On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 22:13 +0100, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> Bill Peck schreef, Op 30-11-2012 16:00:
> >
> > I did. :-)
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881846
>
> My problem is more like this one:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818291
Ha, just as I guessed. As
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 16:52 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 29/11/2012 alle 17.21 +, Frank Murphy ha scritto:
> > I used fedup earlier today, to successfully upgrade from F17+
> > 3rd Party repos to F18 as described here:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp
>
> My f17 test sys
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 17:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Ven 30 novembre 2012 15:11, Mark Bidewell a écrit :
> > I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
> > RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
> > components.
>
> You need to c
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 09:35 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0100, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> > Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
>
> I can't answer the _detailed_ part of your question, but, F18
> has version 1.0.4 of the open source Nouveau driver, whe
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 13:30 +0100, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> Op 30-11-2012 12:34, Andreas Tunek schreef:
> >
> > Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to
> > be fixed?
> >
>
> No I haven't reported a bug, sorry. I upgraded from f14 to f17 (via
> f16). I searched the
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 12:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:42:15AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> > > I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing
> > > features or critical path components". What's the threshold for
> > > defaults? (LVM, for a spe
I have created new Fedora 18 Beta repo. This repo has both x86_64
and i686 in it. You can install via my repo rpm
yum install
http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/18/enlightenment-repo-0.0.3-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
And then try out enlightenment. I tested the x86_64 i just have not
had
Bill Peck schreef, Op 30-11-2012 16:00:
I did. :-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881846
My problem is more like this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818291
regards,
--
Erwin Waterlander
http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:07:34PM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I maintain IDJC [1], which depends on libshout. The latest version
> though depends on libshout-idjc a fork of the original library, since
> the idjc upstream developer wanted some extra functionality on libshout
> and didn't
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Nikos Roussos
wrote:
> **
> Hi,
>
> I maintain IDJC [1], which depends on libshout. The latest version though
> depends on libshout-idjc a fork of the original library, since the idjc
> upstream developer wanted some extra functionality on libshout and didn't
> wan
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:38:29PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 12:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code.
> >I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it.
> >
> >For details including search syntax, please see:
>
>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:42:15AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> > I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing
> > features or critical path components". What's the threshold for
> > defaults? (LVM, for a specific example.) What's the threshold for a
> > change to a critic
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 04:37:47PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> %file
> ...
> %dif /opt/companydirs
%files
...
%dir
:-)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software insi
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 03:28:52PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I'd love to see the feature process to be turned opposite, i.e. make
> the feature auto-approved as default. It could look like:
In general, features _have_ been approved by default, so in practice, this
isn't a major change. It partic
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing features
> > or
> > critical path components". What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM, for a
> > specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a critical
Le Ven 30 novembre 2012 15:11, Mark Bidewell a écrit :
> I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
> RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
> components.
You need to create those directories in %install and have your package own
them in
Hi,
FESCo on 2012-11-28 meeting agreed to initially target an end-of-May
release with an end-of-February branch date, but may adjust outwards
depending on submitted features [1].
The Feature Submission Deadline is now set to 2013-01-29 and the F19
submission period window is open [2].
Schedule wi
Il giorno gio, 29/11/2012 alle 17.21 +, Frank Murphy ha scritto:
> I used fedup earlier today, to successfully upgrade from F17+
> 3rd Party repos to F18 as described here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp
My f17 test system, on a kvm/qemu virtual machine, is install into a LVM
encrypte
Quoting Mark Bidewell (2012-11-30 16:21:20)
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why are you creating these directories in %post in the firs place?
> >
> > If you create them in %install (empty) and own them regularly in %file and
> > do the same on
> > the oth
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Well fair enough, but at the moment these have to go through the
> feature process, which is extremely cumbersome for a routine upgrade.
>
> Take a look at:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GHC741
>
> That's a huge amount of
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing features or
> critical path components". What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM, for a
> specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a critical path
> component?
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:32 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> Lacks clarification on what's considered an feature.
The proposal continues to use the current wide definition - it only
treats some differently.
> Arguably it should be mandatory for feature owners to provide or work with
On Friday 30 of November 2012 14:15:11, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> For what it's worth, I just upgraded with "fedup" and my keyboard went from
> UK English to US English. Just used system-config-keyboard to change it and
> that seemed to work ...
I tried that and the change was not persistent. At
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why are you creating these directories in %post in the firs place?
>
> If you create them in %install (empty) and own them regularly in %file and
> do the same on
> the other packages that install thins on it, they will be properly
On 11/30/2012 07:30 AM, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Op 30-11-2012 12:34, Andreas Tunek schreef:
Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to
be fixed?
No I haven't reported a bug, sorry. I upgraded from f14 to f17 (via
f16). I searched the internet for solutions and f
Hi,
Why are you creating these directories in %post in the firs place?
If you create them in %install (empty) and own them regularly in %file and do
the same on
the other packages that install thins on it, they will be properly removed when
the last
RPM that owns them go away.
Regards,
Fernan
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:38:36 -0500,
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Mark Bidewell wrote:
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
components. If I yum remo
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:38:29PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 12:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code.
> >I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it.
> >
> >For details including search syntax, please see:
>
>
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:11:54 -0500,
Mark Bidewell wrote:
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
components. If I yum remove the main package it will be erased first by
yum prior to erasi
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
> RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
> components. If I yum remove the main package it will be erased first by
> yum prior to
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0100, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
I can't answer the _detailed_ part of your question, but, F18
has version 1.0.4 of the open source Nouveau driver, where as F17 shipped
with a git snapshot named '0.0.16-34.20110720gitb
Dne 28.11.2012 21:08, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
Hello,
this proposal was recently linked in various places, so let's formally
introduce it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Feature_process
This an incremental change, not a major overhaul designed to solve all problems.
The benefits
On 30 November 2012 12:33, Jan Včelák wrote:
>
> If 'localectl' is the only supported way, we should add this information to
> "Upgrading Fedora using yum" instructions on the wiki. The same with old
> kernel options. (I do not know how is this handled in the other upgrade
> methods.)
>
> If the
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
components. If I yum remove the main package it will be erased first by
yum prior to erasing the dependent packages. When the uninstall scripts
for the dep
On Friday 30 of November 2012 14:06:03, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> I guess now is used /etc/vconsole.conf. Could you add it into upgrade
> page if it works for you?
> Imho it's related to my previous question:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/963
OK, I added an additional step to the instru
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:29:52 -0500,
Martin Preisler wrote:
Hi,
I want to push Ogre 1.8.1 into rawhide next week. This will most likely break some packages
but we have a lots and lots of time to fix it all up in rawhide. The changes in Ogre API
aren't extensive enough for this to be a rea
On 11/30/2012 12:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code.
I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it.
For details including search syntax, please see:
I managed to copy&paste a UTF8 BOM onto the end of the previous URL.
Not sure
Hi,
I want to push Ogre 1.8.1 into rawhide next week. This will most likely break
some packages but we have a lots and lots of time to fix it all up in rawhide.
The changes in Ogre API aren't extensive enough for this to be a real risk and
we can always revert. The most common break is
Ogre::Si
Compose started at Fri Nov 30 09:15:40 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-3.fc18
gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.80-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
0c9239e... Update to 1.80
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.80-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
0c9239e... Update to 1.80
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev
On 11/30/2012 01:33 PM, Jan Včelák wrote:
Hello list,
what is the expected way of handling X11 keyboard layouts in Fedora 18?
I don't use xorg.conf, the configuration was autodetected from
/etc/sysconfig/keyboard (probably) till F17 and it worked just fine. After
upgrading to F18 using yum meth
Hello list,
what is the expected way of handling X11 keyboard layouts in Fedora 18?
I don't use xorg.conf, the configuration was autodetected from
/etc/sysconfig/keyboard (probably) till F17 and it worked just fine. After
upgrading to F18 using yum method, my keyboard layout stopped working.
S
Op 30-11-2012 12:34, Andreas Tunek schreef:
Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to
be fixed?
No I haven't reported a bug, sorry. I upgraded from f14 to f17 (via
f16). I searched the internet for solutions and found that this problem
exists since f15. Therefor
Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code.
I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it.
For details including search syntax, please see:
http://www.pixelbeat.org/docs/fedora_source.html
thanks,
Pádraig.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
On 30 November 2012 11:34, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to be
> fixed?
>
> On Nov 30, 2012 12:10 PM, "Ian Malone" wrote:
>>
>> On 30 November 2012 10:58, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Has the Nvidia driver been improved in
Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to be
fixed?
On Nov 30, 2012 12:10 PM, "Ian Malone" wrote:
> On 30 November 2012 10:58, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
> >
> > I have an Nvidia GeForce GT220. When I upgraded f
On 30 November 2012 10:58, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
>
> I have an Nvidia GeForce GT220. When I upgraded from f14 to f16 and then to
> f17 I had to go through a lot of trouble, because Anaconda gave me a black
> screen every time between 1 and 5
I also have a nvidia device in fc17x86_64. Using fedup-cli to update I have
issues;
[root@fedora17desk ~]# fedup-cli --network 18 --debuglog fedupdebug.log
--instrepo
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/18-Beta/Fedora/x86_64/os
setting up repos...
instrepo
Hi,
Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
I have an Nvidia GeForce GT220. When I upgraded from f14 to f16 and then
to f17 I had to go through a lot of trouble, because Anaconda gave me a
black screen every time between 1 and 5 minutes. I had to do many
reboots to continue the installati
Il giorno ven, 30/11/2012 alle 06.16 +, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
> On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 12:28 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
>
> >
> > Sounds like a plan, hopefully it won't be too difficult to figure out.
>
> I was just out of space in Hard Disk, correctly writes package
> foo needs 100M etc
51 matches
Mail list logo
