On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 22:43 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> Why not just drop the sponsorship process and just raise the barrier of
> entry for the packaging process instead?
>
> Like having to have been a comaintainer for atleast one release cycle
> then completed x many reviews in t
On 25/04/12 10:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:30 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed. If you're
using Fedora in production, I presume you're installing with
Kickstart.
It's worth noting that if the question is how does fi
On 04/25/2012 10:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
For a while now I have been working on a proposal for some changes to
both the way we elevate packagers to sponsors and what (to a small
extent) sponsors actually do. Please note that this is not a proposal
for any changes to how people are mad
> "KD" == Ken Dreyer writes:
KD> Looks good to me. I was unaware that sponsors are (currently) also
KD> provenpackagers. I've considered the idea of becoming a sponsor
KD> myself, but when I read the archived tickets where other people
KD> smarter than me have been denied, the barrier to entr
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> For a while now I have been working on a proposal for some changes to
> both the way we elevate packagers to sponsors and what (to a small
> extent) sponsors actually do. Please note that this is not a proposal
> for any changes to ho
For a while now I have been working on a proposal for some changes to
both the way we elevate packagers to sponsors and what (to a small
extent) sponsors actually do. Please note that this is not a proposal
for any changes to how people are made members of the packager group in
the first place and
On 04/24/2012 01:33 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> Times in various timezones:
>>
>> PDT: 2pm
>> CDT: 3pm
>> EDT: 4pm
>> UTC: 8pm
>> BST: 9pm
>> CST: 10pm
>
> Shouldn't that be
>
> PDT: 1pm
> MDT: 2pm
Yes, as I said on IRC I was going to make a
On 04/24/2012 12:27 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Let's have one of our "weekly" status calls tomorrow pm. I aim to send
> these reminders out more regularly so that we can get in the habit. If
> the times no longer work for those involved in the Fedora ARM project,
> please do let us know asap. Sadly,
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 14:39 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Hmm... I think that would be quite a bit more complicated. I don't
> think Xnest would be the right tool for that. I really don't know
> enough about X to guess. I would think that the build server probably
> runs without X and even if it cou
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/216
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/216/0001-Ticket-216-RFE-Disable-replication-agreements.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:15:45PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Here's the draft:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Testing
>>
>> Comments/additions welcomed!
>>
> Cool. Ive read the draft now. I thought it was going to be
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/04/12 19:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>
>> I...no, I was referring to cows. You know. The things which have four
>> legs, go moo, and dispense tasty, tasty milk.
>
>
> Ah right, we call it the fridge.
> Goes rrr every so often.
On 25/04/12 19:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
I...no, I was referring to cows. You know. The things which have four
legs, go moo, and dispense tasty, tasty milk.
Ah right, we call it the fridge.
Goes rrr every so often.
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 19:37 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/04/12 19:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 18:58 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >> On 25/04/12 17:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> which venerates the cow
> >>
> >> Ah, now Adam,
> >> As bad as she is you can't be calli
Josef Bacik wrote:
> Wow ok I would have thought after the stab-o-matic thing it would have
> been obvious I was kidding, Btrfs still has a little ways to go before
> it is as stable as Ext4, though we are getting closer. Thanks,
I see you don't have a sarcasm tag. Please take the one I've attach
On 25/04/12 19:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 18:58 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 25/04/12 17:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
which venerates the cow
Ah, now Adam,
As bad as she is you can't be calling anyone a cow ;)
Er...wha?
I thought you were calling the cow a "cow".
Whic
On 25/04/12 19:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
Its absence as an option in the interactive installer in F17 is a
regression, but an intentional one. See
http://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/release-notes/en-US/ , section
2.3.3:
2.3.3. btrfs
btrfs is not available as a target file system during install
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 18:58 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/04/12 17:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > which venerates the cow
>
> Ah, now Adam,
> As bad as she is you can't be calling anyone a cow ;)
Er...wha?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | id
Em 25 de abril de 2012 14:07, Adam Williamson escreveu:
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:33 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>
>> Note that I am a Mandriva employee and my major interest is to become
>> more aware of how Fedora works, so, I want to contribute like I did with
>> several oth
Hi all,
I'm orphaning papyon, since Empathy no longer uses telepathy-butterfly
for MSN support. papyon is pretty much dead upstream, but I believe a
few of the lesser known IM clients may still be using.
Thanks,
/B
--
Brian Pepple
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp
On 04/25/2012 06:22 PM, Chris wrote:
> 2012/4/25 Josef Bacik :
That's because Btrfs is way more stable than ext4,
>>>
>>> [citation needed]
>>>
>>
>> https://twitter.com/#!/josefbacik/status/195190540529184768
>
> Is this a joke? Btrfs more stable than ext4??? Not really???
I think the tongu
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.04.2012 18:03, schrieb Josef Bacik:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> +1. I'd like to see t
On 25/04/12 17:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
which venerates the cow
Ah, now Adam,
As bad as she is you can't be calling anyone a cow ;)
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 25.04.2012 18:03, schrieb Josef Bacik:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
+1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
>>> Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports b
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Chris wrote:
2012/4/25 Josef Bacik :
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:03 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Apr
Friends of ABRT, Quality Engineers, fellow testers -
There's a Test Day going on tomorrow, Thursday 2012-Apr-26:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-26_ABRT_and_deduplication_service
Looking at ABRT v2.0.10 (and related components) in Fedora 17 (see the
feature page at
https://fed
2012/4/25 Josef Bacik :
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Chris wrote:
>> 2012/4/25 Josef Bacik :
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:03 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz
> wrote:
> > On W
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Chris wrote:
> 2012/4/25 Josef Bacik :
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:03 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +
2012/4/25 Josef Bacik :
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:03 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>> >> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít O
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 09:03 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Matthias Runge
> wrote:
> > On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
> > Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
>
> It's deferr
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:33 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> Note that I am a Mandriva employee and my major interest is to become
> more aware of how Fedora works, so, I want to contribute like I did with
> several other projects in the past, that is, after work at home and/or
> w
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:30 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed. If you're
> using Fedora in production, I presume you're installing with
> Kickstart.
It's worth noting that if the question is how does firewalld handle
upgrades, I think it may b
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 13:59 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 23 April 2012 14:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm not against release names because some people are supposed to have
> > been offended by the words 'Beefy Miracle'
>
> I don't know about offended, it just sounds silly.
Some who
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:59 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> It's not about anaconda specifically, it's about having a standard
> installer experience across all PAs to the extent technically sensible.
> Maybe something else will supplant anaconda in time.
FWIW, in writing the QA release crite
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:03 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> >> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> >> > +1. I'd
Hello all!
I'm trying to package Fest for Fedora, and I need a sponsor for this
first package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816264
This is my first package, but I'm not new to Fedora, I recently joined
Red Hat, after many year of Free Software work with other companies,
I've been
commit 387342c8e0fe3f903259516c5731faeff7bbc834
Author: Julian C. Dunn
Date: Wed Apr 25 12:29:15 2012 -0400
Upgrade to 3.18002
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-Twitter.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff -
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Twitter:
6bb5ffa27023ed854841bc80b0ee4797 Net-Twitter-3.18002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:03 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> >> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> > +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
> >> Yes, me too. Afaik,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> > +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
>> Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
>
> For a
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:15:45PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Here's the draft:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Testing
>
> Comments/additions welcomed!
>
Cool. Ive read the draft now. I thought it was going to be about using
Xnest with graphical unittests. Oops. Doesn't 100%
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> Hi, a new cfistio package (3.300) as landed in rawhide. Packages
> depending on cfitsio should be rebuilt.
soname bumps should be announced in advance, ideally.
-J
> --
> Sergio Pascual http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr +34 91 394 5018
Hi, a new cfistio package (3.300) as landed in rawhide. Packages
depending on cfitsio should be rebuilt.
--
Sergio Pascual http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr +34 91 394 5018
gpg fingerprint: 5203 B42D 86A0 5649 410A F4AC A35F D465 F263 BCCC
Departamento de Astrofísica -- Universidad Complutense
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.2()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpm.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i686 requires librpmio.so.2
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i6
commit af34c75358aad7b813795c2aac12c7c5eeb536b1
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Apr 25 17:07:56 2012 +0200
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-constant-defer.spec | 57 ++
sources |1 +
3 files changed, 59 insertio
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:34:07PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
> Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
For added laughs, SLES does not support read-write ext4. Ext4 read-
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-constant-defer:
519232b64896395b84b41f5300d1cab3 constant-defer-5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:39:20AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Ok, I'll have to look at the CD issue. Can you report the initramfs
> problem?
Figured out the CD problem, I'll push a fix to git. Looking at the
initramfs problem now.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 10:09 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 20:58 -0400, Anthony Green wrote:
> > Sorry folks -- thanks for untagging. I'll ping the list again after May 9,
> > as was suggested earlier in this thread.
>
> Here's a lightly tested patch which implements my sugg
I plan on importing exiv2-0.23 into rawhide soon'ish. It includes an
ABI bump, so dependent packages will require rebuilding, including:
calligra
darktable
entangle
geeqie
gipfel
gnome-color-manager
gnome-commander
gpscorrelate
gthumb
gwenview
hugin
immix
kde-runtime
krename
libextractor
libgexi
On 04/24/2012 10:20 PM, John Reiser wrote:
Choosing the Windows logo gets a VGA-like display (black with white
character-cell text):
1.
2.
3.
Select CD-ROM Boot Type :
and there is no response to console keyboard. So FAIL again.
Even though this disc is wrong for that machine, so th
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> On 25.4.2012 15:05, Peter Jones wrote:
>>
>> On 04/24/2012 05:14 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>>> I can keep only 3-5last releases in my poor head.
>>
>>
>> Then just *don't*. F14 is the past. Let it go.
>
>
> Tell it to Mythdora which is ba
On 25.4.2012 15:05, Peter Jones wrote:
On 04/24/2012 05:14 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I can keep only 3-5last releases in my poor head.
Then just *don't*. F14 is the past. Let it go.
Tell it to Mythdora which is based on Fedora Cambridge.
Or RaspberryPi remix which is based on Fedora Laughl
On 04/24/2012 05:14 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I can keep only 3-5last releases in my poor head.
Then just *don't*. F14 is the past. Let it go.
--
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Matthias Runge
wrote:
> On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
> Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
It's deferred. There's still no viable btrfs.fsck. I believe you can
create
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Kévin Raymond
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jeremy Sanders
> wrote:
>> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nice to have a third option:
>>> -Change release names to release theme.
>>>
>>> We don't really need a name (IMO), but the theme adds
On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de
Compose started at Wed Apr 25 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[aeolus-configserver]
aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch require
Kévin Raymond wrote:
> Many Linux distributions are identified by a color.
> I would personally hate to have a purple, green or orange background…
I wouldn't use the colour as the basis of the whole theme, but use it in a
tasteful manner in highlights, etc.
Jeremy
--
http://jeremysanders.net/
Summary of changes:
e2b5365... make module Kwalitee conditional on distribution (*)
21741bc... Simplify Test::Kwalitee conditional (*)
3271923... Update to 1.48 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jeremy Sanders
wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> It would be nice to have a third option:
>> -Change release names to release theme.
>>
>> We don't really need a name (IMO), but the theme adds a nice touch.
>
> A colour would be a nice clear release theme.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jeremy Sanders
wrote:
> Amaranth -> Blue -> Celadon -> ...
>
> See e.g http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colors
>
> There shouldn't be any major internationalisation issues,
Well, two out of the three have no equivalent in Czech language. That
doesn't prevent
commit 327192316b956f52de8894f2125b651362f9fcf3
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Apr 25 10:00:13 2012 +0100
Update to 1.48
- New upstream release 1.48
- removed unneeded Debian_CPANTS.txt from MANIFEST
- fixed incorrect documentation about the best way to call CTX_set_opt
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSLeay:
4e10d9da28f26732e37807820bf72af5 Net-SSLeay-1.48.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> It would be nice to have a third option:
> -Change release names to release theme.
>
> We don't really need a name (IMO), but the theme adds a nice touch.
A colour would be a nice clear release theme. You could even increment the
first letter of the colour for each
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 25/04/12 03:46, Brendan Jones wrote:
>>
>> I fully agree. We need to help the design team out,
>
>
> Agree, give ideas
>
>
> Drop the name
>>
>> but lets vote on a theme
>
>
> No,
> I think it should all be left to the design them.
> (with
Dne 25.4.2012 09:30, Chris Murphy napsal(a):
No installation type lists btrfs as an option for / or /home, whether LVM is
checked or unchecked.
Is this still being worked on? Or is this how it will be for release?
+1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
Vit
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
No installation type lists btrfs as an option for / or /home, whether LVM is
checked or unchecked.
Is this still being worked on? Or is this how it will be for release?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 25/04/12 03:46, Brendan Jones wrote:
I fully agree. We need to help the design team out,
Agree, give ideas
Drop the name
but lets vote on a theme
No,
I think it should all be left to the design them.
(with advice from legal, if necessary)
Not in a "let them do the work", but more of a
t
69 matches
Mail list logo
