Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 31.10.2016 v 12:55 Tom Hughes napsal(a): >> The problem, as I believe has been repeatedly explained, is that you don't >> really have any idea whether the connection >> is metered. Yes you may be trying to guess by considering things lik

Re: Intel Vulkan driver status

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 09/02/2016 09:03 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> >> On 09/02/2016 08:59 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >>> >>> We need Vulkan loader which is now on review. I will take care of it >>> ASAP. >> >> >> I see it[1] now. Thanks, Igor. If there

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:05:03PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: >> Example output for the /boot sub-tree on my daily driver: >> >> grub2-efi-2.02-0.34.fc24.x86_64 >> └── /boot/efi/EFI/fedora >> mactel-boot-0.9-13.f

Re: Intel Vulkan driver status

On 09/02/2016 09:03 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 09/02/2016 08:59 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: We need Vulkan loader which is now on review. I will take care of it ASAP. I see it[1] now. Thanks, Igor. If there is anything I can do to help with the review just let me know. [1] https://bugzi

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On jueves, 27 de octubre de 2016 10:05:03 AM CDT Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > * And probably last think, why the Rawhide should be really exception? > > Why we should not use Bodhi if we are using it anywhere else? > > Lets use Bodhi for R

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:53:27 +0200 Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi all, > > I am thinking, why we don't have enabled Bodhi for Rawhide? I know > that you might think now that I went nut and it is bureaucracy, but > let me explain. > > If I understand it correctly, during several past years, our build >

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2016-11-01)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:55:35 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:20:45AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > >> Already implemented. You can supress test failures by a python > > >> code in a .rpmlint file in package's dist-git repository. > > > I can? Where is this documented? Can

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-11-01)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2016-11-01)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On 2016-11-01, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:20:45AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> >> Already implemented. You can supress test failures by a python code in >> >> a .rpmlint file in package's dist-git repository. >> > I can? Where is this documented? Can we add a link to that >>

Fedora 25-20161101.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161031.n.0): ID: 45272 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/45272 ID: 45336 Test: x86_64 universa

Fedora 25 Final Freeze today (2016-Nov-01)

Hi all, Today, November 1st 2016, is an important day on the Fedora 25 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final comp

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG

Minutes and logs from the meeting are available at [1] and [2]. [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2016-11-01/modularity_wg.2016-11-01-15.00.html [2] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2016-11-01/modularity_wg.2016-11-01-15.00.log.html Regards, Jan On Tue, N

Re: remote: sh: ./hooks/post-receive-chained.d/post-receive-alternativearch: No such file or directory

Thank you guys for the reply, I'm just glad it's not something critical... :) David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] *Associate Software Engineer* *Brno, Czech Republic* RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. Every airline in the Fortune 500 relies on Red Hat. Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161101.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-25-20161031.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161101.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:23 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 99 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 15.89 MiB Size of dropped packages:891.77 KiB

Re: remote: sh: ./hooks/post-receive-chained.d/post-receive-alternativearch: No such file or directory

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:41:55AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:34 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] > wrote: > > Hello folks, > > when I was pushing new commit to ghostscript, I received the line in > $SUBJ during the push, for all the currently used Fedora

Re: remote: sh: ./hooks/post-receive-chained.d/post-receive-alternativearch: No such file or directory

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:34 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > Hello folks, > > when I was pushing new commit to ghostscript, I received the line in $SUBJ > during the push, for all the currently used Fedora branches. > > Did anybody else stumble upon this? Any idea where should I report this >

remote: sh: ./hooks/post-receive-chained.d/post-receive-alternativearch: No such file or directory

Hello folks, when I was pushing new commit to ghostscript, I received the line in $SUBJ during the push, for all the currently used Fedora branches. Did anybody else stumble upon this? Any idea where should I report this bug since this is apparently problem of our Fedora infrastracture? Thanks,

Re: Self Introduction: Brad Hubbard

Hi, welcome! Just as a comment, I learned about Red Hat in the late Cretaceous so we almost coincide in time xD Cheers, Sylvia On 30/10/16 02:45, Brad Hubbard wrote: Hello all, Some of you may have seen me around before under my preferred nick of badone as I've lurked in open source and

Re: Self Introduction: Mike Miller

Hey welcome here! Are you interested in any programme in particular to contribute? Just as curiosity, what kind of sports and video games you like? Cheers, Sylvia On 28/10/16 16:15, Mike Miller wrote: Hello, My name is Mike Miller and I have been a software developer for almost ten year

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:05:03PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Example output for the /boot sub-tree on my daily driver: > > grub2-efi-2.02-0.34.fc24.x86_64 > └── /boot/efi/EFI/fedora > mactel-boot-0.9-13.fc24.x86_64 > ├── /boot/efi/.VolumeIcon.icns > ├── /boot/efi/System

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:20:45AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> Already implemented. You can supress test failures by a python code in > >> a .rpmlint file in package's dist-git repository. > > I can? Where is this documented? Can we add a link to that > > documentation to the output from Taskotro

Re: Private Bugzilla bugs

Answers from my (user and frequent bug reporter) view: 1. abrt/libreport reports way too much data. There is no need to report my hostname to Fedora/RedHat infrastructure. Same for UID, PID, username, time, environ, … 2. abrt/libreport leaks much sensitive data. This includes paths in my home di

Re: Many directories without owning packages

Hi, This is mass bug filing material, I have been under the weather shortly after the first message on this thread but I have made more progress now. Enough to CC the packaging list too. On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 06 October 2016 at 18:58

NetworkManager's Metered property (was: Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage)

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:31 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:23:06AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > For that matter, I'm fairly sure I've seen background update > > downloading happen when I was using an Android wifi tether > > connection. I'm pretty sure I remember

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On 2016-10-31, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:19:54PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> Already implemented. You can supress test failures by a python code in >> a .rpmlint file in package's dist-git repository. > > I can? Where is this documented? Can we add a link to that > documen

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

Dne 31.10.2016 v 12:55 Tom Hughes napsal(a): > The problem, as I believe has been repeatedly explained, is that you don't > really have any idea whether the connection > is metered. Yes you may be trying to guess by considering things like 3G > connections as metered but that is an extremely > po

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Monday, October 31, 2016 9:54:37 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Note that this is not security-only. That's the reason for > > 'prepared-rpms' prefix, e.g. if we had something like that in Fedora, > > we could test/use this feature several times a year as we are > > informed by PostgreSQL upstre