date:20160120

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Ralf Corsepius


On 01/20/2016 08:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:


I have filed a bug (against gtk3 for now) about this issue:

   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300432


I still don't know the cause of this issue, I don't think this is gtk3's 
fault (alone). It's possible to generate similar breakdowns for many 
packages (My gut feeling is, this culprit is dnf).


Example:
# dnf install usbguard-devel.i686

Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: review swap: nvme-cli

2016-01-20 Thread Dennis Chen

I'll take it for review. I have two simple reviews if you wouldn't
mind: 

1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299179
2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300158

Thanks,
Dennis Chen

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review (take 3): [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

2016-01-20 Thread Noriko Hosoi

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch
git patch file (master) -- revised following the comments by William in 
#comment:8 

$ man status-dirsrv
[...]
EXIST STATUS
   status-dirsrv returns 0 if all Directory Server instances are running.  
Otherwise, a  non-
   zero failure code returned from systemctl is returned.

   If  a single Directory Server instance is specified, 0 is returned if the 
instance is run‐
   ning; a non-zero failure code returned from systemctl is returned if the 
instance  is  not
   running; 255 is returned if the instance does not exist.

On 01/20/2016 04:52 PM, 389 Project wrote:

Replying to [comment:8 firstyear]:
  > Can we return a different code for bogus?
  >
  > This will let us call this and make decisions about if a server:
  >
  > * Exists and is running
  > * Exists and in stopped
  > * Does not exist.

  Are there any standard we should follow?

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@%(host_name)s
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1285486] perl-Test-CheckManifest: please update and build epel7

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285486



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-CheckManifest-1.29-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1282828] Bump perl-Test-TCP version in epel7

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282828
Bug 1282828 depends on bug 1284623, which changed state.

Bug 1284623 Summary: perl-Test-SharedFork: update to 0.29 in epel7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284623

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1284623] perl-Test-SharedFork: update to 0.29 in epel7

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284623



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test-SharedFork-0.35-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1285486] perl-Test-CheckManifest: please update and build epel7

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285486

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-CheckManifest-1.2
   ||9-3.el7
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-01-20 23:38:07



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1284623] perl-Test-SharedFork: update to 0.29 in epel7

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284623

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-SharedFork-0.35-1
   ||.el7
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-01-20 23:38:02



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaning lexertl, libpuma, tex-zfuzz, undertaker

2016-01-20 Thread Jerry James

I am orphaning a few packages that I no longer use.  All of them,
except lexertl, are on their latest upstream versions in Rawhide.
None of them have any open bugs.  Upstream releases are fairly rare
for all of these packages.  They are:
- lexertl: a modular lexical analyzer generator (needed by libpuma)
- libpuma: a library for parsing and manipulating C/C++ source code,
including AspectC++, a compiler supporting aspect-oriented extensions
to C++ (needed by undertaker)
- undertaker: a tool to find always-on and always-off conditional C code
- tex-zfuzz: a type-checker and LaTeX style for the Z specification language

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Michael Schwendt

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:45:15 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:

> Wouldn't there also be the problem of headers getting clobbered when
> you do this?

Not generally. Not all projects generate headers to be arch-specific.
At least in the C/C++ world, it is much more common for headers to
contain conditionals to handle arch-dependent sections.

Else, yes, it can happen that headers (and sometimes other files such as
-config scripts) in multilib -devel packages cause implicit conflicts,
which are not acceptable, even if fixing the conflicts has been
neglected for a long time.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

review swap: nvme-cli

2016-01-20 Thread Andrew Lutomirski

I'll gladly trade a simple review for a simple review:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298019

It's the command line tool for poking at nvme disks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Ralf Corsepius


On 01/21/2016 12:45 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:


We don't store libraries and headers in such a way that the different
arches can coexist without clobbering.
Headers being installed to /usr/include must be multilib capable. I.e. 
they either must be arch-independent or contain sufficient magic 
(conditionals) to cope with all fedora archs.



That would be possible if we
have something like this:
/usr/lib/
/usr/include/


Current practice is
/usr/include/ ... for nonarch headers.

/usr/{lib,lib64}/... for arched parts of a package, comprising arched 
headers.



For example, a 32-bit x86 platform would probably use
"i686-redhat-linux-gnu", whereas a 64-bit x86 platform would use
"x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".

Without that, it would be tough to guarantee that installing the
32-bit version of a devel package would produce a consistent and sane
build compared to an actual 32-bit chroot.

No, cf. above.

Does anybody still have a non yum-only based x86_64 system? I suspecting 
and am pretty sure this issue is caused by yet another brokenness in dnf.


Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1299287] perl-System-Command-1.117 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299287



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-System-Command-1.117-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7cbed75ccf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-28e25379b1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300111] perl-Log-Report-1.12 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300111



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-28e25379b1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bodhi - new update obsoleted an older update that had been submitted for stable

2016-01-20 Thread Josh Boyer

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Luke Macken  wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 07:17:10AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Richard Fearn  
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/763
>> >
>> > You beat me to it :) Thanks for doing that!
>> >
>> > And Luke seems to have fixed the problem already. Thanks Luke!
>>
>> He fixed the code, but it isn't merged yet nor is it deployed in
>> Fedora Infrastructure from what I can tell.
>
> The fix is now in production.
>
> Sorry about the annoying regression, folks. Bodhi previously would avoid
> obsoleting updates that had an open request, even if it hasn't gotten
> pulled into a push yet. A recent improvement to this logic allows for
> updates with a testing request to get obsoleted if a newer update gets
> submitted before it gets "locked" into a push. The bug that snuck in
> allowed this to happen to unlocked updates with a stable request too.

Thanks for the explanation and the quick fix, Luke.

josh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297594] perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297594



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297530] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML - Light and fast TwiML generator

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297530



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML-1.05-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297594] perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297594

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc |perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc
   |24  |24
   |perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc |perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc
   |23  |23
   ||perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc
   ||22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297365] Upgrade perl-Date-Holidays-DE to 1.7

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297365

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7-1 |perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7-1
   |.fc23   |.fc23
   ||perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7-1
   ||.fc22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297365] Upgrade perl-Date-Holidays-DE to 1.7

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297365



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1285518] Review Request: perl-File-Edit-Portable - Read and write files while keeping the original line-endings intact

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285518



--- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
The package should be updated before submit. The latest version is
File-Edit-Portable-1.15

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300290] perl-Module-Build-0.4216 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300290

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Build-0.42.16-1
   ||.fc24
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-01-21 02:11:35



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1285518] Review Request: perl-File-Edit-Portable - Read and write files while keeping the original line-endings intact

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285518



--- Comment #5 from Denis Fateyev  ---
Sure. I waited for some modules to be populated in EPEL.
Now it's done and tested, so I will update/push packages for this module soon.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Kratochvil

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:59:01 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:59:01 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:50:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > However on the same host if you do:
> > > 
> > >   dnf install gtk3-devel.i686
> > > 
> > > then there's a lot missing before you can compile a 32 bit Gtk3
> > > application[2].  
> > 
> > There were always missing many %{?_isa} in BuildRequires, I was filing many 
> > of
> > them, got some fixed.  But now it is even forbidden to use them:
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires_and_.25.7B_isa.7D
> 
> This is about explicit and automatic Requires, _not_ BuildRequires.

I was talking from a higher point of view.  Yes, the %{?_isa} would be needed
in Requires in OP and I was filing such %{?_isa} Bugs for Requires:
glibc-devel: Missing %{?_isa} for Requires: libgcc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289356
[...]
Although I was filing even BuildRequires:
python: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773708
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773708

This is sure a stupid way as those Bugs could be detected automatically.

The point was that these two issues are very related:
  %{?_isa} inBuildRequires: commonly not present + now forbidden
  %{?_isa} in *-devel Requires: commonly not present
There is an implication:
  missing %{?_isa} in *-devel Requires => %{?_isa} in BuildRequires is useless
And I claim that in this current state fixing the %{?_isa} in *-devel Requires
has only marginal impact.  It can only make possible to multi-arch build
non-rpm packages (or rpm packages in non-rpm way) - that is you need to
specify all the "dnf install FOO-devel.i686" build requirements by hand as the
%{?_isa} in BuildRequires must not be present in the *.spec file now.

And I was suggesting it makes more sense to me to give it up and use mock.

Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

2016-01-20 Thread Sander Hoentjen

On 01/20/2016 05:44 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 10:18 AM, Sander Hoentjen wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I am currently packaging dnsdist[1][2]. This is a binary that has a
> > httpserver built-in, and the html, css and js files embedded in the
> > binary. The javascript files are jquery and a few other known
> > scripts[3], and there is one javascript specific to dnsdist
> > itself[4]. What are the guidelines on javascript embedded this way?
> > Do I need to miniify them myself, or are pre-minified files ok?
> > Also, is it ok to use the jquery shipped in the source tarball of
> > dnsdist?
>
>
>
> > [1]  [2]
> >  [3]
> > 
>
>
> [4]
> >
> 
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript
Yeah I read that, but is says "Please note that this section really only
applies to JavaScript libraries intended for use on the web." so I am
not sure that applies to my case.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Changes in F24 schedule - additional one-week slip

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Kurik

Hello, Fedora people,

Earlier this month, it was brought to FESCo's attention that when it
had made the initial Fedora 24 schedule, it failed to accommodate a
necessary mass-rebuild for the GCC 6 compiler. As a result, FESCo
decided[2] to slip the release by at least two weeks and by as much as
three weeks, pending feedback by the GCC team.

After that feedback was received, it became clear that the full three
weeks slip would be needed, so we are extending the slip of Fedora 24
by one additional week from the previous announcement.

For full details, see the updated schedule[3].

Dates for the most important milestones:
2016-03-22 Alpha Release
2015-05-03 Beta Release
2016-06-07 Fedora 24 Final Release (GA)


[1] 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/WW2KDKKQUA2LINOKRWXWAZQWPZHKCP6W/
[2] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2016-01-08-17.22.html
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule#Key_Milestones

-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

REMINDER: System V to systemd unit migration

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Kurik

At the FESCo meeting on October 14th [1], it was decided that the time
has come to finally complete the migration away from System V init
scripts.

This email is a reminder about this Change, following the announcement
sent by Stephen Gallagher [2].
You might also want to check the list of possibly affected packages [2].

The branch of F24 from rawhide is currently scheduled on 2016-02-23.
As previously announced, any package that has not been migrated from
System V init scripts to systemd units before this date will be
retired from the Fedora package collection. Exceptions to this must be
requested by FESCo ticket no later than February 2nd.

[1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2015-10-14-18.01.html
[2] bit.ly/1ZBEqhc

-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding epel-rpm-macros to the buildroot

2016-01-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:02:46 -0600
Jason L Tibbitts III  wrote:

> I've now done many mass rebuilds both with and without epel-rpm-macros
> in the buildroot and have found exactly 31 failures which result from
> the presence of the macro package.  This macro package enables, in
> EPEL6, the use of %license in the %files section of the spec without
> having to conditionally define it.

...snip...

> Does anyone have any objections to me doing either of these?  If I can
> get the macro package into the buildroot then I can move on with
> adding some of the other requested macros.  This should all be much
> easier with the rebuild infrastructure I have in place now.  I can
> also move on to trying to help out EPEL5 as well.  I'd really like to
> put this phase of the work to bed as soon as is feasible.

Sounds great to me, and thanks for working on this. :) 

kevin


pgpzq3Mr_1E6a.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Ralf Corsepius


On 01/20/2016 04:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

If you're on freshly installed Fedora 23 (x86-64), then

   dnf install gtk3-devel.x86_64

gets you everything you need to compile a simple Gtk3 application[1].

However on the same host if you do:

   dnf install gtk3-devel.i686

then there's a lot missing before you can compile a 32 bit Gtk3
application[2].  I had to install the following dependencies (found by
tedious trial-and-error) before I could compile it:

   dnf -y install 
{pango,pixman,zlib,libpng,expat,mesa-libEGL,libX11,libdrm,libxcb,libXau,libXdamage,libXfixes,libXxf86vm,libXext,mesa-libGL,libXrender,harfbuzz,graphite2,gdk-pixbuf2,atk,cairo-gobject,libXinerama,libXi,libXrandr,libXcursor,libXcomposite,wayland,libwayland-client,libxkbcommon,libwayland-cursor,mesa-libwayland-egl,libepoxy,at-spi2-atk,at-spi2-core,dbus,glib2,glibc}-devel.i686

Is this a bug or is it not expected this would work or I am doing it wrong?


IMO, this is supposed to work => Bug

The big question would be: Where?

Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding epel-rpm-macros to the buildroot

2016-01-20 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III

> "DG" == Dennis Gilmore  writes:

DG> When you are ready for the change to be made, please file a ticket
DG> with releng, we will need to coordinate a koji and comps change.

Yep, that was part of my plan.  After committing the tiny fixes needed
for those few packages (many of which hadn't been touched since the
dist-git conversion) and a final complete rpmdiff run to make trebly
certain that everything is OK, I've filed the releng ticket.

Now I'll do the same checking for the version Orion committed that has
the added nodejs macro, and work on adding others in the TODO list.
Then its on to EPEL5.

BTW, you can see the TODO list at
https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/epel-rpm-macros.git/tree/TODO?h=el6

Obviously some of those aren't actually possible, but it's worth a try.

 - J<
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

F24 Self Contained Change: Atomic Storage Clients

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Kurik

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Atomic Storage Clients =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AtomicStorageClients

Change owner(s):
* mmicene 

Kubernetes provides a mechanism for providing storage to Pods via
volumes. Volumes support several underlying storage protocols, but
clients are needed to support each type. Native GlusterFS and Ceph
clients will be added to the Atomic host base to support these Volume
types.

== Detailed Description ==
By design, Docker container internal storage is ephemeral in nature
and data is lost when a container is stopped. Kubernetes uses Volumes
to provide a means for Pods keep data for extended periods of time and
between container restarts.

A Volume in Kubernetes represents a real piece of underlying storage
capacity in the infrastructure. Persistent Volumes are a way for users
to "claim" a Volume without knowing the details of the particular
storage environment. Persistent volumes are intended for "network
volumes" like NFS shares, iSCSI devices, GlusterFS volumes, or Ceph
devices. Persistent Volumes also exist past the Pod lifecycle.

In order to access the underlying storage, the appropriate drivers
must be available to Kubernetes on the Atomic host. We will add the
appropriate packages to support the following Volume types:
* GlusterFS
* RBD (Ceph Block Device)

Both projects currently have packages available and accepted in Fedora
for general use. No new packaging should be required.

== Scope ==
Proposal owners:
* Add GlusterFS client Fedora packages to Atomic package list
* Add Ceph client Fedora packages to Atomic package list
  -- The Ceph packaging will be changing to reduce the number of
dependencies. This may cause some bloat in the image until fixed.

Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

List of deliverables: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding epel-rpm-macros to the buildroot

2016-01-20 Thread Dennis Gilmore

On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 08:26:13 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:02:46 -0600
> 
> Jason L Tibbitts III  wrote:
> > I've now done many mass rebuilds both with and without epel-rpm-macros
> > in the buildroot and have found exactly 31 failures which result from
> > the presence of the macro package.  This macro package enables, in
> > EPEL6, the use of %license in the %files section of the spec without
> > having to conditionally define it.
> 
> ...snip...
> 
> > Does anyone have any objections to me doing either of these?  If I can
> > get the macro package into the buildroot then I can move on with
> > adding some of the other requested macros.  This should all be much
> > easier with the rebuild infrastructure I have in place now.  I can
> > also move on to trying to help out EPEL5 as well.  I'd really like to
> > put this phase of the work to bed as soon as is feasible.
> 
> Sounds great to me, and thanks for working on this. :)
> 
> kevin
+1

When you are ready for the change to be made, please file a ticket with 
releng, we will need to coordinate a koji and comps change.

Dennis

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Sérgio Basto

On Qua, 2016-01-20 at 17:59 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:32:52 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> > IMO, this is supposed to work => Bug
> > 
> > The big question would be: Where?

I bet more in packaging which have some missing %{_isa}

dnf repoquery --requires  gtk3-devel.x86_64 > 1

dnf repoquery --requires  gtk3-devel.i686 > 2

vi -O 1 2
both requires same pkgconfig(atk) for example, 

Somehow 
    dnf repoquery --provides  gtk3-devel.x86_64 
and 
    dnf repoquery --provides  gtk3-devel.i686

should provides different pkgconfig(s) instead the same : 
pkgconfig(gail-3.0) = 3.18.2 

maybe pkgconfig(gail-3.0)(x86-64) and pkgconfig(gail-3.0)(x86-32) 


> It cannot work as long as gtk3-devel relies on pkgconfig(foo)
> dependencies
> instead of arch-specific explicit Requires.

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Changes in F24 schedule - additional one-week slip

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Kurik

Hello, Fedora people,

Earlier this month, it was brought to FESCo's attention that when it
had made the initial Fedora 24 schedule, it failed to accommodate a
necessary mass-rebuild for the GCC 6 compiler. As a result, FESCo
decided[2] to slip the release by at least two weeks and by as much as
three weeks, pending feedback by the GCC team.

After that feedback was received, it became clear that the full three
weeks slip would be needed, so we are extending the slip of Fedora 24
by one additional week from the previous announcement.

For full details, see the updated schedule[3].

Dates for the most important milestones:
2016-03-22 Alpha Release
2015-05-03 Beta Release
2016-06-07 Fedora 24 Final Release (GA)


[1] 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/WW2KDKKQUA2LINOKRWXWAZQWPZHKCP6W/
[2] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2016-01-08-17.22.html
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule#Key_Milestones

-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: COPR repo in mock?

2016-01-20 Thread Colin Walters

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016, at 08:05 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

> There are actually some very real security reasons not to let mock
> pull arbitrary configuration files from local directories. It would
> provide way, way too much power to the local developer to build
> arbitrary chroot cages on the mock server,

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283709
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Michael Schwendt

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:32:52 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> IMO, this is supposed to work => Bug
> 
> The big question would be: Where?

It cannot work as long as gtk3-devel relies on pkgconfig(foo) dependencies
instead of arch-specific explicit Requires.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik uploaded Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz for perl-Module-Build

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

681e174d184087d7e5bf64a338c5e48c  Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Module-Build/Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz/md5/681e174d184087d7e5bf64a338c5e48c/Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones

If you're on freshly installed Fedora 23 (x86-64), then

  dnf install gtk3-devel.x86_64

gets you everything you need to compile a simple Gtk3 application[1].

However on the same host if you do:

  dnf install gtk3-devel.i686

then there's a lot missing before you can compile a 32 bit Gtk3
application[2].  I had to install the following dependencies (found by
tedious trial-and-error) before I could compile it:

  dnf -y install 
{pango,pixman,zlib,libpng,expat,mesa-libEGL,libX11,libdrm,libxcb,libXau,libXdamage,libXfixes,libXxf86vm,libXext,mesa-libGL,libXrender,harfbuzz,graphite2,gdk-pixbuf2,atk,cairo-gobject,libXinerama,libXi,libXrandr,libXcursor,libXcomposite,wayland,libwayland-client,libxkbcommon,libwayland-cursor,mesa-libwayland-egl,libepoxy,at-spi2-atk,at-spi2-core,dbus,glib2,glibc}-devel.i686

Is this a bug or is it not expected this would work or I am doing it wrong?

Rich.

[1] For my test I am using the trivial example from here:

  https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/gtk-getting-started.html

[2] To compile the 32 bit application I'm using:

  gcc -m32 trivial.c `PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR=/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/share/pkgconfig 
pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-3.0` -o trivial

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide 20160120 compose check report

2016-01-20 Thread Fedora compose checker

Missing expected images:

Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64

Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160119:

Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64
Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64

No images in Rawhide 20160119 but not this.

Failed openQA tests: 4 of 63

ID: 3484Test: x86_64 universal server_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/3484
ID: 3535Test: x86_64 workstation_live base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/3535
ID: 3491Test: x86_64 universal package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/3491
ID: 3517Test: i386 universal package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/3517

Passed openQA tests: 59 of 63
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:59:25PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:32:52 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> > IMO, this is supposed to work => Bug
> > 
> > The big question would be: Where?
> 
> It cannot work as long as gtk3-devel relies on pkgconfig(foo) dependencies
> instead of arch-specific explicit Requires.

Interesting ...

$ rpm -qR gtk2-devel | grep pkgconfig
pkgconfig
pkgconfig(atk)
pkgconfig(cairo)
[etc]

$ rpm -q --whatprovides "pkgconfig(atk)"
atk-devel-2.18.0-1.fc24.i686
atk-devel-2.18.0-1.fc24.x86_64

Should the pkgconfig() dependencies be modified to contain %_isa or
%__isa_bits?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Embedding javascript in binary

2016-01-20 Thread Sander Hoentjen

Hi,

I am currently packaging dnsdist[1][2].
This is a binary that has a httpserver built-in, and the html, css and
js files embedded in the binary.
The javascript files are jquery and a few other known scripts[3], and
there is one javascript specific to dnsdist itself[4].
What are the guidelines on javascript embedded this way? Do I need to
miniify them myself, or are pre-minified files ok?
Also, is it ok to use the jquery shipped in the source tarball of dnsdist?



[1] 
[2] 
[3] 
[4]


Regards,
Sander
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

2016-01-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 01/20/2016 10:18 AM, Sander Hoentjen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am currently packaging dnsdist[1][2]. This is a binary that has a
> httpserver built-in, and the html, css and js files embedded in the
> binary. The javascript files are jquery and a few other known
> scripts[3], and there is one javascript specific to dnsdist
> itself[4]. What are the guidelines on javascript embedded this way?
> Do I need to miniify them myself, or are pre-minified files ok? 
> Also, is it ok to use the jquery shipped in the source tarball of
> dnsdist?
> 
> 
> 
> [1]  [2]
>  [3]
> 
>
> 
[4]
> 


https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlafuW4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6OyIwCdEiujsl8k2vJCycspoRF3svs5
rI0An0bIPdQM7kRE1i8ZeOjPKa0OzVz8
=NerB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-Module-Build (master). "0.4216 bump"

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

From 68a39743a48b5de59e5ed42cf7f8e818b676db20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:02:46 +0100
Subject: 0.4216 bump

---
 .gitignore |  1 +
 perl-Module-Build.spec | 18 +-
 sources|  2 +-
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3768523..507e2de 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -21,3 +21,4 @@ Module-Build-0.2808.tar.gz
 /Module-Build-0.4211.tar.gz
 /Module-Build-0.4212.tar.gz
 /Module-Build-0.4214.tar.gz
+/Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Module-Build.spec b/perl-Module-Build.spec
index 0d72036..a28b84d 100644
--- a/perl-Module-Build.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-Build.spec
@@ -1,17 +1,18 @@
 %global cpan_version_major 0.42
-%global cpan_version_minor 14
+%global cpan_version_minor 16
 %global cpan_version %{cpan_version_major}%{?cpan_version_minor}
 
 Name:   perl-Module-Build
 Epoch:  2
 Version:
%{cpan_version_major}%{?cpan_version_minor:.%cpan_version_minor}
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Build and install Perl modules
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Build/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/L/LE/LEONT/Module-Build-%{cpan_version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  coreutils
 BuildRequires:  perl
 BuildRequires:  perl-devel
 BuildRequires:  perl(Archive::Tar)
@@ -57,13 +58,15 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 # Optional tests:
 %if !%{defined perl_bootstrap}
 BuildRequires:  perl(Archive::Zip)
-BuildRequires:  perl(File::ShareDir)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::ShareDir) >= 1.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(PAR::Dist)
 %if 0%{?fedora}  || 0%{?rhel} < 7
 BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Readme)
 %endif
 %endif
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Harness) >= 3.16
+BuildRequires:  perl(TAP::Harness)
+BuildRequires:  perl(TAP::Harness::Env)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Harness) >= 3.29
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.49
 BuildRequires:  perl(Text::ParseWords)
 BuildRequires:  perl(utf8)
@@ -83,6 +86,7 @@ Requires:   perl(inc::latest)
 Requires:   perl(Module::Metadata) >= 1.02
 # Keep PAR support optional (PAR::Dist)
 Requires:   perl(Perl::OSType) >= 1
+Requires:   perl(TAP::Harness::Env)
 Requires:   perl(Test::Harness)
 %if !%{defined perl_bootstrap}
 # Optional run-time needed for Software::License license identifier,
@@ -133,13 +137,17 @@ rm t/signature.t
 LANG=C TEST_SIGNATURE=1 MB_TEST_EXPERIMENTAL=1 ./Build test
 
 %files
-%doc Changes contrib LICENSE README
+%license LICENSE
+%doc Changes contrib README
 %{_bindir}/config_data
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man1/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jan 20 2016 Jitka Plesnikova  - 2:0.42.16-1
+- 0.4216 bump
+
 * Thu Jun 18 2015 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 2:0.42.14-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index c34c57d..4bec0c3 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7b7ca5a47bef48c50c8b5906ca3ac7fb  Module-Build-0.4214.tar.gz
+681e174d184087d7e5bf64a338c5e48c  Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Module-Build.git/commit/?h=master=68a39743a48b5de59e5ed42cf7f8e818b676db20
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2016-01-21 17:00 UTC)

2016-01-20 Thread James Antill

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-01-21 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

 Local time information (via. rktime):

2016-01-21 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2016-01-21 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2016-01-21 17:00 Thu UTC <-
2016-01-21 17:00 Thu Europe/London <-
2016-01-21 18:00 Thu Europe/Paris   CET
2016-01-21 18:00 Thu Europe/Berlin  CET
2016-01-21 22:30 Thu Asia/Calcutta  IST
--new day--
2016-01-22 01:00 Fri Asia/Singapore SGT
2016-01-22 01:00 Fri Asia/Hong_Kong HKT
2016-01-22 02:00 Fri Asia/Tokyo JST
2016-01-22 03:00 Fri Australia/Brisbane EST

 Links to all tickets below can be found at: 

https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13

= Followups =

#topic #558 Application/Library distinction and package splitting
.fpc 558
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/558

#topic #566 RPM file triggers
.fpc 566
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/566

= New business =

#topic #590 systemd links update
.fpc 590
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/590

#topic #591 Description of filtering macros in Perl is outdated
.fpc 591
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/591

#topic #592 Blanked bootstrapping exception for mlton
.fpc 592
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/592

= Open Floor = 

 For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket.  The
report of the agenda items can be found at:

https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13

 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting. 
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones


I have filed a bug (against gtk3 for now) about this issue:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300432

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

2016-01-20 Thread Noriko Hosoi


https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch

Note: no need to review this patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0002-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch
git patch file (master) -- derived files by autogen
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@%(host_name)s
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

AMD FirePro W4100

2016-01-20 Thread Ian Pilcher


I'm looking at upgrading my video setup to support 3 monitors.  I had
intended to purchase an AMD FirePro V4900, since it is known to "just
work" with the open source drivers, but I see that the W4100 is now
available at approximately the same price point, with more memory, etc.,
etc.

Has anyone tried a W4100 with the open source drivers?

--

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com
 "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" 

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Python naming guidelines clarification

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Včelák

Hello.

I've got several Python packages on review. But I'm not sure if the
naming policy applies to the spec file the same way as it applies on
the resulting packages.

socketIO-client RHBZ #1300092
ripe-atlas-sagan RHBZ #1300217
ripe-atlas-cousteau RHBZ #1300219
ripe-atlas-tools RHBZ #1300222

For each package, the build creates python2-name and python3-name
subpackage containing the Python modules. But the main package is
created only in the case of ripe-atlas-tools, which contains
executable utilities. The other packages don't contain any utilities.

Should be the spec file prefixed with python-? Does this apply both to
packages containing primarily the utilities? Or is there a better and
consistent naming scheme for this case?

Thank you,

Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Kratochvil

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:50:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> However on the same host if you do:
> 
>   dnf install gtk3-devel.i686
> 
> then there's a lot missing before you can compile a 32 bit Gtk3
> application[2].

There were always missing many %{?_isa} in BuildRequires, I was filing many of
them, got some fixed.  But now it is even forbidden to use them:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires_and_.25.7B_isa.7D

IMO it is because it was causing more harm than good due to rpm/yum/dnf never
properly supporting those:
RFE: 'dnf builddep' should be able to extract the specfile from a 
.src.rpm and use it for the dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210276

IIUC Fedora gave up on multi-arch building and you should use mock for that,
ISTM multi-arch is now officially supported only for installation.


Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

The %license property is now supported in EPEL6

2016-01-20 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III

Just a note that it EPEL6 no longer requires you to include the
definition of %license property; you can use it freely in your %files
list as you would in EPEL7 or Fedora.  It simply maps to %doc as it
would if you had included the magic line noise manually.  This works for
me in koji; if it doesn't work in your local mock instance, it's
possible that the mirrors still need to catch up with the change to
comps.

You'll still need that line noise (for now, at least) in EPEL5.  Next
I'll be looking into whether or not it's actually possible.

 - J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297530] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML - Light and fast TwiML generator

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297530

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-01-20 16:54:20



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297530] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML - Light and fast TwiML generator

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297530



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML-1.05-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1294485] perl-Net-GitHub-0.81 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294485

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Net-GitHub-0.82-1.fc23
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-01-20 16:54:51



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297773] perl-Net-GitHub-0.82 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297773

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Net-GitHub-0.82-1.fc23
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-01-20 16:54:48



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297594] perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297594



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Michael Schwendt

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:59:01 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:50:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > However on the same host if you do:
> > 
> >   dnf install gtk3-devel.i686
> > 
> > then there's a lot missing before you can compile a 32 bit Gtk3
> > application[2].  
> 
> There were always missing many %{?_isa} in BuildRequires, I was filing many of
> them, got some fixed.  But now it is even forbidden to use them:
>   
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires_and_.25.7B_isa.7D
>

This is about explicit and automatic Requires, _not_ BuildRequires.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Python naming guidelines clarification

2016-01-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:44:50PM +0100, Jan Včelák wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I've got several Python packages on review. But I'm not sure if the
> naming policy applies to the spec file the same way as it applies on
> the resulting packages.
> 
> socketIO-client RHBZ #1300092
> ripe-atlas-sagan RHBZ #1300217
> ripe-atlas-cousteau RHBZ #1300219
Yes, the guidelines apply to the source rpm name too. Those
srpms should be called python-*, because they contain python libries.

> ripe-atlas-tools RHBZ #130022
This one contains an application (too), so the current srpm name is fine.

Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

2016-01-20 Thread Christopher

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM Sander Hoentjen  wrote:
[snip]

> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript
> Yeah I read that, but is says "Please note that this section really only
> applies to JavaScript libraries intended for use on the web." so I am
> not sure that applies to my case.
>

It also doesn't thoroughly cover these use cases:

1. how to handle customized embedded forks of a JavaScript library in
upstream,

2. how to deal with JavaScript resources which upstream Java packages embed
in their WARs (should the maintainer have to rewrite significant portions
of upstream code to make these resources available from another location in
the filesystem?),

3. applications which require the same shared JavaScript resources but with
slightly different flags set in the source (to control style, or behavior),

4. how to package a single upstream project which many projects use which
contains a combination of images, styles, JavaScript, and other resources,
in a well-known hierarchical structure (like Bootstrap)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48394: lower password history minimum to 1

2016-01-20 Thread Noriko Hosoi


https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48394

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48394/0001-Ticket-48394-lower-password-history-minimum-to-1.patch


https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48417

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48417/0001-Ticket-48394-ds-console-lower-password-history-minim.patch
git patch file (389-ds-console/master)
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@%(host_name)s
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

2016-01-20 Thread Noriko Hosoi


https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch
git patch file (master) -- revised based upon the review by mreynolds 
(Thanks!!)

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@%(host_name)s
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297257] Man pages installed in wrong place

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297257



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Razor-Agent-2.85-21.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297257] Man pages installed in wrong place

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297257

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Razor-Agent-2.85-21.fc
   ||23
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-01-20 16:55:49



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

F24 Self Contained Change: Atomic Storage Clients

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Kurik

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Atomic Storage Clients =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AtomicStorageClients

Change owner(s):
* mmicene 

Kubernetes provides a mechanism for providing storage to Pods via
volumes. Volumes support several underlying storage protocols, but
clients are needed to support each type. Native GlusterFS and Ceph
clients will be added to the Atomic host base to support these Volume
types.

== Detailed Description ==
By design, Docker container internal storage is ephemeral in nature
and data is lost when a container is stopped. Kubernetes uses Volumes
to provide a means for Pods keep data for extended periods of time and
between container restarts.

A Volume in Kubernetes represents a real piece of underlying storage
capacity in the infrastructure. Persistent Volumes are a way for users
to "claim" a Volume without knowing the details of the particular
storage environment. Persistent volumes are intended for "network
volumes" like NFS shares, iSCSI devices, GlusterFS volumes, or Ceph
devices. Persistent Volumes also exist past the Pod lifecycle.

In order to access the underlying storage, the appropriate drivers
must be available to Kubernetes on the Atomic host. We will add the
appropriate packages to support the following Volume types:
* GlusterFS
* RBD (Ceph Block Device)

Both projects currently have packages available and accepted in Fedora
for general use. No new packaging should be required.

== Scope ==
Proposal owners:
* Add GlusterFS client Fedora packages to Atomic package list
* Add Ceph client Fedora packages to Atomic package list
  -- The Ceph packaging will be changing to reduce the number of
dependencies. This may cause some bloat in the image until fixed.

Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

List of deliverables: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297365] Upgrade perl-Date-Holidays-DE to 1.7

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297365



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297365] Upgrade perl-Date-Holidays-DE to 1.7

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297365

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7-1
   ||.fc23
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-01-20 16:55:00



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297594] perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297594

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc |perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc
   |24  |24
   ||perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc
   ||23
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-01-20 16:54:55



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297773] perl-Net-GitHub-0.82 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297773



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Net-GitHub-0.82-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1294485] perl-Net-GitHub-0.81 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294485



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Net-GitHub-0.82-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300111] perl-Log-Report-1.12 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300111

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-44c4e0c26b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-44c4e0c26b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300481] New: perl-Mojolicious-6.41 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300481

Bug ID: 1300481
   Summary: perl-Mojolicious-6.41 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Mojolicious
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
robinlee.s...@gmail.com



Latest upstream release: 6.41
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.40-1.fc24
URL: http://mojolicio.us/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300481] perl-Mojolicious-6.41 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300481



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1116747
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116747=edit
[patch] Update to 6.41 (#1300481)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300484] perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0131 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300484



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1116751
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116751=edit
[patch] Update to 0.0131 (#1300484)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300484] New: perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0131 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300484

Bug ID: 1300484
   Summary: perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0131 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Test-Run-CmdLine
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
psab...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.0131
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.0130-1.fc24
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Run-CmdLine/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300484] perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0131 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300484



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12626191

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300488] perl-XML-XPath-1.25 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300488



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12626230

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bodhi - new update obsoleted an older update that had been submitted for stable

2016-01-20 Thread Luke Macken

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 07:17:10AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Richard Fearn  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/763
> >
> > You beat me to it :) Thanks for doing that!
> >
> > And Luke seems to have fixed the problem already. Thanks Luke!
> 
> He fixed the code, but it isn't merged yet nor is it deployed in
> Fedora Infrastructure from what I can tell.

The fix is now in production.

Sorry about the annoying regression, folks. Bodhi previously would avoid
obsoleting updates that had an open request, even if it hasn't gotten
pulled into a push yet. A recent improvement to this logic allows for
updates with a testing request to get obsoleted if a newer update gets
submitted before it gets "locked" into a push. The bug that snuck in
allowed this to happen to unlocked updates with a stable request too.

luke

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] EPEL5 mass rebuild (2016-01-20, 179 failures)

2016-01-20 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III

I performed a mass build of EPEL5, skipping only a few packages that
take absolutely forever to build (libguestfs, thunderbird-lightning,
ikarus and pypy).  I also skipped rubygem-eventmachine because its test
suite hangs forever.  Turns out that I should also have skipped 
perl-Gearman-Client-Async for
the same reason, but I didn't, so it appears as a failure.

Logs from all build failures are available at
https://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/fedora

As a fun note, I found that python-boto, python-six and python-requests
are all in the repository, but have nobody with commit access to the
EPEL5 branches.  pkgdb has main contacts listed who have no access to
the packages.  That's why the list below shows no owners for them.  For
example, see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-boto


Total build failures: 179

Failures due to missing dependencies: 122
arprec-2.2.18-1.el5.src.rpm [qd-devel] (besser82)
babel-0.9.5-2.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (jcollie, fschwarz)
Cython-0.14.1-3.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (stevetraylen)
dinotrace-9.4c-1.el5.src.rpm [emacs-verilog-mode] (chitlesh)
disktype-9-5.el5.src.rpm [libewf-devel] (richardfearn, kwizart)
euca2ools-2.1.3-1.el5.src.rpm [python26-setuptools] (gholms)
gdal-1.4.2-4.el5.src.rpm [xerces-c-devel] (devrim, pali, volter)
grin-1.1.1-3.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (hubbitus)
mnemosyne-1.2.1-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (rathann)
mongodb-1.6.4-1.el5.src.rpm [unittest] (npmccallum, tdawson, maxamillion, 
jpacner, hhorak, mskalick)
mysql-connector-java-5.1.12-2.el5.src.rpm [ant-contrib >= 1.0] (stevetraylen, 
mjakubicek, jdornak, hhorak)
perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.src.rpm [xerces-c-devel = 2.7.0] (xavierb)
planet-2.0-20.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (limb)
pymol-1.1-14.20081015svn3468.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (timfenn, 
limb)
pypar-2.1.0_66-3.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (bstinson)
python26-argparse-1.2.1-3.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (pingou)
python26-boto-2.27.0-1.el5.src.rpm [python26-setuptools] (gholms)
python26-cheetah-2.4.4-3.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (stevetraylen)
python26-eventlet-0.9.9-1.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (kevin)
python26-greenlet-0.3.1-3.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (kevin)
python26-markupsafe-0.11-3.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (stevetraylen)
python26-msgpack-0.1.12-2.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (herlo)
python26-mysqldb-1.2.3-2.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (stevetraylen)
python26-paramiko-1.7.7.1-1.el5.src.rpm [python26-setuptools] (arg, gholms)
python26-PyXML-0.8.4-23.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (stevetraylen)
python26-PyYAML-3.08-4.el5.src.rpm [python26-setuptools] (herlo)
python26-requests-0.13.1-1.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (limb, sagarun)
python-amqpclt-0.5-1.el5.src.rpm [rabbitmq-server] (mpaladin, lcons)
python-application-1.1.5-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (peter)
python-backports-ssl_match_hostname-3.4.0.2-5.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] 
()
python-batchhttp-1.0-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (puiterwijk)
python-boto-1.9b-6.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] ()
python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (lmacken)
python-cement-0.8.18-4.el5.src.rpm [python-sphinx] (derks)
python-chardet-2.0.1-2.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (kushal, churchyard)
python-cheetah-2.0.1-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (mikeb)
python-decorator-2.2.0-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (ralph)
python-decorator3-3.1.2-2.el5.1.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (lmacken)
python-decoratortools-1.7-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (lmacken)
python-demjson-1.3-4.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (lmacken, thm)
python-docutils-0.5-3.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (oddshocks, 
group::infra-sig)
python-dtopt-0.1-3.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (ricky)
python-eventlet-0.9.12-2.el5.src.rpm [python-sphinx] (abbot, kevin)
python-feedcache-1.3-5.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (lmacken)
python-feedparser-5.0.1-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (lmacken, mcepl)
python-flup-1.0-2.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools >= 0.6c6] (till, jdornak)
python-formencode-1.2.2-2.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (lmacken, ralph)
python-genshi-0.5.1-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (jcollie, fschwarz)
python-googlevoice-0.5-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (jcollie)
python-guppy-0.1.9-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (peter)
python-halite-0.1.16-1.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (terminalmage)
python-httplib2-0.7.7-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (awjb, jspaleta, 
dchen)
python-jinja2-2.2.1-4.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (lmacken, thm)
python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-6.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (dwayne)
python-libcloud-0.14.1-1.el5.src.rpm [python26-distribute] (dbruno, 
terminalmage)
python-mako-0.3.4-1.el5.src.rpm [python-setuptools-devel] (lmacken, kylev, 
mcepl)
python-markdown2-1.4.2-2.el5.src.rpm

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

2016-01-20 Thread Neal Gompa

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Michael Schwendt  wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:59:01 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:50:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > However on the same host if you do:
>> >
>> >   dnf install gtk3-devel.i686
>> >
>> > then there's a lot missing before you can compile a 32 bit Gtk3
>> > application[2].
>>
>> There were always missing many %{?_isa} in BuildRequires, I was filing many 
>> of
>> them, got some fixed.  But now it is even forbidden to use them:
>>   
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires_and_.25.7B_isa.7D
>>
>
> This is about explicit and automatic Requires, _not_ BuildRequires.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Wouldn't there also be the problem of headers getting clobbered when
you do this?

We don't store libraries and headers in such a way that the different
arches can coexist without clobbering. That would be possible if we
have something like this:
/usr/lib/
/usr/include/

For example, a 32-bit x86 platform would probably use
"i686-redhat-linux-gnu", whereas a 64-bit x86 platform would use
"x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".

Without that, it would be tough to guarantee that installing the
32-bit version of a devel package would produce a consistent and sane
build compared to an actual 32-bit chroot.

-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1299287] perl-System-Command-1.117 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299287

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-System-Command-1.117-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-86cf431784

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300481] perl-Mojolicious-6.41 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300481



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12626166

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300488] New: perl-XML-XPath-1.25 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300488

Bug ID: 1300488
   Summary: perl-XML-XPath-1.25 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-XML-XPath
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 1.25
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.24-1.fc24
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-XPath/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300488] perl-XML-XPath-1.25 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300488



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1116756
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116756=edit
[patch] Update to 1.25 (#1300488)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: AMD FirePro W4100

2016-01-20 Thread Ian Pilcher


On 01/20/2016 01:21 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:

I'm looking at upgrading my video setup to support 3 monitors.  I had
intended to purchase an AMD FirePro V4900, since it is known to "just
work" with the open source drivers, but I see that the W4100 is now
available at approximately the same price point, with more memory, etc.,
etc.

Has anyone tried a W4100 with the open source drivers?


Wrong list, sorry.

I gave the W4100 a quick shot, but I was unable to get any output once
KMS kicked in.  (I didn't try the proprietary drivers.)

Exchanged the W4100 for a V4900 which seems to be working perfectly so
far.

--

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com
 "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" 

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.
   ||02-1.fc24



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
Enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report-Optional (master). "1.02 bump"

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

From e5e1a7d337fe12036fdc9b7dfb7a4c85dd0fb47c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:02:19 +0100
Subject: 1.02 bump

---
 .gitignore|  1 +
 perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec | 10 --
 sources   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 4282ee5..a26801f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 /Log-Report-Optional-1.00.tar.gz
 /Log-Report-Optional-1.01.tar.gz
+/Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec b/perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec
index 3419cc4..42a47eb 100644
--- a/perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec
+++ b/perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
 Name:   perl-Log-Report-Optional
-Version:1.01
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Version:1.02
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Base class for large Log::Report and simple 
Log::Report::Minimal
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Report-Optional/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MA/MARKOV/Log-Report-Optional-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  findutils
+BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 # Run-time:
@@ -15,6 +17,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires:  perl(List::Util)
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(String::Print) >= 0.13
+BuildRequires:  perl(vars)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
 # Tests:
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.86
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jan 20 2016 Petr Pisar  - 1.02-1
+- 1.02 bump
+
 * Thu Jun 18 2015 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.01-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 901cf36..317109f 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fb379bb1f84c2fa1dee5ea8998fe2426  Log-Report-Optional-1.01.tar.gz
+4b35c7c2c32004d7d7eeae1286f9927b  Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Log-Report-Optional.git/commit/?h=master=e5e1a7d337fe12036fdc9b7dfb7a4c85dd0fb47c
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report-Optional (f23). "1.02 bump"

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

From e5e1a7d337fe12036fdc9b7dfb7a4c85dd0fb47c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:02:19 +0100
Subject: 1.02 bump

---
 .gitignore|  1 +
 perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec | 10 --
 sources   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 4282ee5..a26801f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 /Log-Report-Optional-1.00.tar.gz
 /Log-Report-Optional-1.01.tar.gz
+/Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec b/perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec
index 3419cc4..42a47eb 100644
--- a/perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec
+++ b/perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
 Name:   perl-Log-Report-Optional
-Version:1.01
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Version:1.02
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Base class for large Log::Report and simple 
Log::Report::Minimal
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Report-Optional/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MA/MARKOV/Log-Report-Optional-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
+BuildRequires:  findutils
+BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 # Run-time:
@@ -15,6 +17,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires:  perl(List::Util)
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(String::Print) >= 0.13
+BuildRequires:  perl(vars)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
 # Tests:
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.86
@@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jan 20 2016 Petr Pisar  - 1.02-1
+- 1.02 bump
+
 * Thu Jun 18 2015 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.01-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 901cf36..317109f 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fb379bb1f84c2fa1dee5ea8998fe2426  Log-Report-Optional-1.01.tar.gz
+4b35c7c2c32004d7d7eeae1286f9927b  Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Log-Report-Optional.git/commit/?h=f23=e5e1a7d337fe12036fdc9b7dfb7a4c85dd0fb47c
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
ppisar's perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=712489

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300111] perl-Log-Report-1.12 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300111

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Log-Report-1.12-1.fc24



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
Fixes and enhancements suitable for all Fedoras.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report (f23). "1.12 bump"

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

From 1314d38b76bb10432ff73af819778db98d28da98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:21:29 +0100
Subject: 1.12 bump

---
 .gitignore   |  1 +
 perl-Log-Report.spec | 17 ++---
 sources  |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 49aeec1..224bc79 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
 /Log-Report-1.08.tar.gz
 /Log-Report-1.09.tar.gz
 /Log-Report-1.10.tar.gz
+/Log-Report-1.12.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Log-Report.spec b/perl-Log-Report.spec
index e86f343..5a885c8 100644
--- a/perl-Log-Report.spec
+++ b/perl-Log-Report.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Log-Report
-Version:1.10
+Version:1.12
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Report a problem with exceptions and translation support
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(List::Util)
 BuildRequires:  perl(locale)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Dispatch) >= 2.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Log4perl)
-# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.01 for contained
+# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.02 for contained
 # Log::Report::{Minimal::Domain,Util}
-BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.01
-BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.01
+BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.02
+BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.02
 # Mojo tests are optional
 BuildRequires:  perl(Mojo::Base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Mojo::Log)
@@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Mojolicious) >= 2.16
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`perl -V:version`"; echo $version))
 Requires:   perl(Devel::GlobalDestruction) >= 0.09
 Requires:   perl(Encode) >= 2.00
-# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.01 for contained
+# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.02 for contained
 # Log::Report::{Minimal::Domain,Util}
-Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.01
-Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.01
+Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.02
+Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.02
 Requires:   perl(overload)
 
 # Remove under-specified dependencies
@@ -214,6 +214,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/MojoX::Log::Report.*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jan 20 2016 Petr Pisar  - 1.12-1
+- 1.12 bump
+
 * Wed Dec 02 2015 Petr Pisar  - 1.10-1
 - 1.10 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 772b722..5b55eb2 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-6cbf987cdbc4d031ef121b3be8f43d5a  Log-Report-1.10.tar.gz
+b52332a97d38fdce761244ea64b6a4d4  Log-Report-1.12.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Log-Report.git/commit/?h=f23=1314d38b76bb10432ff73af819778db98d28da98
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300113] perl-HTML-Parser-3.72 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300113



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jplesnik's perl-HTML-Parser-3.72-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=712514

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik uploaded XML-XPath-1.24.tar.gz for perl-XML-XPath

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

5eea1e03f4a548b427d9a8cdd13c98be  XML-XPath-1.24.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-XML-XPath/XML-XPath-1.24.tar.gz/md5/5eea1e03f4a548b427d9a8cdd13c98be/XML-XPath-1.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300129] perl-XML-XPath-1.24 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300129

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-XML-XPath-1.24-1.fc24
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-01-20 04:34:57



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report (master). "1.12 bump"

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

From c0e477cec0b7c63508b9552069a4d508cdf7ba20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:21:29 +0100
Subject: 1.12 bump

---
 .gitignore   |  1 +
 perl-Log-Report.spec | 17 ++---
 sources  |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 49aeec1..224bc79 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
 /Log-Report-1.08.tar.gz
 /Log-Report-1.09.tar.gz
 /Log-Report-1.10.tar.gz
+/Log-Report-1.12.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Log-Report.spec b/perl-Log-Report.spec
index e86f343..5a885c8 100644
--- a/perl-Log-Report.spec
+++ b/perl-Log-Report.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Log-Report
-Version:1.10
+Version:1.12
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Report a problem with exceptions and translation support
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(List::Util)
 BuildRequires:  perl(locale)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Dispatch) >= 2.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Log4perl)
-# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.01 for contained
+# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.02 for contained
 # Log::Report::{Minimal::Domain,Util}
-BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.01
-BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.01
+BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.02
+BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.02
 # Mojo tests are optional
 BuildRequires:  perl(Mojo::Base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Mojo::Log)
@@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Mojolicious) >= 2.16
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`perl -V:version`"; echo $version))
 Requires:   perl(Devel::GlobalDestruction) >= 0.09
 Requires:   perl(Encode) >= 2.00
-# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.01 for contained
+# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.02 for contained
 # Log::Report::{Minimal::Domain,Util}
-Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.01
-Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.01
+Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.02
+Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.02
 Requires:   perl(overload)
 
 # Remove under-specified dependencies
@@ -214,6 +214,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/MojoX::Log::Report.*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jan 20 2016 Petr Pisar  - 1.12-1
+- 1.12 bump
+
 * Wed Dec 02 2015 Petr Pisar  - 1.10-1
 - 1.10 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 772b722..5b55eb2 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-6cbf987cdbc4d031ef121b3be8f43d5a  Log-Report-1.10.tar.gz
+b52332a97d38fdce761244ea64b6a4d4  Log-Report-1.12.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Log-Report.git/commit/?h=master=c0e477cec0b7c63508b9552069a4d508cdf7ba20
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report (f22). "1.12 bump"

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

From 912294e7b9c358419de5e00cfe07874fbb39da5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:21:29 +0100
Subject: 1.12 bump

---
 .gitignore   |  1 +
 perl-Log-Report.spec | 17 ++---
 sources  |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 49aeec1..224bc79 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
 /Log-Report-1.08.tar.gz
 /Log-Report-1.09.tar.gz
 /Log-Report-1.10.tar.gz
+/Log-Report-1.12.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Log-Report.spec b/perl-Log-Report.spec
index d4b9306..91f8818 100644
--- a/perl-Log-Report.spec
+++ b/perl-Log-Report.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Log-Report
-Version:1.10
+Version:1.12
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Report a problem with exceptions and translation support
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(List::Util)
 BuildRequires:  perl(locale)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Dispatch) >= 2.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Log4perl)
-# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.01 for contained
+# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.02 for contained
 # Log::Report::{Minimal::Domain,Util}
-BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.01
-BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.01
+BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.02
+BuildRequires:  perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.02
 # Mojo tests are optional
 BuildRequires:  perl(Mojo::Base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Mojo::Log)
@@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Mojolicious) >= 2.16
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`perl -V:version`"; echo $version))
 Requires:   perl(Devel::GlobalDestruction) >= 0.09
 Requires:   perl(Encode) >= 2.00
-# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.01 for contained
+# Makefile.PL states Log::Report::Optional 1.02 for contained
 # Log::Report::{Minimal::Domain,Util}
-Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.01
-Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.01
+Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Minimal::Domain) >= 1.02
+Requires:   perl(Log::Report::Util) >= 1.02
 Requires:   perl(overload)
 
 # Remove under-specified dependencies
@@ -214,6 +214,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/MojoX::Log::Report.*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jan 20 2016 Petr Pisar  - 1.12-1
+- 1.12 bump
+
 * Wed Dec 02 2015 Petr Pisar  - 1.10-1
 - 1.10 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 772b722..5b55eb2 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-6cbf987cdbc4d031ef121b3be8f43d5a  Log-Report-1.10.tar.gz
+b52332a97d38fdce761244ea64b6a4d4  Log-Report-1.12.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Log-Report.git/commit/?h=f22=912294e7b9c358419de5e00cfe07874fbb39da5e
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-HTML-Parser (master). "3.72 bump"

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

From b5a5a01631566dd706eae2cda2e7014c4c2a2e8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:55:12 +0100
Subject: 3.72 bump

---
 .gitignore|  1 +
 perl-HTML-Parser.spec | 15 +++
 sources   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index cee6bee..6299506 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ HTML-Parser-3.66.tar.gz
 /HTML-Parser-3.69.tar.gz
 /HTML-Parser-3.70.tar.gz
 /HTML-Parser-3.71.tar.gz
+/HTML-Parser-3.72.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-HTML-Parser.spec b/perl-HTML-Parser.spec
index 178813a..4c4c806 100644
--- a/perl-HTML-Parser.spec
+++ b/perl-HTML-Parser.spec
@@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
 Name:   perl-HTML-Parser
 Summary:Perl module for parsing HTML
-Version:3.71
-Release:11%{?dist}
+Version:3.72
+Release:1%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/HTML-Parser-%{version}.tar.gz 
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Parser/
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`perl -V:version`"; echo $version))
+BuildRequires:  coreutils
+BuildRequires:  findutils
+BuildRequires:  glibc-common
+BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
 BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Config)
@@ -56,8 +60,8 @@ file=%{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man3/HTML::Entities.3pm
 iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 <"$file" > "${file}_" && \
 touch -r ${file} ${file}_ && \
 mv -f "${file}_" "$file"
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -exec rm -f {} ';'
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -delete
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
 chmod -R u+w %{buildroot}/*
 
 %check
@@ -70,6 +74,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jan 20 2016 Jitka Plesnikova  - 3.72-1
+- 3.72 bump
+
 * Thu Jun 18 2015 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 3.71-11
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 1031944..7c7e260 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-9128a45893097dfa3bf03301b19c5efe  HTML-Parser-3.71.tar.gz
+eb7505e5f626913350df9dd4a03d54a8  HTML-Parser-3.72.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.11.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-HTML-Parser.git/commit/?h=master=b5a5a01631566dd706eae2cda2e7014c4c2a2e8f
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1295094] perl-Math-PlanePath-122 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295094

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-Math-PlanePath-122-1.f
   ||c24
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Assignee|mhron...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com
Last Closed||2016-01-20 04:38:44



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar uploaded Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz for perl-Log-Report-Optional

2016-01-20 Thread notifications

4b35c7c2c32004d7d7eeae1286f9927b  Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Log-Report-Optional/Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz/md5/4b35c7c2c32004d7d7eeae1286f9927b/Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-28e25379b1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 2 >

1 - 100 of 131 matches

Mail list logo