On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 16:39 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 13/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161106.n.0):
>
> ID: 46279 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://ope
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:13:43PM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
> > I'd like to announce that we now support package auto-rebuilding on a new
> > commit(s) into a Pagure repository. Apart from having your package repo
> > hosted in Pagure,
I have no idea why this happens. Can anyone (maybe Bodhi developers I
guess, I'm not sure) help to solve this?
Forwarded Message
Subject: Broken dependencies: fedpkg
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:21:23 + (UTC)
From: build...@fedoraproject.org
To: fedpkg-ow...@fedoraproject.org
On Ter, 2016-11-08 at 04:04 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> PackageKit-yum
> never used RPM groups, always comps
So, (if we want the package have a group ) all packages should be
enumerated in comps, or not ? .
Also we have a poor support of groups in dnf, even querytags [1]
haven't group tag to q
On 11/07/2016 11:03 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/07/2016 08:52 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> Is it normal to have fc24 packages get installed when I install a package on
>> F25?
>> This system started as an F25 cloud instance based on the cloud image.
>>
>> $ rpm -qa | grep fc24 | wc -l
>> 116
On 11/07/2016 08:52 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Is it normal to have fc24 packages get installed when I install a package on
F25?
This system started as an F25 cloud instance based on the cloud image.
$ rpm -qa | grep fc24 | wc -l
116
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five)
- Dusty
Is it normal to have fc24 packages get installed when I install a package on
F25?
This system started as an F25 cloud instance based on the cloud image.
$ rpm -qa | grep fc24 | wc -l
116
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five)
- Dusty
___
Jan Kurik wrote:
> We will deploy an instance of the Module Build Service (MBS) to
> production in Fedora Infrastructure. Other teams will use this service
> to produce some "modular" content for the Fedora 26 release.
>
> In short, the MBS is a workflow orchestration service on top of koji.
> Whe
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> While more convenient way is "dnf history undo last", which used to work
> with YUM, but is broken in DNF, since it does not keep the cache around,
> as Kevin pointed out.
YUM was also set up with keepcache=0 in the Fedora package, against the
upstream default of keepcache=1.
Adam Williamson wrote:
> (Obviously the *right* way to do that general approach is some form of
> snapshotting...
No. If one update is broken, I want to revert that particular update, not my
entire system. The Window$ "system restore" approach is just broken and a
horrible idea to reimplement.
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I don't see how the text you quoted support this in any way. None of the
>> KDE tools support the Group tag. (They never did.)
>
> That's not true. They currently do not with the Fedora backend, but in
> the past they did
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> For the Fedora 26 timeframe, we will lock down the users who can
> submit to the MBS to a small number of Modularity WG members. This is
> not ideal, but the thought is that we want to limit the amount of spam
> that the MBS will impose on the pr
On 11/07/2016 07:00 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The only sensible way to write the psABI is for it to say "this is how
to pass an 80 or 128 bit floating point value." The psABI can't say
I would advise using IEEE 754-2008 names in psABIs where availabl
New mercurial 4.0 is not compatible currently with git-remote-hg and I don't
have
time now for maintainance. Could you wait 1-2 week?
Or someone can look at it :-)
I take a note just about this one:
https://github.com/felipec/git-remote-hg/issues/66
On 7.11.2016 19:27, Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm
I'm planning to update mercurial to 4.0 for rawhide. Any objections?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:13:43PM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
> I'd like to announce that we now support package auto-rebuilding on a new
> commit(s) into a Pagure repository. Apart from having your package repo
> hosted in Pagure, you just need to enable firing of fedmsg notifications
> for new
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 5/79 (x86_64), 1/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161106.n.0):
ID: 46403 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso inst
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 13/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161106.n.0):
ID: 46279 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/46279
ID: 46305 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso des
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 12:25:02 PM CET Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/03/2016 08:53 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Even more interesting, %arm is not on ExclusiveArch list for
> > 'vim-syntastic-d' package, while the build on arm machine succeeded:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?t
On Monday, November 7, 2016 9:10:47 AM CST Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 11/07/2016 08:54 AM, Björn "besser82" Esser wrote:
> > Rebuild [1] is running…
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Björn
> >
> > [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16336701
>
> Thanks. Looks like tests are fail
Hey,
I'd like to announce that we now support package auto-rebuilding on a new
commit(s) into a Pagure repository. Apart from having your package repo
hosted in Pagure, you just need to enable firing of fedmsg notifications
for new commits by clicking a single checkbox in 'Hooks' section...well,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Honza Silhan said:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> > I was trying to figure out why I had kernel-debug* packages installed,
>> > and tracked it to xl2tpd wanting "kmod(l2tp_ppp.ko)". That is provided
On 07/11/16 15:13, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 11/07/2016 08:54 AM, Björn "besser82" Esser wrote:
Rebuild [1] is running…
Cheers,
Björn
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16336701
Thanks. Looks like tests are fail
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 11/07/2016 08:54 AM, Björn "besser82" Esser wrote:
>>
>> Rebuild [1] is running…
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Björn
>>
>> [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16336701
>
>
> Thanks. Looks like tests are failing due to no audi
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:28:12PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/04/2016 07:34 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >Also the hardening stuff often doesn't apply in safe languages, so the
> >tools you build around this shouldn't automatically assume
> >no hardening == bad; or that 'long double
On 11/07/2016 08:54 AM, Björn "besser82" Esser wrote:
Rebuild [1] is running…
Cheers,
Björn
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16336701
Thanks. Looks like tests are failing due to no audio device on ppc64 builders.
@Dennis / Releng, can you fix the ppc64 builders?
_
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 23:57:07 -
Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 05:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> > "hunt down"?
> >
> > koji download-build (nvr) works fine.
Just a side note: Kevin Kofler didn't say that.
Please watch your attributions.
> I think you are missi
Rebuild [1] is running…
Cheers,
Björn
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16336701
Am 07.11.2016 um 15:24 schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
Can someone please fix this? I don't own pygame. Pygame wasn't rebuilt
for ppc builds. I'm getting spammed daily for something I cannot
depend on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392225
Il 07/11/2016 15:21, build...@fedoraproject.org ha scritto:
weka has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On ppc64:
weka-3.6.14-2.fc25.noarch requires libsvm-java
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
_
On Monday, November 7, 2016 3:28:52 PM CST Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 7.11.2016 v 14:49 Dan Horák napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:37:18 +
> >
> > Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Vít Ondruch
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>> What is wrong with the PPC? Is it missing depen
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161107.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 27
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Once upon a time, Honza Silhan said:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > I was trying to figure out why I had kernel-debug* packages installed,
> > and tracked it to xl2tpd wanting "kmod(l2tp_ppp.ko)". That is provided
> > by kernel-debug-modules-extra and kernel-modules-ext
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 14:48 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:35:35 -0500
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Julien Enselme
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I recently (2016-10-23) updated libsearpc on rawhide. I also
> > > proposed the update o
Dne 7.11.2016 v 14:49 Dan Horák napsal(a):
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:37:18 +
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Vít Ondruch
>> wrote:
>>> What is wrong with the PPC? Is it missing dependencies on its own
>>> subpackages or how I should understand this?
>> The tagged
On 11/04/2016 07:34 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Also the hardening stuff often doesn't apply in safe languages, so the
tools you build around this shouldn't automatically assume
no hardening == bad; or that 'long double' or 'wchar_t' are meaningful.
Sorry, this isn't true. As long as you do
Can someone please fix this? I don't own pygame. Pygame wasn't rebuilt for ppc
builds. I'm getting spammed daily for something I cannot fix.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Broken dependencies: deluge
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:21:25 + (UTC)
From: build...@fedoraprojec
OLD: Fedora-25-20161106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161107.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
Start Date: 2016-10-31 10:08:01.604052
End Date: 2016-11-07 10:08:01.604052
Jitka Plesnikova : 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382928
perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389286
perl-Module-Install-DOAP
https://bugzi
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
3 packages were orphaned
freesteam [master] was orphaned by sagitter
Calculate the properties of water and steam
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/freest
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:37:18 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Vít Ondruch
> wrote:
> > What is wrong with the PPC? Is it missing dependencies on its own
> > subpackages or how I should understand this?
>
> The tagged build on F-26 was FTBFS on ppc64 so the associate
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 12:35:35 -0500
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Julien Enselme
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently (2016-10-23) updated libsearpc on rawhide. I also
> > proposed the update of fedora 25 [1] (still in testing). After my
> > successful build on rawhide, Dan H
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> What is wrong with the PPC? Is it missing dependencies on its own
> subpackages or how I should understand this?
The tagged build on F-26 was FTBFS on ppc64 so the associated build
wasn't imported for rubygem-bson. Fix the rubygem-bson failure
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for the Fedora 25
Final Release Readiness Meeting meeting.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, November 10th, 2016 at
19:00 UTC. Please check the [FedoCal] link for your time zone.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 25
Final.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, November 10th, 2016 at
17:00 UTC. Please check the [FedoCal] link for your time zone.
Before each public relea
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Module Build Service =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModuleBuildService
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Ralph Bean
>
>
> We will deploy an instance of the Module Build Service to production
> in Fedora Infras
Dne 5.11.2016 v 07:10 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 05:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Otherwise, you have to hunt down the old builds
>> directly in Koji
> "hunt down"?
>
> koji download-build (nvr) works fine.
While more convenient way is "dnf history undo last", which u
Long time no see, welcome back ;)
V.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
What is wrong with the PPC? Is it missing dependencies on its own
subpackages or how I should understand this?
Vít
Dne 7.11.2016 v 01:58 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
> Broken deps for ppc64
> --
> [rubygem-bson]
> rubygem-bson-d
On 11/05/2016 05:01 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
>> Add to this that these caches seem to be never cleaned, so that they
>> grow up very large up to the point they prevent updating the system. I
>> just found that the packagekit cache on my machine is about 7Gb !!!
>> Prob
From 3cbfb70ff9529e53a01c5fcb22b80d29ee6fad88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:31:51 +
Subject: Update to 0.31
- New upstream release 0.31
- The stack trace contained by Specio::Exception objects no longer includes
stack frames for the Specio::Excepti
On 2016-11-07, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't believe the vast majority of people actually install old
> package versions *ever*, unless they get very explicit instructions to
> do so either because there was a big fail of some kind and we did our
> usual emergency drill, or they hit some kind o
On 2016-11-05, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 05:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Otherwise, you have to hunt down the old builds
>> directly in Koji
>
> "hunt down"?
>
> koji download-build (nvr) works fine.
DNF history lists binary package NVRs. Koji works with source package
N
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Module Build Service =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModuleBuildService
Change owner(s):
* Ralph Bean
We will deploy an instance of the Module Build Service to production
in Fedora Infrastructure. Other teams will use this service to produce
some "modu
0fbaede861d5a6bcdae7bcd2e5182e61 Params-ValidationCompiler-0.17.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler/Params-ValidationCompiler-0.17.tar.gz/md5/0fbaede861d5a6bcdae7bcd2e5182e61/Params-ValidationCompiler-0.17.tar.gz
_
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Modular Compose =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularCompose
Change owner(s):
* Ralph Bean
For Fedora 26, we would like to modify the compose tools (pungi) to
produce an additional experimental variant, derived from modules built
in the Module Build S
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> I was trying to figure out why I had kernel-debug* packages installed,
> and tracked it to xl2tpd wanting "kmod(l2tp_ppp.ko)". That is provided
> by kernel-debug-modules-extra and kernel-modules-extra; dnf choose to
> install the -debug version
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 23:57 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 05:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> > "hunt down"?
> >
> > koji download-build (nvr) works fine.
>
> I think you are missing the point here. Reverting dnf history does
> not work if packages are missing from
57 matches
Mail list logo
