Re: Orphaning all my packages

I'll take SOAPpy, co-maintainers for all of my packages are welcome. Full list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/supercyper Regards, Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 04:19:25AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/12/2010 03:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Mike McGrath wrote: > >> Luckily Remi got a list: > >> > >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140708.html > > > > Unfortunately, Remi's list only covers php-*,

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/11/2010 07:11 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 12.08.10 01:40, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote: > >> >> Frank Murphy wrote: >>> I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14 >>> systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 04:11 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 12.08.10 01:40, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote: > > > > > Frank Murphy wrote: > > > I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14 > > > systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to >

Want to help pick the F14 Release Slogan?

We need a slogan for the F14 release. A release slogan is a short call-to-action that fits the artwork theme from Design, found at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F14_release_slogan#Themes. (F13's slogan was "Rock it.") If you are interested in suggesting ideas for the release slogan, please take a

One week slip of Fedora 14 schedule

Today we held our readiness meeting for the Alpha release of Fedora 14. As you may know, this is a meeting with representatives from the Development, Release Engineering, and Quality Assurance teams. In these meetings, we evaluate the list of blocker bugs and give a "go" or "no go" signal on the

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On 08/12/2010 03:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Mike McGrath wrote: >> Luckily Remi got a list: >> >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140708.html > > Unfortunately, Remi's list only covers php-*, I think there are other > affected packages too. He links to pkgdb for the ful

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On Thu, 12.08.10 01:40, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote: > > Frank Murphy wrote: > > I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14 > > systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to > > F15(Rawhide) > > Normally, development is supposed to happen in Rawhi

[Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting: 2010-08-12 @ 12:00 UTC Recap

The first Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting was held 2010-08-12 at 12:00 UTC (so evening of 2010-08-11 in North America). The outcome of the meeting was a decision to slip the Alpha release by one week due to one bug agreed to be a definite blocker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=62312

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 01:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Frank Murphy wrote: > > I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14 > > systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to > > F15(Rawhide) > > Normally, development is supposed to happen in Rawhide FIRST. Frank's

Re: Orphaning all my packages

Mike McGrath wrote: > Luckily Remi got a list: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140708.html Unfortunately, Remi's list only covers php-*, I think there are other affected packages too. He links to pkgdb for the full list, but that doesn't work anymore because the p

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > All your packages are now orphaned. > > > > Thanks for letting us know. > > Do we have a list of the packages that got orphaned? Unfortunately, querying > pkgdb doesn't help anymore now that you set the stuff to orphaned. > Luckily

Re: Orphaning all my packages

seth vidal wrote: > All your packages are now orphaned. > > Thanks for letting us know. Do we have a list of the packages that got orphaned? Unfortunately, querying pkgdb doesn't help anymore now that you set the stuff to orphaned. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedora

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 04:28:07 pm Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2010/8/11 Andre Robatino : >> > Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the >> > following pages for download links and testing instructions. >> >> I downloaded >> http://a

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

Frank Murphy wrote: > I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14 > systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updates to > F15(Rawhide) Normally, development is supposed to happen in Rawhide FIRST. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 155 more python packages need to be rebuilt for Python 2.7

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 21:26 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > Thanks to Kalev Lember who wrote a script identifying the affected > packages. Using its output, Dave Malcolm has just mass-filed bugs > against the packages which we could identify and he's looking to get > these rebuilt en-masse as well

Re: vesa-mode Anaconda install

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:05 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > On 08/11/10 10:03, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 08:20 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > >> . > >> Perhaps having a simple "vesa" arg to anaconda to force a vesa Xserver > >> would provide a quick and simple work-around. It se

[389-devel] Please review: [Bug 622903] fix coverity Defect Type: Code maintainability issues

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622903 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=437967&action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=437967&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=437971&action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=437

[Test-Announce] Working F14 Alpha RC3 live images now available

Hi, everyone. Working live images for Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 are now available here: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Alpha.RC3.1.live/ we've screwed this up so many times I took the precaution of actually downloading and booting all the x86-64 images before writing this email. So I per

Re: 155 more python packages need to be rebuilt for Python 2.7

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 21:26 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > Hi everybody, > > a lot of packages were rebuilt for Python 2.7 recently, but > unfortunately they've turned out to be not all that needed rebuilding. > Essentially, all packages that contain .py files that aren't > below /usr/lib(64)/pyt

Re: vesa-mode Anaconda install

On 08/11/10 10:03, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 08:20 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: >> . >> Perhaps having a simple "vesa" arg to anaconda to force a vesa Xserver >> would provide a quick and simple work-around. It seems like this might >> be a simple hack to add to anaconda. A

hughsie AFK for two weeks

Hello fedora people, I'm going on holiday for two weeks (without a laptop), so if you've got any issues with gnome-color-manager, gnome-packagekit, PackageKit, gnome-power-mamager, upower, or any of my other packages then please get a provenpackager to fix it for me, or talk to mclasen in fedora-d

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On 08/11/2010 01:23 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 11/08/2010 19:28, Jon Ciesla a écrit : > >>> php-Smarty >> I'll take php-Smarty. > All ownership taken, except this one. > > + Taken. -J -- - in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@

155 more python packages need to be rebuilt for Python 2.7

Hi everybody, a lot of packages were rebuilt for Python 2.7 recently, but unfortunately they've turned out to be not all that needed rebuilding. Essentially, all packages that contain .py files that aren't below /usr/lib(64)/python need to be rebuilt so that their respective pre-built .pyc/.pyo fi

Re: crash in fedpkg import

On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 01:28:54 pm Mikhail wrote: > If i do "fedpkg import my-srpm.src.rpm" > > i've got: > > Uploading: 8f133420a821ce7dde80ea9ec48cd20d my-package.tar.gz > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 959, in > args.command(args) > File "/us

crash in fedpkg import

If i do "fedpkg import my-srpm.src.rpm" i've got: Uploading: 8f133420a821ce7dde80ea9ec48cd20d my-package.tar.gz Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 959, in args.command(args) File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 467, in import_srpm mymodule.upload(uploadfiles, re

Re: Orphaning all my packages

Le 11/08/2010 19:28, Jon Ciesla a écrit : >> php-Smarty > I'll take php-Smarty. All ownership taken, except this one. + -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 09:32 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > Im no longer maintaining all my packages > > Do whatever you need to do to orphan them or open them up. > All your packages are now orphaned. Thanks for letting us know. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On 08/11/2010 12:19 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 11/08/2010 18:32, Christopher Stone a écrit : >> Im no longer maintaining all my packages >> >> Do whatever you need to do to orphan them or open them up. >> >> Thanks >> >> Bye. > The Full list: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/package

Re: Orphaning all my packages

Le 11/08/2010 18:32, Christopher Stone a écrit : > Im no longer maintaining all my packages > > Do whatever you need to do to orphan them or open them up. > > Thanks > > Bye. The Full list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/xulchris I will take all the PHP stuff because I ha

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

Jared K. Smith said the following on 08/11/2010 06:15 AM Pacific Time: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Thanks, Andre! Everyone please note we have the go/no-go meeting for >> Alpha release tomorrow afternoon at 5pm Eastern time, so we really >> *really* need as much te

Orphaning all my packages

Im no longer maintaining all my packages Do whatever you need to do to orphan them or open them up. Thanks Bye. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: vesa-mode Anaconda install

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 08:20 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > If support for text mode installation is dead (or dying), recent > traffic on the test & develop list indicates that there's still a > strong need to have a fall-back installation mode. Just in case the > your particular version of Radeon, NVi

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:03 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Michał Piotrowski on 08/11/2010 09:28 AM wrote: > > I > > downloadedhttp://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20100810.15.iso > > - it is too large to fit on the CD. > > This is the "Green Age" what

Re: Reminder: Bugzilla UPGRADE to 3.6 on August 13th 9:00 p.m.EDT [01:00 UTC]

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:07 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "JP" == John Poelstra writes: > > JP> Also *PLEASE* make sure any scripts or other external applications > JP> that rely on bugzilla.redhat.com are tested against our test server > JP> before the upgrade if you have not done s

[Test-Announce] Reminder: Bugzilla UPGRADE to 3.6 on August 13th 9:00 p.m.EDT [01:00 UTC]

Sending on behalf of Dave Lawrence. This will affect Fedora too. REMINDER: Red Hat Bugzilla (bugzilla.redhat.com) will be unavailable on August 13th starting at 9:00 p.m. EDT [01:00 UTC] to perform an upgrade from Bugzilla 3.4 to Bugzilla 3.6. We are hoping to be complete in no more than 5 hour

Re: vesa-mode Anaconda install

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:22:48AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > nomodeset should do this. The KMS X driver should fail to bind and then > we should fall back to vesa naturally. If we don't it's an X driver > bug. It's not always that simple. For the Intel problem I earlier mailed about (see

Re: Reminder: Bugzilla UPGRADE to 3.6 on August 13th 9:00 p.m.EDT [01:00 UTC]

> "JP" == John Poelstra writes: JP> Also *PLEASE* make sure any scripts or other external applications JP> that rely on bugzilla.redhat.com are tested against our test server JP> before the upgrade if you have not done so already (see original JP> email below). Unfortunately the test instanc

F-14 Branched report: 20100811 changes

Compose started at Wed Aug 11 13:15:31 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0 CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

On 11/08/10 16:37, Brandon Lozza wrote: > > Political discussion is EXTREMELY off topic and will cause flame wars. > Environmental talk is politics, especially the stuff you're bringing up > with video links. > Actually power-saving was a feature of Fedora and Linux in general iirc. Common sence e

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

Brandon Lozza on 08/11/2010 10:13 AM wrote: > Keep the greening politics to yourself please So that there are no further misunderstands or continuation of this tangent - I was being sarcastic. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

W dniu 11 sierpnia 2010 17:37 użytkownik Brandon Lozza napisał: > Political discussion is EXTREMELY off topic and will cause flame wars. > Environmental talk is politics, especially the stuff you're bringing up with > video links. Sorry, I did not know that the music here evokes holy wars ;) Reg

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

2010/8/11 Michał Piotrowski > 2010/8/11 Brandon Lozza : > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Michael Cronenworth > > wrote: > >> > >> Michał Piotrowski on 08/11/2010 09:28 AM wrote: > >> > I > >> > downloadedhttp:// > alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-2010081

Re: vesa-mode Anaconda install

On 08/11/10 08:25, Chris Lumens wrote: >> Perhaps having a simple "vesa" arg to anaconda to force a vesa Xserver >> would provide a quick and simple work-around. It seems like this might >> be a simple hack to add to anaconda. A short-hand for xdriver=vesa > > Why do we need a shorthand for an

Reminder: Bugzilla UPGRADE to 3.6 on August 13th 9:00 p.m.EDT [01:00 UTC]

Sending on behalf of Dave Lawrence. This will affect Fedora too. REMINDER: Red Hat Bugzilla (bugzilla.redhat.com) will be unavailable on August 13th starting at 9:00 p.m. EDT [01:00 UTC] to perform an upgrade from Bugzilla 3.4 to Bugzilla 3.6. We are hoping to be complete in no more than 5 hour

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

2010/8/11 Brandon Lozza : > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Michael Cronenworth > wrote: >> >> Michał Piotrowski on 08/11/2010 09:28 AM wrote: >> > I >> > downloadedhttp://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20100810.15.iso >> > - it is too large to fit on the C

Re: vesa-mode Anaconda install

> Perhaps having a simple "vesa" arg to anaconda to force a vesa Xserver > would provide a quick and simple work-around. It seems like this might > be a simple hack to add to anaconda. A short-hand for xdriver=vesa Why do we need a shorthand for an argument you should only have to type once? xd

Re: vesa-mode Anaconda install

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 08:20 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > If support for text mode installation is dead (or dying), recent > traffic on the test & develop list indicates that there's still a > strong need to have a fall-back installation mode. Just in case the > your particular version of Radeon, NVi

vesa-mode Anaconda install

If support for text mode installation is dead (or dying), recent traffic on the test & develop list indicates that there's still a strong need to have a fall-back installation mode. Just in case the your particular version of Radeon, NVidia, (.. whatever) hardware is recognized but doesn't run cor

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Michał Piotrowski on 08/11/2010 09:28 AM wrote: > > I downloadedhttp:// > alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20100810.15.iso > > - it is too large to fit on the CD. > > This is the "Green Age" what ar

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

Michał Piotrowski on 08/11/2010 09:28 AM wrote: > I > downloadedhttp://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20100810.15.iso > - it is too large to fit on the CD. This is the "Green Age" what are you doing wasting a CD? Mother earth frowns on you. Be kind and reus

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 04:28:07 pm Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > 2010/8/11 Andre Robatino : > > Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following > > pages for download links and testing instructions. > > I downloaded > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/night

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/11/2010 10:28 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > 2010/8/11 Andre Robatino : >> Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following >> pages for download links and testing instructions. >> > > I downloaded > http://alt.

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as po

Broken dependencies: perl-Config-Model

perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree: On x86_64: perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) >= 0:0.303 On i386: perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) >= 0:0.303 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedor

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

Hi, 2010/8/11 Andre Robatino : > Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 is now available [1].  Please refer to the following > pages for download links and testing instructions. > I downloaded http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20100810.15.iso - it is too large to fit on t

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-08-10)

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 09:54 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:03:07 -0400, Bill wrote: > > Just saying that the person to commit the fixes found in the review > > should (IMO) not be the reviewer themselves, even if they happen to > > be a provenpackager. It allows for a havin

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Thanks, Andre! Everyone please note we have the go/no-go meeting for > Alpha release tomorrow afternoon at 5pm Eastern time, so we really > *really* need as much testing as possible by then. I have the Go/No-Go meeting in my calendar as Th

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On 11/08/10 11:32, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > wrong: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10477 > > the newer versions have only been built for f14 not rawhide. I guess they are waiting to iron out a few bugs on F14 systemd\selinux\udev? Before they push the same broken updat

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

2010/8/11 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : >  On 08/11/2010 10:32 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >> 2010/8/11 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": >>> On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >>> >>> instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check >>> if a clean install of latest package would work

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On 08/11/2010 10:32 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > 2010/8/11 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": >> On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >> >> instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check >> if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this >> result: >> >> Instal

rawhide report: 20100811 changes

Compose started at Wed Aug 11 08:15:15 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) PragmARC-20060427-6.fc1

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

2010/8/11 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > > instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check > if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this > result: > > Installing : systemd-units-5-2.fc15.x86_64 > > This is f

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this result: Installing : systemd-units-5-2.fc15.x86_64 This is far from being the latest packages ( the latest b

Re: Fedora's ssh known hosts file

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 01:55 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 09:07 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:04, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 22:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > >> Yes ssh is secure if used properly. To get the proper

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

instead of trying to workaround the problem i actually tried to check if a clean install of latest package would work properly with this result: Installing : systemd-units-5-2.fc15.x86_64 1/4 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sqw1k7: line 25: 19348 Segmentati

Re: Fedora's ssh known hosts file

On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 09:07 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:04, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 22:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > >> Yes ssh is secure if used properly. To get the proper known_hosts entry, > >> one has to download https://admin.fedorap

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-08-10)

On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:03:07 -0400, Bill wrote: > Michael Schwendt said: > > > * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/MERGE.html > > > (nirik, 19:59:05) > > > * AGREED: : encourage provenpackagers to commit to rawhide fixes for > > > merge reviews. said pp's should not b