Re: Proposed F19 Feature: JRuby 1.7 - JRuby is an alternative Ruby implementation

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required > to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce > list. > FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announce

Re: Static Analysis: proposed interchange format ("firehose")

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:53:56PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > This is a followup to my proposal in > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/175232.html > > I want a common output format for static analysis tools so that we can > easily slurp the results from different tool

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Jan 16, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > I thought one of the biggest blockers was the lack of a complete and > stable fsck implementation for it. I think this is a poor metric for outsiders to require. ZFS has been stable for some time and does not have an fsck. A more important q

Re: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution [Was: DualstackNetworking]

> > = Features/Fix Network Name Resolution = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution > > Why would this be a Fedora issue Isn't glibc used in Fedora for name resolution? > or a feature? See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution#Rationale

Re: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution [Was: DualstackNetworking]

Jaroslav Reznik writes: See https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/986 = Features/Fix Network Name Resolution = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution Why would this be a Fedora issue or a feature? Seems to me this falls squarely inside the scope of glibc, and it sho

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Enlightenment - Integrate Enlightenment in Fedora

Thanks for your reply. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Enlightenment - Integrate Enlightenment in Fedora

Le mercredi 16 janvier 2013 à 21:52 +0800, Christopher Meng a écrit : > I love this one, can I do something for this? - test, once the package are in - do review, even non official one - write documentation, or tests cases -- Michael Scherer -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Changing bugz.fp.o's alias (again)

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Ralph Bean wrote: > I've since done some work to fix bugs and speed up the new app and would like > some feedback if you could provide it. It is up in our staging environment > at: > > https://apps.stg.fedoraproject.org/packages/ I tried looking up a package

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

To make BTRFS (or any new file-system) the default for a distribution will be really hard. My thought on the subject: -1. IS IT STILL DESIRED TO MAKE BTRFS THE DEFAULT FILE-SYSTEM FOR FEDORA AT SOME (yet unknown) POINT IN THE FUTURE? 0. DETERMINE A ROOT FILE-SYSTEM CRITERIA (AND/OR a DEFAULT FS

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:53:25AM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: >> Hallo, >> >> for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the >> standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered >> because the fsck utitlities for btrfs was

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:13:07 +1030 William Brown wrote: > > > ID 258 gen 56580 top level 5 path /root > > I take it then that subvolid 258 is marked as "/" in your fstab? yes, via a subvol=root fstab entry. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

Re: Fedora ARM weekly status meeting 2013-01-16 (Results)

Hi everybody, Thank you for joining today's meeting. Here are links to its minutes and log: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-01-16/fedora-meeting-1.2013-01-16-21.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-01-16/fedora-meetin

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

> ID 258 gen 56580 top level 5 path /root I take it then that subvolid 258 is marked as "/" in your fstab? -- Sincerely, William Brown pgp.mit.edu http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x3C0AC6DAB2F928A2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 01/16/2013 01:16 PM, William Brown wrote: > If root isn't placed into a subvolume, say /root then mounted > as /dev/sda1 subvolid=255 / lets say, you can't snapshot the root fs, > which defeats the whole point of using btrfs . Yes you can -- the btrfs wiki even has this example: mount -

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

On 16/01/13 21:40, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Stahl writes: >> read more carefully then: the git repo contains binaries built against >> different Ubuntu baseline versions, the older of which have jpeg6 and >> the newer jpeg8. > > [ shrug... ] So we'd be incompatible with some of them no matter w

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 07:46 +1030, William Brown wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 13:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:18:37 -0500 > > Josef Bacik wrote: > > > > > I'm waiting until Anaconda settles down before I pursue btrfs in > > > Fedora again. Things change too much and

[Bug 765950] build for EPEL 6

Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765950 Ken Dreyer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolut

[Bug 765934] build for EPEL 6

Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765934 Bug 765934 depends on bug 765950, which changed state. Bug 765950 Summary: build for EPEL 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765950 What|Removed |Added --

Node.js module packaging [was Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2013-01-16)]

On 1/16/13, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > * #992 F19 Feature: NodeJS - >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS (mmaslano, 18:04:56) >* AGREED: NodeJS is approved; for the feature to be considered > complete, packaging guidelines must be approved (+8,-0) (mmaslano, > 18:17:

[Bug 765934] build for EPEL 6

Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765934 Ken Dreyer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolut

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:46:34 +1030 William Brown wrote: > Did the root volume (/) Go into it's own subvolume, or is root just > in /? > > If root isn't placed into a subvolume, say /root then mounted > as /dev/sda1 subvolid=255 / lets say, you can't snapshot the root fs, > which defeats the who

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 13:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:18:37 -0500 > Josef Bacik wrote: > > > I'm waiting until Anaconda settles down before I pursue btrfs in > > Fedora again. Things change too much and Btrfs is too reliant on the > > anaconda part working properly to e

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:36:10PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones >wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: > > > > > So there are a couple of issues

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:36:10PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: > > > > So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely > > > > must be fixed before it

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: BIND10 - next generation of the popular BIND9 DNS server rewritten from scratch

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:59:10PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 21:55 +0100, Adam Tkac wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: > > > > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Fe

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: BIND10 - next generation of the popular BIND9 DNS server rewritten from scratch

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 21:55 +0100, Adam Tkac wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: > > > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are > > > required > > > to pass through the community revie

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: BIND10 - next generation of the popular BIND9 DNS server rewritten from scratch

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: > > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are > > required > > to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce > > list. > > FESCo vo

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > Even better! Will the 3 failed builds mentioned at the beginning of > the thread be resolved by the end-of-January estimated ready to go > time? Are there any outstanding bugs in the 4.8-pre compiler that > might have major impact

Static Analysis: proposed interchange format ("firehose")

This is a followup to my proposal in http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/175232.html I want a common output format for static analysis tools so that we can easily slurp the results from different tools into a database and have a common system for managing the results (mark

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: BIND10 - next generation of the popular BIND9 DNS server rewritten from scratch

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 15:21 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: > > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are > > required > > to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce > > list. > > FESCo votes on

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

Michael Stahl writes: > read more carefully then: the git repo contains binaries built against > different Ubuntu baseline versions, the older of which have jpeg6 and > the newer jpeg8. [ shrug... ] So we'd be incompatible with some of them no matter what. But the bigger point is that we can't l

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: BIND10 - next generation of the popular BIND9 DNS server rewritten from scratch

On 01/16/2013 09:21 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: I note that the feature page describes this as a parallel installable stack. Is there a reason to keep both versions around in a way we didn't with other bind major upgrades? As far as I understand it, it will take some time until BIND 10 reaches

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

- Original Message - > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:15:25 -0500 > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and > > > is > > > currently in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test > > > mass rebuild on x86_64 > > > > Looking at the sch

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

On 01/16/2013 12:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The mass rebuild doesn't have to be with a released compiler (and in fact, usually has been performed with a prerelease compiler), it is just important that the release is released with a released compiler. Even better! Will the 3 failed builds ment

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: > > > So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely > > > must be fixed before it can become the default > > > > I'd agree, though I'd have a different l

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:52:04AM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 01/16/2013 11:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >We need to decide the schedule soon IMHO. > > Perhaps the schedule should be decided in part on time to do mass > rebuild after gcc 4.8.0 is released. The ARM team would really like >

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: BIND10 - next generation of the popular BIND9 DNS server rewritten from scratch

Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required > to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce > list. > FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. > > = Features

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Ruby 2.0.0 - the latest stable version of Ruby, with major increases in speed and reliability

Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: > Yet, it is source level backward compatible with Ruby 1.9.3, so your software > will continue to work. > > The updated Ruby also provides better integration with Fedora, especially > JRuby. > But not only JRuby, it is also one step closer to be prepa

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:18:37 -0500 Josef Bacik wrote: > I'm waiting until Anaconda settles down before I pursue btrfs in > Fedora again. Things change too much and Btrfs is too reliant on the > anaconda part working properly to even bother trying to push it > through at this point. Thanks, Wel

[Bug 892381] please pull perl-Sys-Syscall 0.25 into f18

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892381 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sys-Syscall-0.25-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

On 01/16/2013 11:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: We need to decide the schedule soon IMHO. Perhaps the schedule should be decided in part on time to do mass rebuild after gcc 4.8.0 is released. The ARM team would really like to see 4.8 in F19 because 4.8 is the first gcc with native Aarch64 suppor

Re: Strange Build problem....

2013/1/16 Steve Dickson : > On 16/01/13 12:27, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Looking at the F17 version of matplotlib, the default afm font is being set >> to None there -- so a better fix (but requiring fixing in matplotlib) might >> be to patch it like this: >> >> >> --- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-pac

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: > > So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely > > must be fixed before it can become the default > > I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs. > > But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the f

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

On 16/01/13 16:55, Adam Tkac wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >> On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >>> I hope other distributions don't use that release. >> >> FWIW i'm afraid i've had to build jpeg8 from source already to get a >> certain binary [

Re: Strange Build problem....

On 16/01/13 12:27, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Looking at the F17 version of matplotlib, the default afm font is being set > to None there -- so a better fix (but requiring fixing in matplotlib) might > be to patch it like this: > > > --- /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py

[Bug 739461] Surprising value for --optimize in generated spec file

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739461 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpazdzi...@redhat.com

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:15 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is > > currently > > in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test mass rebuild on > > x86_64 > > Looking at the schedule Wouldn't it be better to do the ma

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 14:15 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is > > > currently > > > in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test mass rebuild on > > > x86_6

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

Jaroslav Reznik schreef op wo 16-01-2013 om 12:35 [-0500]: > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required > to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce > list. > FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.

[Bug 757089] cpanspec error: Dest dir longer than base dir is not supported

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757089 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpazdzi...@redhat.com --

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:15:25 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: > > GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is > > currently in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test > > mass rebuild on x86_64 > > Looking at the schedule Wouldn't it be better to do the mass > r

[Bug 665901] Review Request: perl-Gravatar-URL - Make URLs for Gravatars from an email address

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665901 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

> GCC 4.8.0 is going to be released in mid March to mid April and is currently > in regression bugfix only mode. I've performed a test mass rebuild on x86_64 Looking at the schedule Wouldn't it be better to do the mass rebuild in Rawhide before the branch? If we're really looking at a secon

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2013-01-16)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-01-16) === Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:01:37 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-01-16/fesco.2013-01-16-18.01.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: MariaDB in Fedora

On 01/16/2013 04:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ReplaceMySQLwithMariaDB > > We could use help with testing. Personally I'd like to dump mysql in > time for F19, but we need validation that switching to maria doesn't > break anything for anyone. Good news guys! I

[Bug 895876] Upgrade to new upstream version

Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895876 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- Package perl-No-Worries-0.8-1.el5: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update

[Bug 893464] Upgrade to new upstream version

Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893464 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- Package perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.0-1.el5: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days.

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Zach Brown wrote: >> So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely >> must be fixed before it can become the default > > I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs. > > But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to adm

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

> So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely > must be fixed before it can become the default I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs. But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to admit that I'm pretty risk averse, especially when it comes to

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Erlyvideo - add Erlyvideo video streaming server to the Fedora repositories

Hello All 2013/1/16 Jaroslav Reznik : >> Although I'm going to disable all MP4/AAC-transcoding features and >> support for patented streaming protocols, it still will be useful. > Will it be possible to split it out to standalone package distributed > by different means? Same as we do for example

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Erlyvideo - add Erlyvideo video streaming server to the Fedora repositories

Hello All. 2013/1/16 Josh Boyer : > I'm kind of concerned about this one. The Feature page seems to be more > of an announcement that the application is packaged than anything else. > It was last updated back in August, and it is still at 0%. While we > might debate the usefulness of percentage

Changing bugz.fp.o's alias (again)

A month ago, I switched over the http://bugz.fedoraproject.org alias from the current pkgdb bugs app[1] to the new "packages" app[2]. There was a response from the community that this shouldn't have happened during that phase of the release cycle and that the new app was broken and too slow[3][4].

Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list. FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. = Features/GCC48 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GCC48 *

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Erlyvideo - add Erlyvideo video streaming server to the Fedora repositories

- Original Message - > Hello All. > > 2013/1/16 Bill Nottingham : > > > Also, the scope bits about the issues with codecs are not > > encouraging. Do we > > know that streaming to any of the above targets will work with > > patent-unencumbered codecs? > > Actually that's not a really big

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Erlyvideo - add Erlyvideo video streaming server to the Fedora repositories

Hello All. 2013/1/16 Bill Nottingham : > Also, the scope bits about the issues with codecs are not encouraging. Do we > know that streaming to any of the above targets will work with > patent-unencumbered codecs? Actually that's not a really big issue. Erlyvide can work as a proxy for other stre

Re: Strange Build problem....

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:59:08AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > > and here is the traceback > > raceback (most recent call last): > File "/tmp/test.py", line 5, in > import matplotlib.pyplot as plt > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/pyplot.py", line 26, in > >

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > Hallo, > > for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the > standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered > because the fsck utitlities for btrfs was not available > on the stable state for Fedora 17. > > So, I would like to a

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:41 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > >> >> Afik Josef just left Red Hat not Fedora... > > > I haven't seen any recent activity in Fedora from him. Have you? > > Did you see consistent activity in Fedor

Proposed F19 Feature: BIND10 - next generation of the popular BIND9 DNS server rewritten from scratch

As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list. FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. = Features/BIND 10 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BIND10

Proposed F19 Feature: Boost 1.53 Uplift - brings Boost 1.53.0 to Fedora 19

As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list. FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. = Features/F19Boost153 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F1

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

I am testing btrfs on kvm guest, currently i have found: * Bug 894837 - Transient / Intermittent ENOSPC errors with BTRFS and F18 (btrfs gives no space left on device at full or near full filesystem and heavy io, for example deleting stuff to reclaim space.) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 01/16/2013 12:00 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I haven't seen any recent activity in Fedora from him. Have you? Rahul Some patches on the btrfs list on Jan 7 and 8, 2013. -- Regards, OldFart -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:41 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > Afik Josef just left Red Hat not Fedora... I haven't seen any recent activity in Fedora from him. Have you? Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Strange Build problem....

On 15/01/13 15:43, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > The try: except: is swallowing all errors here. Getting a more verbose > traceback may help diagnose. You can remove the try: except: and dedent the > remaining code one level to get the actual traceback in the build.log. This is exactly what I did:

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Erlyvideo - add Erlyvideo video streaming server to the Fedora repositories

- Original Message - > Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik > > wrote: > > > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features > > > are required > > > to pass through the community review by announcing them on > > > devel

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:38:29AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:14:26 +0100 > Adam Tkac wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided > > to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. > > The main r

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Erlyvideo - add Erlyvideo video streaming server to the Fedora repositories

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Also, the scope bits about the issues with codecs are not encouraging. Do we > know that streaming to any of the above targets will work with > patent-unencumbered codecs? Android should work with WebM as for the others I doubt it ... --

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Erlyvideo - add Erlyvideo video streaming server to the Fedora repositories

Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are > > required > > to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce > > list. > > FESCo votes on new fea

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 01/16/2013 04:23 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 1/16/13 10:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil mailto:jan.kratoch...@redhat.com>> wrote: It affects also compilation, GDB was rebuilding for 10-15 minutes instead of < 1 minute. I have provided

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

- Original Message - > Hello all, > > after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided > to drop the > "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. Ok, I'm going to switch libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI to incomplete category, thanks. Jaroslav > The main > reason

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:14:26 +0100 Adam Tkac wrote: > Hello all, > > after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided > to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. > The main reason is that libjpeg upstream didn't present any valid > argument for post-j

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 1/16/13 10:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil > wrote: > > > It affects also compilation, GDB was rebuilding for 10-15 minutes instead > of > < 1 minute. I have provided even a reproducer for 1sec

Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

Hello all, after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. The main reason is that libjpeg upstream didn't present any valid argument for post-jpeg6 changes and libjpeg-turbo is not going to port all post-jpeg6

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > It affects also compilation, GDB was rebuilding for 10-15 minutes instead > of > < 1 minute. I have provided even a reproducer for 1sec vs. 1min issue. > The Bug just got automatically closed without any human reply as almost > all of > th

Re: Shall we modify '-g' to '-g3' to have gcc save the macro info?

Hello xining, xning a écrit: > Shall we should modify '-g' to '-g3' to have gcc save the macro info? > So when we install *-debuginfo packages, we can look up a macro > definition, just like we can look up a function definition. For what it's worth, I believe that would be useful, yes. Though

Re: Problems with Automake 1.13 and 1.13.1

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:57:02 +0100 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Of course (BTW the Automake maintainer now confirmed to me privately > that he'd accept such a patch), though it would probably would make > sense to put it in Fedora even before 1.13.2. > > I'll try to put together the patch tomorrow, un

Re: Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > On 01/15/2013 01:01 PM, Adam Tkac wrote: > > > >> Another interesting thread is > >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30352453 > >> > >> We are currently discussin

Re: MariaDB in Fedora

Henrique Junior writes: > Other distros are discussing about the future of MySQL and the > implementation of MariaDB as default. What is Fedora position about this > matter? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ReplaceMySQLwithMariaDB We could use help with testing. Personally I'd like to du

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-01-12

On 01/11/2013 07:04 PM, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > Broken upgrade path report for tags f18 -> f18-updates -> f19: > crobinso: > qemu: > f18-updates > f19 (2:qemu-1.2.2-1.fc18 2:qemu-1.2.0-25.fc19) Was working out some regressions with qemu 1.3, fixed now: http://koji.fedorap

Re: Fedora 18 laptop regression

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:49:18 + "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 11:38:46PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > is to invoke it via "systemd-inhibit --what=handle-lid-switch". > > # systemd-inhibit --what=handle-lid-switch > Missing command line to execute. > > .. whate

Fedora ARM weekly status meeting 2013-01-16

This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Jan 16th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work): PDT: 1pm MDT: 2pm CDT: 3pm EDT: 4pm UTC: 8pm BST: 9pm CST: 10pm Current items on the agenda: 1) Current Proble

Proposed F19 Feature: RemovePyXML - the goal of this Feature is to remove the PyXML package from Fedora

As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list. FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. = Features/RemovePyXML = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Re

Re: Shall we modify '-g' to '-g3' to have gcc save the macro info?

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 02:26:00PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:12:29 +0100, xning wrote: > > Shall we should modify '-g' to '-g3' to have gcc save the macro > > info? So when we install *-debuginfo packages, we can look up a > > macro definition, just like we can look up a

Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution [Was: DualstackNetworking]

As the Feature was renamed and the content of Feature has been extended as requested by FESCo, re-announcing it to the community for re-review. See https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/986 = Features/Fix Network Name Resolution = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Erlyvideo - add Erlyvideo video streaming server to the Fedora repositories

- Original Message - > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik > wrote: > > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features > > are required > > to pass through the community review by announcing them on > > devel-announce list. > > FESCo votes on new features no

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Enlightenment - Integrate Enlightenment in Fedora

I love this one, can I do something for this? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora 18 laptop regression

On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 11:38:46PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > is to invoke it via "systemd-inhibit --what=handle-lid-switch". # systemd-inhibit --what=handle-lid-switch Missing command line to execute. .. whatever that means. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http:/

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Erlyvideo - add Erlyvideo video streaming server to the Fedora repositories

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required > to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce > list. > FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. >

Re: fedup ui

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue 15 Jan 2013 01:58:45 PM EST, Neal Becker wrote: > Just tried fedup f17->f18. After digging for correct command line, I got it > to > work. BUT, > > after reboot it sits at fedora splash screen, which is pulsating. It gives > almost no indica

[perl] Remove bundled Pod-Parser

commit 0494b1c5823db7f9d607eff207e928c464de02f1 Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Jan 16 14:13:09 2013 +0100 Remove bundled Pod-Parser perl.spec |9 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec index 1ed6a6c..c6f8d4d 100644 --- a/perl.sp

  1   2   >