Christoph Wickert wrote:
> How many DE actually to this? GNOME does, not sure about KDE, Sugar or
> Mate, but inhibit support seems to be the exception and not the rule
> Xfce and LXDE do not yet support it, so power management on these DEs is
> broken by default.
>
> A change that affects all de
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:18:36 -0500
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> wrote:
> > On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
> > And we are supposed to QA this how?
>
> Lik
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:18:56 -0800
Mahrud S wrote:
> I know that Slax Linux used to have this feature. You could just
> choose the modules that you want on the website and download a custom
> live iso with those packages! But that feature is disabled
> now, perhaps because they use a new module sy
On 01/09/2013 05:10 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm on this idea and see if it can
On 01/08/2013 09:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm on this idea and see if it can be beaten
into a plan/schedule/feature, or if
On Jan 8, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 02:43:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> We did (try to...) convert installs from grub to grub2 when we did that
>> migration in Fedora...16?...when using the 'official upgrade
>> path' (anaconda, at the time), so tha
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT, 19:00 CEST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #896 Refine Feature process
The Fedora ARM team is pleased to announce that the Fedora 18 Beta release
for ARM is now available for download from:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/18-Beta/Images/
The Beta release includes pre-built images for Versatile Express (QEMU),
Trimslice (Tegra), Pand
update: definitely works.
It's pretty neat to have a live usb with the exact programs that you like
ready in your pocket!
How can you create an iso on the fly that fast?!
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Mahrud S wrote:
> I know that Slax Linux used to have this feature. You could just choose
> t
I know that Slax Linux used to have this feature. You could just choose the
modules that you want on the website and download a custom live iso with
those packages! But that feature is disabled now, perhaps
because they use a new module system now.
Ah, here: http://old.slax.org/build.php
I'm not s
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
> And we are supposed to QA this how?
Like any software?
I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 02:43:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> We did (try to...) convert installs from grub to grub2 when we did that
> migration in Fedora...16?...when using the 'official upgrade
> path' (anaconda, at the time), so that precedent suggests we should do
> the same for EFI. If n
On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
And we are supposed to QA this how?
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/07/2013 10:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 19:49 +, alex...@hushmail.com wrote:
On 07/01/2013 at 7:40 PM, "Matthias Clasen" wrote:
- Original Message -
And is it possible to disable suspend on lid close but still have
GNOME lock the screen on lid close?
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 12:33 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>
> > What package is responsible for writing the file /etc/default/grub?
> Because a prior EFI system with grub-efi, which of course doesn't have
> an /etc/default/grub, doesn't have it af
Nothing's using this in F18, and upstream is very much dormant. I don't
want to maintain it and I'd honestly prefer people use gupnp, so I'm
tossing ushare to the wolves. If nobody claims it in a week I'll
deadpackage it.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message par
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:20:41PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 08:28:03PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
>
> > I'll agree that most users probably don't verify their DVD images as it
> > takes some manual work to do it properly, so that's another weak link,
> > but the possibi
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 02:03:31PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:16:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >>> cp /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grubx64.e
On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:16:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> cp /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grubx64.efi
>>> /boot/efi/EFI/System/Library/CoreServices/boot.efi
>>> grub2-mkconfig -o
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 08:28:03PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> I'll agree that most users probably don't verify their DVD images as it
> takes some manual work to do it properly, so that's another weak link,
> but the possibility does exist for those of us who care enough about
> our security.
On 08/01/2013 at 6:46 AM, "Bastien Nocera" wrote:
>
>On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 19:49 +, alex...@hushmail.com wrote:
>> On 07/01/2013 at 7:40 PM, "Matthias Clasen"
>wrote:
>> >
>> >- Original Message -
>> >
>> >> And is it possible to disable suspend on lid close but still
>have
>> >> GN
> From: Kevin Fenzi
>
> Greetings.
>
> I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
> something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
> fudcon session to brainstorm on this idea and see if it can be beaten
> into a plan/schedule/feature, or if it's not
On 01/08/2013 08:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:07 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
Surely we must have some kind of "omg we cant release with this
component in final it's utterly broken or posses security risk!" fail
safe mechanism in place to deal with this?
Do any o
Greetings.
I've whipped up the early ideas of a way to replace (most) spins with
something that is more generic and useful. I have signed up for a
fudcon session to brainstorm on this idea and see if it can be beaten
into a plan/schedule/feature, or if it's not going to work for whatever
reason.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:07 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>>> Surely we must have some kind of "omg we cant release with this
>>> component in final it's utterly broken or posses security risk!" fail
>>> safe mechanism in place to deal with this?
>>
>> Do any of these packages pose a high sec
On 01/08/2013 07:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:39:10 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
This may come as an completely stupid question but given that we have
not released yet why cant we remove those packages?
Because we are in the very last stages of final freeze.
Any ch
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:39:10 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> This may come as an completely stupid question but given that we have
> not released yet why cant we remove those packages?
Because we are in the very last stages of final freeze.
Any changes at all can cause consequences we c
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 10:36:18 Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/QXLKMSSupport
No, this feature has nothing to do with Windows. You can get Windows guest
drivers including a RH-signed QXL driver from here:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/virtio-win/latest/im
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> = Features/NodeJS =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS
>
> From Summary:
>> The Node.js JavaScript runtime and associated ecosystem, including the npm
>> package manager.
On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:16:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> cp /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grubx64.efi
>> /boot/efi/EFI/System/Library/CoreServices/boot.efi
>> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg
>
> Make sure that the config i
On 2013-01-08 14:26, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 08:16 PM, Yannick Brosseau wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have one pending package review that I would like to swap:
>>
>> babeltrace - Trace Viewer and Converter, mainly for the Common Trace
>> Format (LTTng)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
On 1/8/13, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> I thought Lubomir Rintel a.k.a lkundrak had been working on this [1]?
>
> Was he not contacted either?
The last time he was contacted (during my original packaging effort)
regarding it he said he was "disgusted" with it and since FESCo
recently reassign
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:16:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> cp /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grubx64.efi
> /boot/efi/EFI/System/Library/CoreServices/boot.efi
> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg
Make sure that the config is using linuxefi and initrdefi, not linux and
initrd.
--
Matthe
On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> What package is responsible for writing the file /etc/default/grub? Because a
> prior EFI system with grub-efi, which of course doesn't have an
> /etc/default/grub, doesn't have it after a fedup upgrade, and still doesn't
> have it after manu
Peter Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 05:46:04PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> > In my opinion, if Anaconda finds that it was booted without Secure
> > Boot, then it should assume that the user has verified the checksum on
> > the installation image and that the keys therein are therefore tr
On 01/08/2013 08:16 PM, Yannick Brosseau wrote:
Hi,
I have one pending package review that I would like to swap:
babeltrace - Trace Viewer and Converter, mainly for the Common Trace
Format (LTTng)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
Thanks,
Yannick
I'll take this if you can t
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Features/NodeJS =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS
From Summary:
> The Node.js JavaScript runtime and associated ecosystem, including the npm
> package manager.
Could you describe more detail the interaction of npm and rp
What package is responsible for writing the file /etc/default/grub? Because a
prior EFI system with grub-efi, which of course doesn't have an
/etc/default/grub, doesn't have it after a fedup upgrade, and still doesn't
have it after manually installing either the grub2 or grub2-efi packages.
I d
Fedora 17, EFI booting with grub-efi And then I used Fedup to update, which
went fine, and still uses grub legacy efi.
To upgrade to grub2-efi, I partially figured out how to do this:
cp /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grubx64.efi
/boot/efi/EFI/System/Library/CoreServices/boot.efi
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 19:29 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 08/01/2013 19:05, David Malcolm a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > [...]
> >> = Features/Php55 =
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
> >
> > [...snip...]
> >> Dtrace enabled build
>
Hi,
I have one pending package review that I would like to swap:
babeltrace - Trace Viewer and Converter, mainly for the Common Trace
Format (LTTng)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
Thanks,
Yannick
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 19:23 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:05:39PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > [...]
> > > = Features/Php55 =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
> >
> > [...snip...]
> > > Dt
Le 08/01/2013 19:05, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> [...]
>> = Features/Php55 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
>
> [...snip...]
>> Dtrace enabled build
>
> As I understand it, Fedora has systemtap but not dtrace (/usr/bin/d
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:05:39PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> [...]
> > = Features/Php55 =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
>
> [...snip...]
> > Dtrace enabled build
>
> As I understand it, Fedora has systemtap but n
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:04:30AM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
>
> What about repins? I want to add my own custom package that is not signed and
> create a new CD with a custom ks.cfg.
> How would that work?
You'd generate your own key, and people using your packages, who have
presumably decided th
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
[...]
> = Features/Php55 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
[...snip...]
> Dtrace enabled build
As I understand it, Fedora has systemtap but not dtrace (/usr/bin/dtrace
is a shim to systemtap), so does this mean that *syste
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 05:46:04PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> > One long-standing problem in Fedora is that we don't check package
> > signatures
> > during installation.
> [...]
> > Following the implementation of Features/SecureBoot, we can extend the
> > Secure
> > Boot keys as a root of tr
> One long-standing problem in Fedora is that we don't check package signatures
> during installation.
[...]
> Following the implementation of Features/SecureBoot, we can extend the Secure
> Boot keys as a root of trust provided by the hardware against which we can
> verify a signature on our key f
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 17:28:18 +0100
Adrian Reber wrote:
> I tried to do all rebuilds yesterday after the rawhide report. I
> missed pragha which is building right now. There were no broken
> dependencies over a few days. Just today from the packages rebuilt
> too late.
Ah, ok.
pragha was the one
When I powered up the Windows 7 guest that I have on my Fedora 18 system at
work, it wanted to install a driver for a "Red Hat QXL GPU" device.
Googling didn't turn up anything definitive but I'm wondering if this is an
early result of:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/QXLKMSSupport
Is ther
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:03:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:22:18 +0100
> Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> > Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the
> > libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate
> > package called libcdio-parano
On 01/08/2013 03:59 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 01/08/2013 10:40 AM, Adrian Alves wrote:
why am not in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS If i was
the first one on start with NODEJS package
The list of people on that page is volunteer-added. If you would like
to help on this,
On 01/08/2013 10:55 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:52:02PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2013-01-08, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Features/PackageSignatureCheckingDuringInstall =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackageSignatureCheckingDuringInstall
* Detailed description:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:22:18 +0100
Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the
> libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate
> package called libcdio-paranoia. libcdio-paranoia has been imported
> and I will now also update li
On 01/08/2013 10:40 AM, Adrian Alves wrote:
why am not in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS If i was
the first one on start with NODEJS package
The list of people on that page is volunteer-added. If you would like to
help on this, please feel free to add your name to the list. If
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:52:02PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2013-01-08, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >
> >= Features/PackageSignatureCheckingDuringInstall =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackageSignatureCheckingDuringInstall
> >
> > * Detailed description:
> > One long-standing prob
On 2013-01-08, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
>= Features/PackageSignatureCheckingDuringInstall =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackageSignatureCheckingDuringInstall
>
> * Detailed description:
> One long-standing problem in Fedora is that we don't check package signatures
> during installat
why am not in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS If i was the
first one on start with NODEJS package
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
> why am not in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS If i was the
> first one on start with NODEJS package
>
>
> On Tue
why am not in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS If i was the
first one on start with NODEJS package
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are
> required
> to pass through the community review by an
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/Php55 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
*
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/PackageSignatureCheckingDuringInstall =
https://fedorapr
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/NodeJS =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/NetworkManagerCLIAddConnection =
https://fedoraproject.o
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18.
Wednesday, January 09, 2013 @19:00 UTC (14:00 EST/11:00 PST/20:00 CET)
Due to conflicts in Meeting IRC channel and to give us the flexibility
to have as long Go/
Compose started at Tue Jan 8 09:15:31 UTC 2013
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Upgraded Packages: 0
Compose finished at Tue Jan 8 13:41:04 UTC 2013
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Compress:
346a1c981930f7cab54a4973480b3c73 IO-Compress-2.060.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871442
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet ---
> The patch does not apply.
This patch doesn't apply on the installed config.
It apply on the upstream provided config (in the source tarball).
The spec then alter it (using perl/sed, in %pre
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892918
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:22:18PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the
> libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate
> package called libcdio-paranoia. libcdio-paranoia has been imported and
> I will now also update
> Here's what our policies say:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment
>
> "All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment
>
> All patches in Fedora spec files SHOULD have a comment above them
> about
> their upstr
On 01/08/2013 03:48 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
So the remaining webapps that ship with the broken configuration that we
are about to release into the hands our our enduser ba
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:19 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and t
72 matches
Mail list logo
