Fedora Rawhide-20180311.n.1 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 20/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 201499  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201499
ID: 201505  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201505
ID: 201507  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201507
ID: 201528  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201528
ID: 201536  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201536
ID: 201537  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201537
ID: 201538  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201538
ID: 201543  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201543
ID: 201549  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201549
ID: 201551  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201551
ID: 201555  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201555
ID: 201556  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201556
ID: 201557  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201557
ID: 201567  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201567
ID: 201570  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201570
ID: 201597  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201597
ID: 201598  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201598
ID: 201604  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201604
ID: 201608  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201608
ID: 201609  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201609
ID: 201617  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201617
ID: 201628  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201628
ID: 201631  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201631
ID: 201643  Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201643
ID: 201651  Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201651
ID: 201652  Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201652

Soft failed openQA tests: 65/137 (x86_64), 15/23 (i386)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 201491  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201491
ID: 201492  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201492
ID: 201494  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201494
ID: 201495  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201495
ID: 201497  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201497
ID: 201498  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201498
ID: 201511  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201511
ID: 201514  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201514
ID: 201515  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201515
ID: 201516  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201516
ID: 201517  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201517
ID: 201518  Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201518
ID: 201520  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201520
ID: 201540  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201540
ID: 201553  Test: x86_64 

Re: Open Seats on the Fedora Packaging Committee

[James Antill]

On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 02:11 -0500, James Antill wrote:
>  The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting
> submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.
> 
>  The FPC would like to thank Ralf Corsepius, Dominik 'Rathann'
> Mierzejewski, and Thomas Spura for their service.
[...]
>  Candidates who are interested should provide the
> following details to the FPC for consideration, by emailing it
> directly
> to me (james(a)fedoraproject.org).
> 
>  The FPC will consider all candidates, but strongly prefers
> candidates who have extensive experience packaging in Fedora. We will
> accept applications for the next two weeks (deadline Wednesday, 2018-
> 03-14).

 We currently have submissions from:

churchyard - Miro Hrončok
decathorpe - Fabio Valentini
hobbes1069 - Richard Shaw
ignatenkobrain - Igor Gnatenko
jwakely - Jonathan Wakely

...so if you think you sent me an email and your name is not on that
list, please send it again! Also, if you are interested you still have
3 days to send me an email.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180311.n.1 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180310.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180311.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:13
Dropped images:  5
Added packages:  4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   102
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  162.28 KiB
Size of dropped packages:40.46 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   1.98 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   1.12 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Python_Classroom live x86_64
Path: 
Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.iso
Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-virtualbox i386
Path: 
Labs/i386/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.i386.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: AtomicHost vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Path: 
AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box
Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-libvirt i386
Path: 
Labs/i386/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.i386.vagrant-libvirt.box
Image: AtomicHost raw-xz x86_64
Path: 
AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.x86_64.raw.xz
Image: Design_suite live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Design_suite-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.iso
Image: Python_Classroom live i386
Path: Labs/i386/iso/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Live-i386-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.iso
Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Path: 
Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box
Image: AtomicHost qcow2 aarch64
Path: 
AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.aarch64.qcow2
Image: AtomicHost raw-xz aarch64
Path: 
AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: AtomicHost vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: 
AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: 
Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: AtomicHost qcow2 x86_64
Path: 
AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Rawhide-20180311.n.1.x86_64.qcow2

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Cloud boot ppc64le
Path: Cloud/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Cloud-netinst-ppc64le-Rawhide-20180310.n.0.iso
Image: Cloud boot ppc64
Path: Cloud/ppc64/iso/Fedora-Cloud-netinst-ppc64-Rawhide-20180310.n.0.iso
Image: Cloud boot s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/iso/Fedora-Cloud-netinst-s390x-Rawhide-20180310.n.0.iso
Image: Cloud boot aarch64
Path: Cloud/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Cloud-netinst-aarch64-Rawhide-20180310.n.0.iso
Image: Cloud boot x86_64
Path: Cloud/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Cloud-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20180310.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: rust-http-0.1.5-1.fc29
Summary: Set of types for representing HTTP requests and responses
RPMs:rust-http-devel
Size:87.76 KiB

Package: rust-tokio-executor-0.1.0-1.fc29
Summary: Future execution primitives
RPMs:rust-tokio-executor-devel
Size:17.47 KiB

Package: rust-tokio-reactor-0.1.0-1.fc29
Summary: Event loop that drives Tokio I/O resources
RPMs:rust-tokio-reactor-devel
Size:26.25 KiB

Package: rust-tokio-threadpool-0.1.0-1.fc29
Summary: Task scheduler backed by a work-stealing thread pool
RPMs:rust-tokio-threadpool-devel
Size:30.80 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: rust-pest0.3-0.3.3-4.fc28
Summary: Elegant, efficient grammars
RPMs:rust-pest0.3-devel
Size:40.46 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  GAPDoc-1.6.1-4.fc29
Old package:  GAPDoc-1.6.1-2.fc28
Summary:  GAP documentation tool
RPMs: GAPDoc GAPDoc-latex
Size: 1.34 MiB
Size change:  301.52 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 10 2018 Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> - 1.6.1-3
  - Require metafont as well to generate fonts as needed

  * Sat Mar 10 2018 Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> - 1.6.1-4
  - Require tex(pdftex.map) also so PostScript fonts can be generated


Package:  OpenNL-3.2.1-19.fc29
Old package:  OpenNL-3.2.1-18.fc28
Summary:  A library for solving sparse linear systems
RPMs: OpenNL OpenNL-devel
Size: 8.36 MiB
Size change:  1.87 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 10 2018 Ankur Sinha  - 3.2.1-19
  - Add gcc/g++ to BR
  - Fix typo


Package:  Panini-0.72.0-1.fc29
Old package:  Panini-0.71.104-11.fc28
Summary:  A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide 
angle images
RPMs: Panini
Size: 1.59 MiB
Size change:  80.77 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 10 2018 Ankur Sinha  - 0.72.0-1
  - Update to latest upstream release
  - Add gcc/g++ to BRs
  - Remove unneeded patch
  - Remove unneeded sources
  - Use qt5
  - Update appdata info


Package:  axel-2.16-1.fc29
Old package:  axel-2.15-2.fc28
Summary:  Light command line download accelerator for Linux and Unix
RPMs: axel
Size: 543.80 KiB
Size change:  15.70 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 10 2018 Ankur S

[Bug 1554163] New: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000108 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554163

Bug ID: 1554163
   Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000108 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Test2-Suite
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.000108
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.000106-1.fc29
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test2-Suite/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/9536/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1554155] New: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.30 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554155

Bug ID: 1554155
   Summary: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.30 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.30
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.29-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dancer-Session-Cookie/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2757/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Use of int types in the code base,

[William Brown]

On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 02:35 -0500, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "William Brown" 
> > To: "Simon Pichugin" 
> > Cc: "389-devel" <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 12:30:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: Use of int types in the code base,
> > 
> > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 17:33 -0500, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> > > Hi William!
> > > Thank you for the email. It has clarified the things for me. :)
> > > I still have one question though.
> > > 
> > > Do I understand right that I need also to cast types with these
> > > types
> > > from inttypes.h?
> > > So use it not only in the defenitions.
> > > - sprintf(buf, "%lu", (long unsigned int)maxsize);
> > > + sprintf(buf, "%" PRIu64, (uint64_t)maxsize);
> > 
> > There is PRIu32 too :)
> > 
> > The pattern is:
> > 
> > PRI
> > 
> > IE
> > 
> > PRIu64 - uint64_t
> > PRId64 - int64_t
> > PRIu32 - uint32_t
> > PRId32 - int32_t
> > 
> > Check what type maxsize is to be sure you use the correct PRI type.
> > 
> > Hope that helps,
> 
> Ok. My question was about a bit different thing :)
> But now, after some investigation I have clarified something but not
> all:
> 
> So we have size_t that will have the size of the platform (it's 64
> now but later we can have 128 bit platform, etc.).

It's a bit optimistic to think 128bit computing will arrive anytime
soon ;) 

> For now, the code will work like this (without any warning)
> size_t maxsize
> sprintf(buf, "%" PRIu64, maxsize);
> And, actually, we already have lines like these in the older code
> added by you:
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/c/274823860ac98b153e7f0bc84d979861c4ca8
> 95f
> 
> Or we can change size_t as you've proposed in pull request:
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49595
> "Ahhh I see the issue here. You have maxsize as size_t, but you have
> PRIu64. Size_t is platform specific width, so you could change
> maxsize to be a uint64_t instead to avoid this."
> uint64_t maxsize
> sprintf(buf, "%" PRIu64, maxsize);

I would do it this way (uint64_t for maxsize). It's better to be
"absolute" and explicit in our types. size_t only makes sense for array
indexing, nothing else. 

> 
> So could you please guide me here on what coding style do we have in
> cases like this?
> 
> As I understood from coding style guide you gave, we need to use
> 64bit types mostly (size_t for arrays indexing and 32bit types for
> compatibility with some apis only)
> 
> Thank you,
> Simon
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Simon
> > > 
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "William Brown" 
> > > > To: "389-devel" <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 12:42:03 AM
> > > > Subject: Use of int types in the code base,
> > > > 
> > > > Hi there,
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/development/coding-style.html
> > > > #typ
> > > > es
> > > > 
> > > > In a few reviews I still see this sometimes.
> > > > 
> > > > It's pretty important that we keep moving our quality standard
> > > > higher,
> > > > and having known type sizes is important to this. Types like
> > > > int
> > > > and
> > > > long are unknown sizes until you compile it depending on
> > > > platform.
> > > > 
> > > > As a result, it's really important we use the intX_t and
> > > > uintX_t
> > > > types
> > > > so we have guarantees of our values. I would encourage the use
> > > > of
> > > > int64_t and uint64_t, because while they are "larger", it's
> > > > significantly faster for a modern 64bit system to process these
> > > > values
> > > > than their 32bit counterparts.
> > > > 
> > > > Another note is that arrays index by size_t, not 'int', so we
> > > > should
> > > > always keep this in mind.
> > > > 
> > > > Finally, because we are using c99 now, this means we should
> > > > avoid:
> > > > 
> > > > size_t i = 0;
> > > > 
> > > > for (i = 0; i < cond; i++) {
> > > > ...
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > When we really should scope our values. Scoping is good because
> > > > it
> > > > limits possibility of data corruption to flow and other
> > > > mistakes
> > > > such
> > > > as re-use of values. This means:
> > > > 
> > > > for (size_t i = 0; i < cond; i++) {
> > > > ...
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > William Brown
> > > > 
> > 
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > William Brown
> > 
> 
> ___
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.o
> rg
-- 
Thanks,

William Brown
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 02:22:49PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia  wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> >  wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:04:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> >>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> >>>  wrote:
>> >
>> >>> > I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the proper
>> >>> > location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or
>> >>> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)?
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> redhat-rpm-config is the right place. It belongs in 
>> >>> /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros.
>> >>
>> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/22
>> >
>> > So you're not actually adding a feature, as the pull request seems to
>> > describe. You're simply resetting the default from "0" to "numerical
>> > equivalent of 2 years", for all applications. Why not simply alter it
>> > for kernel.ll other packages unmodified?
>>
>> That came out somewhat garbled.
>>
>> Why not simply alter it for kernel.spec, and leave alone other
>> packages that may use the same macro?
> This seems to be misunderstanding. This has nothing to do with kernel.spec
> in particular. That PR trims _all_ changelogs, on purpose.

Ahh, that's more clear. I also saw the note and whitespace patch
mentioning "kernel-rpm-macros".  If I were writing such a change from
scratch, I'd set the log entry to say "Set default changelog retention
to 2 years", rather than "Trim changelog entries older than two
years", because the code is not actually in your patch. only the
change of the default entry. But it's not my package, I thought I'd
noticed an inconsistency that is nowhere near size of what I
understood to be a possible issue.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] 2018-03-12 @ ** 16:00 ** UTC - Fedora 28 Blocker Review Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

# F28 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-03-12
# Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! We have four proposed blockers and nine proposed freeze
exceptions for Fedora 28 Beta, so let's have a review meeting tomorrow.

Note that daylight savings time started in North America (mostly)
today, so the meeting is now an hour earlier in UTC. If you changed
your clocks forward today, the meeting will be at the same local time
as before. If you did *not* change your clocks, the meeting will be an
hour earlier than last week for you.

If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting -  the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ .

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the 
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not 
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F28 can be found on the 
wiki [0].

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, 
check out these links:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting 
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out 
the SOP on the wiki:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

Have a good day and see you tomorrow!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] 2018-03-12 @ ** 15:00 ** UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

[Adam Williamson]

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2018-03-12
# Time: ** 15:00 ** UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net

Greetings testers!

We're kind of in the crunch time for Fedora 28 now, and things aren't
looking great, so I figured it'd be a good idea to have a meeting to
sync up on current status and plans for Beta.

Note that daylight savings time started in North America (mostly)
today, so the meeting is now an hour earlier in UTC. If you changed
your clocks forward today, the meeting will be at the same local time
as before. If you did *not* change your clocks, the meeting will be an
hour earlier than last week for you.

If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
email and suggest them! Thanks.

== Proposed Agenda Topics ==

1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 28 status, Beta schedule
3. Open floor
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1553503] perl-Time-Moment-0.43 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553503



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Time-Moment-0.43-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-215515c7ee

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1553503] perl-Time-Moment-0.43 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553503



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Time-Moment-0.43-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-96758851c2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 1098  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
 861  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
 443  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-04bc9dd81d   
libbsd-0.8.3-1.el7
 340  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d241156dfe   
mod_cluster-1.3.3-10.el7
 172  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e27758bd23   
libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el7
 110  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e64eeb6ece   
nagios-4.3.4-5.el7
  59  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-73ee944e65   
rootsh-1.5.3-17.el7
  33  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7134fc92a1   
jhead-3.00-7.el7
  18  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-50566f0a39   
uwsgi-2.0.16-1.el7
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3e70a38ad4   
drupal7-7.57-1.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-aacf1b47d6   
clamav-0.99.4-1.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-815e0064e9   
tor-0.2.9.15-1.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f7a629b46f   
python-django16-1.6.11.7-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

adapta-gtk-theme-3.93.0.153-1.el7
certbot-0.22.0-1.el7
gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-31-1.el7
lzma-sdk-4.6.5-21.el7
mate-terminal-1.16.3-2.el7
nmh-1.7.1-3.el7
nulib2-3.1.0-1.el7
perl-Time-Moment-0.43-1.el7
php-paragonie-constant-time-encoding-1.0.2-1.el7
php-simplesamlphp-saml2-2.3.8-1.el7
php-simplesamlphp-saml2_1-1.10.6-1.el7
python-acme-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-apache-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-cloudflare-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-cloudxns-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-digitalocean-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-dnsimple-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-dnsmadeeasy-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-google-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-luadns-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-nsone-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-rfc2136-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-dns-route53-0.22.0-1.el7
python-certbot-nginx-0.22.0-1.el7
ucl-1.03-24.el7
upx-3.94-2.el7
yadifa-2.3.8-1.el7

Details about builds:



 adapta-gtk-theme-3.93.0.153-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-08514a0300)
 An adaptive Gtk+ theme based on Material Design Guidelines

Update Information:

- New upstream release

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1551163 - adapta-gtk-theme-3.93.0.153 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551163




 certbot-0.22.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-d4a7ea4adc)
 A free, automated certificate authority client

Update Information:

Update to 0.22.0.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1552951 - python-acme-0.22.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552951
  [ 2 ] Bug #1552953 - certbot-0.22.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552953
  [ 3 ] Bug #1552954 - python-certbot-apache-0.22.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552954
  [ 4 ] Bug #1552955 - python-certbot-dns-rfc2136-0.22.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552955
  [ 5 ] Bug #1552956 - python-certbot-nginx-0.22.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552956




 gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-31-1.el7 
(FEDORA-EPEL-2018-92bcc8eeda)
 Show app icons on top of the windows thumbnails in Activities Overview

Update Information:

Upstream made several releases in a short amount of time, which collectively
provide improvements to the default visual styles, optimizations for icon
animation, and general cleanup of the code base, including a fix for an error
that could happen if the user locks the Shell in overview mode.




 lzma-sdk-4.6.5-21.el7 

[Bug 1553503] perl-Time-Moment-0.43 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553503



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Time-Moment-0.43-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-4f5dc51fe6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 971  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168   
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
 861  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
 832  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-35e240edd9   
thttpd-2.25b-24.el6
 443  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e3e50897ac   
libbsd-0.8.3-2.el6
 172  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-4c76ddcc92   
libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el6
  92  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-6aaee32b7e   
optipng-0.7.6-6.el6
  64  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8c9006d462   
heimdal-7.5.0-1.el6
  58  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-752a7c9ad4   
rootsh-1.5.3-17.el6
  27  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f742513635   
jhead-3.00-9.el6
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-5d12c76136   
drupal7-7.57-1.el6
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7e91105260   
clamav-0.99.4-1.el6
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a27d71c715   
pax-utils-1.2.3-1.el6
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-4bcfff2d5e   
tor-0.2.9.15-1.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

nmh-1.7.1-3.el6
php-simplesamlphp-saml2-2.3.8-1.el6
php-simplesamlphp-saml2_1-1.10.6-1.el6
pidgin-sipe-1.23.2-1.el6
python-antlr-2.7.7-5.el6

Details about builds:



 nmh-1.7.1-3.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-eae0de1c6b)
 A capable MIME-email-handling system with a command-line interface

Update Information:

Replaced /usr/bin/vi with /bin/vi.




 php-simplesamlphp-saml2-2.3.8-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-57cbc61216)
 SAML2 PHP library from SimpleSAMLphp

Update Information:

* [SSPSA 201803-01 /
CVE-2018-7711](https://simplesamlphp.org/security/201803-01) * [SSPSA 201802-01
/ CVE-2018-7644](https://simplesamlphp.org/security/201802-01) * [SSPSA
201801-01 / CVE-2018-6519](https://simplesamlphp.org/security/201801-01)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1553357 - CVE-2018-7711 php-simplesamlphp-saml2: Authentication 
Bypass in the signature validation utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553357
  [ 2 ] Bug #1553352 - CVE-2018-7644 php-simplesamlphp-saml2: Signature 
Validation Bypass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553352
  [ 3 ] Bug #1542244 - CVE-2018-6519 php-simplesamlphp-saml2: Denial of Service 
in xs:DateTime timestamp in SAML2 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542244




 php-simplesamlphp-saml2_1-1.10.6-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0f3319c1ea)
 SAML2 PHP library from SimpleSAMLphp (version 1)

Update Information:

* [SSPSA 201803-01 /
CVE-2018-7711](https://simplesamlphp.org/security/201803-01) * [SSPSA 201802-01
/ CVE-2018-7644](https://simplesamlphp.org/security/201802-01) * [SSPSA
201801-01 / CVE-2018-6519](https://simplesamlphp.org/security/201801-01)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1553357 - CVE-2018-7711 php-simplesamlphp-saml2: Authentication 
Bypass in the signature validation utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553357
  [ 2 ] Bug #1553352 - CVE-2018-7644 php-simplesamlphp-saml2: Signature 
Validation Bypass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553352
  [ 3 ] Bug #1542244 - CVE-2018-6519 php-simplesamlphp-saml2: Denial of Service 
in xs:DateTime timestamp in SAML2 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542244




 pidgin-sipe-1.23.2-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a1b231db0b)
 Pidgin protocol plugin to connect to MS Office Communicator

Update Information:

New upstream release:  * add support for IPv6 addresses in SIP & SDP messages *
extend libpurple D-Bus interface * don't load buddy photos from unknown sites by
default * add support for user redirect in Lync 

Fedora Rawhide-20180310.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 21/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 201274  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201274
ID: 201280  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201280
ID: 201303  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201303
ID: 201306  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201306
ID: 201311  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201311
ID: 201312  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201312
ID: 201313  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201313
ID: 201314  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201314
ID: 201318  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201318
ID: 201326  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201326
ID: 201330  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201330
ID: 201331  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201331
ID: 201332  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201332
ID: 201345  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201345
ID: 201355  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201355
ID: 201372  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201372
ID: 201373  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201373
ID: 201379  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201379
ID: 201383  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201383
ID: 201384  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201384
ID: 201385  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201385
ID: 201388  Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201388
ID: 201392  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201392
ID: 201406  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201406
ID: 201415  Test: i386 universal install_blivet_btrfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201415
ID: 201418  Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201418
ID: 201426  Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201426
ID: 201427  Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201427

Soft failed openQA tests: 64/137 (x86_64), 13/23 (i386)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 201266  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201266
ID: 201267  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201267
ID: 201269  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201269
ID: 201270  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201270
ID: 201272  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201272
ID: 201273  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201273
ID: 201286  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201286
ID: 201289  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201289
ID: 201290  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201290
ID: 201291  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201291
ID: 201292  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201292
ID: 201296  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: 

Fedora Rawhide-20180311.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 19/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 201112  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201112
ID: 201118  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201118
ID: 201149  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201149
ID: 201150  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201150
ID: 201151  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201151
ID: 201156  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201156
ID: 201164  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201164
ID: 201168  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201168
ID: 201169  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201169
ID: 201170  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201170
ID: 201183  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201183
ID: 201192  Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201192
ID: 201204  Test: x86_64 universal install_multi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201204
ID: 201210  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201210
ID: 201211  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201211
ID: 201217  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201217
ID: 201221  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201221
ID: 201222  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201222
ID: 201230  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201230
ID: 201241  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201241
ID: 201244  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201244
ID: 201247  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201247
ID: 201256  Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201256
ID: 201262  Test: i386 universal install_blivet_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201262
ID: 201264  Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201264
ID: 201265  Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201265

Soft failed openQA tests: 61/137 (x86_64), 15/23 (i386)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 201104  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201104
ID: 201105  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201105
ID: 201107  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201107
ID: 201108  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201108
ID: 201110  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201110
ID: 20  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/20
ID: 201124  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201124
ID: 201127  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201127
ID: 201128  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201128
ID: 201129  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201129
ID: 201130  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201130
ID: 201131  Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201131
ID: 201152  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201152
ID: 201166  Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/201166
ID: 201167  Test: x86_64 

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 02:22:49PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia  wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >  wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:04:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >>>  wrote:
> >
> >>> > I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the proper
> >>> > location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or
> >>> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)?
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> redhat-rpm-config is the right place. It belongs in 
> >>> /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros.
> >>
> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/22
> >
> > So you're not actually adding a feature, as the pull request seems to
> > describe. You're simply resetting the default from "0" to "numerical
> > equivalent of 2 years", for all applications. Why not simply alter it
> > for kernel.ll other packages unmodified?
> 
> That came out somewhat garbled.
> 
> Why not simply alter it for kernel.spec, and leave alone other
> packages that may use the same macro?
This seems to be misunderstanding. This has nothing to do with kernel.spec
in particular. That PR trims _all_ changelogs, on purpose.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1552447] perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90117-2.fc29 FTBFS: Failed test ' elapsed' at t/unit_stats.t

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552447

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90117-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cd4219f2d2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:04:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>>  wrote:

>> > I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the proper
>> > location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or
>> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)?
>> >
>>
>> redhat-rpm-config is the right place. It belongs in 
>> /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/22

So you're not actually adding a feature, as the pull request seems to
describe. You're simply resetting the default from "0" to "numerical
equivalent of 2 years", for all applications. Why not simply alter it
for kernel.ll other packages unmodified?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia  wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>  wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:04:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>>>  wrote:
>
>>> > I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the proper
>>> > location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or
>>> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)?
>>> >
>>>
>>> redhat-rpm-config is the right place. It belongs in 
>>> /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros.
>>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/22
>
> So you're not actually adding a feature, as the pull request seems to
> describe. You're simply resetting the default from "0" to "numerical
> equivalent of 2 years", for all applications. Why not simply alter it
> for kernel.ll other packages unmodified?

That came out somewhat garbled.

Why not simply alter it for kernel.spec, and leave alone other
packages that may use the same macro?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: lxqt install group environment - bug ?

[Cătălin George Feștilă]

I install all mesa drivers for i686 , 64 and omx
the startx command get this error:

 xf86EnableIOPorts : failed to set IOPL for I/O ...

maybe is virtualbox problem , but this error is just on lxqt environment .
the lxde and xfce  environments works well.

I don't have any idea if this is a bug or come from bad package lxqt .

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Kevin Kofler 
wrote:

> Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> > I try to install lxqt desktop group environment
> > I use the last Fedora Server image from Fedora
> >
> > The error on default user point to xorg error :
> >
> > xf86EnableIOPorts - EGL_MESA_drm_image require
> >
> > This is strange because the lxde desktop environment group running well
> on
> > machine.
> >
> > Maybe is a bug ?
>
> Is the mesa-dri-drivers package installed? If not, try installing it.
>
> Kevin Kofler
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:04:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>  wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 08:18:20AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Randy Barlow
> >>  wrote:
> >> > On 02/12/2018 08:00 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
> >> >> The changelogs are long ass hell.
> >> >> What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and deleting the rest?
> >> >> (It will be still kept in GIT history)
> >> >> 2 releases could be 2-
> >> >
> >> > I usually trim my changelogs to the last year of entries. It's kinda
> >> > arbitrary, but it does keep it from getting too insane and it's easy.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> What I don't get is why we don't just set RPM to trim the changelog
> >> automatically for the binary RPMs.
> >
> > I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the proper
> > location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or
> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)?
> >
> 
> redhat-rpm-config is the right place. It belongs in 
> /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/22

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

[Neal Gompa]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 08:18:20AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Randy Barlow
>>  wrote:
>> > On 02/12/2018 08:00 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
>> >> The changelogs are long ass hell.
>> >> What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and deleting the rest?
>> >> (It will be still kept in GIT history)
>> >> 2 releases could be 2-
>> >
>> > I usually trim my changelogs to the last year of entries. It's kinda
>> > arbitrary, but it does keep it from getting too insane and it's easy.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> What I don't get is why we don't just set RPM to trim the changelog
>> automatically for the binary RPMs.
>
> I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the proper
> location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or
> /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)?
>

redhat-rpm-config is the right place. It belongs in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 08:18:20AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Randy Barlow
>  wrote:
> > On 02/12/2018 08:00 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
> >> The changelogs are long ass hell.
> >> What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and deleting the rest?
> >> (It will be still kept in GIT history)
> >> 2 releases could be 2-
> >
> > I usually trim my changelogs to the last year of entries. It's kinda
> > arbitrary, but it does keep it from getting too insane and it's easy.
> >
> >
> 
> What I don't get is why we don't just set RPM to trim the changelog
> automatically for the binary RPMs.

I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the proper
location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or
/usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)?

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Workaround for Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 11:05:55AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> I have built RPM with backported with/without/unless rich deps for F26.
> 
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ignatenkobrain/rpm-4.13.x-richd
> eps/
> 
> Just update from this repo before doing distro-sync/system-upgrade and
> you should be good.

Should this be advertised more widely through a Fedora Magazine article
or Common Bugs or something like that?

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1554097] New: perl-Email-Stuffer-0.017 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554097

Bug ID: 1554097
   Summary: perl-Email-Stuffer-0.017 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Email-Stuffer
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 0.017
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.016-2.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Email-Stuffer/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/13425/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1552447] perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90117-2.fc29 FTBFS: Failed test ' elapsed' at t/unit_stats.t

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552447



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90117-3.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cd4219f2d2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

i386 buildroot broken Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180309.n.0 compose check report

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 04:10 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 03:56 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> 
> > -- 
> > Mail generated by check-compose:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
> 
> 
> Please  check if secondary arches are updated [1] 
> latest updates are from 2018-03-04 19:48
> 

[1] 
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/development/rawhide/Everything/
 


Packages in secondary arch did not updated , it seems also happens with 
branched repo [2]
this breaks copr builds 

[2]
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/development/28/Everything/

> Thanks,
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1553952] perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator-1.114 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553952

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator-1.11
   ||4-1.fc29
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-03-11 07:03:44



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Built for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1056675

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1551806] perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.23 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551806

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-CGI-Application-Plugin
   ||-Authentication-0.23-1.fc29
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-03-11 07:03:05



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Built for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1056674

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org