Missing expected images:
Docker_base docker x86_64
Server dvd arm
Failed openQA tests: 20/94 (x86_64), 5/19 (i386)
ID: 178156 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/178156
ID: 178162 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171201.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171202.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 86/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171130.n.0):
ID: 178048 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20171201.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the blocker review meeting for
Monday, as there would only be a couple of F28 bugs to consider and
it's not worth having a meeting for that.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http:
Pete Walter wrote:
> qt5-qtwebengine-5.9.3-1.fc28.src.rpm
This fails to build because of the #error here:
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/tree/chromium/components/url_formatter/url_formatter.cc?h=56-based#n481
In 5.10, this has moved to another file:
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/q
Rex Dieter wrote:
> I can/will step up (for qt v4 which won't be going away any time soon).
Can't we patch Qt 4 to build with OpenSSL 1.1 instead?
At least Debian has a patch (which seems to be over a year old):
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/qt/qt4-x11.git/tree/debian/patches/openssl_1.
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> This is big and old-school hammer. If you did "git cherry-pick" instead,
> you could get most of the changes you did in master without the
> branches. Also, merging means that you get into older (or EPEL) branches
> stuff like changelogs from mass rebuild, which should not be t
On 01/12/17 22:33, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If you do "rpm -qi soundfont-utils" you will find a line like this:
Source RPM : gt-0.4-23.fc26.src.rpm
That means that this package is a sub-package of gt. That's where
you'll find it in bugzilla and the package database. That's also
probably where th
On 12/01/2017 12:51 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I know that we started splitting the source packages off---but
unfortunately there doesn't seem to be soundfont-utils-debugsource
anywhere. In fact, the sounfount-utils package is a little bit of a
mystery: I couldn't find it on the Fedora packag
On 12/01/2017 04:39 PM, John Reiser wrote:
I ran into a problem with midi-disasm from soundfount-utils. I tried
to debug it but installing soundfont-utils-debuginfo only brings in
the symbol tables, not sources.
Perhaps the problem is particular to that rpm, or similar ones?
Is soundfont-util
Hello everyone, my name is Ryan and I’m looking to join the Packager group to
revive and update the netatalk package, as well as be available to assist with
anything else I find myself interested in helping with. I’m a huge fan of
Fedora and it’s long been my favorite Linux distribution so I’m e
I ran into a problem with midi-disasm from soundfount-utils. I tried to debug
it but installing soundfont-utils-debuginfo only brings in the symbol tables,
not sources.
Perhaps the problem is particular to that rpm, or similar ones?
Is soundfont-utils one of several rpms that belong to the sa
I ran into a problem with midi-disasm from soundfount-utils. I tried to
debug it but installing soundfont-utils-debuginfo only brings in the
symbol tables, not sources.
I know that we started splitting the source packages off---but
unfortunately there doesn't seem to be soundfont-utils-debugs
If I have version 1 of package foo, containing items bar, xxx, yyy, zzz, i.e.
foo-1-barxxxyyyzzz
and, for version 2, bar is split off to its own sub-package, foo-bar, so that
the desired packaging becomes:
foo-2 foo-bar-2- -xxx baryyyzzz
with foo-bar perma
Hello everyone,
FOSDEM[0], the biggest free and non-commercial event organized by and
for the community in Europe, is just 2 months away. The conference will
be held in Brussels, Belgium, on February 3 & 4. As every year, EMEA
Ambassadors organize the booth at FOSDEM, where many developers,
contri
Missing expected images:
Docker_base docker x86_64
Server dvd arm
Failed openQA tests: 21/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171201.n.0):
ID: 177939 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177939
ID: 177943
__
> From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> On Friday 01.12.2017 at 09:31
>Hi, Jarek.
>On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 18:25, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
>> my name is Jaroslav, Jarek for short, I am 16 years old student,
>> I live a
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Currently we have Nomination & Campaign period [1] in progress and we
still accept nominations to "steering bodies" of the following teams:
* FESCo (Engineering) (5 seats) [2]
* Fedora Council (2 seats) [3]
* Mindshare (2 seats) [4]
This period is open until 2017-Dec-04 at 23:59:59 UTC.
Nominees
Here's a quick update: icu 60.1 is now built and the rebuilds are all done and
releng just tagged all the builds over from the f28-icu side tag to f28.
A few of the rebuilds failed. I'd appreciate if the maintainers of the packages
could take a look and help fix them up. Here's the full list of
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-12-01)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 16:00:04 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-12-01/fesco.2017-12-01-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171201.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171201.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages
On 12/01/2017 04:44 PM, Christian Groessler wrote:
> On 11/30/17 13:57, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Looks like gdm is missing BuildRequires: pkgconfig(xorg-server)
>> Please report a bug for gdm in Bugzilla.
>
>
> Can I cite your email on this bug report. What exactly will this
> "BuildRequires"
On 11/30/17 13:57, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Looks like gdm is missing BuildRequires: pkgconfig(xorg-server)
Please report a bug for gdm in Bugzilla.
Can I cite your email on this bug report. What exactly will this
"BuildRequires" change accomplish?
regards,
chris
_
On 11/30/17 13:58, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:39:16 +0100, Christian Groessler wrote:
This is handled by conditional compilation in gdm (depending on a
HAVE_XSERVER_THAT_DEFAULTS_TO_LOCAL_ONLY define).
gdm ignores DisallowTCP=false on F22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
On 11/30/2017 11:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:05:52PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
>> FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
>> irc.freenode.net.
>>
>> To convert UTC to your loca
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 06:40 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Tomas Mraz wrote:
>>
>> > Compat-openssl10-devel will be removed at the latest by Fedora 29
>> > and
>> > anything that requires it will be no longer buildable.
>>
>> That's the first I've seen or heard of any such hard
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 06:40 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> > Compat-openssl10-devel will be removed at the latest by Fedora 29
> > and
> > anything that requires it will be no longer buildable.
>
> That's the first I've seen or heard of any such hard deadline... has
> that
> be
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> Compat-openssl10-devel will be removed at the latest by Fedora 29 and
> anything that requires it will be no longer buildable.
That's the first I've seen or heard of any such hard deadline... has that
been mentioned before?
-- Rex
On Friday, 01 December 2017 at 11:39, Vít Ondruch wrote:
[...]
> What I really want to answer is the question in $SUBJECT, since the
> scope of guidelines is not specified anywhere. It seems that FPC itself
> does not know what releases they target and my guidelines update [1] is
> stuck in review
Good day,
I am unretiring packages for Estonia ID cards
Review request: qdigidoc - Estonian digital signature application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519749
Review request: qesteidutil - Estonian ID card utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519323
Review request:
Dne 30.11.2017 v 17:32 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
> On 30 November 2017 at 03:49, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Reading logs from yesterdays FPC meeting [1], I think we should discuss
>> what is actually purpose of packaging guidelines and which version of
>> Fedora/EPEL/RHEL they act
Welcome to Fedora!
On 11/30/2017 07:25 PM, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
Hi everyone,
my name is Jaroslav, Jarek for short, I am 16 years old student, I live
and study in Brno, Czech Republic.
I am beginner in the world of programming, right now I am working on
becoming rpm packager.
For now I w
Hi, Jarek.
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 18:25, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
> my name is Jaroslav, Jarek for short, I am 16 years old student,
> I live and study in Brno, Czech Republic. I am beginner in the
> world of programming, right now I am working on becoming rpm
> packager.
Welcome to Fedor
35 matches
Mail list logo
