Re: pdftk retired?

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> >> Sorry I am missing something. Why can't we keep the old pdftk that >> works with itext2? > > Check the whole thread - because of GCJ dependency. iText is second > issue. The first could be fixed by rewrite of offending part of code > to J

[Test-Announce] 2014-03-10 @ ** 15:00 ** UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2014-03-10 # Time: ** 15:00 UTC ** (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again on Monday! Note that daylight saving time begins over the weekend in No

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 23:57 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 22:52 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > > >> > There is at least one starkly obvious difference there, which is that > >> > you choose your religious beliefs and affiliatio

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

Am 07.03.2014 23:33, schrieb Adam Williamson: > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 22:52 +0100, drago01 wrote: >>> There is at least one starkly obvious difference there, which is that >>> you choose your religious beliefs and affiliations; you do not choose >>> your race/color/general genetic origin. >> >> W

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 22:52 +0100, drago01 wrote: > >> > There is at least one starkly obvious difference there, which is that >> > you choose your religious beliefs and affiliations; you do not choose >> > your race/color/general genetic o

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 22:52 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > There is at least one starkly obvious difference there, which is that > > you choose your religious beliefs and affiliations; you do not choose > > your race/color/general genetic origin. > > Well people can choose to not be offended by random

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:17 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: >> On 03/07/2014 10:59 AM, H. Guémar wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I don't think that worrying about perpetuating offensive stereotypes >> > is specifc to the US, we have similar controver

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:17 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > On 03/07/2014 10:59 AM, H. Guémar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't think that worrying about perpetuating offensive stereotypes > > is specifc to the US, we have similar controversies in Europe: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banania#Controv

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

Am 07.03.2014 20:42, schrieb Przemek Klosowski: > On 03/07/2014 11:21 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: >> On 7 March 2014 14:08, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >>> Microsoft, Apple, and Google set requirements that apps must follow if >>> they want to appear in the software center in order to ensure a good >>>

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On 03/07/2014 11:21 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: On 7 March 2014 14:08, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Microsoft, Apple, and Google set requirements that apps must follow if they want to appear in the software center in order to ensure a good user experience. This is something I absolutely want to do.

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 07.03.2014 18:16, schrieb Ryan Lerch: > > IMHO, the proposal was less of > > > > "let's remove ugly icons" > > > > and more > > > > "lets hide applications that use icons in this particular format that > doesn't support the features of t

Re: review swap: cscppc, cswrap

Hi Mukundan, On Friday, March 07, 2014 09:29:09 nonamedotc wrote: > I have taken cswrap for review. I will take cscppc also after > finishing cswrap. thank you very much for taking the reviews! Kamil -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: Read this if your package includes a status notifier / system tray icon

Hi On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > i know that all and aware that it is not perfect but if others "adopt" > something existing and already widely used they hardly can demand to > change all existing code There is no need to assume that clarifying something requires cha

Re: Read this if your package includes a status notifier / system tray icon

Am 07.03.2014 18:33, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > in case of changes gaining less to zero -> YES > > If a single desktop environment wants to just implement something, they can > go ahead and do so but that doesn't > make it a real spe

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

Am 07.03.2014 18:16, schrieb Ryan Lerch: > IMHO, the proposal was less of > > "let's remove ugly icons" > > and more > > "lets hide applications that use icons in this particular format that doesn't > support the features of the software > application" IMHO you did not read the proposal itsel

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

2014-03-07 18:32 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy : > On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > >- For configuration: What we really want is a VCS, dealing with >changesets, documenting who has changed what, when and why. Snapshots are >a really poor VCS. > > Obviously we don't hav

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

On Mar 7, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/07/2014 09:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy >>> wrote: On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> Ot

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On 06/03/14 13:51, Tim Lauridsen wrote: Not showing app, because they have bad looking icons, seems like a bad idea to me. what about using some cairo magic to merge the .xpm icon with some other .png frame to make it look better http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10983739/how-to-composite-m

Re: Read this if your package includes a status notifier / system tray icon

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > in case of changes gaining less to zero -> YES > If a single desktop environment wants to just implement something, they can go ahead and do so but that doesn't make it a real specification. For other desktop environments to adopt it, it

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > 2014-03-07 14:31 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer : > remember. It is only concerned with /usr and to as minimal a degree > as possible /etc. People likely still want snapshot and rollback for > their actual _data_ as well. > > (Choosing a random point

Re: Read this if your package includes a status notifier / system tray icon

Am 07.03.2014 18:16, schrieb Dan Williams: > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 00:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> * change requests that would have broken compatibility with the existing >> implementations of the protocol already in wide use for little to no >> practical benefit, such as nitpicking about t

Re: Read this if your package includes a status notifier / system tray icon

On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 00:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Please stop rewriting history. The spec was proposed, flaws were pointed > > out in the review, and there was no willingness to address those flaws > > in any meaningful way. > > The purported "flaws" were of 2 kin

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

On 03/07/2014 09:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Other developers: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning Release engineering: N/A (not

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On 7 March 2014 14:08, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Microsoft, Apple, and Google set requirements that apps must follow if > they want to appear in the software center in order to ensure a good > user experience. This is something I absolutely want to do. We already rate the applications in GNOME 3

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said: > On 6 March 2014 18:51, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > > Not showing app, because they have bad looking icons, seems like a bad idea > > to me. > > I'm not sure anyone will be surprised in my goal of making the > applications we show users have high quality co

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> Other developers: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:57 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > The quaility of an application has nothing todo, with at fancy icon, > not showning the icon is ok, but don't show the application is not IMO > what will be the next ? qt apps ? gtk2 apps Consider the option of assuming good faith. - aj

Self Introduction: Adrien Vergé

Hi everybody, I'm a French Fedora user and I'm trying to become a package maintainer for the system I have been using for years! Usually I write C and Python for personal stuff, I am also involved in projects (currently, tracing on Linux with LTTng) and contributed to the Linux kernel. I would l

Re: review swap: cscppc, cswrap

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2014 10:30 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > Hi, > > is anyone willing to review or swap reviews of the following > packages? > > * cscppc - A compiler wrapper that runs cppcheck in background, > available at >

F21 System Wide Change: u-boot syslinux by default

= Proposed System Wide Change: u-boot syslinux by default = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/u-boot_syslinux Change owner(s): Dennis Gilmore Add syslinux support to u-boot enabling both pxelinux and extlinux support. simplifying booting arm machines, making anaconda installs easy and over

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: I don't think that's accurate. OSTree doesn't touch /home from what I remember. It is only concerned with /usr and to as minimal a degree as possible /etc. People likely still want snapshot and rollback for their actual _data_ as well. Exact

Re: [389-devel] strcasestr vs. PL_strcasestr

On 03/07/2014 07:15 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: Hi Nathan, is there special reason why you use /strcasestr/ in ACL plugin instead of /PL_strcasestr/. It presents me some headache to build 1.3.2 on Solaris 10. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/ds.git/commit/ldap/servers/plugins/acl?id=952146

Re: pdftk retired?

- Original Message - > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > On 03/06/2014 06:41 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > >>> pdftk has a hard dependency on GCJ because it's a C++ program that > >>> uses a Java l

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: i don't think people *really* like to restore a snapshot of /usr without /var/lib/rpm if they only know what that means at the end On an rpm-ostree system, /var/lib/rpm is a symlink to /usr/share/rpm. And that's only because I wanted to a

Re: pdftk retired?

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 03/06/2014 06:41 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >>> pdftk has a hard dependency on GCJ because it's a C++ program that >>> uses a Java library (iText) through CNI. I once tried

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 07. Mar 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting: Proposal for cancel due to empty agenda

On 03/07/2014 02:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote: No agenda for today, so i'd propose to cancel the meeting today and prepare another more detailed review of the Tech Specs and a checkup of the takslist of dglimore next week. Agreed. As an aside, I

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

Am 07.03.2014 15:08, schrieb Michael Catanzaro: > Ancient icons are a good heuristic that the app is unmaintained > and not something the user really wants to install Ancient icons are a good heuristic that a app if it does what i need the next week or month does not get a complete rewrite with

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

Am 07.03.2014 15:08, schrieb Michael Catanzaro: > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 13:19 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> says who? >> >> as long GTK1 is not forbidden in Fedora there is no valid >> reason for that statement - you may prefer not having a >> function at all if it is not beautiful enough for yo

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On 03/07/2014 02:32 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: 2014-03-07 12:16 GMT+01:00 Ralf Corsepius mailto:rc040...@freenet.de>>: On 03/07/2014 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681339#c31 OK, that's better than nothing, but this still is just one in

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 13:19 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > says who? > > as long GTK1 is not forbidden in Fedora there is no valid > reason for that statement - you may prefer not having a > function at all if it is not beautiful enough for you > > *but* > > * beautiful is in the eye of the behol

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

2014-03-07 12:35 GMT+01:00 Richard Hughes : > I'm not sure anyone will be surprised in my goal of making the > applications we show users have high quality content. XPM icons are a > good first step, then it'll be things like missing icon transparency, > AppData, translated AppData over the next f

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

2014-03-07 14:31 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer : > remember. It is only concerned with /usr and to as minimal a degree > as possible /etc. People likely still want snapshot and rollback for > their actual _data_ as well. > (Choosing a random point in the conversation...) I'm starting to think that snap

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

Am 07.03.2014 14:31, schrieb Josh Boyer: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> I this project dead? I'm casting about to tools to manage lvm snapshots >>> and roller-derby sounded promising. Any other tools out there? >> >> There's a recent snapshot/rollback thread on the

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 07. Mar 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting: Proposal for cancel due to empty agenda

- Original Message - > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote: > > No agenda for today, so i'd propose to cancel the meeting today and prepare > > another more detailed review of the Tech Specs and a checkup of the > > takslist > > of dglimore next week. > > Agreed. I'm ok to

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Snapshot and Rollback Tool

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >>> Other developers: OS Installer Support for LVM Thin Provisioning >>> Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change) >>> Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) >>>

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

2014-03-07 12:16 GMT+01:00 Ralf Corsepius : > On 03/07/2014 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681339#c31 >> > > OK, that's better than nothing, but this still is just one individual's > position and is far from being an official position. > See https://fedo

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 07. Mar 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting: Proposal for cancel due to empty agenda

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote: > No agenda for today, so i'd propose to cancel the meeting today and prepare > another more detailed review of the Tech Specs and a checkup of the takslist > of dglimore next week. Agreed. As an aside, I've missed this meeting the past couple

ABRT 2.2 with Python 3 support heading to Fedora

Hi, ABRT 2.2 adds support for Python 3 in form of two new packages: - abrt-python3 providing an API for problem manipulation and - abrt-addon-python3 adding support for collecting unhandled exceptions in python 3 applications. Packages are now available in rawhide and will land in updates-testing

Re: qt-creator arm build timing out

On 07.03.2014 14:05, Dan Horák wrote: On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:53:24 +0100 Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build qt-creator [1], but the builds fail due to the arm build timing out. Is there anyway I can increase the timeout? can you resubmit with parallel make disabled for ARM? Building

Re: pdftk retired?

On 03/07/2014 01:30 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote: On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:52:27 -0500 Tom Callaway wrote: That are the two reasons why I'm not able to support pdftk on Fedora anymore and was forced to reitred this package. I'm sorry for nayone who maintaining any package with dependencies on this pack

Re: qt-creator arm build timing out

On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:53:24 +0100 Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build qt-creator [1], but the builds fail due to the > arm build timing out. Is there anyway I can increase the timeout? can you resubmit with parallel make disabled for ARM? Building heavy C++ code in parallel with o

qt-creator arm build timing out

Hi, I'm trying to build qt-creator [1], but the builds fail due to the arm build timing out. Is there anyway I can increase the timeout? Thanks, Sandro [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6604270 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: pdftk retired?

On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:52:27 -0500 Tom Callaway wrote: > > That are the two reasons why I'm not able to support pdftk on > > Fedora anymore and was forced to reitred this package. I'm sorry > > for nayone who maintaining any package with dependencies on this > > package. > > This is why pdftk die

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

Am 07.03.2014 13:15, schrieb Richard Hughes: > On 7 March 2014 11:57, Tim Lauridsen wrote: >> what will be the next ? qt apps ? gtk2 apps > > No, because that would be ridiculous. Hiding applications using GTK1 > would of course be okay says who? as long GTK1 is not forbidden in Fedora there

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 07. Mar 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting: Proposal for cancel due to empty agenda

No agenda for today, so i'd propose to cancel the meeting today and prepare another more detailed review of the Tech Specs and a checkup of the takslist of dglimore next week. Thanks & regards, Phil -- Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470 Manager Core Services| Fax.:

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On 7 March 2014 11:57, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > what will be the next ? qt apps ? gtk2 apps No, because that would be ridiculous. Hiding applications using GTK1 would of course be okay. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/d

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

Am 07.03.2014 12:57, schrieb Tim Lauridsen: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Satyajit Sahoo > wrote: > > Apps with ugly icons and ugly design results in bad user experience > IMO. They should not be displayed in the software center > > The quaility of an appli

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On 7 March 2014 11:42, Petr Pisar wrote: > GIF is an old standard for icons used by a very small number of > desktop packages in Fedora. Also valid. The *two* applications in Fedora using gif icons are asymptote and imagej. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://adm

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Satyajit Sahoo wrote: > Apps with ugly icons and ugly design results in bad user experience > IMO. They should not be displayed in the software center > The quaility of an application has nothing todo, with at fancy icon, not showning the icon is ok, but don't show

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On 2014-03-06, Richard Hughes wrote: > XPM is an old standard for icons used by a very small number of > desktop packages in Fedora. The XPM icons are normally small, mostly 8 > bit, and usually without an alpha channel and look very bad in the > software center. > > I'm going to propose for F21 t

Re: Proposal: Don't show applications in the software center with XPM icons

On 6 March 2014 18:51, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > Not showing app, because they have bad looking icons, seems like a bad idea > to me. I'm not sure anyone will be surprised in my goal of making the applications we show users have high quality content. XPM icons are a good first step, then it'll be th

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On 03/07/2014 11:53 AM, drago01 wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 03/06/2014 09:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Rahul Sundaram wrote: I certainly did file a complaint

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On 03/07/2014 10:59 AM, H. Guémar wrote: Hi, I don't think that worrying about perpetuating offensive stereotypes is specifc to the US, we have similar controversies in Europe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banania#Controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet#Controversies Well, read th

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/06/2014 09:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> >>> Rahul Sundaram wrote: I certainly did file a complaint against generi

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On 03/06/2014 09:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2014 03:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Rahul Sundaram wrote: I certainly did file a complaint against generic-logos which has a similar problem with Fedora Board which in turn dismissed my conce

Re: ANN Retiring pdftk for F20+

On 03/06/2014 12:52 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > Hello, > > I have reitiered pdftk for F-20 and rawhide. > > The rationals for this steps are: > > 1.) pdftk is a C++ programm which calls methods of a Java library called > iText. To do this, gcj with CNI support is required. The support of this >

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

Hi, I don't think that worrying about perpetuating offensive stereotypes is specifc to the US, we have similar controversies in Europe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banania#Controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet#Controversies Anyway, the line between what is acceptable and unaccepta

F21 System Wide Change: jQuery

= Proposed System Wide Change: jQuery = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/jQuery Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth jQuery is a fast, small, and feature-rich JavaScript library. It makes things like HTML document traversal and manipulation, event handling, animation, and Ajax much simple

ANN Retiring pdftk for F20+

Hello, I have reitiered pdftk for F-20 and rawhide. The rationals for this steps are: 1.) pdftk is a C++ programm which calls methods of a Java library called iText. To do this, gcj with CNI support is required. The support of this technology is discontinued in Fedora Linux. Therefore you can't

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-05)

On 03/06/2014 06:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:50:37PM +0100, drago01 wrote: For instance we named a release "beefy miracle" and that might have been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but apparently no one cared enough to "officially" complain. Additionally,