On 11/06/2010 02:11 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
>>
>>> On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
>>> maintainer on a component they have reported against I not only ask t
On 11/06/2010 01:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/05/2010 09:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
>>
>>> ABRT
>>> It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
>>> worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
>> Parts of th
On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
>
>> On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
>> maintainer on a component they have reported against I not only ask the
>> ABRT maintainers to block any reports against
On 11/05/2010 08:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 17:49 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>>> 2010/11/4 Orcan Ogetbil :
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for
On 11/05/2010 09:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
>
>> ABRT
>
>> It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
>> worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
>
> Parts of the Fedora user base "abuse" ABRT in that they refus
On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
>
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:08:40 -0400
Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Some more question related to el6:
>
> When will packages appear in el6? I maintain some of the dependencies
> for el5, but they are not in el6.
They will appear when someone branches them and builds them, or when
the maintainers of th
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be
> > > the
> > > right time getting involved in the discussion.
> > >
> > > http://wayland.freedesktop.org
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:14:08 +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >> The practical point is that F12
>> >> is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed...
>> >
>> >
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 23:09 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:45:37 -0700, Adam wrote:
>
> > > Something is terribly wrong here, if reporter adjusts F12 -> F13 -> F14
> > > over a period of N months in reply to the automated NEEDINFO requests and
> > > still doesn't get any r
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:45:37 -0700, Adam wrote:
> > Something is terribly wrong here, if reporter adjusts F12 -> F13 -> F14
> > over a period of N months in reply to the automated NEEDINFO requests and
> > still doesn't get any response other than another automated one after
> > six more months.
>
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 15:41 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 19:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
> wrote:
> > Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
> >
> > Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
> > right time gettin
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 19:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
>
> Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
> right time getting involved in the discussion.
>
> http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
There is
Well, there's the cprops library, but I'd need to make a package out of that
first
http://cprops.sourceforge.net/
Seems like this might be generically useful (i.e. not just for radix tries but
the other search types).
Not sure if the threading support is needed or not... plus it might mean
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:27:46 +0200, Alexander wrote:
> I can't see why can't we just admit - This is our best feel free to join us
> and help ?? (someone should find better wording)
Yeah. It isn't that obvious to our users (and potential contributors
among them) where help is needed, where help
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
> On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
> maintainer on a component they have reported against I not only ask the
> ABRT maintainers to block any reports against those component that a
> maintainer has not respond
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:05:01 +0100, Jiri wrote:
>
>> - if you think ABRT is not providing a good info for you packages, then
>> please write me an email how to improve it
>
> Could you please add another hurdle that tries to stop users from
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:05:01 +0100, Jiri wrote:
> - if you think ABRT is not providing a good info for you packages, then
> please write me an email how to improve it
Could you please add another hurdle that tries to stop users from not
filling in the empty fields about how to reproduce a proble
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
> ABRT
> It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
> worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
Parts of the Fedora user base "abuse" ABRT in that they refuse to
fill in the empty fields. Blame the reporters not th
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:30:41 -0700, Adam wrote:
>
> > If the bug hasn't had any attention for the last
> > year and a half it's not particularly likely to magically get it now, is
> > it?
>
> Then why should the reporter take action in
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:30:41 -0700, Adam wrote:
> If the bug hasn't had any attention for the last
> year and a half it's not particularly likely to magically get it now, is
> it?
Then why should the reporter take action in reply to the NEEDINFO
bugzapping request?
Something is terribly wrong he
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 13:57:18 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:19:14 +0200
> Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>
> > > It's being fixed; no rebuilds needed.
> >
> > Fixed, in what sense? What about the packages that have already been
> > rebuilt?
>
> About 30min after the rawhide comp
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:19:14 +0200
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > It's being fixed; no rebuilds needed.
>
> Fixed, in what sense? What about the packages that have already been
> rebuilt?
About 30min after the rawhide compose kicked off:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=203440
I
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 13:48 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 06:22 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
> > 2- ABRT should keep track of unresponsive users. If a user has an
> > outstanding "needinfo?" flag for the bugs sent through ABRT, he
> > shouldn't be able to send a new bug report thr
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 18:29 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It is inefficient, if some time later another user needs to report the
> same issue only to get ignored, too. It is not encouraging our users to
> spend time on reporting bugs and on replying to NEEDINFO or other
> questions in the ticke
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 07:27 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Frank Murphy said the following on 11/05/2010 12:47 AM Pacific Time:
> > On 05/11/10 07:27, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> >
> >> So what if I got 100 bug reports and didn't answered 10 bugs you will want
> >> to
> >> orphan my package?
> >> W
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 17:49 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> > 2010/11/4 Orcan Ogetbil :
> >> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
> >> that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
> >> obv
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 16:10 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > The practical point is that F12
> > is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed...
>
> Why? Obviously it needs to be clear that nothing further should be
> expected f
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:16:32 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> > 2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová :
> > > On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Release of libxml2-2.7.
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> 2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová :
> > On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
> >>
> >>> Release of libxml2-2.7.8
> >>>
> >>> libxml2.spec | 10 --
> >> Seems to break the k
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
> > Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
> > right time getting involved in the discussion.
> >
> > http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
>
> What's the implication for people who absolutely need to use
> X applicatio
Some more question related to el6:
When will packages appear in el6? I maintain some of the dependencies
for el5, but they are not in el6.
Do I just need to build them? Will there be or should there have been a
mass rebuild? Do I need to file a koji update?
Thanks again,
Tim
--
On 05.11.2010 14:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The userdel seems unrelated to the real problem:
>
> DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for gearbox-devel>= 9.11
[...]
Thanks, missed those. I wish it could be made more clear which state
failed. I wonder why it says return code 0, although this failed?
2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová :
> On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
>>
>>> Release of libxml2-2.7.8
>>>
>>> libxml2.spec | 10 --
>> Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
> Dependent packag
On 5 November 2010 19:47, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Koji Builds:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2580299
That then points to
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2580322
Note the
Result : BuildError: error building package (arch noarch), mock
exited with stat
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:47:38 -0400
Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Hello fellow Fedorans.
>
> I'm trying to build a new package for Fawkes which has just passed
> review. It build fine on f13/f14/f15, but it fails on el5/el6 with an
> error that seems to be related to the build system, not to the actu
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.003-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
781ff92... Initial import of perl-Test-Fatal 0.003-1
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
Hello fellow Fedorans.
I'm trying to build a new package for Fawkes which has just passed
review. It build fine on f13/f14/f15, but it fails on el5/el6 with an
error that seems to be related to the build system, not to the actual
package.
Koji Builds:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskin
On 11/04/2010 06:22 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> 2- ABRT should keep track of unresponsive users. If a user has an
> outstanding "needinfo?" flag for the bugs sent through ABRT, he
> shouldn't be able to send a new bug report through ABRT for my
> packages.
That's a little harsh---I have been in s
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:38:35 -0700, Adam wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:28 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > > So can someone please explain my why I should continue to try to
> > > improve Fedora by reporting bugs ?
> >
> > Glad you ask this. The bugzapping script is stupid. It asks the r
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:07:30PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:57:56AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:11:22AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > > Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
> > >
> > > Has
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Thomas Bendler wrote:
> What does this mean, wait until Canoncial provides patches before taking a
> look at interresting technologies? Or even better, don't use applications
> where Canoncial don't provide patches? That means that a lot of application
> can't be u
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:12:09AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 02:11 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
> >
> > Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
> > right time
On 11/05/2010 05:41 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Orcan Ogetbil, Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:02:02 -0400:
>> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
>> that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
>> obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
>>
>> From what I have
Orcan Ogetbil, Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:02:02 -0400:
> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
> that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
> obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
>
> From what I have seen, the maintainers are more responsive to man
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> What's the implication for people who absolutely need to use
> X applications remotely?
I believe the idea for the overall plan is that the traditional X
server grows the ability to be a Wayland client and that any normal
distribution w
Nathan Kinder wrote:
> Please review these design notes for implementing one way AD sync. In
> particular, I'm concerned about the possible inconsistencies that can
> arise from directly modifying a synced entry on the DS side. Does using
> access control seem sufficient for avoiding these inc
Hi,
Please review the patch for the following bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643979
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=458122&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=458122&action=diff
Thanks!
--
Endi S. Dewata
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to bring tritonus back from the dead
> (as it is a dependency for vorbisspi, which is needed
> to be able to playback .ogg files under java).
>
> I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before, but there
> does not seem t
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 02:11 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
>
> Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
> right time getting involved in the discussion.
>
> http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
U
Hi,
I would like to bring tritonus back from the dead
(as it is a dependency for vorbisspi, which is needed
to be able to playback .ogg files under java).
I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before, but there
does not seem to be anything written about it on the wiki
(or I cannot find it).
Frank Murphy said the following on 11/05/2010 12:47 AM Pacific Time:
> On 05/11/10 07:27, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
>
>> So what if I got 100 bug reports and didn't answered 10 bugs you will want to
>> orphan my package?
>> Welcome to the world without gtk, openjdk, eclipse-platform, kdelibs
>
Hi All,
Unfortunately I don't have the time to proper maintain the
packages below. So I believe it is better to orphan them,
and have just done so.
If you're interested in any of these feel free to pick them up
bochs - Portable x86 PC emulator
I believe everyone is pretty much using qemu now. If
Java SIG pseudo user has been created with commit emails from monitored
packages[1] flowing to java-devel mailing list (thanks to tibbs and mjw).
If you want java-sig to monitor and check your commits you can add
java-sig pseudo user to CC for your package. For old packages follow
[2]. For new pa
On 11/05/2010 07:47 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 05/11/10 07:27, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
>
>> So what if I got 100 bug reports and didn't answered 10 bugs you will want to
>> orphan my package?
>> Welcome to the world without gtk, openjdk, eclipse-platform, kdelibs
> I think maybe it is mea
Am Montag, den 01.11.2010, 21:12 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> I am planning to push libnotify 0.7.0 into rawhide by the end of this
> week;
Next time you are making an update that affects a large number of
packages, please use devel-announce.
TIA,
Christoph
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
2010/11/5 Jeff Spaleta
> [...]
> I'm more than happy to give Shuttleworth the benefit of the doubt
> about the sincerity of his interest and I will be watching the Wayland
> commit logs closely looking for Canonical sponsored contributions to
> _start_ trickling in.
> [...]
>
What does this mean
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:59:14AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:28:53AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Fri Nov 5 08:15:13 UTC 2010
> >
> > Broken deps for x86_64
> > --
> > 3Depict-0.
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:57:56AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:11:22AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
> >
> > Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
> > r
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:28:53AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Fri Nov 5 08:15:13 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> 3Depict-0.0.2-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0)(64bit)
etc.
Is it saf
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:11:22AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
>
> Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
> right time getting involved in the discussion.
>
> http://wayland.freedesktop.
On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
>
>> Release of libxml2-2.7.8
>>
>> libxml2.spec | 10 --
> Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
Dependent packages should be rebuild.
--
Marcela Mašlá
On 05/11/10 10:01, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Matthew Booth writes:
>
>> [mbo...@t500 virt-v2v (f14)]$ git push origin f14
>
> $ git push origin f14:f14/master
>
> (It was a very bad idea to name the local branches differently than the
> remote branches.)
Actually, at the suggestion of hicham on #fe
Matthew Booth writes:
> [mbo...@t500 virt-v2v (f14)]$ git push origin f14
$ git push origin f14:f14/master
(It was a very bad idea to name the local branches differently than the
remote branches.)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5
[mbo...@t500 virt-v2v (f14)]$ git push origin f14
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: C refs/heads/f14 mdbooth DENIED by refs/heads/f[0-9][0-9]
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/f14
To ssh://mdbo...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/virt-v2v
! [remote rejected] f14 -> f14 (hook dec
On 05/11/10 07:27, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> So what if I got 100 bug reports and didn't answered 10 bugs you will want to
> orphan my package?
> Welcome to the world without gtk, openjdk, eclipse-platform, kdelibs
I think maybe it is meant more as "You have 100 bugs, 80 are not
acknowle
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 11:58:21PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 11/04/2010 10:22 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > > 2- ABRT should keep track of unresponsive users. If a user has an
> > > outstanding "needinfo?" flag for the bugs sent through ABRT, he
> > > shouldn't be able to send
Le 05/11/2010 03:10, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> On 11/05/2010 06:41 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
> Considering that it was started by a Red Hat employee, I would say there
> has already been some involvement
>
> Rahul
Kristian does not work for Red Hat anymore but at Intel OSTC.
Will Ubunt
> > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >> The practical point is that F12
> > >> is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed...
> > >
> > > Why? Obviously it needs to be clear that nothing further
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> The practical point is that F12
> >> is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed...
> >
> > Why? Obviously it needs to be clear that nothing further should be
>
70 matches
Mail list logo
