>> > I received a FTBFS[1] on one of my packages for the F26 rebuild only to
>> > find out the only reason it failed (that I know of thus far) is that not
>> > all the dependencies could be installed.
>> >
>> > The root cause seems to be that not all dependent packages were rebuilt
>> > when boost
On 16 February 2017 at 07:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> libffado has more of these stupid errors that have affected dozens of
> packages because [expletives deleted]:
>
> src/libieee1394/configrom.cpp: In member function 'bool
> ConfigRom::initialize()':
> src/libieee1394/configrom.cpp:179:31: error
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:32:54PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
>
> - 元のメッセージ -
> > 差出人: "Richard Shaw"
> > 宛先: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > 送信済み: 2017年2月17日, 金曜日 12:21:07
> > 件名: GRIPE: A package is not FTBFS if the dependencies can't be installed
> >
> > I re
- 元のメッセージ -
> 差出人: "Richard Shaw"
> 宛先: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> 送信済み: 2017年2月17日, 金曜日 12:21:07
> 件名: GRIPE: A package is not FTBFS if the dependencies can't be installed
>
> I received a FTBFS[1] on one of my packages for the F26 rebuild only to
> find out the
I received a FTBFS[1] on one of my packages for the F26 rebuild only to
find out the only reason it failed (that I know of thus far) is that not
all the dependencies could be installed.
The root cause seems to be that not all dependent packages were rebuilt
when boost was updated to 1.63. Since I
dmsimard's blog saved my day -
https://dmsimard.com/2016/12/12/updates-to-fedora-account-system-and-impacts-to-fedpkg-koji/
Thanks,
Ravindra
From: Ravindra Kumar [mailto:ravindraku...@vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 5:02 PM
To: ad...@fedoraproject.org
Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.
Hi,
I've been trying to run 'fedpkg build' command on rawhide and it keeps hanging.
I came across https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207178 and I have
regenerated my cert multiple times already but no luck.
I have deleted ~/.fedora and ~/.fedora*. I re-ran fedora-packager-setup
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the first ever Fedora Layered
Image Release. Each Container Image is released with the following
streams which aim to provide lifecycle management choices to our
users:
Name
Name
- Original Message -
> From: "Josh Stone"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, 17 February, 2017 4:50:47 AM
> Subject: LLVM compatibility hazard on F24/F25
>
> re https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422930
>
> This is an indirect consequence of the LLVM update f
On 02/16/2017 09:47 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a package, suricata, that I maintain. I closely follow upstream. Some
> how I got signed up for a new package notification that I never asked for. It
> sends emails like this:
>
> A new version of "suricata" has been detected: "3.2
Hello,
I have a package, suricata, that I maintain. I closely follow upstream. Some
how I got signed up for a new package notification that I never asked for. It
sends emails like this:
A new version of "suricata" has been detected: "3.2.1" newer than "3.2",
packaged as "suricata"
htt
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 11:27:17 AM EST Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 09:36 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Yesterday I built a security update for the suricata package, 3.2.1-
> > 1:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10021
> >
> > Any time I try
re https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422930
This is an indirect consequence of the LLVM update for bug 1376213. In
the initial llvm-3.8.1-1 update, ajax enabled the Mips target, but this
was never pushed out due to unrelated build issues. Then later I found
I needed an LLVM update for
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:57:00PM -, Dan Naughton wrote:
> Hello Fedora devel list.
> I am interested in becoming the package maintainer for the linux Control and
> Measurement Device interface (comedi) libraries. One is a kernel space
> library (comedi) and the other is a user space librar
Hello Fedora devel list.
I am interested in becoming the package maintainer for the linux Control and
Measurement Device interface (comedi) libraries. One is a kernel space library
(comedi) and the other is a user space library (comedilib). The are used for
data acquisition from linux. Inform
Hello Björn!
I did a couple of reviews (including my own package):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422714
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422344
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411984
Was a bit busy today, so didn't have much time to do more, sorry.
Hope y
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 09:36 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Yesterday I built a security update for the suricata package, 3.2.1-
> 1:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10021
>
> Any time I try to create the bodhi new release, it finds an older
> build, 3.2-1.
> Typing the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday I built a security update for the suricata package, 3.2.1-1:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10021
>
> Any time I try to create the bodhi new release, it finds an older build,
> 3.2-1.
> Typin
Hello,
Yesterday I built a security update for the suricata package, 3.2.1-1:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10021
Any time I try to create the bodhi new release, it finds an older build, 3.2-1.
Typing the version in causes it to say it can't find any package that mat
On 16.02.2017 13:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 16/02/17 10:15 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/02/17 22:53 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On 15 February 2017 at 09:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
A mockchain build of dbus-c++ libffado and sflphone works with this
patch. repoquery says nothing els
Hello Nemanja,
I already assigned your review request to me and will have a look into
it during today. I intend to sponsor you into the packager-group, but
please do some "informal" reviews in the mean time and post links to
them here.
Cheers
Björn
Am 16.02.2017 um 01:41 schrieb Nemanj
On 16/02/17 10:15 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/02/17 22:53 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On 15 February 2017 at 09:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
A mockchain build of dbus-c++ libffado and sflphone works with this
patch. repoquery says nothing else depends on dbus-c++.
Any objections to me co
Hi,
I'll push builds with updated SELinux Userspace and SETools in to
Rawhide soon.
In the mean time, you can test it from my COPR plautrba/selinux-2.6
repository [1].
SELinux userspace Release 2016-10-14 - 2.6
- sepolicy was converted to SETools 4
- lot of genhomedircon enhancements
For more
jline license has been changed from BSD and ASL 2.0 to BSD
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 15/02/17 22:53 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On 15 February 2017 at 09:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
A mockchain build of dbus-c++ libffado and sflphone works with this
patch. repoquery says nothing else depends on dbus-c++.
Any objections to me committing the patch to dbus-c++ and rebuilding it?
maven-archetype license tag was corrected
from "ASL 2.0"
to "ASL 2.0 and ASL 1.1"
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedo
Hello Nemanja and welcome!
Thanks for your contributions.
Regards,
Charalampos Stratakis
Associate Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
- Original Message -
From: "Nemanja Milosevic"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:41:29 AM
Subject:
27 matches
Mail list logo
