On 01/27/2016 05:44 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> GNOME Chess in F23 has been crashing when promoting pawns. This is easy
> to reproduce by turning off the computer player in Preferences,
> starting a new game, and just moving pawns across the board. It turns
> out to be due to our new ha
> On January 26, 2016 at 10:44 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> GNOME Chess in F23 has been crashing when promoting pawns. This is easy
> to reproduce by turning off the computer player in Preferences,
> starting a new game, and just moving pawns across the board. It turns
> out to
On 2016-01-26 18:11, Peter Robinson wrote:
does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually).
Mozilla
does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be
removed/deprecated. I'd like to remove the package from Fedora 24.
PackageKit has a npapi plugin that I'm
Hi,
GNOME Chess in F23 has been crashing when promoting pawns. This is easy
to reproduce by turning off the computer player in Preferences,
starting a new game, and just moving pawns across the board. It turns
out to be due to our new hardening flags.
This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually).
Mozilla
does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be
removed/deprecated. I'd like to remove the package from Fedora 24.
>>>
>>>
>>> PackageKit has a npapi plugin that I'm guessing is soo
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 13:32 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Samuel Sieb
> wrote:
> > On 01/26/2016 09:47 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > >
> > > I still think that, for the default workstation use case,
> > > configuring
> > > a hostname as a mandatory part of
2016-01-26 9:22 GMT+01:00 Vít Ondruch :
> Dne 25.1.2016 v 17:55 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Seg, 2016-01-25 at 13:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 22.1.2016 v 21:12 Pier Luigi Fiorini napsal(a):
> >>> 2016-01-22 20:58 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:46:12
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 09:47 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> I still think that, for the default workstation use case, configuring
>> a hostname as a mandatory part of installation is counterproductive.
>> Would it make sense to improve support for
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:05:12 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 03:43:16PM -0500, Brandon Thomas wrote:
> > Can I make multiple review requests while I'm waiting for a
> > sponsor?
> Yes, you should. It actually helps, because
> a) you show that you are a capable
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 03:43:16PM -0500, Brandon Thomas wrote:
> Can I make multiple review requests while I'm waiting for a sponsor?
Yes, you should. It actually helps, because
a) you show that you are a capable packager,
b) it's easier for potential sponsors to find a package they want
to rev
On 01/26/2016 09:47 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I still think that, for the default workstation use case, configuring
a hostname as a mandatory part of installation is counterproductive.
Would it make sense to improve support for hostname-less workstations?
NetworkManager could take hostname==
Can I make multiple review requests while I'm waiting for a sponsor?
And I should add the FE_NEEDSPONSOR block onto the new one as well,
right?
Regards,
Brandon Thomas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thank you.
26.01.2016 22:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:32:22 +0300
Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
I found very interesting BPG image format - http://bellard.org/bpg/
Under licensing chapter on offsite stated:
* The BPG decoding library uses a modified version of FFmpeg
rele
On 12/24/2015 04:01 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> To satisfy my curiosity, I grepped the convenient tarball of specfiles
> (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz) for lines
> matching "(? there were more than 1900 hits.
>
> Here's a complete (long) list. I don't think the
Please forward any requests about legal issues to Fedora Legal mailing
list:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/
The Fedora development mailing list is not appropriate for legal
inquiries for packaging software for Fedora.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM,
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:32:22 +0300
Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I found very interesting BPG image format - http://bellard.org/bpg/
>
> Under licensing chapter on offsite stated:
>
> * The BPG decoding library uses a modified version of FFmpeg
> released under the LGPL version 2.1 as HE
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 19:46 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Kde disk raw armhfp
>
> Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160125:
>
> Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64
> Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64
>
> No images in Rawhide 20160125 but not thi
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160125:
Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64
Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64
No images in Rawhide 20160125 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 18 of 68
ID: 4334Test: x86_64 kde_live default_inst
hi
take!
can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
for me?
thanks in advance
.g
Il 26/01/2016 20:27, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
1) pgcenter - Top-like PostgreSQL statistics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
It should be quite simple.
--
dev
> "VS" == Ville Skyttä writes:
VS> The original post's general case is the one immediately after
VS> %files, that's what was grepped according to the poster.
Yes, I limited the search to %defattr falling immediately after %files
and setting a default value. I'm sure that doesn't catch all o
Hello.
I found very interesting BPG image format - http://bellard.org/bpg/
Under licensing chapter on offsite stated:
* The BPG decoding library uses a modified version of FFmpeg released
under the LGPL version 2.1 as HEVC decoder. The BPG decoding library
excluding the FFmpeg code is re
tis 2016-01-26 klockan 10:18 + skrev Peter Robinson:
> > > > So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with
> > > > interesting state where mock by default does not install weak
> > > > dependencies where Koji installs them. It causes interesting issues
> > > > already.
Hi!
I'll be happy swap reviews for 3 my packages:
1) pgcenter - Top-like PostgreSQL statistics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
It should be quite simple.
2) pgmodeler - PostgreSQL Database Modeler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
It old and bigger. B
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 09:47 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Dan Williams
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Peter Robinson <
> > > pbrobin...@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I
On 26 January 2016 at 10:18, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-01-26 08:55, Richard Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 26 January 2016 at 12:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>>
>>> does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually).
>>> Mozilla
>>> does not maintain it any more and the XUL as techn
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Peter Robinson > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is
>> > > > > > > only supposed
>> > > > > > > to h
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-01-26 08:55, Richard Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 26 January 2016 at 12:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>>
>>> does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually).
>>> Mozilla
>>> does not maintain it any more and the XUL as
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Peter Robinson > wrote:
> > > > > > > It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is
> > > > > > > only supposed
> > > > > > > to have an effect if 'gateway' is not defined in the
> > > > > >
On 2016-01-26 08:55, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 26 January 2016 at 12:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually). Mozilla
does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be
removed/deprecated. I'd like to remove the package fro
On 26.01.2016 17:46, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 05:41:39 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Just noticed twice today that koji wait-repo rawhide --build <...>
reported that the build (specifically, leptonica-1.72-1.fc24 and
mingw-leptonica-1.72-1.fc24) appeared in the repo, but
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 05:41:39 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just noticed twice today that koji wait-repo rawhide --build <...>
> reported that the build (specifically, leptonica-1.72-1.fc24 and
> mingw-leptonica-1.72-1.fc24) appeared in the repo, but builds fired
> immediately afterwards
Hi
Just noticed twice today that koji wait-repo rawhide --build <...>
reported that the build (specifically, leptonica-1.72-1.fc24 and
mingw-leptonica-1.72-1.fc24) appeared in the repo, but builds fired
immediately afterwards still used the previous version of the package in
question.
Haven
On 14/01/16 12:40 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today?
I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then
1.60.0-2 this morning in the main f24 tag?
Boost 1.60 really has landed in rawhide now (a few days ago actually,
sorry for not ann
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Josh Boyer
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Martin Stransky
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually).
> Mozilla
> > does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be
> > removed/depre
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Checking the nightly compose from Design Suite Lab[1], these packages
> are currently broken according to root.log[2] : Blender,
> LuxRender-Blender, Synfig, Calligra-Krita
calligra rebuild submitted...
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://
On 26/01/16 09:06 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 14:57:27 +,
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
If you packages are broken then by all means take a look at them and
see if you can see how to get it to build. Otherwise you'll be getting
bug reports as soon as I have time (I'm als
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 14:57:27 +,
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
If you packages are broken then by all means take a look at them and
see if you can see how to get it to build. Otherwise you'll be getting
bug reports as soon as I have time (I'm also trying to get GCC 6 in
shape for the mass rebu
On 26/01/16 08:41 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Rawhide has boost 1.6 now but a number of packages haven't been rebuilt
for it yet. I haven't seen bugs filed against my packages asking me to
fix things, so I am wondering if the boost guys were planning to do rebuilds
or if there was some other pl
On 26 January 2016 at 12:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually). Mozilla
> does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be
> removed/deprecated. I'd like to remove the package from Fedora 24.
PackageKit has a npapi plu
Rawhide has boost 1.6 now but a number of packages haven't been rebuilt
for it yet. I haven't seen bugs filed against my packages asking me to
fix things, so I am wondering if the boost guys were planning to do rebuilds
or if there was some other plan I should be aware of. The change page seems
to
On 26/01/16 14:10, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> pencil
>
pencil did not had any release for a longer time (although they directly
recommend downloading a fedora 19 package, the latest build made by the
package maintainer was 2 years ago for f20.
Maybe it's time to retire it completely?
Matthias
--
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 08:42:15AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:52:31 +0100
> Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm speaking about the following two bodhi updates:
> >
> > - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-49246e36a3
> > - https:/
On 25/01/16 16:34 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
boost (pmachata, denisarnaud, jwakely)
pstreams-devel (hubbitus, jwakely)
Fixed in rawhide, not rebuilt.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello fedora developers!
I am a new package maintainer from the Czech Republic and I would like to
introduce myself briefly.
My main open-source projects I was (or still am) involved in are:
- lit (https://github.com/clime/lit) a programming language prototype
- motionpaint (https://github.com/c
On 01/26/2016 01:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually). Mozilla
>> does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be
>> removed/deprecated. I'd like to r
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually). Mozilla
> does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be
> removed/deprecated. I'd like to remove the package from Fedora 24.
A quick repoqu
Hi,
does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually).
Mozilla does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going
to be removed/deprecated. I'd like to remove the package from Fedora 24.
ma.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedorap
On 01/26/2016 12:45 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 26.01.16 08:58, Petr Spacek (pspa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> I disagree with your disagreement. We have only 1 shared namespace for this
>> world, and like it or not, the root zone (and thus all single-label names in
>> it) is managed by
On Tue, 26.01.16 08:58, Petr Spacek (pspa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> I disagree with your disagreement. We have only 1 shared namespace for this
> world, and like it or not, the root zone (and thus all single-label names in
> it) is managed by ICANN.
Well, did you actually read the earlier discussio
> From: "Mikolaj Izdebski"
> On 01/25/2016 11:37 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 04:26:43PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> >> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:14:44 -0700
> >> Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>
> >>> It would be very helpful to have information on what packages are
> >>> pulli
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> gtkglarea2 (rjones, rathann)
Done + a few other spec file cleanups.
> ioport (rjones)
Done.
> nekovm (rjones, andyli)
Done.
> ocaml-autoconf (rjones)
> ocaml-camomile (rjones)
> ocaml-p3l (rjones)
All done.
> rpmdepsize
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:18:08 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> > So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps
> >> > us with interesting state where mock by default does not install
> >> > weak dependencies where Koji installs them. It causes
> >> > interesting issues already.
>
>> > So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with
>> > interesting state where mock by default does not install weak
>> > dependencies where Koji installs them. It causes interesting issues
>> > already.
>>
>> mock/koji not installing weak dependencies == anything wanting
Hi,
as announced a month ago, I just closed approx. 200 bugs as EOL. The
list of closed bugs is available in CSV format [1].
If you think any of the closed bugs is still valid and should remain
open, please re-open it and assign it to a supported release (F22,
F23) or to rawhide.
[1] https://fedo
On 01/26/2016 08:58 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> So, please, do not push "gateway." or any other single-label name forward. It
> will cause trouble sooner or later.
I think “_gateway” or “gateway_” would work, despite being a single
label. We could give this one priority over DNS, even.
Florian
--
d
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:48:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> > This can bring bugs because, as noted in the orignal message, some
>> > people use to change wrong permissions coming fr
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:48:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > This can bring bugs because, as noted in the orignal message, some
> > people use to change wrong permissions coming from %install section.
>
> Can you give a concrete example where
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> This can bring bugs because, as noted in the orignal message, some
> people use to change wrong permissions coming from %install section.
Can you give a concrete example where doing this actually accomplishes
something with rpmbuild >= 4.4? I c
Dne 25.1.2016 v 17:55 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> On Seg, 2016-01-25 at 13:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 22.1.2016 v 21:12 Pier Luigi Fiorini napsal(a):
>>> 2016-01-22 20:58 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi :
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:46:12 -
" mastaiza" wrote:
> Yes hawaii-sh
Dne 25.1.2016 v 18:58 Mattias Ellert napsal(a):
> mån 2016-01-25 klockan 18:09 +0100 skrev Marcin Juszkiewicz:
>> W dniu 25.01.2016 o 17:03, Vít Ondruch pisze:
>>> So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with
>>> interesting state where mock by default does not install wea
60 matches
Mail list logo
