Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

> > * if the package includes *precompiled* gschema... remove it? > No, because these don't exist (at least I don't think so). All > installed gschemas are compiled at once based on the schemas installed > on the system, and there are no precompiled schemas. A few of packages' sources include a g

Fedora Rawhide-20170224.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 62/107 (x86_64), 2/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 57526 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: htt

Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

On Sat, 2017-02-25 at 01:04 +, Andrew Toskin wrote: > I'd just like to confirm what actions I need to take for my RPM > specs, then, if any. Does this sound right? > > * if the package source includes a .gschema.xml file, it's okay, and > needed, so leave it alone. Yes. > * if the package so

Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

I'd just like to confirm what actions I need to take for my RPM specs, then, if any. Does this sound right? * if the package source includes a .gschema.xml file, it's okay, and needed, so leave it alone. * if the package source includes a Makefile, which compiles the gschema file, then the sche

Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

> It used to be important. The review criteria should be updated. Do you > want to file a bug with fedora-review? Looks like there's already an open bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409315 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fed

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: Bodhi Non-RPM Artifacts

> Bodhi, the Fedora Updates System, should be able to process more than just > RPMs. > > As Fedora starts to deliver more than just RPMs and ISOs, we need a > way to handle delivering updates to these artifacts. Bodhi currently > handles this workflow for RPMs only, but we want to start using it f

Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 21:15 +, Andrew Toskin wrote: >> But then why is this such a prominent "Issue" in the output >> review.txt file? > > It used to be important. The review criteria should be updated. Do you > want to file a bug wit

Re: Touchpad pointer accel - testers required, scratch build available

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:48:11PM -0600, Keith Keith wrote: >> I think I sent you some touchpad data before for a Toshiba Tecra M11. I >> have xorg-x11-drv-synaptics installed to keep my setup from F24. Do I need >> to do anything besides

dadhditools.tar.gz for fc25

you can download my dahdi-tools as a tar.gz file https://dk-software.org/RPMS/dahdi-tools.tar.gz -- Dominik Kucher t: +43 720 511 941 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: asterisk-dahdi cannot installed on Fedora 25

Am 2017-02-24 um 19:45 schrieb Jared K. Smith: > dahdi-tools was orphaned due to missing systemd support. I've added > systemd support and submitted it to be re-reviewed. See RH BZ > 1422683 . i doesn't have a problem with my build it works c

Re: asterisk-dahdi cannot installed on Fedora 25

Am 2017-02-24 um 11:53 schrieb Petr Pisar: > On 2017-02-23, <> <> wrote: > > > > asterisk-dahdi cannot installed on fc25. > > > > > > I forwareded it to Bugzilla > <>. Though asterisk > seems unmaintained. > > -- Petr > > _

Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 21:15 +, Andrew Toskin wrote: > But then why is this such a prominent "Issue" in the output > review.txt file? It used to be important. The review criteria should be updated. Do you want to file a bug with fedora-review? > And why does it warn me even when nothing in th

Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

> gsettings schema compilation is automatically handled these days with an > rpm file trigger that glib2 sets up. There's no need to add > glib-compile-schemas %postun and %postrans scripts any more (but they > won't hurt either and are required for EPEL7 if you want to keep the > same spec file).

dnf group and dnf group list diff ?

[root@localhost mythcat]# dnf group Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:47 ago on Fri Feb 24 13:27:40 2017. Installed Groups: 3 Available Groups: 33 [root@localhost mythcat]# dnf group list told me are more than 3 installed this is a error or bug ? ___

Re: asterisk-dahdi cannot installed on Fedora 25

dahdi-tools was orphaned due to missing systemd support. I've added systemd support and submitted it to be re-reviewed. See RH BZ 1422683 . -- Jared Smith On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:30 PM, wrote: > Hi! > > asterisk-dahdi cannot installed

Re: Touchpad pointer accel - testers required, scratch build available

Hi! I'm using Wayland.  Is it the same or should I do something different? Cheers,Sylvia On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 12:26 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:48:11PM -0600, Keith Keith wrote: > > I think I sent you some touchpad data before for a Toshiba Tecra > > M11.  I > > hav

Re: New pastebin service on paste.fedoraproject.org

Yes, also notice that there's a lot of empty space to the right.   On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 12:20 -0600, Keith Keith wrote: > I only get 21 lines.  I'm know nothing about web page design and even > less about image editing as you'll see but the attached pic seems > like what I would do placement wis

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

Kevin If you have nothing nice to say.. please keep it to yourself. I am tired of your vitriol and everything is doomed. Fedora hasn't died in the 10+ years you have said we are killing it, and I am frankly tired of dealing with the weekly telling other people how to do their job. On 24 February 2

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 06:30:30PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > By the way, "sunset" is much too euphemistic a metaphor for what is planned. > "Massacre" or, if you want to keep the sun theme, "supernova", would be more > fitting metaphors. "supernova" seems appropriate — after all supernovae le

Re: fedorahosted.org sunset is next week!

By the way, "sunset" is much too euphemistic a metaphor for what is planned. "Massacre" or, if you want to keep the sun theme, "supernova", would be more fitting metaphors. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 04:24:16PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 15:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:48:43AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On 23 February 2017 at 12:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > > wrote

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 17:28, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 24 February 2017 at 11:19, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > >> You both sound as if you're thinking I'm totally against introducing new > >> dependencies. > > > > No. I didn't take that to be your view at all. I am going more w

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On 24 February 2017 at 11:19, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> You both sound as if you're thinking I'm totally against introducing new >> dependencies. > > No. I didn't take that to be your view at all. I am going more with > the fact that you ran into a wall, and then you decided to smash your >

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On 24 February 2017 at 10:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 15:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:48:43AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> > On 23 February 2017 at 12:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski >> > wrote: >> > > On Th

Sponsor request of gsequencer v0.7.122.6

Hi As mentioned in a previous mail discussion, I'd like to provide Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer to fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417 I have done a lot of efforts doing a more stable package. http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/gsequencer/stable/ Bests, Joël __

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 15:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:48:43AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On 23 February 2017 at 12:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > wrote: > > > On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 14:23, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > I have noth

Re: Any voluteers for maintaining xml-security-c?

Hi, Just requested admin access to this package. kloczek PS. Thanks for help guys from #fedora-admin sponsoring my packager privs :) -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: *http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH * On 22 February 2017 at 19:51, wrote: > https://github.com/metsma/libdigidocpp/blob

Re: hotness tried to map X to an upstream project, but failed: "Could not determine backend for http://url/project/X"

Hi Jeremy, > I help maintain both the-new-hotness and Anitya. the-new-hotness > attempts to update projects in Anitya when changes occur in pkgdb > (among other things). I assume when you use "X" you don't literally > mean "X" and when you say "http://url/project/X"; you don't literally > mean tha

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:48:43AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 23 February 2017 at 12:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 14:23, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > I have nothing against delivering latest and greatest software to our > > users and thi

[Bug 1422290] perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422290 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.24-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8529304848 -- You are receiving this mail because: You ar

Vagrant 1.9.1 landed in Rawhide

Hi all, Vagrant 1.9.1 is now built in Rawhide. Vít Dne 14.2.2017 v 14:14 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Hi everybody, > > I spent last few days updating Vagrant in Rawhide. As it turned out, it > is quite significant update for several reasons: > > 1) Upstream changed the way how Vagrant is distrib

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On 23 February 2017 at 12:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 14:23, Neal Gompa wrote: > I have nothing against delivering latest and greatest software to our > users and this proposal is not against that goal, either. However, > package maintainers are no

Re: hotness tried to map X to an upstream project, but failed: "Could not determine backend for http://url/project/X"

On 02/24/2017 11:08 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > I've just received about a dozen of messages like the one mentioned in > the subject, accompanied with: > > pkgdb_updater updated: upstream_url of X > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/X/ > > for a number of gdo

hotness tried to map X to an upstream project, but failed: "Could not determine backend for http://url/project/X"

Hello, I've just received about a dozen of messages like the one mentioned in the subject, accompanied with: pkgdb_updater updated: upstream_url of X https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/X/ for a number of gdouros-X-fonts that I updated recently and whose upstream URL had change

Re: asterisk-dahdi cannot installed on Fedora 25

On 2017-02-23, wrote: > asterisk-dahdi cannot installed on fc25. > I forwareded it to Bugzilla . Though asterisk seems unmaintained. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Retiring yap (Prolog interpreter)

On 2017-02-23, Till Hofmann wrote: > Just another piece of information which may be relevant for anyone > interested in taking care of the package: It looks like the project was > pretty active until Feb 11, 2016, but there are no commits after that. That's the SourceForge repository. I found ano

Re: fedora-review complains about gschema files in an RPM package

Am 24.02.2017 um 06:19 schrieb Andrew Toskin: I'm a new Fedora packager; my very first packages have not yet been accepted. I'm working on RPM packages for a few GNOME Shell extensions. Things are mostly going well, except that `fedora-review` complains about gschemas in the packages, and I'm

F27 Self Contained Change: Bodhi Non-RPM Artifacts

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Bodhi Non-RPM Artifacts = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BodhiNonRPMArtifacts Change owner(s): * Randy Barlow Bodhi, the Fedora Updates System, should be able to process more than just RPMs. == Detailed Description == As Fedora starts to deliver more t