Did something change with ssh-agent in F24?

Previously in F23, an ssh-agent was running when I started a gnome session. I believe (perhaps incorrectly) that this was being provided by gnome-keyring-daemon. Now, it appears that one isn't running. When I type "ssh-add -L", I get the message: "Could not open a connection to your authentication

Re: releng's mlt-6.2.0-3.fc25 failed to build

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:40:11 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > That is it , I got 2 releng's notifications that failed to build , > though that I will receive much more ... , so I decide to warning > you.  > > Let us know when we should resubmit the packages ... or if you will > resubmit ?  I don't t

Fedora Elections July 2016 - Voting now open

The Campaign period of Elections for the Fedora Council and Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) are now over. As of this morning, voting is now open. == Candidate Interviews == There is one seat open on the Fedora Council (contested by two candidates) and four seats open on FESCo (

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

Oron Peled wrote: > On יום שלישי, 19 ביולי 2016 15:23:25 IDT Matthew Miller wrote: > > ... > > I remember when this came up before but can't find it now. I think it > > was changed to 99 when UIDs went to 32 bit and it suddenly started > > being 65535 on some systems and 4294967295 on others. * I w

Re: notion of base or minimal image

On יום שלישי, 19 ביולי 2016 9:20:41 IDT Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016, at 07:32 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there some notion or definition of a Fedora minimal or base image? > > A lot depends on whether "image" is a container or OS, which mostly > boils down t

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 12:17:49AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Lennart Poettering > > wrote: > > > We can meet in the middle and make this LOG_NOTICE. That's not the > > > usual LOG_INFO, but also not the higher LOG_WARNING. > > > >

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On יום שלישי, 19 ביולי 2016 15:23:25 IDT Matthew Miller wrote: > ... > I remember when this came up before but can't find it now. I think it > was changed to 99 when UIDs went to 32 bit and it suddenly started > being 65535 on some systems and 4294967295 on others. * I was trying to > figure out wh

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:58:06 -0700 "Gerald B. Cox" wrote: > I guess that begs the question of what is happening that can't be > automated. Seems that if the build > is successful and the packager then pushes to the testing repository, > that should be something that > could be automated. Curren

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > I never push updates on weekends. the person pushing may or may not push > them > on weekends I would say updates pushes on weekends are not expected and > are a > bonus if they do happen. > I guess that begs the question of what is happe

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:18:49AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora, > > and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not > > proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet, but > > my h

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

On Monday, July 18, 2016 4:47:40 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:05:56 -0700 > > "Gerald B. Cox" wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > I could tell you more about your specific updates if you list > > > them... > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraprojec

Re: notion of base or minimal image

On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 9:20:41 AM CDT Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016, at 07:32 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there some notion or definition of a Fedora minimal or base image? > > A lot depends on whether "image" is a container or OS, which mostly > boils down

Re: releng's mlt-6.2.0-3.fc25 failed to build

On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 11:12 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:05:38 -0600 > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:10:06 +0100 > > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > > > DEBUG util.py:417:  Error: nothing provides > > > libpoppler.so.60()(64bit) needed by gdal-libs-

[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 End Of Life

As of the 19th of July 2016, Fedora 22 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 22. A previous reminder was sent on 22nd of June [0]. Fedora 23 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month aft

Fedora 22 End Of Life

As of the 19th of July 2016, Fedora 22 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 22. A previous reminder was sent on 22nd of June [0]. Fedora 23 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month aft

Re: releng's mlt-6.2.0-3.fc25 failed to build

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:05:38 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:10:06 +0100 > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > DEBUG util.py:417:  Error: nothing provides > > libpoppler.so.60()(64bit) needed by gdal-libs-2.1.0-6.fc25.x86_64 > > DEBUG util.py:417:  (try to add '--allowerasing' to comman

Re: releng's mlt-6.2.0-3.fc25 failed to build

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:10:06 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > DEBUG util.py:417:  Error: nothing provides libpoppler.so.60()(64bit) > needed by gdal-libs-2.1.0-6.fc25.x86_64 > DEBUG util.py:417:  (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to > replace conflicting packages) > DEBUG util.py:542:  Chil

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:30:30 +0200 Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2016-07-18 23:57 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi : > > I could tell you more about your specific updates if you list > > them... > > This one took a bit more than 6 days from submission to testing: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 07:39 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Like I said, I'm thinking of "rsync", "tar", and "star". Also, > people do some interesting scripting to detect things like failed > NFS configurations. I'm not saying that's a blocker, but shifting it > to overlap with the current "

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 14:39 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya! > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora, > and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not > proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet, > but > my hope

Re: releng's mlt-6.2.0-3.fc25 failed to build

DEBUG util.py:417:  Error: nothing provides libpoppler.so.60()(64bit) needed by gdal-libs-2.1.0-6.fc25.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:417:  (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) DEBUG util.py:542:  Child return code was: 1 On Ter, 2016-07-19 at 13:20 +, notifica

Re: notion of base or minimal image

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:32:36PM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Hi, >  Is there some notion or definition of a Fedora minimal or base image? > I couldn't find some documentation on that. I would like to modify some > script which a package on the critical path depends on, from bash to >

Re: notion of base or minimal image

On 07/19/2016 07:32 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Hi, > Is there some notion or definition of a Fedora minimal or base image? > I couldn't find some documentation on that. I would like to modify some > script which a package on the critical path depends on, from bash to > perl and I would l

Re: notion of base or minimal image

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016, at 07:32 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Hi, >  Is there some notion or definition of a Fedora minimal or base image? A lot depends on whether "image" is a container or OS, which mostly boils down to "contains a kernel". For containers I would look at: `docker run --

Fedora Rawhide-20160719.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 26/74 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386) ID: 25632 Test: x86_64 Everyth

Re: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On 18 Jul 2016, at 8:39, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya! > > I'd like to start a discussion regarding the "nobody" user on Fedora, > and propose that we change its definition sooner or later. I am not > proposing a feature according to the feature process for this yet, but > my hope is that thes

[Test-Announce] 2016-07-20 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 25 Blocker Review

# F25 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-07-20 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have currently few blockers proposed for future Fedora 25 so it would be great to look at them now when they aren't overpopulated yet. There are 3 proposed Beta blo

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fedora, we currently have a "nobody" user that is defined to UID > 99. It's defined unconditionally like this. To my knowledge there's no > actual use of this user at all in Fedora however. The UID 65514 > carries no name by default

notion of base or minimal image

Hi,  Is there some notion or definition of a Fedora minimal or base image? I couldn't find some documentation on that. I would like to modify some script which a package on the critical path depends on, from bash to perl and I would like to understand whether that could affect any fedora images. r

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Tue, 19.07.16 11:17, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 19 July 2016 at 10:59, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Mon, 18.07.16 17:45, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > > > > > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > > > > >On Fedora, we currently have a "nobody" user

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Rawhide 20160719.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 25 Rawhide 20160719.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On 19 July 2016 at 10:59, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 18.07.16 17:45, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > > > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > > >On Fedora, we currently have a "nobody" user that is defined to UID > > >99. It's defined unconditionally like this. To my knowled

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Mon, 18.07.16 17:45, Sam Varshavchik (mr...@courier-mta.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering writes: > > >On Fedora, we currently have a "nobody" user that is defined to UID > >99. It's defined unconditionally like this. To my knowledge there's no > >actual use of this user at all in Fedora howeve

Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

On Mon, 18.07.16 17:00, Ondřej Vašík (ova...@redhat.com) wrote: > > So what do you propose instead? Just stick our heads in the sand, > > ignore the issue, accept that in containers all files in /proc now > > sometimes show up as owned by the literal "65534" user and sometimes > > as owned by "nfs

Re: Bodhi takes days to get something pushed to testing

2016-07-18 23:57 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi : > I could tell you more about your specific updates if you list them... This one took a bit more than 6 days from submission to testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e5b5fbfa86 - Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: rpm-build's dependency on perl-generators removed

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:56:43AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > Perl > F25 change, I removed run-time dependency on perl-generators from > rpm-build package in rpm-4.13.0-0.rc1.40.fc25 build. > > This should remove perl from minimal bu