-Simple.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:30:41AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Multiplex/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20953/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Multiplex/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20953/devel
Modified Files:
perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64,
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Jcode/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv376/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Jcode.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Jcode.spec
===
RCS file:
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Jcode/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv376/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Jcode.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Jcode.spec
===
RCS file:
I made an operating system based on fedora and open suse if anyone will test
it email me a lamabo...@gmail.com
--
Lama boy ;-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
Hello.
Nowadays the jack project has two branches - old jack (1) branch with
version 0.116.2 and new one called jack2 version 1.9.3.
I'd like to gather opinions and suggestions about
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Event/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13694
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Event.spec sources
Log Message:
Update 1.13.
Index: .cvsignore
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 10:11 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
And if that principled approach is not the most popular.. it doesn't
mean its worth giving up. We need to shake loose the idea that being
the most popular matters. What I want is contributor targets to shoot
for. I want a clear vision by
On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Date-Simple.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:14:27AM -0600, jerrick Davis wrote:
I made an operating system based on fedora and open suse if anyone will test
it email me a lamabo...@gmail.com
Please stop sending this email. We have enough trouble getting people to test
our own OS. We don't need you using this
On 11/05/10 16:58, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/11/2010 05:48 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
In directory
On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
And so what ?
In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
* 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.comwrote:
...
[6]mediatomb -- MediaTomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux
I'll take this one. Co-maintainers welcome.
Rich
- End forwarded message -
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-GMP/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25938
Modified Files:
perl-Math-GMP.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2.06-4
- Don't clobber ~/.gnupg
Index: perl-Math-GMP.spec
On 05/11/2010 06:05 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
And so what ?
In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
* 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
You said that, because you haven't seen really the oldest packages
in
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:30 +0200, H. Guémar wrote:
It is not part of a default package set.
Even if it were, blocking bugfixes in order to reduce updates size is
nothing but stupid.
It wasn't bugfixes, it was a new upstream release, and yes size does
matter. All mirrors, public and
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
CVE should the maintainer not
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:29 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
12M hanazono-fonts-20100222-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
48M xmoto-0.5.3-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
260M wesnoth-data-1.8.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
318M openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
...the last
On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:10:42 +0200, Xavier wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
I definitively missed that one.
Like to comment on your other packages? Are there any packages where
you would appreciate co-maintainers?
For example, soundconverter has 8 open tickets,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:10:42 +0200, Xavier wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
I definitively missed that one.
Like to comment on your other packages? Are there any packages where
you
On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:00:47 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:14:27AM -0600, jerrick Davis wrote:
I made an operating system based on fedora and open suse if anyone
will test it email me a lamabo...@gmail.com
Please stop sending this email. We have
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
wesnoth-data due to it's size.
Then fix this deficiency of your process and provide them.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:19:41 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:14:58AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make
anyone think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates
with a
On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:23:17 -0700
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
What say you?
I like it. It's not perfect, but I think it could make for a better
procedure. :) Lets give it a try for f14 if we can.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:23 -0400, James Antill wrote:
Within Fedora deltarpms have a limit of applying only to rpms less than
100MB, so there are no deltarpms. Anyone who wants to blame rel-eng for
that is free to fix the delarpm code...
On that subject, anyone who wants to fix this would be
On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:37:51 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are
filed against any package, and who have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591215
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to
insufficient stripping of CR/LF [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591215
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
It's unfortunate that these two big packages didn't make it into the
base repo, but such is life. ;(
As this is the first time we've done the early branching... I
certainly expect mistakes right around the time of the branch
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-GMP/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30344
Modified Files:
perl-Math-GMP.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2.06-4
- Don't clobber ~/.gnupg
- No perl(Test::YAML::Meta) in EPEL
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the
day before the go/no-go meeting?
Nope, not at all. It's very important that everybody still be able to
propose blockers as easily as possible. Checking a flag is a
Xose Vazquez Perez (xose.vazq...@gmail.com) said:
On 05/11/2010 06:05 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
And so what ?
In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
* 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
You said
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
wesnoth-data due to it's size.
Then fix this deficiency of your process and provide them.
Patches welcome.
--
Jesse
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:27:30 -0500,
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I don't think either wesnoth or openarena are on the desktop spin.
They are probably only on the games spin. So the impact of those,
really should not be that big. (Compared to say
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fedora.
Sure would be good to have
On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
wesnoth-data due to it's size.
Then fix this deficiency of your process and
On 05/11/2010 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
wesnoth-data due
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:33:49 -0400, Bernie wrote:
Yesterday I got this dependency error from yum on Fedora 12:
Error: Paquete: usb_modeswitch-1.1.2-3.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
Necesita: usb_modeswitch-data
Did I perhaps cause something to break in F-12 with my F-11 update?
Why
Dne 10.5.2010 20:11, Jeff Spaleta napsal(a):
And if that principled approach is not the most popular.. it doesn't
mean its worth giving up. We need to shake loose the idea that being
the most popular matters.
PREACH IT!!! PREACH IT, BROTHER!!!
--
The American Republic will endure, until
On 05/11/2010 07:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the
day before the go/no-go meeting?
Nope, not at all. It's very important that everybody still be able to
propose
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
