Re: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution [Was: DualstackNetworking]

On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: As the Feature was renamed and the content of Feature has been extended as requested by FESCo, re-announcing it to the community for re-review. See https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/986 = Features/Fix Network Name Resolution =

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 01/17/2013 07:00 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: Yes, I'd veto btrfs as the default as well. I lost a huge chunk of data on a btrfs partition a while back, with *no* diagnostics, recovery tools, help from Google, etc. Screw speed - unless it's rock solid and *simple* to back up, maintain, di

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Marc Deop Argemí wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2013 12:18:19 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689127 >> (performance problem with virtual machines) > > I must add that, in my experience, the performance is *bad* not only i

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wednesday 16 January 2013 12:18:19 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689127 > (performance problem with virtual machines) I must add that, in my experience, the performance is *bad* not only in virtual machines but in the whole user experience (I've been u

Re: Problems with Automake 1.13 and 1.13.1

>> Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> Of course (BTW the Automake maintainer now confirmed to me privately >> that he'd accept such a patch), though it would probably would make >> sense to put it in Fedora even before 1.13.2. >> >> I'll try to put together the patch tomorrow, unless a

Re: Fedora 18: Lock up on boot of kernel 3.7.2-201 on Dell Optiplex 755 -- KMS

On 01/17/2013 05:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Jan 17, 2013 10:03 AM, "Robert Knight" > wrote: > > > > After installation of F18 from DVD and an update, several Dell > Optiplex 755's failed on reboot with a garbled display and frozen > system. These all have the "

Re: Changing bugz.fp.o's alias (again)

On 01/16/2013 07:11 PM, Jerry James wrote: https://apps.stg.fedoraproject.org/packages/ I clicked on the "Changelog" tab. It said: "This package has no Changelog entries." ... which is false. If that's due to limited data in the staging environment, then no problem, otherwise there'

Re: Fedora 18: Lock up on boot of kernel 3.7.2-201 on Dell Optiplex 755 -- KMS

On Jan 17, 2013 10:03 AM, "Robert Knight" wrote: > > After installation of F18 from DVD and an update, several Dell Optiplex 755's failed on reboot with a garbled display and frozen system. These all have the "Intel Corporation 82Q35 Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)" display contro

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On 01/16/2013 11:41 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 01/16/2013 04:23 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 1/16/13 10:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil > wrote: It affects also compilation, GDB was rebuilding for

Re: Changing bugz.fp.o's alias (again)

On Jan 17, 2013 1:34 AM, "Ville Skyttä" wrote: > > On 2013-01-16 19:45, Ralph Bean wrote: > > > I put cacheing in place. > > That'll probably help some, but does the old pkgdb cache its bugs view? > I suppose it doesn't, and while it's not that fast, its load time is IMO > fast enough. > Correct.

Fedora 18: Lock up on boot of kernel 3.7.2-201 on Dell Optiplex 755 -- KMS

After installation of F18 from DVD and an update, several Dell Optiplex 755's failed on reboot with a garbled display and frozen system. These all have the "Intel Corporation 82Q35 Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)" display controllers. Booting with "nomodeset" parameter prevent

Re: Odd Problems to build inn on rawhide

On 01/17/2013 03:30 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: Hallo, during my last build of inn on rawhide I have got the following odd error messages: RPM build errors: bogus date in %changelog: Wed Jan 13 2009 Ondrej Vasik - 2.4.5-7 bogus date in %changelog: Fri Jul 7 2008 Ondrej Vasik - 2.4.

[perl-Gravatar-URL] Polish the rough edges

commit dcafde3466adc316f670fa2c992d8f83c72a2b3e Author: Petr Šabata Date: Thu Jan 17 14:45:36 2013 +0100 Polish the rough edges perl-Gravatar-URL.spec | 31 +++ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Gravatar-URL.spec b/perl-

[perl-Gravatar-URL] Initial import (#665901)

commit 82dbbddd4e31c3c62426e3952635cdd9063a211d Author: Petr Šabata Date: Thu Jan 17 13:39:50 2013 +0100 Initial import (#665901) .gitignore |1 + perl-Gravatar-URL.spec | 56 sources|1 + 3 files chang

Re: Odd Problems to build inn on rawhide

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:30:09PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > Hallo, > > during my last build of inn on rawhide I have got the following odd > error messages: > > RPM build errors: > bogus date in %changelog: Wed Jan 13 2009 Ondrej Vasik > - 2.4.5-7 > bogus date in %changelog: Fri J

Re: Odd Problems to build inn on rawhide

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:30:09PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > Hallo, > > during my last build of inn on rawhide I have got the following odd > error messages: > > RPM build errors: > bogus date in %changelog: Wed Jan 13 2009 Ondrej Vasik > - 2.4.5-7 > bogus date in %changelog: Fri J

Re: Odd Problems to build inn on rawhide

On 2013-01-17 14:30, Jochen Schmitt wrote: Hallo, during my last build of inn on rawhide I have got the following odd error messages: RPM build errors: bogus date in %changelog: Wed Jan 13 2009 Ondrej Vasik - 2.4.5-7 bogus date in %changelog: Fri Jul 7 2008 Ondrej Vasik - 2.4.5-2

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Ruby 2.0.0 - the latest stable version of Ruby, with major increases in speed and reliability

Dne 17.1.2013 14:13, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:00:33 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: Yes, everything needs rebuild. It needs rebuild also due to change from ruby(abi) to ruby(release) we are proposing in guildelines draft and which was discussed on packaging list (it would need it

Re: Node.js module packaging [was Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2013-01-16)]

On 01/16/2013 10:21 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On 1/16/13, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: * #992 F19 Feature: NodeJS - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS (mmaslano, 18:04:56) * AGREED: NodeJS is approved; for the feature to be considered complete, packaging guidelines mu

Odd Problems to build inn on rawhide

Hallo, during my last build of inn on rawhide I have got the following odd error messages: RPM build errors: bogus date in %changelog: Wed Jan 13 2009 Ondrej Vasik - 2.4.5-7 bogus date in %changelog: Fri Jul 7 2008 Ondrej Vasik - 2.4.5-2 bogus date in %changelog: Sun Jul 10 2000

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Ruby 2.0.0 - the latest stable version of Ruby, with major increases in speed and reliability

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:00:33 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: > Yes, everything needs rebuild. It needs rebuild also due to change > from ruby(abi) to ruby(release) we are proposing in guildelines draft > and which was discussed on packaging list (it would need it due to > change in ruby(abi) version any

abrt server report: 20130117

Hot problems: ID Components Count --- 34452 dconf450 28310 kernel 379 228274 kernel 327 100

Re: Problems with Automake 1.13 and 1.13.1

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:27:35PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:05:03PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Automake 1.13.1 also miscompiles the following: > > > > TESTS = run-bindtests \ > > $(sort \ > > $(patsubst %,%.bc,$(test_progs)) \ > >

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Ruby 2.0.0 - the latest stable version of Ruby, with major increases in speed and reliability

Dne 16.1.2013 21:18, Bill Nottingham napsal(a): Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: Yet, it is source level backward compatible with Ruby 1.9.3, so your software will continue to work. The updated Ruby also provides better integration with Fedora, especially JRuby. But not only JRuby, it

[Bug 768394] LWP::UserAgent cuts chunked response sent through HTTPS

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768394 --- Comment #12 from Petr Pisar --- We don't know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=E8fXkic6Or&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fed

Re: Problems with Automake 1.13 and 1.13.1

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:05:03PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Automake 1.13.1 also miscompiles the following: > > TESTS = run-bindtests \ > $(sort \ > $(patsubst %,%.bc,$(test_progs)) \ > $(patsubst %,%.opt,$(test_progs))) Apparently even jamming them int

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37:56PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 16.1.2013 17:42, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): > >- Original Message - > >>Hello all, > >> > >>after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided > >>to drop the > >>"jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpe

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:45:04PM +0100, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote: > is gcc bug[1] fixed in 4.8.0? it could bring a lot of nasty problems > with app which using atomit_t (unsigned long) > > [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55981 I think it isn't yet committed, has been approved thou

Re: Problems with Automake 1.13 and 1.13.1

Automake 1.13.1 also miscompiles the following: TESTS = run-bindtests \ $(sort \ $(patsubst %,%.bc,$(test_progs)) \ $(patsubst %,%.opt,$(test_progs))) which worked in previous versions. It turns it into the following which breaks make because of the unclos

[Bug 825678] SDL::App->new() on console framebuffer segfaults

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825678 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Version|16 |17 --- Comment #10 from Pet

[Bug 665901] Review Request: perl-Gravatar-URL - Make URLs for Gravatars from an email address

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665901 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JHpc5hjezT&a=

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GCC48 - switch GCC in Fedora 19 to 4.8.x, rebuild all packages with it

Jaroslav Reznik writes: > As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required > to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce > list. > FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. > > = Features/GCC48 = > https://

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

Dne 16.1.2013 17:42, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): - Original Message - Hello all, after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. Ok, I'm going to switch libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI to incomplete category

Re: Coordinating libffi upgrade

Dennis wrote: > I am right now building a compat-libffi package that has just the > old .so nothing to be built against. so expect that early this week > the .so of libffi will be bumped. Hey, thanks Dennis! I really appreciate this. I'm hoping to release 3.0.12 soon and get that into the F19 re

Re: Static Analysis: proposed interchange format ("firehose")

On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 15:53:56 David Malcolm wrote: > This is a followup to my proposal in > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/175232.html > > I want a common output format for static analysis tools so that we can > easily slurp the results from different tools

Re: Changing bugz.fp.o's alias (again)

On 2013-01-16 19:45, Ralph Bean wrote: > I put cacheing in place. That'll probably help some, but does the old pkgdb cache its bugs view? I suppose it doesn't, and while it's not that fast, its load time is IMO fast enough. Also, not actually knowing how often these pages are requested, I have a

Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:14:32PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > Has anyone tested subvolid=xxx works for rootfs yet? I know GRUB 2 > will not resolve subvolid, it essentially treats subvols as folders, > but does it only with pathnames, not ID number. If fstab uses > subvolid for boot, then boot fa