I've just orphaned jai-imageio-core in EPEL 6. Feel free to take it.
I have no idea how I become the owner of this package in EPEL 6.
I definitely don't remember agreeing to take it.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
___
Compose started at Wed Aug 13 08:15:03 UTC 2014
New package: alot-0.3.6-1.el7
An experimental terminal MUA based on notmuch mail
New package: backintime-1.0.36-1.el7
Simple backup tool inspired from the Flyback project and TimeVault
New package: capstats-0.21-1.el7
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:49:14 +0200
Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de wrote:
Orion built zabbix22 (2.2.5) in EPEL 7 yesterday.
Volker
Hi Volker,
I just wanted to test the packages, but the zabbix22 rpms are not
signed. Could you please push signed rpms?
Thx a lot for
On 13.08.2014 14:29, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
epel rpms are not guaranteed to be signed until we go out of beta.
releng signs them, packagers have no ability to do so.
Dennis
Thx Dennis. I just wondered, because most of the EPEL7 packages are
signed. But nevermind, I will try the rpms then
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:05:07 +0200
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
At FLOCK this year, I did a short workshop on what was labeled
EPEL.Next. At that we went over a bit of what EPEL has done in the
past, what its current challenges are, and what could be its future.
Toshio
On 13 August 2014 06:28, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 01:25:04 +0200
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 August 2014 21:56, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
* Example: When RHEL7.1 comes out we have a 30 day window to get
packages
On 08/13/2014 09:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:05:07 +0200
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
At FLOCK this year, I did a short workshop on what was labeled
EPEL.Next. At that we went over a bit of what EPEL has done in the
past, what its current challenges
Can anybody help me? I have:
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
Stefan Ringel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
Can anybody help me? I have:
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
IIRC, only --scratch build are allowed from SRPMs.
--
Tomasz Torcz God, root, what's the difference?
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:52:27PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so,
Hello,
New minor version was released yesterday. All summed up on our blog:
http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/08/12/dnf-0-6-0-released/
Cheers,
Ales
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
Can anybody help me? I have:
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
IIRC, only --scratch build are allowed from SRPMs.
other problem:
koji -d add-pkg
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
Can anybody help me? I have:
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
IIRC, only
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:46:53 +0200
Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 13:42 schrieb Dan Horák:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM
On Wed 13 Aug 2014 01:46:53 PM CEST Stefan Ringel wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 13:42 schrieb Dan Horák:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
Stefan Ringel linu...@stefanringel.de wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
Can
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:57:17PM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
because that a package is required (gstreamer1-rtsp-server version
=1.4.0) for build gnome-dvb-daemon version 0.2.90 . Have you other
ideas?
if gstreamer1-rtsp-server is a new package, then it must follow the
processes, see
# F21 Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2014-08-13
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
We've got another blocker meeting coming up this week. As of today
there are 6 proposed blockers and 1 proposed FE for F21 Alpha. The full
list can be
Compose started at Wed Aug 13 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[GraphicsMagick]
GraphicsMagick-1.3.19-7.fc21.armv7hl requires libjbig.so.2.0
[NetworkManager-l2tp]
On Aug 5, 2014, at 3:28, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/08/14 19:13, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Can someone point me to discussion which ended in /media being symlink
to /run/media directory?
I am now looking at Picasa rescanning 40GB of pictures just because
+Ruby-sig
bcc fedora-devel
snip
Hey, sorry for not getting some of these updated (you also didn't stay
on #fedora-ruby long enough for me to respond). I find that updating many
of these breaks API, because ruby library authors are really good at fixing
security problems while introducing
On Jul 28, 2014, at 16:18, Derek Pressnall dere...@needcaffeine.net wrote:
I have a question about contributing a package to Fedora. Is it common for
the author of an open source package to act as package maintainer? Or is it
better to have someone else be the package maintainer
Hi -
I have a question about [1], the policy limiting what services may
be started/enabled by default (when the RPM is installed).
# If a service does not require configuration to be functional and
# does not listen on a network socket, it may be enabled by default
# [...]
# All other
- Original Message -
I have a question about [1], the policy limiting what services may
be started/enabled by default (when the RPM is installed).
# If a service does not require configuration to be functional and
# does not listen on a network socket, it may be enabled by
Fedora's recent tendency to override the published file system hierarchy
specs, at whim, and replace them with symlinks is problematic, unnecessary,
and is breaking things. In this case, /media is defined in the upstream specs
as the location for removable media. Not /run/media. Not
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report
rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
linux-firmware-20140808-39.gitce64fa89.fc22.1
-
* Fri Aug 08 2014 Kyle McMartin k...@fedoraproject.org
20140808-39.gitce64fa89.1
- Update from upstream
I'd like to add a new Fedora project for translation.
The instructions in the guide at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Guide#How_do_I_add_a_module_to_Transifex.3F_.28.23add-transifex.29
have a link to a page which doesn't exist.
Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:22:17AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
iwl5000-firmware-8.83.5.1_1-38.fc21.1 iwl5000-firmware-8.83.5.1-39.fc22.1
iwl5000-firmware-8.83.5.1_1-38.fc21.1 iwl5000-firmware-8.83.5.1-39.fc22.1
So that's an upgrade, right? But yum distro-sync disagrees:
...
Downgrading:
Greetings!
Alpha Change Deadline slips one more week due to requested glibc/GCC mass
rebuild [1]. Alpha Change Deadline is now 2014-08-19.
For full schedule check out [2]. I'll update TJ schedule ASAP.
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5962
[2]
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-08-12)
===
Meeting started by mitr at 17:03:50 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-08-13/fesco.2014-08-13-17.03.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Dhiru Kholia dhiru.kho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now, I need your feedback and cool ideas to improve this project :-)
I notice that several packages that I maintain that include assembly
language files showed up in your results, even though the C portions of
those
David Woodhouse wrote:
Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email address
associated with my Fedora account, basically tell me to go away:
You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message
has been automatically rejected. If you think that your
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Kyle McMartin kmcma...@redhat.com wrote:
Bleh, I just ran a script to generate it from git. I have no idea why it
had an underbar in it previously, but the files themselves didn't
change.
FYI, I have filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129865
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Dhiru Kholia dhiru.kho...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, I need your feedback and cool ideas to improve this project :-)
I notice that several packages that I maintain that include assembly
language files showed up in your
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:55:37PM +0200, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
I noticed the same earlier and I am not sure how the stack protection
works for assembly language files (it seems to be a super hard problem).
Can some compiler / toolchain folks handle this question?
Long story short: assembly
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 15:50 -0400, Andrew Schultz wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email address
associated with my Fedora account, basically tell me to go away:
You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message
On 08/13/2014 12:50 PM, Andrew Schultz wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email address
associated with my Fedora account, basically tell me to go away:
You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message
has been
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:50:53 -0700
Samuel Sieb sam...@sieb.net wrote:
On 08/13/2014 12:50 PM, Andrew Schultz wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email address
associated with my Fedora account, basically tell me to go away:
You are not
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 14:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, I'm not sure why this is suddenly confusing.
Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
be somewhere that people should post to for one-off advice and
assistance (or to point out broken links on the web
David Woodhouse wrote:
Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
be somewhere that people should post to for one-off advice and
assistance (or to point out broken links on the web page), without
wanting to subscribe and take a daily interest in l10n matters.
While
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:05:35PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 14:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, I'm not sure why this is suddenly confusing.
Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
be somewhere that people should post to for
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:05:35PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
be somewhere that people should post to for one-off advice and
assistance (or to point out broken links on the web page), without
wanting to subscribe and
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 22:05:35 +0100
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 14:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, I'm not sure why this is suddenly confusing.
Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might
actually be somewhere that people should
On 08/13/2014 01:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:50:53 -0700
Samuel Sieb sam...@sieb.net wrote:
I would recommend changing the wording as, at least to me, that
sounds like a closed list. There is no indication that someone could
actually send to the list if they were
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
Fedora's recent tendency to override the published file system hierarchy
specs, at whim, and replace them with symlinks is problematic, unnecessary,
and is breaking things. In this case, /media is defined in the upstream
specs
Orion Poplawski wrote:
It seems to me like we have a lot of /usr/lib64 rpaths being added to
binaries
now that were not previously. Anyone know why?
Something libtool-related with arts/kdelibs3 stuff, but I think I
successfully fixed them today.
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
Why? Rsnapshot and AMANDA are already available, stable, and quite robust.
They seem to cover just the niches you're aiming at, and the performance and
security ramifications have already been worked out. Plus, neither requires
an SQL database, which makes them much more robust.
It's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128792
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
I cannot explain this failure as a bug in tests. (I found another flaw in the
tests but it's irrelevant to this failure.)
This failure says the looked-up key does exist in the cache, but
commit 4e4be5f230d7dff04cc4d506e27c5b6b52e71ca5
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Aug 13 09:41:28 2014 +0200
Fix other time race in tests
...che-1.06-Make-tests-aware-of-running-time.patch | 28 +++
perl-Cache-Cache.spec |5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112553
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Cache-Cache-1.06-16.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128979
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #6)
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #5)
Like many other perl modules, Plack has a long dependency chain, which needs
to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128792
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
After reading Cache::CacheSizer::_Limit_Size():
sub _Limit_Size
{
my ( $p_cache, $p_cache_meta_data, $p_new_size ) = @_;
Assert_Defined( $p_cache );
Assert_Defined(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128792
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
The unexpected dequeuing can be reproduced by:
--- a/lib/Cache/SizeAwareCacheTester.pm
+++ b/lib/Cache/SizeAwareCacheTester.pm
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ sub _test_two
$self-ok( ) :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129583
Bug ID: 1129583
Summary: perl-OpenOffice-UNO: tests fails on s390(x)
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-OpenOffice-UNO
Assignee: lkund...@v3.sk
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128979
--- Comment #8 from Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #7)
No, it's an upstream requirement. Plack-1.0031 requires
perl(File::ShareDir::Install) = 0.06
Fixing this bug does not require updating
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128792
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit e5b1262b2fb6caece67fdb8c32d3ff80126e6631
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Aug 13 12:06:54 2014 +0200
Fix race between adding two key sets in tests
...che-1.06-Make-tests-aware-of-running-time.patch | 29 +---
perl-Cache-Cache.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128792
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
External Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129614
Bug ID: 1129614
Summary: perl-MooseX-Declare-0.35-8.fc22 FTBFS: Can't locate
object method current_metaclass via package
MooseX::Role::Parameterized at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129614
Fedora Perl Development Team perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 04/08/2014 12:47, David Dick wrote:
On 08/04/2014 08:14 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
On 03/08/2014 06:28, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
perl-DateTime-Incomplete has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.07-1.el6.noarch requires
Thanks a lot for clarifying, Ralph. I was wondering what was going on there.
- Ken
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote:
The fedora-apps team identified a security hole in the new pkgdb
application this morning that may have inadvertently granted the
On 03/08/2014 06:28, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
perl-DateTime-Incomplete has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.07-1.el6.noarch requires perl(DateTime::Set)
= 0:0.0901
On i386:
perl-DateTime-Incomplete-0.07-1.el6.noarch requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #3 from Harald Reindl h.rei...@thelounge.net ---
yes, but that is new in F20
perl-SOAP-WSDL-2.00.99_3-3.fc20.20140812.rh.noarch is just a unchanged rebuild
of the F19 src.rpm and on F19 there where no devel-dependencies
the same
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
The MM::maybe_command() exists in various implementations specific for each
operating system these implementations requires ExtUtils::MakeMaker back.
So it's unlikely that IPC::Cmd upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #5 from Harald Reindl h.rei...@thelounge.net ---
however, pull perl-devel, glibc-devel, glibc-header and kernel-headers just for
http://search.cpan.org/~pmevzek/Net-DRI-0.96/lib/Net/DRI.pm to register domains
is somehow pervert
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
spamassissin uses ExtUtils::MakeMaker from sa-compile.raw like this:
my $ccopt = $Config{optimize}; # typically -O2
open(FILE, Makefile.PL) or die cannot create Makefile.PL: $!;
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #5)
however, pull perl-devel, glibc-devel, glibc-header and kernel-headers just
for http://search.cpan.org/~pmevzek/Net-DRI-0.96/lib/Net/DRI.pm to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129321
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #8 from Harald Reindl h.rei...@thelounge.net ---
i would accept the perl-devel but in F19 perl-devel did not pull
glibc-headers, glibc-devel and kernel-headers
F19:
* perl-devel
* perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder
* perl-ExtUtils-Install
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #8)
i would accept the perl-devel but in F19 perl-devel did not pull
glibc-headers, glibc-devel and kernel-headers
F19:
* perl-devel
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129614
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128979
--- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #8)
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #7)
No, it's an upstream requirement. Plack-1.0031 requires
perl(File::ShareDir::Install)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
These binary packages requires something from perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker:
bucardo-0:4.5.0-7.fc21.noarch
clusterssh-0:4.02.03-2.fc21.noarch
dnssec-tools-perlmods-0:2.0-10.fc21.x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #12 from Harald Reindl h.rei...@thelounge.net ---
thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129443
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
I will review dependency on perl-devel for each package which posses it now.
E.g. perl-ExtUtils-Install does not need it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128979
--- Comment #10 from Eric Christensen spa...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #9)
Let's take this thread to an end. I'll further on disgard it and further
CVEs.
That's fine. Depending on the severity of the CVE your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128979
--- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Eric Christensen from comment #10)
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #9)
Let's take this thread to an end. I'll further on disgard it and further
CVEs.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128979
--- Comment #12 from Eric Christensen spa...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #11)
(In reply to Eric Christensen from comment #10)
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #9)
Let's take this thread to an end. I'll
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Jcode from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Jcode
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Jcode from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Jcode
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Unicode-Map
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Unicode-Map
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: approveacls of package: perl-Jcode from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Jcode
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: kevin set for ixs acl: commit of package: perl-Unicode-Map from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Unicode-Map
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: kevin set for ixs acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Unicode-Map from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Unicode-Map
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-Jcode from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Jcode
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: kevin set for ixs acl: approveacls of package: perl-Unicode-Map from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Unicode-Map
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: kevin set for ixs acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Unicode-Map from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Unicode-Map
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: approveacls of package: perl-Unicode-Map from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Unicode-Map
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Unicode-Map
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Unicode-Map
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-Unicode-Map from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Unicode-Map
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: approveacls of package: perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: kevin set for pghmcfc acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: kevin set for perl-sig acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: kevin set for perl-sig acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Digest-Perl-MD5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
bd5ae05... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
e5f0ddf... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
762863b... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
3dad124... Spec tidy-up (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no
user: pghmcfc set for fale acl: commit of package: perl-Jcode from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Jcode
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: pghmcfc set for fale acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Jcode from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Jcode
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: pghmcfc set for fale acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Jcode from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Jcode
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
