[Bug 1536234] perl-BDB-1.92 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536234 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

Re: EPEL support in "master" branch (aka speeding up Fedora development)

On 22 January 2018 at 02:12, R P Herrold wrote: [..] >> If it is common in case of EL7/EL6 EPEL packages consumers it is perfect >> reason to not bother EPEL on master branch because Fedora has noting out >> from such end users and keeping all EL6/EL7 adjustments are only

Re: EPEL analyse/observation, some question, PR proposals/questions and more ..

On 22 January 2018 at 03:39, Neal Gompa wrote: [..] > > Multi-distro spec files in itself aren't that bad. In my experience, > the things that drag you down are the Debian/Ubuntu and RHEL/SLE > targets. But they eventually catch up. However, the sad reality is, > you can only

Re: EPEL analyse/observation, some question, PR proposals/questions and more ..

On 22 January 2018 at 03:10, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: > [..] > > 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up > to > > ABI level so all this should be: > > > > a)

Re: EPEL analyse/observation, some question, PR proposals/questions and more ..

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >> As preface some oneliner result: >> > >> 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up to >> ABI level so

Re: EPEL analyse/observation, some question, PR proposals/questions and more ..

On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > As preface some oneliner result: > > 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up to > ABI level so all this should be: > > a) removed > b) replaced by %{el6} and %{el7} (and if it is

Re: EPEL support in "master" branch (aka speeding up Fedora development)

On 21 January 2018 at 15:07, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 21 January 2018 at 17:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> On 20 January 2018 at 21:00, Tomasz Kłoczko >> wrote: >> > On 20 January 2018 at 23:26, Stephen John Smoogen

Re: EPEL support in "master" branch (aka speeding up Fedora development)

On Sun, 21 Jan 2018, Tomasz K?oczko wrote: > If it is common in case of EL7/EL6 EPEL packages consumers it is perfect > reason to not bother EPEL on master branch because Fedora has noting out > from such end users and keeping all EL6/EL7 adjustments are only slowing > down Fedora development by

Re: Unresponsive maintainer

you might even be better to catch him over on the SUSE IRC channels, it might be worth a shot to see if anyone in SUSE Packages those packages an are up to date an Grab the Source RPM's from there ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Unresponsive maintainer

Hi Mamoru, Thanks for the information! I've pinged his gmail. Let's see how it goes. Regards, Alick On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 1:57 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Hello, > > alick9...@gmail.com wrote on 01/20/2018 12:59 PM: >> >> Hi All, >> >> As per >>

Re: Build fails on s390x - complains about missing /usr/lib64/lib*.so* file

Thanks Artur, Antonio Trande has also made some suggestions in the review, I will try them and if nothing changes, I will report the issue upstream. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

EPEL analyse/observation, some question, PR proposals/questions and more ..

As preface some oneliner result: [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ for i in el4 el5 el6 el7 rhel centos epel; do echo -n "$i "; grep '%{?'$i * | wc -l; done el4 10 el5 243 el6 265 el7 281 rhel 5428 centos 239 epel 45 1) Shortly I'm going to create PR with mass change request to remove all EL4 and

Re: EPEL support in "master" branch (aka speeding up Fedora development)

On 21 January 2018 at 17:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 20 January 2018 at 21:00, Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: > > On 20 January 2018 at 23:26, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > [..] > >> > >> As EPEL is the only reason I stay in

Re: make yum repo when we build things in koji

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:53:30PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 01/19/2018 10:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > > > [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/koji.repo > > [koji] > > name=Koji Repo > >

Re: Wyland is a disaster

On 21 January 2018 at 14:06, Howard Howell wrote: > On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 15:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> Folks, please move this discussion to us...@lists.fedoraproject.org. >> ___ >> devel mailing list --

Re: Wyland is a disaster

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 5:06 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 20 Jan 2018, at 8:24 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > >>> I'm sorry, but wyland is a disaster for me. I do work on lots >>> of different software platforms, and things are just not working well.

Re: Wyland is a disaster

On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 15:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Folks, please move this discussion to us...@lists.fedoraproject.org. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1536694] perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90116 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536694 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 124136

Re: Build fails on s390x - complains about missing /usr/lib64/lib*.so* file

I took a quick look at build.log for i686, x86_64 and s390x and one thing I've noticed is that during make install, the s390x build puts the .so files in %{buildroot}/usr/lib, not %{buildroot}/usr/lib64. The only thing that comes to my mind now is the qmake script (or some other part of the

[Bug 1531386] Upgrade perl-File-Copy-Recursive to 0.39

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531386 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.40-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5c81167e5c -- You are receiving

[Bug 1531386] Upgrade perl-File-Copy-Recursive to 0.39

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531386 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.40-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5c4fad2711 -- You are receiving

Build fails on s390x - complains about missing /usr/lib64/lib*.so* file

Hello, I submitted a package for review[0] about an hour ago and when I ran a scratch build in koji[1] there was a failure with this message in build.log: error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/molsketch-0.5.1-2.fc28.s390x/usr/lib64/lib*.so* I had built previous versions of the same

[Bug 1534797] perl-Mojolicious-7.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534797 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Re: EPEL support in "master" branch (aka speeding up Fedora development)

On 20 January 2018 at 21:00, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 20 January 2018 at 23:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > [..] >> >> As EPEL is the only reason I stay in Fedora.. I would like to make >> sure it doesn't cause developers that much problems. As

Re: Wyland is a disaster

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Folks, please move this discussion to us...@lists.fedoraproject.org. - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlpkotIACgkQaVcUvRu8

Re: Wyland is a disaster

On 21/01/18 13:06, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 20 Jan 2018, at 8:24 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > >>> I'm sorry, but wyland is a disaster for me. I do work on lots >>> of different software platforms, and things are just not working well. >>> They kind-of-work, which is the

Re: Things which are on collision course between Fedora and RHEL/EPEL on master branch

On Sat, 20 Jan 2018 16:43:23 +0100 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 15:27 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > Just for the record list of things which are now on crash course > > with EPEL/RHEL

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1049 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 811 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 393

[Bug 1389064] EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389064 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 921 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 811 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 783

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:53:17AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 00:51 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > > […] > > > > I was not fully aware of this and

[Bug 1531386] Upgrade perl-File-Copy-Recursive to 0.39

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531386 Bug 1531386 depends on bug 1531380, which changed state. Bug 1531380 Summary: Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380 What|Removed

Re: Wyland is a disaster

On 21/01/18 12:06, Graham Leggett wrote: On 20 Jan 2018, at 8:24 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: I'm sorry, but wyland is a disaster for me. I do work on lots of different software platforms, and things are just not working well. They kind-of-work, which is the really

Re: Wyland is a disaster

On 20 Jan 2018, at 8:24 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: >> I'm sorry, but wyland is a disaster for me. I do work on lots >> of different software platforms, and things are just not working well. >> They kind-of-work, which is the really worst condition one can have. > >