[Bug 1524390] perl-Net-GitHub-0.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524390 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-GitHub-0.91-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c2a9bfb129 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1525738] perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-3.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525738 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1392472] root is not built for ppc64

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392472 Daniel Black changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 4:31 PM, John Reiser wrote: > Then there's the subtle point that filing bugzilla encourages > the exhibit of a reproducible test case: the actual command line, > the actual .rpms for the program and libraries, > the actual environment variables,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1015 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 777 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 359

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

On 12/17/2017 13:57 UTC, Tony Nelson wrote: On 17-12-17 14:33:43, John Reiser wrote:  ... At this point I suggest to file a bugzilla report against the compiler for not keeping %rsp 16-byte aligned.  Include the traceback and the register info from the gdb session at SIGSEGV, and the

Fedora Rawhide-20171217.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server boot x86_64 Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server dvd x86_64 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 55/106 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171213.n.0): ID: 180801 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

On 17-12-17 14:33:43, John Reiser wrote: ... At this point I suggest to file a bugzilla report against the compiler for not keeping %rsp 16-byte aligned. Include the traceback and the register info from the gdb session at SIGSEGV, and the identities (.so name, build-id, .rpm name) of the

[Bug 1521155] _version_check gives unhelpful advice

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1521155 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer2-0.205002-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-86379fd7f5 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1521155] _version_check gives unhelpful advice

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1521155 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer2-0.204004-3.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0dace90d48 -- You are receiving this mail

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 893 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 887 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 777

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2017-12-18 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. Once again, I don't think we have anything requiring discussion this week. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting. Thanks! -- Adam

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2017-12-18 blocker review meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the blocker review meeting for tomorrow. There's only one proposed blocker, which doesn't seem worth running a meeting for. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net

Re: apitrace, bundled libbacktrace

Resurrecting a very old thread: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within > > the gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Rawhide 20171217.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20171217.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 1:33 PM, John Reiser wrote: > > Anyway, the focus now shifts to the backtrace from > https://pastebin.com/LCDQpB5d : > #0 __GI__dl_catch_error > #1 0x763b76a5 in _dlerror_run at dlerror.c:163 > #2 0x763b701f in __dlclose at

MASS CHANGE announcement: python2- prefix renaming, part 2

Dear fellow Fedora developers, I plan to execute part 2 of the renaming. First part was announced and discussed here [1]. Recently, Iryna Shcherbina announced [2] plans for a follow up: changing the requirements. Before that happens I want to finish my renaming. In this round my changes are

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

At this point ... You could also plant a breakpoint at the <+0> of each routine named in the traceback, and print %rsp. It should be (8 mod 16) because the dynamically-preceding 'call' should have pushed 8 bytes when the %rsp was 16-byte aligned. (gdb) b * # use a numerical address, NOT a

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

Dump of assembler code for function __GI__dl_catch_error:    0x76136100 <+0>:push   %rbx    0x76136101 <+1>:sub    $0x140,%rsp    0x76136108 <+8>:lea    0x4c(%rsp),%rax    0x7613610d <+13>:mov    %rdi,0x10(%rsp)    0x76136112 <+18>:mov   

Re: Firefox "shield"

On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 11:09 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 12/17/2017 04:09 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > > > > On 12/17/2017 01:11 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > > > Sorry if this was discussed already, but it looks like Firefox 57 > > > on > > > Fedora 26 (and I assume 27 but have not checked)

Re: Firefox "shield"

On 12/17/2017 04:09 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 12/17/2017 01:11 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: >> Sorry if this was discussed already, but it looks like Firefox 57 on >> Fedora 26 (and I assume 27 but have not checked) in the Fedora repo has >> "extension.shield-recipe-client.enabled = true".

Re: Missing deltarpms?

On 12/15/2017 09:59 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > I may have missed something, but I think there might be a problem with > deltarpms in all the current Fedora releases. > > Looking at http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/updates/27/x86_64/drpms, > there are eight available deltarpms for F27, and if

[EPEL-devel] Something changed the meeting time on the website

So it looks like a translation bot or something reverted the front page of the EPEL meeting times to Friday at 1800 UTC. Meetings are still at Wednesday at 1800 UTC. My apologies for the people who showed up thinking there was a meeting and thanks to R Herrold for correcting the page and fielding

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

Dump of assembler code for function __GI__dl_catch_error: 0x76136100 <+0>: push %rbx 0x76136101 <+1>: sub$0x140,%rsp 0x76136108 <+8>: lea0x4c(%rsp),%rax 0x7613610d <+13>: mov%rdi,0x10(%rsp) 0x76136112 <+18>: mov%rsi,0x8(%rsp)

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

https://pastebin.com/r03HxDrX rsp0x7fffd6e8 0x7fffd6e8 BAD: not 16-byte aligned pc=> 0x7613616c <__GI__dl_catch_error+108>:movaps %xmm0,0x50(%rsp) The problem is that the effective address 0x...738 is not 16-byte aligned, and this generates SIGSEGV

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:04 AM, John Reiser wrote: > > SIGSEGV is a bad memory reference, but none of those URLs gives any info > about the memory reference itself: the address, the size, > Read/Write/Execute, > the program counter value, the contents of the instruction

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

On 12/17/2017 12:58 UTC, Richard Shaw wrote: Ok, so I built the latest version of hedgewars (0.9.23) and submitted an update and quickly found out that when the game exits (hwengine, not the hedgewars binary) it get's a segmentation fault. http://hedgewars.org/node/6879?page=0

Re: Need help debugging hedgewars

Hello, Richard. I've happened to stumble across a very similar issue recently. I've been working on an update to Colorful - which, like Hedgewars, is a game written in Pascal and compiled with FPC - and the game gives me an Access Violation upon exiting. This happens after all of "my" code has

Need help debugging hedgewars

Ok, so I built the latest version of hedgewars (0.9.23) and submitted an update and quickly found out that when the game exits (hwengine, not the hedgewars binary) it get's a segmentation fault. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f9a419a9e9 I have posted to the hedgewars support

Re: Firefox "shield"

On 12/17/2017 01:11 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > Sorry if this was discussed already, but it looks like Firefox 57 on > Fedora 26 (and I assume 27 but have not checked) in the Fedora repo has > "extension.shield-recipe-client.enabled = true". > > 1) Is there a reason this is not turned off by

[Bug 1526776] New: perlbrew-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526776 Bug ID: 1526776 Summary: perlbrew-0.82 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perlbrew Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

Re: Introducing myself to Fedora

Il 16 Dic 2017 23:39, "Spyros Trigazis" ha scritto: Hello Fedora Developers, I would like to join the packagers group and I am sending you this email to introduce myself. My name is Spyros Trigazis and I'm currently working for the CERN [1] Cloud Infrastructure team