Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

[Neal Gompa]

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Nick Coghlan  wrote:
> On 8 October 2016 at 23:13, Kevin Kofler  wrote:
>> These python[23][1-9] packages are entirely unnecessary and should go away
>> ASAP.
>
> They're not unnecessary for Python developers, as if you want to make
> sure you're not accidentally using any features from later versions of
> Python, the only way to reliably check that is to actually test your
> code on those older versions. Tools like "tox" make that relatively
> easy to do, but you still need a straightforward way to get hold of
> the old runtimes for tox to use. The addition of these packages to
> Fedora means that as soon as you do "dnf install tox", those runtimes
> are all brought in automatically via Recommends, rather than having to
> jump through multiple hoops to reconfigure your local package
> management.
>
> For the specific case of Python though, it would be better if the EOL
> upstream versions were built from the CentOS SRPMs (which *do* get
> security fixes) rather than directly from the upstream tarballs (in
> addition to Python 2.6 RPMs that mirror those in CentOS 6.x, it'd be
> nice to have the patched Python 2.7.5 release from CentOS 7.x readily
> available for compatibility testing as well).
>
> So +1 from me for the general premise of this thread - if we're going
> to include EOL software, that should be treated as a special case
> requiring approval from FESCo, and we should try to find a source for
> that software where it *isn't* EOL (even if that means inverting the
> traditional dependency flow between Fedora and RHEL/CentOS).
>
> However, I'm also a strong +1 for making tox work well by default in
> Fedora, and that means providing widely used Python runtime versions,
> even if they're officially EOL upstream and now only supported by
> redistributors.
>

Why in the main repository? Why not just put them in a COPR instead?
The main repository provides a very specific promise that I don't
think we can keep with these EOL packages (that the software is
trustable, useful, and dependable).


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

[Nick Coghlan]

On 8 October 2016 at 23:13, Kevin Kofler  wrote:
> These python[23][1-9] packages are entirely unnecessary and should go away
> ASAP.

They're not unnecessary for Python developers, as if you want to make
sure you're not accidentally using any features from later versions of
Python, the only way to reliably check that is to actually test your
code on those older versions. Tools like "tox" make that relatively
easy to do, but you still need a straightforward way to get hold of
the old runtimes for tox to use. The addition of these packages to
Fedora means that as soon as you do "dnf install tox", those runtimes
are all brought in automatically via Recommends, rather than having to
jump through multiple hoops to reconfigure your local package
management.

For the specific case of Python though, it would be better if the EOL
upstream versions were built from the CentOS SRPMs (which *do* get
security fixes) rather than directly from the upstream tarballs (in
addition to Python 2.6 RPMs that mirror those in CentOS 6.x, it'd be
nice to have the patched Python 2.7.5 release from CentOS 7.x readily
available for compatibility testing as well).

So +1 from me for the general premise of this thread - if we're going
to include EOL software, that should be treated as a special case
requiring approval from FESCo, and we should try to find a source for
that software where it *isn't* EOL (even if that means inverting the
traditional dependency flow between Fedora and RHEL/CentOS).

However, I'm also a strong +1 for making tox work well by default in
Fedora, and that means providing widely used Python runtime versions,
even if they're officially EOL upstream and now only supported by
redistributors.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncogh...@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1377506] perl-Git-PurePerl-0.53 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377506

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Git-PurePerl-0.53-1.fc |perl-Git-PurePerl-0.53-1.fc
   |24  |24
   ||perl-Git-PurePerl-0.53-1.fc
   ||25



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Git-PurePerl-0.53-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380082] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9740 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380082



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Time-HiRes-1.9740-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376997] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.08 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376997

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Locale-1.08-1 |perl-DateTime-Locale-1.08-1
   |.fc26   |.fc26
   ||perl-DateTime-Locale-1.08-1
   ||.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:49:10



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DateTime-Locale-1.08-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376996] perl-DateTime-1.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376996
Bug 1376996 depends on bug 1376997, which changed state.

Bug 1376997 Summary: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376997

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376996] perl-DateTime-1.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376996

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-1.39-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:48:22



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DateTime-1.39-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1377504] perl-Business-ISBN-3.003 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377504

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-3.003-1. |perl-Business-ISBN-3.003-1.
   |fc26|fc26
   ||perl-Business-ISBN-3.003-1.
   ||fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:47:09



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Business-ISBN-3.003-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1379101] perl-App-Cme-1.014 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379101

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-App-Cme-1.014-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:47:13



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-App-Cme-1.014-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1377902] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.94 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377902

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.9 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.9
   |4-1.fc26|4-1.fc26
   ||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.9
   ||4-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:46:51



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.94-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380561] perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.46 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380561

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.46
   ||-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:45:58



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.46-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380057] perl-Params-Validate-1.25 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380057

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Params-Validate-1.25-1
   ||.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:46:02



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Params-Validate-1.25-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376998] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.03 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376998

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.04 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.04
   |-1.fc26 |-1.fc26
   ||perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05
   ||-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:46:16



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1379999] perl-CPAN-ParseDistribution-1.54 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=137

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-ParseDistribution |perl-CPAN-ParseDistribution
   |-1.54-1.fc26|-1.54-1.fc26
   ||perl-CPAN-ParseDistribution
   ||-1.54-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:46:24



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-ParseDistribution-1.54-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380212] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380212

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05
   |-1.fc26 |-1.fc26
   ||perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05
   ||-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:46:13



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376996] perl-DateTime-1.39 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376996
Bug 1376996 depends on bug 1376998, which changed state.

Bug 1376998 Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.03 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376998

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380053] perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.13 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380053

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.13-1 |perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.13-1
   |.fc26   |.fc26
   ||perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.13-1
   ||.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:46:21



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.13-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382923] perl-Plack-1.0042 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382923
Bug 1382923 depends on bug 1382929, which changed state.

Bug 1382929 Summary: perl-Cookie-Baker-0.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382929

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382929] perl-Cookie-Baker-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382929

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Cookie-Baker-0.07-1.fc
   ||25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:44:45



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Cookie-Baker-0.07-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1343053] perl-Gtk3-0.029 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343053

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Gtk3-0.029-1.fc26  |perl-Gtk3-0.029-1.fc26
   ||perl-Gtk3-0.029-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:44:15



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Gtk3-0.029-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1371921] perl-boolean-0.46 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371921

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-boolean-0.46-1.fc26|perl-boolean-0.46-1.fc26
   ||perl-boolean-0.46-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-10-08 22:44:07



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-boolean-0.46-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: remove insecure WebKitGTK+ packages for F27

[Scott Talbert]

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Michael Catanzaro wrote:


Thanks for working on this Scott!

On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:

Also, I plan to create a separate wxGTK3 subpackage containing the
webview 
library that actually uses WebKit.  That way, some of these
artificial 
transitive dependencies on WebKit should go away.


To be clear: that means any wxGTK3 app that does not use the web view
widget will be perfectly safe, and that's probably 95% of them.


OK, so I created a wxGTK3-webview subpackage containing the library that 
currently depends on webkitgtk3.  I also created a similar 
wxPython-webview subpackage for the wxPython module.  (I grepped the code 
of all wxPython-dependent packages and found none of them using the 
webview module, so there should be nothing to do with them.)


After doing this, the number of packages recursively depending on 
webkitgtk3 went from 296 to 127!


Scott___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20161008.n.0 compose check report

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 17:15 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
> 
> Failed openQA tests: 22/102 (x86_64), 6/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

So there was a mix here of test issues (a workaround in the Cockpit
test needed to be removed for Rawhide as the bug it worked around has
been fixed, and SDDM changed its appearance again), failures caused by
the outage this morning, and real bugs.

I've fixed the test issues and re-run those tests and those that were
affected by the network outage. The remaining failures are netinst
installs failing to boot as (due to the timing issues I've explained
before) the installed system got the kernel from yesterday's compose,
what seems to be a still-outstanding kernel issue for ARM - the x86
kernel issues seem fixed with today's compose, but the ARM test still
fails to boot with kernel issues - and known bugs.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 22:33 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 08:59:33AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 14:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:49:07PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > > Based on today's blocker review meeting discussion, and this email
> > > > thread [1] I'd like to propose making only Fedora Media Writer the
> > > > *officially supported* USB installation media creation tool, starting
> > > > with Fedora 26.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > First question: is FMW the same thing as liveusb-creator? In an
> > > up-to-date F25 machine, searching for "media", "fedora", and "writer"
> > > in the gnome search dialogue yields no results. A few simple searches
> > > live 'dnf search fedora-media-writer' and 'dnf search fmw' also yield
> > > nothing. How are people supposed to find this?
> > 
> > 
> > It's 'mediawriter', if you have it installed, searching for 'media' in
> > GNOME Shell should definitely be showing it.
> 
> Yep, once it's installed. Before installation, gnome shell shows "no results"
> for "mediawriter".
> 
> OK, so the whole thing is very confusing. Google for "fedora media writer"
> returns here:
> 1. 
> http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/04/26/fedora-media-writer-the-fastest-way-to-create-live-usb-boot-media/
> 
> which says "sudo dnf install liveusb-creator"

Yeah, that was the *first* rewrite, when it got sort-of renamed but the
package name remained the same. The *second* rewrite happened between
April and now and resulted in the new package.

> 3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2016-04-19_Fedora_Media_Writer
> 
> which says "sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --best install 
> liveusb-creator"

Ditto, that was the test day from April, when the package rename had
not yet happened.

> Positions 2. and 4. are about mediawriter, 5. is again about liveusb-creator,
> then a bunch is about mediawriter. Maybe it would be reasonable to add a big
> banner on pages 1. and 3. to use mediawriter instead.

Well, they're both kinda transient pages, I'd expect that over time
they'll simply naturally drop out of the top of the Google results. We
have lots and lots of old Test Day pages with no-longer-current data in
them, it'd be a full-time job going through them all and sticking
banners in them where they're no longer accurate...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 11:40 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>  wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:49:07PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > Based on today's blocker review meeting discussion, and this email
> > > thread [1] I'd like to propose making only Fedora Media Writer the
> > > *officially supported* USB installation media creation tool, starting
> > > with Fedora 26.
> > 
> > 
> > First question: is FMW the same thing as liveusb-creator?
> 
> 
> No, it's a rewrite. But there is confusion about handling obsoleting
> LUC or keeping it around somehow because it does support persistence.
> The last I heard the consensus was to obsolete it. Plus I think it's
> kinda broken at the moment, so how to support multiple writers? It's
> difficult enough as it is, which is the point of this thread.
> 
> 
> > In an
> > up-to-date F25 machine, searching for "media", "fedora", and "writer"
> > in the gnome search dialogue yields no results. A few simple searches
> > live 'dnf search fedora-media-writer' and 'dnf search fmw' also yield
> > nothing. How are people supposed to find this?
> 
> 
> So long as it passes QA testing, which it has so far, the plan is for
> it to be the primary downloadable. Instead of getting an ISO, you get
> a platform specific copy of Fedora Media Writer. The tool downloads
> the Fedora image of choice, checks the hash, and writes it to a stick.
> 
> But yeah finding the *current* version right now is a bit difficult.
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_USB_fmw suggests:
> 
> sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --best install mediawriter

The --enablerepo=updates-testing should now only be necessary for F23,
a good build is stable for F24 and F25.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 08:59:33AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 14:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:49:07PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > Based on today's blocker review meeting discussion, and this email
> > > thread [1] I'd like to propose making only Fedora Media Writer the
> > > *officially supported* USB installation media creation tool, starting
> > > with Fedora 26.
> > 
> > 
> > First question: is FMW the same thing as liveusb-creator? In an
> > up-to-date F25 machine, searching for "media", "fedora", and "writer"
> > in the gnome search dialogue yields no results. A few simple searches
> > live 'dnf search fedora-media-writer' and 'dnf search fmw' also yield
> > nothing. How are people supposed to find this?
> 
> It's 'mediawriter', if you have it installed, searching for 'media' in
> GNOME Shell should definitely be showing it.
Yep, once it's installed. Before installation, gnome shell shows "no results"
for "mediawriter".

OK, so the whole thing is very confusing. Google for "fedora media writer"
returns here:
1. 
http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/04/26/fedora-media-writer-the-fastest-way-to-create-live-usb-boot-media/

which says "sudo dnf install liveusb-creator"

3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2016-04-19_Fedora_Media_Writer

which says "sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --best install 
liveusb-creator"

Positions 2. and 4. are about mediawriter, 5. is again about liveusb-creator,
then a bunch is about mediawriter. Maybe it would be reasonable to add a big
banner on pages 1. and 3. to use mediawriter instead.

> > Second question: how do I run this:
> > 
> > Clicking on the liveusbcreator icon gives me a polkit dialogue and a
> > spinning cursor which disappears after a while with no futher effect.
> 
> The liveusb-creator package still exists but is badly broken. I already
> filed a bug suggesting mediawriter should obsolete it.

OK, indeed, it seems to run nicely on F25.

Unfortunately it still dumps core if it cannot connect to a display
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382990).

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382980] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.34 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382980



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382980] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.34 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382980



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.33 failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382980] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.34 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382980



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1208434
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1208434=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
See for details and report the eventual error to rebase-helper
https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper/issues.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382980] New: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.34 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382980

Bug ID: 1382980
   Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.34 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.34
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.33-3.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2845/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382954] perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.82 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382954

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.81 is  |perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.82 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 1.82
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.80-1.fc26
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Mechanize/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6584/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382953] perl-TermReadKey-2.37 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382953

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-TermReadKey-2.36 is|perl-TermReadKey-2.37 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 2.37
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.33-5.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/TermReadKey/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3372/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382967] New: perl-HTML-FormFu-2.05 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382967

Bug ID: 1382967
   Summary: perl-HTML-FormFu-2.05 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-HTML-FormFu
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 2.05
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.03-1.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-FormFu/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/10877/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382966] perl-File-chdir-0.1011 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382966



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Following patches has been deleted:
['hgsvn-0.4.1-setup.patch']

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382966] perl-File-chdir-0.1011 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382966



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Patching or scratch build for perl-File-chdir-0.1010 failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382966] New: perl-File-chdir-0.1011 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382966

Bug ID: 1382966
   Summary: perl-File-chdir-0.1011 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-File-chdir
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 0.1011
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.1010-5.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-chdir/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2878/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382966] perl-File-chdir-0.1011 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382966



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1208416
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1208416=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
See for details and report the eventual error to rebase-helper
https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper/issues.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382191] perl-Mock-Sub-1.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382191



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
dfateyev's perl-Mock-Sub-1.07-1.fc26 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=807876

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

[Chris Murphy]

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Josh Boyer  wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Andrew Lutomirski  wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Josh Boyer  wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Chris Murphy  
>>> wrote:
 Changed this subject to match the other one I changed, so if I'm doing
 it wrong at least I'm consistent!

 On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> So, I think we would need to get buyin to get our changes into the spec
> and get everyone to agree on it before we would want to move to it.

 The original spec is unworkable. And attempts to expand the upstream
 spec for real world use cases needed in Fedora haven't gone anywhere.
 It exchanges reduced complexity in the bootloader, by increasing it in
 the installer and increasing wasted space on the drive. I'd try to
 help make it salvageable but I think it's pointless. Make a Fedora
 specific version and if people like it they can adopt it.
>>>
>>> Which, in effect, could just as well be writing a "specification" for 
>>> grubby.
>>
>> I disagree.
>>
>> The bootloader spec, update-grub, and pretty much everything except
>> grubby are stateless in the sense that the list of installed kernels
>> and other things is generated freshly each time it updates.  (The
>> bootloader spec does this at every boot, and update-grub does it
>> whenever it's run.)  These solutions don't try to let users customize
>> the result after the fact.  Instead, any customization is written to a
>> file intended for the specific purpose of customizing the boot
>> process, and that file is never written by automatic tools.
>> Bootloader spec parsing, update-grub, etc are all idempotent, which is
>> a *really* nice property.
>>
>> Grubby attempts to parse a configuration file and apply a change for a
>> single kernel addition or removal to it without losing other
>> customizations.  This is a much harder problem to solve well.  It's
>> also not idempotent.  Unsurprisingly (to me, anyway), it doesn't seem
>> to work all that well and it's a PITA to maintain.
>
> You're focusing on the technical aspects of the implementations.  I
> was making a subtle point about the fact that any Fedora-specific
> version of a spec will simply remain a Fedora specific version, which
> defeats the purpose of a specification to begin with.  In essence,
> we'll wind up repeating the implied lesson of grubby.
>
> If we're going to work on a specification, it should be done in
> coordination with other distros.

My idea of a spec was just to document what Fedora needs to support,
so it's known what work needs to be done, including documentation.
That is, start with what we're actually willing to do, rather than
some fiction we won't even follow anyway.

Of the two bootloader specs, we don't exactly follow either one of
them, in meaningful ways: Like where the configuration files live,
which is a fundamental point of those specs.

If GRUB upstream code is an implicit spec, we don't follow that
either. Fedora's GRUB puts the bootloader config file in a different
location depending on the firmware being used; upstream and other
distros don't do that. And Fedora's GRUB uses kernel and initrd
commands that upstream does not use, nor any other distro I've looked
at, and therefore our GRUB is unable to use other distro's grub.cfgs.
When it comes to discovery of other OS's our installer team rejects
the idea they're supposed to activate all LVM LV's so os-prober can
discover those OS's. Fedora is divergent. Even if there were
coordination done with other distros on a spec, why would we suddenly
start following that one?

Anyway, coordination has been tried and failed. Whether the distros
just don't care about the problem, or actually enjoy the mutual
incompatibility, I can't say. But in the end it's gone no where.


-- 
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382953] perl-TermReadKey-2.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382953

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-TermReadKey-2.35 is|perl-TermReadKey-2.36 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 2.36
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.33-5.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/TermReadKey/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3372/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382942] perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached-1.001004 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382942

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cach |perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cach
   |ed-1.001003 is available|ed-1.001004 is available



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 1.001004
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.001002-12.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7038/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

[Chris Murphy]

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:49:07PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Based on today's blocker review meeting discussion, and this email
>> thread [1] I'd like to propose making only Fedora Media Writer the
>> *officially supported* USB installation media creation tool, starting
>> with Fedora 26.
>
> First question: is FMW the same thing as liveusb-creator?

No, it's a rewrite. But there is confusion about handling obsoleting
LUC or keeping it around somehow because it does support persistence.
The last I heard the consensus was to obsolete it. Plus I think it's
kinda broken at the moment, so how to support multiple writers? It's
difficult enough as it is, which is the point of this thread.


> In an
> up-to-date F25 machine, searching for "media", "fedora", and "writer"
> in the gnome search dialogue yields no results. A few simple searches
> live 'dnf search fedora-media-writer' and 'dnf search fmw' also yield
> nothing. How are people supposed to find this?

So long as it passes QA testing, which it has so far, the plan is for
it to be the primary downloadable. Instead of getting an ISO, you get
a platform specific copy of Fedora Media Writer. The tool downloads
the Fedora image of choice, checks the hash, and writes it to a stick.

But yeah finding the *current* version right now is a bit difficult.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_USB_fmw suggests:

sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --best install mediawriter



-- 
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382954] New: perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.81 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382954

Bug ID: 1382954
   Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.81 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 1.81
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.80-1.fc26
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Mechanize/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6584/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382953] New: perl-TermReadKey-2.35 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382953

Bug ID: 1382953
   Summary: perl-TermReadKey-2.35 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-TermReadKey
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 2.35
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.33-5.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/TermReadKey/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3372/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382182] perl-DBD-ODBC-1.56 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382182

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-DBD-ODBC-1.54 is   |perl-DBD-ODBC-1.56 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 1.56
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.52-6.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-ODBC/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2808/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382182] perl-DBD-ODBC-1.56 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382182



--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Failed to kick off scratch build.

cmd:  spectool -g /var/tmp/thn-2x4c_Z/perl-DBD-ODBC.spec
return code:  6
stdout:
Getting http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/DBD/DBD-ODBC-1.56.tar.gz to
./DBD-ODBC-1.56.tar.gz

stderr:
  % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime Time  Current
 Dload  Upload   Total   SpentLeft  Speed

  0 00 00 0  0  0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
  0 00 00 0  0  0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
  0 00 00 0  0  0 --:--:--  0:00:01 --:--:--
0curl: (6) Could not resolve host: www.cpan.org; Temporary failure in name
resolution

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 14:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:49:07PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Based on today's blocker review meeting discussion, and this email
> > thread [1] I'd like to propose making only Fedora Media Writer the
> > *officially supported* USB installation media creation tool, starting
> > with Fedora 26.
> 
> 
> First question: is FMW the same thing as liveusb-creator? In an
> up-to-date F25 machine, searching for "media", "fedora", and "writer"
> in the gnome search dialogue yields no results. A few simple searches
> live 'dnf search fedora-media-writer' and 'dnf search fmw' also yield
> nothing. How are people supposed to find this?

It's 'mediawriter', if you have it installed, searching for 'media' in
GNOME Shell should definitely be showing it.

> Second question: how do I run this:
> 
> Clicking on the liveusbcreator icon gives me a polkit dialogue and a
> spinning cursor which disappears after a while with no futher effect.

The liveusb-creator package still exists but is badly broken. I already
filed a bug suggesting mediawriter should obsolete it.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382950] perl-Params-Validate-1.26 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382950



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Params-Validate-1.25 failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382950] perl-Params-Validate-1.26 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382950



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382950] perl-Params-Validate-1.26 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382950



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1208395
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1208395=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
See for details and report the eventual error to rebase-helper
https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper/issues.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382950] New: perl-Params-Validate-1.26 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382950

Bug ID: 1382950
   Summary: perl-Params-Validate-1.26 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Params-Validate
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: lxt...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040...@freenet.de



Latest upstream release: 1.26
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.25-1.fc26
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Validate/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/10255/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382943] New: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.008 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382943

Bug ID: 1382943
   Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.008 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Dist-Zilla
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
psab...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 6.008
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.007-1.fc26
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dist-Zilla/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5898/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20161008.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 22/102 (x86_64), 6/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161007.n.0):

ID: 39697   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39697
ID: 39701   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39701
ID: 39732   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39732
ID: 39733   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39733
ID: 39736   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_database_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39736
ID: 39799   Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39799

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20161007.n.0):

ID: 39690   Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39690
ID: 39691   Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39691
ID: 39692   Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39692
ID: 39704   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39704
ID: 39705   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39705
ID: 39707   Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39707
ID: 39710   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39710
ID: 39711   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39711
ID: 39720   Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39720
ID: 39721   Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39721
ID: 39723   Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39723
ID: 39724   Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39724
ID: 39744   Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39744
ID: 39759   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39759
ID: 39761   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39761
ID: 39762   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39762
ID: 39763   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39763
ID: 39764   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39764
ID: 39765   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39765
ID: 39790   Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39790
ID: 39791   Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39791
ID: 39809   Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39809
ID: 39810   Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39810

Passed openQA tests: 72/102 (x86_64), 11/17 (i386)

New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20161007.n.0):

ID: 39693   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39693
ID: 39694   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39694
ID: 39695   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39695
ID: 39696   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39696
ID: 39698   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39698
ID: 39699   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39699
ID: 39700   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_service_manipulation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39700
ID: 39702   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39702
ID: 39703   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_terminal
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39703
ID: 39708   Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39708
ID: 39709   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39709
ID: 39725   

[Bug 1382182] perl-DBD-ODBC-1.56 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382182



--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Rebase helper failed.
See logs and attachments in this bugzilla 'NoneType' object has no attribute
'get_rebasehelper_data'

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382942] New: perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached-1.001003 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382942

Bug ID: 1382942
   Summary: perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached-1.001003 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 1.001003
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.001002-12.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7038/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25-20161008.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 14/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161007.n.0):

ID: 39837   Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39837
ID: 39843   Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39843
ID: 39852   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39852
ID: 39856   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39856
ID: 39865   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39865
ID: 39883   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39883
ID: 39884   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39884
ID: 39885   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39885
ID: 39886   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39886
ID: 39887   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39887
ID: 39893   Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39893
ID: 39894   Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39894

Old failures (same test failed in 25-20161007.n.0):

ID: 39819   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39819
ID: 39830   Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39830
ID: 39931   Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39931
ID: 39935   Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39935

Passed openQA tests: 88/102 (x86_64), 16/17 (i386)

Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 121
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 14:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > to summarize the changes - we improve the test case's wording to give
> > explicit instructions for all three media types we care about (virtual
> > disc attached to a VM, real optical disc in a real machine, real USB
> > stick in a real machine), we ditch the USB test matrices entirely, and
> > we give the 'Default boot and install' tables extra result columns so
> > they can now reflect results for VM, CD/DVD and USB testing (for BIOS
> > and UEFI in all three cases, for x86_64).
> 
> 
> You can actually test in a VM both as a virtual CD/DVD:
> 
> -cdrom file
>   Use file as CD-ROM image (you cannot use -hdc and -cdrom at the same
>   time). You can use the host CD-ROM by using /dev/cdrom as filename.
> 
> and as a virtual USB:
> 
> -usbdevice devname
>   Add the USB device devname. 
> 
>   disk:[format=format]:file
> Mass storage device based on file. The optional format argument will be
> used rather than detecting the format. Can be used to specifiy
> "format=raw" to avoid interpreting an untrusted format header.
> 
> (The quotes are from the qemu manpage.)
> 
> It is not a replacement for testing on real hardware, but it could catch at 
> least some of the differences.

Yeah, I know, I've been meaning to add an openQA test that does the
latter but not really got around to it. It didn't seem worth adding an
extra result column pair for 'virt USB' (vs 'virt CD') though...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:49:07PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Based on today's blocker review meeting discussion, and this email
> thread [1] I'd like to propose making only Fedora Media Writer the
> *officially supported* USB installation media creation tool, starting
> with Fedora 26.

First question: is FMW the same thing as liveusb-creator? In an
up-to-date F25 machine, searching for "media", "fedora", and "writer"
in the gnome search dialogue yields no results. A few simple searches
live 'dnf search fedora-media-writer' and 'dnf search fmw' also yield
nothing. How are people supposed to find this?

Second question: how do I run this:

Clicking on the liveusbcreator icon gives me a polkit dialogue and a
spinning cursor which disappears after a while with no futher effect.

$ liveusb-creator
You must run this application as root
[1]

$ sudo liveusb-creator
No protocol specified
QXcbConnection: Could not connect to display :0
[2]11324 abort  sudo liveusb-creator

$ liveusb-creator_polkit
Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 keyQXcbConnection: Could not connect to display :0
/usr/bin/liveusb-creator_polkit: line 6: 11411 Aborted (core dumped) pkexec 
--disable-internal-agent "/usr/bin/liveusb-creator" "$@"
[134]

(gdb) bt
#0  0x7fb1e1f6a92f in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:58
#1  0x7fb1e1f6c52a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
#2  0x7fb1da2baaf1 in  () at /lib64/libQt5Core.so.5
#3  0x7fb1cf69cb5e in QXcbConnection::QXcbConnection(QXcbNativeInterface*, 
bool, unsigned int, char const*) ()
at /lib64/libQt5XcbQpa.so.5
#4  0x7fb1cf69fd1e in QXcbIntegration::QXcbIntegration(QStringList const&, 
int&, char**) () at /lib64/libQt5XcbQpa.so.5
#5  0x7fb1e321c6ed in QXcbIntegrationPlugin::create(QString const&, 
QStringList const&, int&, char**) ()
at /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/platforms/libqxcb.so
#6  0x7fb1d5e748fd in QPlatformIntegrationFactory::create(QString const&, 
QStringList const&, int&, char**, QString const&) ()
at /lib64/libQt5Gui.so.5
#7  0x7fb1d5e820c1 in QGuiApplicationPrivate::createPlatformIntegration() 
() at /lib64/libQt5Gui.so.5
#8  0x7fb1d5e82f3d in QGuiApplicationPrivate::createEventDispatcher() () at 
/lib64/libQt5Gui.so.5
#9  0x7fb1da4754f9 in QCoreApplicationPrivate::init() () at 
/lib64/libQt5Core.so.5
#10 0x7fb1d5e8419e in QGuiApplicationPrivate::init() () at 
/lib64/libQt5Gui.so.5
#11 0x7fb1d1ea6619 in QApplicationPrivate::init() () at 
/lib64/libQt5Widgets.so.5
#12 0x7fb1d265fb99 in sipQApplication::sipQApplication(int&, char**, int) 
() at /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyQt5/QtWidgets.so
#13 0x7fb1d265fc73 in init_type_QApplication () at 
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyQt5/QtWidgets.so
#14 0x7fb1d6a4f78b in sipSimpleWrapper_init () at 
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sip.so
#15 0x7fb1e2cc45cc in wrap_init () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#16 0x7fb1e2c73003 in PyObject_Call () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#17 0x7fb1e2d05107 in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords () at 
/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#18 0x7fb1e2c88cf5 in wrapperdescr_call () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#19 0x7fb1e2c73003 in PyObject_Call () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#20 0x7fb1e2d0ae66 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#21 0x7fb1e2d0f05c in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#22 0x7fb1e2c97d6c in function_call () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#23 0x7fb1e2c73003 in PyObject_Call () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#24 0x7fb1e2c81e5c in instancemethod_call () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#25 0x7fb1e2c73003 in PyObject_Call () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#26 0x7fb1e2cca127 in slot_tp_init () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#27 0x7fb1e2cc8dee in type_call () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#28 0x7fb1e2c73003 in PyObject_Call () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#29 0x7fb1e2d0ae66 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#30 0x7fb1e2d0c052 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#31 0x7fb1e2d0f05c in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#32 0x7fb1e2d0f149 in PyEval_EvalCode () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#33 0x7fb1e2d2852f in run_mod () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#34 0x7fb1e2d29762 in PyRun_FileExFlags () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#35 0x7fb1e2d2a975 in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags () at 
/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#36 0x7fb1e2d3c900 in Py_Main () at /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#37 0x7fb1e1f55401 in __libc_start_main (main=
0x563e8dd427a0 , argc=3, argv=0x7ffece2797e8, init=, 
fini=, rtld_fini=, stack_end=0x7ffece2797d8) at 
../csu/libc-start.c:289
#38 0x563e8dd427da in _start ()

Waylandly-confused,
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161008.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161007.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161008.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   49
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  264.88 KiB
Size of dropped packages:8.51 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   2.97 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   45.13 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 x86_64
Path: 
CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20161008.n.0.x86_64.qcow2
Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz x86_64
Path: 
CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20161008.n.0.x86_64.raw.xz
Image: Atomic vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: 
CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Atomic-Vagrant-Rawhide-20161008.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Path: CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Atomic-Rawhide-20161008.n.0.x86_64.raw.xz
Image: Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Path: CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Atomic-Rawhide-20161008.n.0.x86_64.qcow2
Image: Atomic vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Path: 
CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Atomic-Vagrant-Rawhide-20161008.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: multicat-2.1-1.fc26
Summary: Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation
RPMs:multicat
Size:271232 bytes


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: media-explorer-0.4.4-14.fc23
Summary: Media center application
RPMs:media-explorer
Size:8918988 bytes


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  Agda-2.4.2.5-1.fc26
Old package:  Agda-2.4.2.2-6.fc24
Summary:  A dependently typed functional programming language and proof 
assistant
RPMs: Agda ghc-Agda ghc-Agda-devel ghc-geniplate-mirror 
ghc-geniplate-mirror-devel
Added RPMs:   ghc-geniplate-mirror ghc-geniplate-mirror-devel
Size: 89912902 bytes
Size change:  -16053208 bytes
Changelog:
  * Thu Oct 06 2016 Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> - 2.4.2.5-1
  - update to 2.4.2.5
  - subpackage new dep geniplate-mirror
  - disable dynlink on aarch64


Package:  HepMC-2.06.09-15.fc26
Old package:  HepMC-2.06.09-14.fc24
Summary:  C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
RPMs: HepMC HepMC-devel HepMC-doc
Size: 1716042 bytes
Size change:  -22260 bytes
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 07 2016 Dan Hor??k <dan[at]danny.cz> - 2.06.09-15
  - disable FMA on s390(x)


Package:  appmenu-qt-0.2.7+14.04.20140305-1.fc26
Old package:  appmenu-qt-0.2.6-9.fc24
Summary:  Global application menu to Qt
RPMs: appmenu-qt
Size: 161816 bytes
Size change:  13940 bytes
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 07 2016 Bj??rn Esser <fed...@besser82.io> - 0.2.7+14.04.20140305-1
  - Update to v0.2.7+14.04.20140305
  - Change Source0 to official release-tarball location
  - Use %autosetup and %make_{build,install} macros
  - Move licensing-files to %license


Package:  cargo-0.13.0-3.fc26
Old package:  cargo-0.13.0-1.fc26
Summary:  Rust's package manager and build tool
RPMs: cargo
Size: 7242156 bytes
Size change:  1707386 bytes
Changelog:
  * Thu Oct 06 2016 Josh Stone <jist...@redhat.com> - 0.13.0-2
  - Bootstrap aarch64.
  - Use jemalloc's MALLOC_CONF to work around #36944.

  * Fri Oct 07 2016 Josh Stone <jist...@redhat.com> - 0.13.0-3
  - Rebuild without bootstrap binaries.


Package:  curl-7.50.3-2.fc26
Old package:  curl-7.50.3-1.fc26
Summary:  A utility for getting files from remote servers (FTP, HTTP, and 
others)
RPMs: curl libcurl libcurl-devel
Size: 4989372 bytes
Size change:  -9632 bytes
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 07 2016 Kamil Dudka <kdu...@redhat.com> 7.50.3-2
  - use the just built version of libcurl while generating zsh completion


Package:  elfutils-0.167-2.fc26
Old package:  elfutils-0.167-1.fc26
Summary:  A collection of utilities and DSOs to handle compiled objects
RPMs: elfutils elfutils-default-yama-scope elfutils-devel 
elfutils-devel-static elfutils-libelf elfutils-libelf-devel 
elfutils-libelf-devel-static elfutils-libs
Size: 4844218 bytes
Size change:  -20320 bytes
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 07 2016 Mark Wielaard <m...@redhat.com> - 0.167-2
  - Add elfutils-0.167-strip-alloc-symbol.patch (#1380961)


Package:  fail2ban-0.9.5-4.fc26
Old package:  fail2ban-0.9.5-3.fc26
Summary:  Daemon to ban hosts that cause multiple authentication errors
RPMs: fail2ban fail2ban-all fail2ban-firewalld fail2ban-hostsdeny 
fail2ban-mail fail2ban-sendmail fail2ban-server fail2ban-shorewall 
fail2ban-systemd fail2ban-tests
Added RPMs:   fail2ban-tests
Size: 602492 bytes
Size change:  25318 bytes
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 07 2016 Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com> - 0.9.5-4
  - %ghost /run/fail2ban
  - Fix typo in shorewall description
  - Move tests to -tests sub-package


Package:  fftw-3.3.5-2.fc26
Old 

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 457  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031   
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
 451  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168   
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
 383  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8156   
nagios-4.0.8-1.el6
 341  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
 313  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-35e240edd9   
thttpd-2.25b-24.el6
 199  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-30a8346813   
vtun-3.0.1-10.el6
  59  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-a1450d7fe0   
knot-1.6.8-1.el6
  44  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8594ed3a53   
chicken-4.11.0-3.el6
  16  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-edda50420f   
mongodb-2.4.14-4.el6
  16  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-25e30f6dc3   
jansson-2.9-1.el6
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e8602185c5   
links-2.13-1.el6
  12  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-1117d3c7f6   
golang-1.7.1-1.el6
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-efb0141e9c   
php-ZendFramework-1.12.20-1.el6
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-63189174a4   
nsd-4.1.13-1.el6
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e3428efd3c   
php-symfony-2.3.42-1.el6
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-c4b3ba1af6   
nodejs-0.10.47-2.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

acme-tiny-0.1-10.20160810git5a7b4e7.el6
drupal7-7.51-1.el6
fedfind-2.5.0-1.el6
fedpkg-copr-0.8-1.el6
guacamole-server-0.9.9-1.el6
php-twig-1.26.1-1.el6
tito-0.6.7-1.el6
uwsgi-2.0.14-1.el6

Details about builds:



 acme-tiny-0.1-10.20160810git5a7b4e7.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-cb6cac6026)
 Tiny auditable script to issue, renew Let's Encrypt certificates

Update Information:

A tiny package to make acme-tiny secure and fire and forget easy on Fedora and
EPEL.  Read the README for hints on using acme certs with sendmail, httpd, and
dovecot.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1366355 - None
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355




 drupal7-7.51-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-75c9469df8)
 An open-source content-management platform

Update Information:

https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/releases/7.51

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1382177 - None
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382177




 fedfind-2.5.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6e67444dbf)
 Fedora Finder finds Fedora

Update Information:

The major change in this update is that fedfind now has the ability to
effectively override the productmd-formatted metadata provided by Pungi in
specific cases where it's problematic. There is a new helper function,
`helpers.correct_image`, which applies these 'corrections', and the image dicts
returned by the `Release.all_images` property - commonly used for getting a flat
list of image dicts from the compose metadata - now have these corrections
applied.  This is intended to work around a [significant
issue](https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/417) that's appeared along with the
introduction of a Workstation ostree installer image for Fedora: pungi sets the
`type` for ostree installer images to `boot`, but that means there is no way to
distinguish a Workstation network install image from a Workstation ostree
install image using the metadata. This is a major problem for several things
which distinguish between images based on the metadata (openQA,
fedora_nightlies, and wikitcms are all affected by this). For now, fedfind will
'correct' the `type` for these images from `boot` to `dvd-ostree`.  Note you can
get un'corrected' image dicts from the `Release.metadata` property, which always
provides the original, entirely unmodified metadata.  There is also a new
helper, `fedfind.helpers.identify_image`, for constructing image identifiers
from image dicts; this is something various fedfind consumers do, and were
duplicating the 

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

[buildsys]

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On aarch64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires libperl.so.5.22
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.22
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

[buildsys]

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On aarch64:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

[Kevin Kofler]

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> My proposal is:
> 1. Prevent EOL software with known security vulnerabilities from
> entering Fedora in the first place, i.e. make it a review bullet point
> (if the package is EOL it MUST NOT have any known security
> vulnerabilties). If existing packages are found to be EOL and have known
> security vulnerabilities, the vulnerability must either be patched by
> the maintainer (or otherwise handled, e.g. by switching to an actively
> maintained fork) or the package must be removed from Fedora.

I agree with this.

While I think it is important to provide compatibility packages to keep 
older software running, in this case, we have old versions of Python that:
* should not be necessary to run software, software for Python n.m usually
  runs just fine with the newer n.m+1,
* in fact, have it as an explicit non-goal to package things against them,
* contain the priceless "No security fixes will be applied.", which is an
  entirely unacceptable attitude: at the very least, if someone files a bug
  report with an explicit CVE against your package, you are supposed to at
  least TRY to backport the fix for that CVE, and ask for help if you fail.

I comaintain the qt3 and kdelibs3 compat packages and do not want those 
removed, but I actually go and fix all security vulnerabilities that I am 
made aware of. I think that this should be the minimum standard to require 
for all packages, even compat packages.

These python[23][1-9] packages are entirely unnecessary and should go away 
ASAP.

> 2. A ticket may be opened to FESCo applying for an exception to the
> above. FESCo should most likely seek the advice of the Fedora
> Security Team in such cases.

What cases do you have in mind for the exceptions? The infamous old WebKit 
versions that everything still depends on? (The old webkitgtk is now getting 
dropped, Qt5WebKit will hopefully soon be upgraded to the new resurrected 
version, and hopefully we can drop Qt4WebKit soon, but right now this is 
still not fully sorted out.) Ideally, we'd just fix all our security 
vulnerabilities. The WebKit mess is a case where it's not working though.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

[Kevin Kofler]

Adam Williamson wrote:
> to summarize the changes - we improve the test case's wording to give
> explicit instructions for all three media types we care about (virtual
> disc attached to a VM, real optical disc in a real machine, real USB
> stick in a real machine), we ditch the USB test matrices entirely, and
> we give the 'Default boot and install' tables extra result columns so
> they can now reflect results for VM, CD/DVD and USB testing (for BIOS
> and UEFI in all three cases, for x86_64).

You can actually test in a VM both as a virtual CD/DVD:

-cdrom file
  Use file as CD-ROM image (you cannot use -hdc and -cdrom at the same
  time). You can use the host CD-ROM by using /dev/cdrom as filename.

and as a virtual USB:

-usbdevice devname
  Add the USB device devname. 

  disk:[format=format]:file
Mass storage device based on file. The optional format argument will be
used rather than detecting the format. Can be used to specifiy
"format=raw" to avoid interpreting an untrusted format header.

(The quotes are from the qemu manpage.)

It is not a replacement for testing on real hardware, but it could catch at 
least some of the differences.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Weak password madness is back again

[Kevin Kofler]

Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> The status quo is that we are not in compliance with FESCo's policy
> [1], which clearly applies to all tools that change passwords and not
> just anaconda, but we can't change anything in GNOME until libpwquality
> stops blocking weak passwords via its PAM module, since we ultimately
> shell out to passwd to implement that (for auditability).

The right fix there is to just remove the libpwquality PAM module by 
default. Enabling such a thing should only be done by the local system 
administrator.

> But there is one more issue. FESCo's policy actually requires that only
> admin users (wheel users, including the initial user account) would be
> able to set weak passwords, and that unprivileged users should be
> blocked from doing so.

And I agree with Chris Murphy that that policy is utter nonsense.

Even if I want to set my password to the empty string, that is my choice. It 
is a perfectly valid password for some use cases. (For what it's worth, I 
actually use a non-empty password, but Anaconda considers even that "weak". 
But I do not want to give more details here, and most definitely not the 
password itself, for obvious reasons.)

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Weak password madness is back again

[Kevin Kofler]

Tomas Mraz wrote:
> The only place where the password strength check should not be
> overridable is when a regular user tries to change his own password.

No, even that should not happen unless the local administrator explicitly 
opted to enforce some such policy (and the exact policy to enforce is the 
administrator's choice, it is likely to differ significantly from GNOME's 
hardcoded policy).

Enforcing password strength rules on all users of the entire distribution, 
no matter what their use cases are, is just not a reasonable thing to do. As 
pointed out by Chris Murphy, even the proprietary operating systems don't do 
that.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

[Kevin Kofler]

Chris Murphy wrote:
> My recollection is grubby was going to get a rethink, but I don't know
> the scope. There are test cases built-into grubby that are considered
> valuable, I'm not sure about the rest. Gene found the code difficult.
> I think the main issue is, whether grubby or something else, it needs
> to be easier to follow the trail of breadcrumbs, self describing. If
> it's too easy, of course, it just means telling different people "no"
> about their use case. If you're going to support all use cases that's
> hard to invent and maintain. See GRUB.

IMHO, you should just drop grubby entirely and configure GRUB the way 
upstream intended. As you wrote in the other thread:

> I don't have a complete or recent evaluation but as of a couple years
> ago, before Gene Czarcinski passed away, we found no other
> distribution using grubby. Distros we ran into use grub-mkconfig as
> recommended by upstream to obliterate the existing grub.cfg and create
> an entirely new one.

As a result, all the configuration GUIs for GRUB, such as kcm-grub2, just 
run grub(2)-mkconfig and will those overwrite any changes you or grubby made 
to grub.cfg directly. Alternative installers such as Calamares also do not 
use grubby, but only grub(2)-mkconfig. (Thankfully, grubby has no problems 
editing the resulting configuration later, when it is invoked by new-kernel-
pkg. But all other distros just rerun grub(2)-mkconfig in that situation.)

Fedora doesn't even remove the comment at the beginning of grub.cfg saying:
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by grub2-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
#
even though nothing in Fedora actually does that.

Dropping the Fedora-only grubby hack would make life easier for everybody.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382929] perl-Cookie-Baker-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382929

Ralf Corsepius  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Blocks||1382923




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382923
[Bug 1382923] perl-Plack-1.0042 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382923] perl-Plack-1.0042 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382923

Ralf Corsepius  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1382929




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382929
[Bug 1382929] perl-Cookie-Baker-0.07 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382929] New: perl-Cookie-Baker-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382929

Bug ID: 1382929
   Summary: perl-Cookie-Baker-0.07 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Cookie-Baker
  Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
  Reporter: rc040...@freenet.de
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040...@freenet.de



Description of problem:
perl-Cookie-Baker-0.07 is available

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382923] perl-Plack-1.0042 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382923

Ralf Corsepius  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1382928




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382928
[Bug 1382928] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser - PSGI compliant HTTP
Entity Parser
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

[Kevin Kofler]

Chris Murphy wrote:
> dmverity is a valid option geared explicitly for this and can include
> Reed-Solomon error correction;

Ouch, please no! Reed-Solomon is going to blow up the size of the live 
images a lot, when all that's really needed is a simple checksum.

> and Btrfs. The Btrfs option is kinda need because a.) it's on-the-fly
> instead of all at once b.) it's every time a block is read, not one time,
> c.) can't be bypassed by the user, and d.) Btrfs supports overlays with
> the seed device function.

That's not quite the same thing as verification of the entire media. It 
would also only be possible to replace the inner ext4 image with Btrfs, not 
the outer SquashFS one, because Btrfs natively only supports zlib or LZO 
compression, not the xz compression we are currently using. Switching (back) 
to zlib would blow up the size of the live images a lot, and LZO is even 
worse. The documentation says that LZMA/xz support is not currently being 
considered in Btrfs. Btrfs also only compresses file contents, not metadata, 
which is another reason an inner image would still be needed (to turn the 
metadata into compressible contents). And whatever you do, the size and 
performance impact of switching to Btrfs would have to be measured, it could 
be significant in either direction.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

[Kevin Kofler]

Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> At the risk of muddying the waters a bit: now that OverlayFS is here, I
> think that even a dd-copied image should be able to support persistence.
> The image could notice that it's dd-copied (by checking GPT GUIDs or
> layout or whatever), see that there's extra space at the end, and allocate
> it.
> 
> This could reduce the testing explosion a bit if all of the supported
> image writing tools ended up being equivalent to dd.

It wouldn't work for the non-destructive use case.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

[Kevin Kofler]

Tomas Mraz wrote:
> At worst if the patching of a package is highly non-trivial and the
> upstream is not responsive we might have to drop the package from
> Fedora.
> 
> We do not want to keep 1.0.2 devel around as that could make it to look
> like the 1.0.2 is still fully "supported" in Fedora and there would be
> no incentive to switch to 1.1.0. Also to get any new features from
> upstream OpenSSL we have to move to newer versions as they are released
> as the old versions get only bug fixes.

IMHO, this is not acceptable. If the API of a library changes enough to 
warrant a compat package, you have to provide the -devel for the compat 
package as well. Dropping all the packages that don't build against the new 
incompatible version from Fedora is not a reasonable plan.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382923] perl-Plack-1.0042 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382923

Ralf Corsepius  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Depends On||1382922




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382922
[Bug 1382922] Review Request: perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded - Parser and builder
for application/x-www-form-urlencoded
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382923] New: perl-Plack-1.0042 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382923

Bug ID: 1382923
   Summary: perl-Plack-1.0042 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Plack
  Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
  Reporter: rc040...@freenet.de
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040...@freenet.de



Description of problem:
perl-Plack-1.0042 is available

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

[Josh Boyer]

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Andrew Lutomirski  wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Josh Boyer  wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Chris Murphy  wrote:
>>> Changed this subject to match the other one I changed, so if I'm doing
>>> it wrong at least I'm consistent!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
 So, I think we would need to get buyin to get our changes into the spec
 and get everyone to agree on it before we would want to move to it.
>>>
>>> The original spec is unworkable. And attempts to expand the upstream
>>> spec for real world use cases needed in Fedora haven't gone anywhere.
>>> It exchanges reduced complexity in the bootloader, by increasing it in
>>> the installer and increasing wasted space on the drive. I'd try to
>>> help make it salvageable but I think it's pointless. Make a Fedora
>>> specific version and if people like it they can adopt it.
>>
>> Which, in effect, could just as well be writing a "specification" for grubby.
>
> I disagree.
>
> The bootloader spec, update-grub, and pretty much everything except
> grubby are stateless in the sense that the list of installed kernels
> and other things is generated freshly each time it updates.  (The
> bootloader spec does this at every boot, and update-grub does it
> whenever it's run.)  These solutions don't try to let users customize
> the result after the fact.  Instead, any customization is written to a
> file intended for the specific purpose of customizing the boot
> process, and that file is never written by automatic tools.
> Bootloader spec parsing, update-grub, etc are all idempotent, which is
> a *really* nice property.
>
> Grubby attempts to parse a configuration file and apply a change for a
> single kernel addition or removal to it without losing other
> customizations.  This is a much harder problem to solve well.  It's
> also not idempotent.  Unsurprisingly (to me, anyway), it doesn't seem
> to work all that well and it's a PITA to maintain.

You're focusing on the technical aspects of the implementations.  I
was making a subtle point about the fact that any Fedora-specific
version of a spec will simply remain a Fedora specific version, which
defeats the purpose of a specification to begin with.  In essence,
we'll wind up repeating the implied lesson of grubby.

If we're going to work on a specification, it should be done in
coordination with other distros.

josh
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Firebird update and Libreoffice dependency

[Philippe Makowski]

Hi,

Firebird 3.0.1 is released, I can upgrade the package in Fedora, I have a
Copr repo with it :
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/makowski/firebird/

The problem is that Firebird 3 don't provide anymore fbembed lib, they put
all in firebird lib.

For Mageia, to don't disturb LibreOffice, I created a new package for
fbembed,
I think it is the easiest way, unless LibreOffice whant to build with
Firebird 3.

Under Mageia, the change in LibreOffice was then :
[packages] Diff of /cauldron/libreoffice/current/SPECS/libreoffice.spec


and here the new package fbembed :
http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/fbembed/current/

Any thought ?
any one to jump to create fbembed ?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

corsepiu pushed to perl-Plack (master). "Preps for Plack-1.0042."

[notifications]

From 304b15da58b7132c5b05e8027a2a108e008d72ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= 
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 08:31:15 +0200
Subject: Preps for Plack-1.0042.

---
 perl-Plack.spec | 17 -
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/perl-Plack.spec b/perl-Plack.spec
index 203c3f3..ec474b4 100644
--- a/perl-Plack.spec
+++ b/perl-Plack.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Plack
 Version:1.0039
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl Superglue for Web frameworks and Web Servers (PSGI 
toolkit)
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -15,8 +15,13 @@ BuildArch:  noarch
 %bcond_with apache
 
 BuildRequires:  perl-generators
+%if "%{version}" > "1.0039"
+BuildRequires:  perl(Apache::LogFormat::Compiler) >= 0.33
+BuildRequires:  perl(Cookie::Baker) >= 0.07
+%else
 BuildRequires:  perl(Apache::LogFormat::Compiler) >= 0.12
 BuildRequires:  perl(Cookie::Baker) >= 0.05
+%endif
 BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::StackTrace) >= 1.23
 BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::StackTrace::AsHTML) >= 0.11
 BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::StackTrace::WithLexicals) >= 0.8
@@ -27,7 +32,11 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Filesys::Notify::Simple)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Hash::MultiValue) >= 0.05
 BuildRequires:  perl(HTTP::Headers::Fast) >= 0.18
 
+%if "%{version}" > "1.0039"
+BuildRequires:  perl(HTTP::Entity::Parser) >= 0.17
+%else
 BuildRequires:  perl(HTTP::Body) >= 1.06
+%endif
 BuildRequires:  perl(HTTP::Message) >= 5.814
 BuildRequires:  perl(HTTP::Tiny) >= 0.03
 BuildRequires:  perl(parent)
@@ -36,6 +45,9 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Stream::Buffered) >= 0.02
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::TCP) >= 2.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Try::Tiny)
 BuildRequires:  perl(URI) >= 1.59
+%if "%{version}" > "1.0039"
+BuildRequires:  perl(WWW::Form::UrlEncoded) >= 0.23
+%endif
 
 # tests
 BuildRequires:  perl(Authen::Simple::Adapter)
@@ -136,6 +148,9 @@ make test %{?_with_apache:TEST_APACHE2=1 TEST_FCGI_CLIENT=1}
 %exclude %{perl_vendorlib}/auto/share/dist/Plack/#foo
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Oct 08 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.0039-2
+- Preps for Plack-1.0042.
+
 * Sat Jun 04 2016 Ralf Corsépius  - 1.0039-1
 - Update to 1.0039.
 - Cleanup BRs.
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Plack.git/commit/?h=master=304b15da58b7132c5b05e8027a2a108e008d72ef
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org