On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:19:34AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > Can you file a bug for this please so we can keep track of it in case this
> > breaks something? You almost certainly also want the fix to fdo #55738
> > http://lists.x.org
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Simon Wesp
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Sven Lankes wrote:
> SL> Fife is already in Fedora!
>
> Am Sonntag, 28 Oktober 2012 14:29:23 schrieb Renich Bon Ciric:
> RBC> Yeah, not the latest... check the versions of my spec vs current
> RBC> one.
>
> Who
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 19:03 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Sven Lankes wrote:
> > > > mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
> > > > which is usu
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Sven Lankes wrote:
> > > mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
> > > which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
> > > be interesting
Am 30.10.2012 02:21, schrieb Tom Lane:
> Reindl Harald writes:
>> i doubt MariaDb would be interface-compatible in most cases
>> BUT not binary comatible as you can also not replace MySQL 5.1
>> against MySQL 5.5 without compat-packages (remi did outside
>> fedora-packages) as long depending pack
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 02:14 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.10.2012 02:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> >> don't get me wrong but where is subtlety necessary here?
> >>
> >> * mysql-libs is a widely used and linked library
> >> * postfix/sendmail/exim is a binary with alternative symlinks
> >>
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 21:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Reindl Harald writes:
> > i doubt MariaDb would be interface-compatible in most cases
> > BUT not binary comatible as you can also not replace MySQL 5.1
> > against MySQL 5.5 without compat-packages (remi did outside
> > fedora-packages) as lon
Reindl Harald writes:
> i doubt MariaDb would be interface-compatible in most cases
> BUT not binary comatible as you can also not replace MySQL 5.1
> against MySQL 5.5 without compat-packages (remi did outside
> fedora-packages) as long depending packages are linked against
> a specific version
Am 30.10.2012 02:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
>> don't get me wrong but where is subtlety necessary here?
>>
>> * mysql-libs is a widely used and linked library
>> * postfix/sendmail/exim is a binary with alternative symlinks
>>
>> different worlds
>> different implications
>
> You're entirely m
Am 30.10.2012 01:58, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Well, we could also take the approach we take with MTAs; have a set of
>>> generic virtual Provides for MySQL-alikes and have all the MySQL-alikes
>>> we package Provide these, as well as P
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 02:03 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.10.2012 01:58, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>> Well, we could also take the approach we take with MTAs; have a set of
> >>> generic virtual Provides for MySQL-alikes and hav
Am 30.10.2012 01:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Sven Lankes wrote:
>>> mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
>>> which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
>>> be interesting.
>>
>> Uh, conflicting
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 13:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > On 10/29/2012 01:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> At this point, I would like to gather people interested in 3D printing
> >> and eventually create a 3D printing SIG.
> >> Would anyone
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:20 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.10.2012 01:08, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> > On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Sven Lankes wrote:
> >>> mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
> >>> which is usually not allowed in fed
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 15:43 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 16:15 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > Il giorno lun, 29/10/2012 alle 09.05 -0500, David Lehman ha scritto:
> > > Just select that device and enter the desired mountpoint without
> > > changing the filesystem type or activa
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 23:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sven Lankes wrote:
> > mariadb will need to conflict with the default mysql packages
> > which is usually not allowed in fedora. So this is going to
> > be interesting.
>
> Uh, conflicting with MySQL is really a no go (just look at how many
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:50:32 -0400 (EDT)
David Vossel wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> I'm David Vossel.
...snip...
> tl:dr - I worked on Asterisk for a few years. Now I work on Fedora's
> High Availability stack. I need a sponsor to add me to the packager
> group.
I've sponsored you in. ;)
Andrew Beekh
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Jiri Eischmann" , "Development discussions related
> to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 10:13:20 PM
> Subject: Re: 3D printing in Fedora
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:02:17PM -0400, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > I think the ti
How accurate are these numbers? I know I've downloaded the XFCE spin at
least 8 times from different computers on different networks and that
counter hasn't even gone up by 1. The torrent reports just under 600 for
the "downloaded" count as well.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Matthew Miller wro
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:02:17PM -0400, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> I think the time to discuss if a spin is needed or not hasn't come yet.
> Now, the primary goal should be to get all the tool in Fedora. When that's
> done, they should probably go for a package group to give users an easy
> way to i
- Original Message -
> From: "Tomas Radej"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 7:31:37 PM
> Subject: Re: 3D printing in Fedora
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:15:06 +0100
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > > I'm not sure that a separate 3d printing spin mak
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 16:15 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 29/10/2012 alle 09.05 -0500, David Lehman ha scritto:
> > Just select that device and enter the desired mountpoint without
> > changing the filesystem type or activating the "Reformat"
> > checkbutton.
>
> Where is the "Reform
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:42:42 +0100
Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> thank you for taking care of this. I am not interested in EPEL,
> sorry. I don't use it and I would have no way of testing the packages.
ok. Hopefully someone else will step up there...
I've switched things for the Fedora
Hi :)
I'm David Vossel.
First off I have an ulterior motive with this self introduction I'd like to get
out of the way quickly. I need a package sponsor. I have volunteered to help
maintain both the pacemaker and libqb upstream packages but need someone to and
add me to the packager group be
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 01:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> At this point, I would like to gather people interested in 3D printing
>> and eventually create a 3D printing SIG.
>> Would anyone be interested and help me?
>
> I'm interested! I'm not sure that
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I am involved in a student group on FIT of Czech Technical University in
Prague - in that group, we focus on 3D printing (RepRap).
At this point, I would like to gather people interested in 3D printing
and eventually create a 3D printing SIG.
Would any
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:15:06 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > I'm not sure that a separate 3d printing spin makes a lot of sense
> Well, it makes for me.
> Lot's of memebers of our group at university asks me: What Linux
> distro should I grap for 3D printing?
> If we have a 3D printing spin, I
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Sven Lankes wrote:
SL> Fife is already in Fedora!
Am Sonntag, 28 Oktober 2012 14:29:23 schrieb Renich Bon Ciric:
RBC> Yeah, not the latest... check the versions of my spec vs current
RBC> one.
Who cares about your package on your fedora share? I mean, it doesn't
Hi,
> I'm not sure that a separate 3d printing spin makes a lot of sense
Well, it makes for me.
Lot's of memebers of our group at university asks me: What Linux
distro should I grap for 3D printing?
If we have a 3D printing spin, I could point them directly to that.
> I'm wondering what sort of p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870407
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
Package rt3-3.8.15-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --e
On 10/29/2012 01:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> At this point, I would like to gather people interested in 3D printing
> and eventually create a 3D printing SIG.
> Would anyone be interested and help me?
I'm interested! I'm not sure that a separate 3d printing spin makes a
lot of sense, but packagin
Hi,
I am involved in a student group on FIT of Czech Technical University in
Prague - in that group, we focus on 3D printing (RepRap).
3D printing needs a set of software on a control PC, such as some kind
of 3D modeller (we're currently using OpenSCAD), a slicer (to convert a
3D model to set of
W dniu 2012-10-29 15:55, Kevin Fenzi pisze:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:01:10 +0200
Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 18.10.2012 19:41, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Hi list,
I have been unsuccessful in trying to contact Victor Bogado:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770887
Old raw-thumbnailer i
FYI, branched composes were not completing since the 24th.
This is the compose that has the final stable pushes before freeze in
it.
There aren't going to be any usable images in it, but hopefully I will
get that fixed for tomorrow.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel m
Compose started at Mon Oct 29 09:15:35 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl
[dnf]
dnf-0.2.14-2.git4831982.fc18.noarch requires python-hawkey >=
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:01:10 +0200
Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 18.10.2012 19:41, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I have been unsuccessful in trying to contact Victor Bogado:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770887
> > Old raw-thumbnailer is not only non-functional,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> Can you file a bug for this please so we can keep track of it in case this
> breaks something? You almost certainly also want the fix to fdo #55738
> http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-October/034062.html
Thanks, filed as https://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/29/2012 05:39 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2012-10-29, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
>> On 10/28/2012 04:08 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: Is there any RPM-fu I
>> can use to extract the ownership and permissions from the package
>> for comparison?
>>
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 01:06 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 16/10/2012 alle 13.22 -0500, David Lehman ha scritto:
> > Repeat for swap. (Hint: enter "swap" as the mountpoint
> > when adding the device initially)
> >
> Ok, thanks, this steps work with a TC6.
>
> There is a method to use
On 10/29/2012 02:18 PM, Clément David wrote:
Hi folks,
Would anyone want to swap reviews? I need "scirenderer[1]" reviewed in
order to update scilab to the latest (5.4.0) version.
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
Thanks,
I can take this if you'd like to take on
https:
Hi folks,
Would anyone want to swap reviews? I need "scirenderer[1]" reviewed in
order to update scilab to the latest (5.4.0) version.
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
Thanks,
--
Clément David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
Compose started at Mon Oct 29 08:15:06 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LabPlot]
LabPlot-1.6.0.2-12.fc18.i686 requires libaudiofile.so.0
LabPlot-1.6.0.2-12.fc18.x86_64 requires libaudiofile.so.0()(64bit)
[PyKDE]
PyK
On 2012-10-29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 10/28/2012 04:08 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Is there any RPM-fu I can use to extract the ownership and permissions
> from the package for comparison?
>
rpm -q -lv -p foo.rpm
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
On 10/29/2012 04:14 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Ah, thank you for this! ;)
That contributor looks to have (temporarily?) left Fedora; if you want
to go ahead and submit a review request, I'd be happy to review.
That is correct, Nelson has left Fedora. He mentioned Manuel Mausz
looking
44 matches
Mail list logo
