Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

2012-02-03 Thread Frank Murphy
On 02/02/12 18:47, Kay Sievers wrote: The former dracut ‘usrmove’ module has been renamed to ‘convertfs’. We need to carry that option for quite some time through future releases Does this mean that ‘convertfs’ will be build into dracut-*? Does the user\tester have to keep doing --force

Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

2012-02-03 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:25, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/02/12 18:47, Kay Sievers wrote: The former dracut ‘usrmove’ module has been renamed to ‘convertfs’. We need to carry that option for quite some time through future releases Does this mean that ‘convertfs’ will be

rubygem-xml-simple license change

2012-02-03 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
Hi all, due to license change in Ruby, I have updated the license of rubygem-xml-simple after clarification with its author. -- Regards, Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Unity in openSUSE Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-03 Thread Nelson Marques
Hi all, First of all, I would like to apologize for opening a new topic, but I wasn't signed on the list, so I can't really reply to the original thread, Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)[1] by Manuel Escudero. I would like to clarify a few things: * Unity is not available for openSUSE

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Jim Meyering
Matthew Garrett wrote: There's various issues with the hfsplus utilities we ship at the moment, including the fact that fsck.hfsplus crashes on 64-bit. I'd like to Glad you're looking at this. I noticed that recently, too. I wanted to use fsck.hfsplus in a test to verify that parted's

[Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!

2012-02-03 Thread Andre Robatino
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now available for testing. (Lives are not currently available.) Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5054 . Please see the following pages for download links

OT: sorry, testing

2012-02-03 Thread Matej Cepl
ignore this please -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

File Tree-XPathEngine-0.05.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2012-02-03 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Tree-XPathEngine: a378a4c7c853b6c20d499b3a4e169efc Tree-XPathEngine-0.05.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bodhi critical path updates policy adjustment

2012-02-03 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/02/2012 05:18 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: We'll keep it around, but I'll update the wiki pages to note that it's kinda 'dormant' for now. I'm hoping that with Bodhi 2.0 we'll be able to re-design the process and utilize

[perl-Tree-XPathEngine] Initial import (#787199)

2012-02-03 Thread Petr Šabata
commit c9ebac94ae637e748db319cb2af104713f6cccb4 Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Fri Feb 3 16:07:07 2012 +0100 Initial import (#787199) .gitignore |1 + perl-Tree-XPathEngine.spec | 45 sources

[Bug 787216] New: perl-Module-Build in el6

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Module-Build in el6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787216 Summary: perl-Module-Build in el6 Product: Fedora EPEL

[Bug 787172] perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.72 is available

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787172 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: Can you point me to the latest upstream sources? git://cavan.codon.org.uk/hfsplus-tools.git - it needs clang to build. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Branching F17

2012-02-03 Thread Mike Chambers
Seeing the TC's for F17 Alpha start to come out (and see how currently based on rawhide), when does the branch get done and set? -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY Best little town on Earth! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Jim Meyering
Matthew Garrett wrote: On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: Can you point me to the latest upstream sources? git://cavan.codon.org.uk/hfsplus-tools.git - it needs clang to build. Thanks. I built it, and when using that version of fsck.hfs, my new parted test passes.

Re: Branching F17

2012-02-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:55:34 -0600, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote: Seeing the TC's for F17 Alpha start to come out (and see how currently based on rawhide), when does the branch get done and set? It's scheduled for February 7th. You can schedules at:

Re: Branching F17

2012-02-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:55:34 -0600 Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote: Seeing the TC's for F17 Alpha start to come out (and see how currently based on rawhide), when does the branch get done and set? From: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule 2012-02-07 Branch Fedora 17 from

[Bug 787216] perl-Module-Build in el6

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787216 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Branching F17

2012-02-03 Thread Frank Murphy
On 03/02/12 16:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote: From: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule 2012-02-07 Branch Fedora 17 from Rawhide-- Branch Freeze kevin Do we then use that with our /usrmove test boxes. Or is Branched to be kept with current-rawhide boxes? -- Regards, Frank Murphy,

Re: Branching F17

2012-02-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:39:05 + Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/02/12 16:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote: From: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule 2012-02-07 Branch Fedora 17 from Rawhide-- Branch Freeze kevin Do we then use that with our /usrmove test boxes.

Re: Branching F17

2012-02-03 Thread Frank Murphy
On 03/02/12 16:51, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'm not sure I understand the question. ;) Neither do I, and I wrote it. ^ - Whatever the current method of migrating should be announced (devel-announce at least). Thats the crumb, was hoping for. Hopefully that happens before branching.

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #279 - filter normalization does not use matching rules

2012-02-03 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/279 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/279/0001-Ticket-279-filter-normalization-does-not-use-matchin.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #280 - extensible binary filters do not work

2012-02-03 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/280 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/280/0001-Ticket-280-extensible-binary-filters-do-not-work.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Bodhi critical path updates policy adjustment

2012-02-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:10 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: On 02/02/2012 05:18 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: We'll keep it around, but I'll update the wiki pages to note that it's kinda 'dormant' for now. I'm hoping that with Bodhi 2.0 we'll be able to re-design the

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 2, 2012, at 5:25 PM, David Lehman wrote: My understanding is that the so-called Apple Bootstrap filesystem required for ppc Macs to boot is HFS. That's what anaconda uses for it. If we could be using HFS+ instead, fine. PPC Macs could only boot using HFS+ since Mac OS X 10.0

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:45 PM, John Reiser wrote: Does anyone object [to dropping support for HFS]? Plain HFS has no journal, so there are workloads where HFS is faster than HFS+ which has a journal. Mac OS Extended or HFS+ or HFS Plus, does not inherently have a journal. There is a

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 3, 2012, at 6:56 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Matthew Garrett wrote: There's various issues with the hfsplus utilities we ship at the moment, including the fact that fsck.hfsplus crashes on 64-bit. I'd like to Glad you're looking at this. I noticed that recently, too. I wanted to use

Fedora Kernel Meeting 02-03-2012 Minutes

2012-02-03 Thread Josh Boyer
== #fedora-meeting: Fedora Kernel meeting == Meeting started by jwb at 18:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-02-03/fedora-kernel.2012-02-03-18.00.log.html .

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread John Reiser
Are you sure you mean HFS? The original maximum volume size for Mac OS Standard (HFS) format, was 2GB. The maximum number of allocation blocks is 65,536. For a 100GB disk, your allocation block would need to be 1.6MB. Considering Mac OS X 10.7, today's current Apple operating system, is

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 3, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: There is yet another variant called HFSX which is case-sensitive, but also has more feature potential than HFSJ. Correction, according to the following URL, HFSX can be case sensitive or insensitive.

Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

2012-02-03 Thread Bill Nottingham
Alan Pevec (ape...@gmail.com) said: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group there, which is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization host. Admittedly this does include

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:06:56AM -0800, John Reiser wrote: PowerPC Macintosh hardware will run for some more years. The monetary cost for a used machine (1GB RAM, 1GHz CPU) is nearly zero. A dead Apple OS has the benefit of no new bugs. Preventing the install of Fedora on such a box (if

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Jim Meyering
Chris Murphy wrote: On Feb 3, 2012, at 6:56 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Matthew Garrett wrote: There's various issues with the hfsplus utilities we ship at the moment, including the fact that fsck.hfsplus crashes on 64-bit. I'd like to Glad you're looking at this. I noticed that recently,

File Devel-CheckLib-0.96.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jpo

2012-02-03 Thread Jose Pedro Oliveira
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-CheckLib: 150053ea0ddcbe2d8bcbe0ebd6209ec0 Devel-CheckLib-0.96.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Devel-CheckLib] Update to 0.96.

2012-02-03 Thread Jose Pedro Oliveira
commit 5c498234e331c8091794c219335baedadf703af0 Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt Date: Fri Feb 3 19:49:38 2012 + Update to 0.96. .gitignore |1 + perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec |9 + sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: Right. The code explicitly rejects any attempt to resize a partition on a disk with sector size != 512. Due to this confusion with jhdr_size, at least for now, I do not plan to change that bit. Maybe someone who is motivated and capable

Review Swap

2012-02-03 Thread Nikos Roussos
I'd like a review about sparkleshare package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787293 Does somebody like to swap reviews? Thanks in advance -- Nikos Roussos about http://autoverse.net/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #281 - TLS not working with latest openldap

2012-02-03 Thread Rich Megginson
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/281 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/281/0001-Ticket-281-TLS-not-working-with-latest-openldap.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

2012-02-03 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 3, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: mount will not mount hfsx volumes, journaled or not. False. -t hfsplus does work in F16, but is confusing because hfsx != hfs+. In any case, journaled fs is read only. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

filesystem

2012-02-03 Thread darrell pfeifer
As far as I've seen on the list, the /usr move stuff was supposed to be confined by tagging to f17-usermove so it wouldn't affect rawhide until the big switch was pulled. Trying to update from koji (which will appear in rawhide tomorrow) gives - Upgrade 2 Packages

Re: filesystem

2012-02-03 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
dp == darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com writes: dp As far as I've seen on the list, the /usr move stuff was supposed to dp be confined by tagging to f17-usermove so it wouldn't affect rawhide dp until the big switch was pulled. Well, yes, but the big switch has actually been pulled. - J --

Re: filesystem

2012-02-03 Thread darrell pfeifer
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 16:33, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.eduwrote: dp == darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com writes: dp As far as I've seen on the list, the /usr move stuff was supposed to dp be confined by tagging to f17-usermove so it wouldn't affect rawhide dp until the big

Re: filesystem

2012-02-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:49:12 -0800 darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 16:33, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.eduwrote: dp == darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com writes: dp As far as I've seen on the list, the /usr move stuff was dp supposed to be

Re: filesystem

2012-02-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:27 -0800, darrell pfeifer wrote: As far as I've seen on the list, the /usr move stuff was supposed to be confined by tagging to f17-usermove so it wouldn't affect rawhide until the big switch was pulled. Yes. We just pulled the big switch. :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora

Re: filesystem

2012-02-03 Thread darrell pfeifer
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 17:15, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:27 -0800, darrell pfeifer wrote: As far as I've seen on the list, the /usr move stuff was supposed to be confined by tagging to f17-usermove so it wouldn't affect rawhide until the big switch

Re: filesystem

2012-02-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:47 -0800, darrell pfeifer wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 17:15, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:27 -0800, darrell pfeifer wrote: As far as I've seen on the list, the /usr move stuff was supposed to

Re: filesystem

2012-02-03 Thread darrell pfeifer
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 17:53, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:47 -0800, darrell pfeifer wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 17:15, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:27 -0800, darrell pfeifer wrote: As

Re: filesystem

2012-02-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 18:10 -0800, darrell pfeifer wrote: If you want to respect people who are testing, then maybe there is something better than we don't have to exercise any care and we don't care, wink, wink, grin. There isn't anything in my request that seems difficult to do. The

[Bug 787170] New: perl-Test-Compile-0.15 is available

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Test-Compile-0.15 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787170 Summary: perl-Test-Compile-0.15 is available Product: Fedora

[Bug 787172] New: perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.72 is available

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.72 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787172 Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.72 is available Product:

[Bug 787170] perl-Test-Compile-0.15 is available

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787170 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

File WWW-Mechanize-1.72.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2012-02-03 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-WWW-Mechanize: 231709669de7d912185b91e454206532 WWW-Mechanize-1.72.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

File Test-Compile-0.15.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2012-02-03 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Compile: 346b0c3c8bd5effe52d13f11195359fa Test-Compile-0.15.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Test-Compile] 0.15 bump

2012-02-03 Thread Petr Pisar
commit ab574a999f8a5697141861911660fec341704214 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Feb 3 13:36:32 2012 +0100 0.15 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Test-Compile.spec | 37 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 18

[Bug 787170] perl-Test-Compile-0.15 is available

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787170 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[perl-WWW-Mechanize] Update to 1.72

2012-02-03 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 938b870c7cf755620de78c1bff0624e438999613 Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr Date: Fri Feb 3 15:33:43 2012 +0100 Update to 1.72 .gitignore |1 + perl-WWW-Mechanize.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7

File CPAN-Meta-2.120351.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Meta: f36aa9a8b1e8d870939c3abd7183ee04 CPAN-Meta-2.120351.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-CPAN-Meta] update to 2.120351

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 892a5775e79cb4ff451002d7f1dc64609b535bb2 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Sat Feb 4 08:18:28 2012 +0100 update to 2.120351 .gitignore |1 + perl-CPAN-Meta.spec |9 ++--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

File Eval-Closure-0.07.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Eval-Closure: 0d525de4f1fcbb95a48da5fa0a91911c Eval-Closure-0.07.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-CPAN-Meta/f16] (6 commits) ...update to 2.120351

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 487f9c8... update to 2.112621 (*) db774fe... update to latest version, which deprecated Version::Require (*) e2a51b6... Apply new source. (*) bb22066... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) 6733088... drop tests subpackage (*) 892a577...

[perl-HTML-FormHandler] update to 0.36002

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
commit b303bf94cc6a1ae60aa58019357cc9b249bf8c03 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Sat Feb 4 08:25:21 2012 +0100 update to 0.36002 .gitignore |1 + perl-HTML-FormHandler.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+),

File HTML-FormHandler-0.36002.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-FormHandler: e2071b069d755e5f38f20315a7bcccbe HTML-FormHandler-0.36002.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Eval-Closure] update to 0.07

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 2dd29b00ec030781cec89b772776eba31ed604f4 Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Sat Feb 4 08:21:29 2012 +0100 update to 0.07 .gitignore |1 + perl-Eval-Closure.spec | 24 sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 14

[perl-CPAN-Meta/f15] (6 commits) ...update to 2.120351

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 487f9c8... update to 2.112621 (*) db774fe... update to latest version, which deprecated Version::Require (*) e2a51b6... Apply new source. (*) bb22066... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) 6733088... drop tests subpackage (*) 892a577...

File MooseX-Getopt-0.39.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Getopt: f4e6ffb5794335eb6222dd822357687a MooseX-Getopt-0.39.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-MooseX-Getopt] update to 0.39

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
commit fada0517568513a24c967c9fd48a8045d0fdb86f Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Sat Feb 4 08:34:15 2012 +0100 update to 0.39 .gitignore |1 + perl-MooseX-Getopt.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

[perl-MooseX-Getopt/f16] (5 commits) ...update to 0.39

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
Summary of changes: 51e2413... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) bd7f025... update to 0.38 (*) 37bf354... rebuilt again for F17 mass rebuild (*) 8083a69... drop tests subpackage (*) fada051... update to 0.39 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another

File Version-Requirements-0.101022.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Version-Requirements: 74e8a660969e30ffbb64999806c0769c Version-Requirements-0.101022.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Version-Requirements] update to 0.101022

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 3d14227d118bba376f254ea223b4eef0818b149d Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com Date: Sat Feb 4 08:40:54 2012 +0100 update to 0.101022 .gitignore |1 + perl-Version-Requirements.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6

File Dist-Zilla-4.300007.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2012-02-03 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dist-Zilla: 38d33b25a9042aa4b93d398cab067dd2 Dist-Zilla-4.37.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: coverity 12488 Resource leak In attr_index_config()

2012-02-03 Thread Rich Megginson
From 9970496be27d5707330e15a4fde0705b88e1e195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:16:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] coverity 12488 Resource leak In attr_index_config(): Leak of memory or pointers to system resources need to free a in case of

Re: [389-devel] Please review: coverity 12488 Resource leak In attr_index_config()

2012-02-03 Thread Noriko Hosoi
Rich Megginson wrote: -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel ack. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #51: memory leaks in 389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el5?

2012-02-03 Thread Noriko Hosoi
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/51 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/51/0001-Trac-Ticket-51-memory-leaks-in-389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.patch Fix description: Ran valgrind with the MMR+SASL servers and fixed leaks found in the test. [plugin/replication/repl5_connection.c]