Bodhi issues

2012-08-11 Thread Orion Poplawski
I just got: 500 Internal error The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request. Powered by CherryPy 2.3.0 submitting a karma update to an update. It did take something because I got email(s) of my comments -- Orion Poplawski Technical

Doesn’t LDD break no-content rule?

2012-08-11 Thread Matej Cepl
According to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ldd-pdf is Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format Isn't it breaking https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content ? Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: OK, so we have https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via systemctl enable --force xyzdm.service But, how to handle upgrades? (or is this case

Re: Doesn’t LDD break no-content rule?

2012-08-11 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
MC == Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com writes: MC Isn't it breaking MC https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content MC ? Maybe you should tell us why you believe it is. I don't see how it violates any of the rules for content. - J -- devel mailing list

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:27:28 -0500 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I'm sure I did something wrong but I'm not exactly sure what I was supposed to do... Due to Boost 1.50 I had a chain of libraries that needed rebuilding: blender - OpenImageIO - Field3D I've been able to

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:27:28 -0500 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I'm sure I did something wrong but I'm not exactly sure what I was supposed to do... Due to Boost 1.50 I had a chain of libraries that needed

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 11.08.12 11:23, Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) wrote: OK, so we have https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via systemctl enable --force xyzdm.service But, how to handle

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 11.08.12 21:54, alekc...@googlemail.com (alekc...@googlemail.com) wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: OK, so we have https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via systemctl enable --force

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:36:45 -0500 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: What!?!?! Ok, I know I wasn't seeing things yesterday. I KNOW it was in f18-candidate otherwise OpenImageIO wouldn't have failed to build. Must have gotten moved somehow? I can't think of any reason it would have...

Re: New bodhi release in production

2012-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:20:35 +0200 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Luke Macken wrote: - The submitter of an update can no longer effect the karma (Till Maas) Uh, last I checked, FESCo had agreed that this should NOT be enforced by the software because it is legitimate for the

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread alekcejk
Lennart Poettering wrote: On Sat, 11.08.12 21:54, alekc...@googlemail.com (alekc...@googlemail.com) wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: OK, so we have https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice,

Re: Doesn’t LDD break no-content rule?

2012-08-11 Thread Matěj Cepl
(sorry, once more, this time to the correct address) On 11/08/12 23:03, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Maybe you should tell us why you believe it is. I don't see how it violates any of the rules for content. I thought that the rule is that Fedora packages shouldn't contain just a pure

Re: Doesn’t LDD break no-content rule?

2012-08-11 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
MC == Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com writes: MC (sorry, once more, this time to the correct address) And now a public reply MC I thought that the rule is that Fedora packages shouldn't contain MC just a pure content. That is incorrect, pretty obviously if you think about it. I mean, how is

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2012-08-11 Thread buildsys
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

2012-08-11 Thread buildsys
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC

2012-08-11 Thread buildsys
perl-Alien-SeleniumRC has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server On i386: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-2.92-1.fc18.noarch requires selenium-server Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl

Broken dependencies: perl-Authen-Simple

2012-08-11 Thread buildsys
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Broken dependencies: cpanspec

2012-08-11 Thread buildsys
cpanspec has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On x86_64: cpanspec-1.78-6.el6.noarch requires perl(Parse::CPAN::Packages) On i386: cpanspec-1.78-6.el6.noarch requires perl(Parse::CPAN::Packages) On ppc64: cpanspec-1.78-6.el6.noarch requires

Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData

2012-08-11 Thread buildsys
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora

Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData

2012-08-11 Thread buildsys
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora