Susi Lehtola wrote:
> OpenBLAS, ATLAS, ACML and MKL only ship one monolitchic library, so this
> is not really an option.
FYI, the author of netlib-java filed an issue with OpenBLAS for that:
https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/296
Unfortunately, upstream is reluctant to change this because
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 20:53 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Digimer wrote:
> >In
> >a couple of occasions, if I leave it long enough, the windows would
> >start responding to a limited amount, but they would all be jammed up
> >to the top-left corner, have no windows and can't be moved or given
> >fo
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Thomas Moschny
wrote:
> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Done
Daniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for
those unable the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-09-25/fedora-meeting-1.2013-09-25-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/
oh, and in fact there are *a lot of more* processes
typically running as long living process directly after
login which should be hardened too
may i suggest Fedora ban "prelink" which is always
the excuse and harden the complete distribution
at least on x86_64 the performance impact is outside ge
Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
> People with interest in secondary architectures might oppose that.
Which architectures are the problem? OpenBLAS currently supports:
| 2. Supported Architecture
|
|X86 : Pentium3 Katmai
|Coppermine
| Athlon (not well optimized, thou
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Thanks for the clarification Kevin... On a related note, the guidelines
> > say I should only retire a package that's not released since the package
> > can not get removed from released versions, so in this case I'm th
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification Kevin... On a related note, the guidelines
> say I should only retire a package that's not released since the package
> can not get removed from released versions, so in this case I'm thinking
> that would be f20 and rawhide.
Right.
> As to the o
On 25/09/13 12:07, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 12:14 AM, Digimer wrote:
>
>> I can't imagine why USB 3 would effect this, but there you go. Any
>> advice on debugging?
>
> Déjà-vu:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/188273.html
>
I honestly forgot about
On 09/25/2013 12:14 AM, Digimer wrote:
> I can't imagine why USB 3 would effect this, but there you go. Any
> advice on debugging?
Déjà-vu: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/188273.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Luke Macken wrote:
> dnf is written in Python, so I don't think that'll be possible. The
> roadmap for 2.0 is apparently going to involve porting to Python3, which
> will most likely help with the memory usage, but not with the
> installation size.
We should be defaulting to some other Hawkey (or
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 25.09.2013 18:25, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> >I'm willing to do a review swap if someone will review
> >python-qpid_messaging:
> >
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012077
> >
> >
> Hi,
>
> I'll do it for perl-Parse-Deb
389-ds-base_Debian_Wheezy - Build # 46 - Fixed:
See attached build log for details.
build.log
Description: Binary data
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Digimer wrote:
>In
>a couple of occasions, if I leave it long enough, the windows would
>start responding to a limited amount, but they would all be jammed up
>to the top-left corner, have no windows and can't be moved or given
>focus (so I can only interact with the windows I can see part of).
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Eric H. Christensen wrote:
>Authentication is based on WEP/WPA/WPA2 passphrase, possibly a MAC
>address (BSSID), and 802.1 authentication.
I guess you refer to using 802.1X with an EAP method that provides
mutual authentication, authenticating both
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, September 25th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Kernel Status Update
2) Aarch64 - Status Update
- Koji
3) F20 Beta Goals & Challenges
4) Open Flo
On 09/25/2013 01:29 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Ric Wheeler wrote:
You should - and can - easily test your workload with your hardware/software
stack to see if the options make a difference.
Of course I can, but the issue is comparison. I can run tests all day long
that may not stress the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012103
kc8...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|unspecified |low
Hardware|Unspecified
Ric Wheeler wrote:
You should - and can - easily test your workload with your hardware/software
stack to see if the options make a difference.
Of course I can, but the issue is comparison. I can run tests all day long that
may not stress the one area people are hitting that disuade them from w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012103
Bug ID: 1012103
Summary: please update perlIO::Async to version 0.60
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: perl-IO-Async
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter: kc8...@gmai
On 09/25/2013 12:48 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Chris Murphy wrote:
https://patrick-nagel.net/blog/archives/337
He provides no reliable testing method. I don't consider his results to be
scientific or useful. One blogger will not be enough evidence.
You should - and can - easily test y
On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>> https://patrick-nagel.net/blog/archives/337
>
> He provides no reliable testing method. I don't consider his results to be
> scientific or useful. One blogger will not be enough evidence.
You say that as if it'
Chris Murphy wrote:
https://patrick-nagel.net/blog/archives/337
He provides no reliable testing method. I don't consider his results to be
scientific or useful. One blogger will not be enough evidence.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
Hello Fedora package maintainers,
Kindly build and push your packages with latest translation files (ie,
pull the latest translations from Transifex/Zanata) by FRIDAY
2013-09-27, for Fedora 20 L10n test scheduled on 2013-10-03 (Thursday).
The packages with latest translations can thus be used
On 25.09.2013 18:25, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I'm willing to do a review swap if someone will review
python-qpid_messaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012077
Hi,
I'll do it for perl-Parse-DebControl [1].
Thanks,
Sandro
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-09-26 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-09-26 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-09-26 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-09-26 1
On Sep 25, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>> So as it turns out some devices get really busy and slow down when TRIM is
>> used, so not all devices are well suited for discard and therefore it's
>> probably not a good idea for it to be set by default. It's a
I'm willing to do a review swap if someone will review
python-qpid_messaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012077
--
Darryl L. Pierce
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/
"What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"
pgp1TszbUo8eW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mai
On Sep 25, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 10:48 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Sep 25, 2013, at 6:12 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>>> We should not confuse TRIM that gets handled at the device layer (and is a
>>> slow, non-queued S-ATA command for example) and a dm-thin parsing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914307
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com
Flags|needin
Hello Adam,
- Original Message -
> From: Adam Williamson
> Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall
>
> That's ironic: just yesterday - without having yet read this discussion
> - I used the firewalld on my laptop to lock down the 'public' zone to
> allow nothing at all (not mdns or ssh), make
Chris Murphy wrote:
So as it turns out some devices get really busy and slow down when TRIM is
used, so not all devices are well suited for discard and therefore it's
probably not a good idea for it to be set by default. It's also not enabled by
default for ssds with btrfs either. And with dm-
On 09/25/2013 10:48 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 25, 2013, at 6:12 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
We should not confuse TRIM that gets handled at the device layer (and is a
slow, non-queued S-ATA command for example) and a dm-thin parsing of that same
command in software which just updates the meta
On Sep 25, 2013, at 6:12 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> We should not confuse TRIM that gets handled at the device layer (and is a
> slow, non-queued S-ATA command for example) and a dm-thin parsing of that
> same command in software which just updates the metadata that dm-thin
> maintains.
Yes, fa
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Today at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets below ca
Hi all,
GNOME 3.10.0 release is this week and we're going to collect all the
builds together and filing them as a single Bodhi megaupdate for F20.
As usual, the spreadsheet for collecting all the builds together is at
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN
On 09/24/2013 10:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 24, 2013, at 7:34 PM, William Brown wrote:
Additionally, with the concerns re device shrink. Yes, XFS won't let you
shrink, but with thin provision LVM that isn't so much an issue: You
just shrink the pv and leave it alone. I would also argue t
2013/9/23 Daniel Drake :
> olpc-library just got obsoleted (nothing uses it now, the
> functionality got moved elsewhere), so if you could point me at how to
> drop this package from rawhide I will get it out of your way.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
T
On 09/25/2013 06:35 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> There are some reports of VM images on btrfs being corrupted somehow
> (although I don't think it's related to balance, I could be wrong),
> and the solution is to set VM images to nodatacow. So I wonder if
> there's some behavior of systemd journaling
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 19:12 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I was wondering as to why Ananconda has no facility to overwrite a
> distro already present on the target machine. I've studied it & apart
> from destroying the existing partition with GParted there seems to be no
> other way
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 20:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:40:15AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > >> Anyone can broadcast an SSID. How does FirewallD authenticate the
> > >> network connection?
> > >FirewallD is not responsible for such authentication/AP validation.
> >
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 03:05 +0800, P J P wrote:
>Yes, I understand the functionality, but I doubt if it'll be used
> at all. It's not desktop background that people would want to change
> everyday.
That's ironic: just yesterday - without having yet read this discussion
- I used the firewalld
42 matches
Mail list logo
