On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 02:22:49PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:04:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >>> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> >>> > I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the proper
> >>> > location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or
> >>> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)?
> >>> >
> >>> redhat-rpm-config is the right place. It belongs in
> >>> /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros.
> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/22
> > So you're not actually adding a feature, as the pull request seems to
> > describe. You're simply resetting the default from "0" to "numerical
> > equivalent of 2 years", for all applications. Why not simply alter it
> > for kernel.ll other packages unmodified?
> That came out somewhat garbled.
> Why not simply alter it for kernel.spec, and leave alone other
> packages that may use the same macro?
This seems to be misunderstanding. This has nothing to do with kernel.spec
in particular. That PR trims _all_ changelogs, on purpose.
devel mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org