Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 21:53 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Consistent with my earlier findings. I have no idea why packagekitd or > gnome-software are even running (by default) on liveOS. This wasn't a live boot. From the description it was clearly an installed system. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA

Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 15:47 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James wrote: > > > For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% + > > unresponsive installer problem is this bug: > > > >

Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James wrote: >> >> For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% + >> unresponsive installer problem is this bug: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577282 >>

Re: VM in a logical volume

Related thread when I discovered this issue a couple months ago, and posted to desktop@ I think the top two memory soaking items are the two gnome-shell instances, one for gdm and one for the user, concurrently. And the lack of zram.service being enabled on liveOS installations, where DVD and

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-05-30 - 100% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/05/30/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.9-2.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: The update system has the wrong package

On Tue, 29 May 2018 16:54:00 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to update the rpcsvc-proto package. > When I try to create a new update, the system > only gives me rpcsvc-proto-devel as a choice > not rpcsvc-proto. > > Where do I open up a ticket to get this taken > care of?

[seeking advice] MariaDB - TokuDB storage engine

Hello, I maintain MariaDB. There is a subpackage containing TokuDB storage engine. (available only for x86_64) However the TokuDB can't be build against Jemalloc 5, but on F>=28 there is no older jemalloc version. The build without jemalloc is not supported too. Is it OK to drop the subpackage

Fedora 26 End Of Life

As of the 29th of May 2018, Fedora 26 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 26. Fedora 27 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month after the release of Fedora 29. The maintenance

Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James wrote: > For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% + > unresponsive installer problem is this bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577282 > > Fortunately, I can give my VM 2 GB to install, but wow. The

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

it didn't help ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: The update system has the wrong package

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 16:54 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to update the rpcsvc-proto package. > When I try to create a new update, the system > only gives me rpcsvc-proto-devel as a choice > not rpcsvc-proto. > > Where do I open up a ticket to get this taken > care of?

The update system has the wrong package

Hello, I'm trying to update the rpcsvc-proto package. When I try to create a new update, the system only gives me rpcsvc-proto-devel as a choice not rpcsvc-proto. Where do I open up a ticket to get this taken care of? steved. ___ devel mailing list

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180527.0

On 05/29/2018 03:06 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180527.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 291ea90da29bc5abe757b5a50813b3de1396b08412939a89b3b671aba9856093 > Commit(aarch64): >

Fedora Rawhide-20180529.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/137 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180526.n.1): ID: 242844 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/242844 Old failures (same test failed in

Planned Outage - Fedora Production Openshift - 2018-05-31 21:00 UTC

Planned Outage - Fedora Production Openshift - 2018-05-31 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2018-05-31 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-05-31

Planned Outage - Fedora Production Openshift - 2018-05-31 21:00 UTC

Planned Outage - Fedora Production Openshift - 2018-05-31 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2018-05-31 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-05-31

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180527.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 28.20180527.0 Commit(x86_64): 291ea90da29bc5abe757b5a50813b3de1396b08412939a89b3b671aba9856093 Commit(aarch64): f3f1b43c6bb1fa705d36f4e2b470e1dc510af421b3d122457f21f1664b37182e Commit(ppc64le):

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

On 29.5.2018 18:38, Martin Gansser wrote: i request a new token ! https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/attachments/pagure-api-token.png did it help? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list --

Self-Introduction: Eamon Walsh, TermySequence

Hello developers, My name is Eamon Walsh and I am submitting my terminal emulator multiplexer server and qt5 client, TermySequence. This is a terminal multiplexer capable of reconnecting to itself, designed for use with SSH and in containers. It supports iTerm2 shell integration, ls --hyperlink,

Re: Firefox with native Wayland backend at updates

On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 09:41 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > On 05/29/2018 08:48 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:56:27AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > > > We have Firefox 60.0.1 with native Wayland backend at Fedora updates now: > > > > > >

Re: VM in a logical volume

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Jerry James wrote: > For work reasons, I need a Fedora 28 VM. I've got a bunch of disk space > set aside to create logical volumes (LVM) for exactly this purpose, with > several existing VMs. On this occasion, I decided that I no longer needed > an older Fedora

[Bug 1467600] CVE-2017-10788 perl-DBD-MySQL: Use-after-free when calling mysql_stmt_error() after mysql_stmt_close()

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467600 Bug 1467600 depends on bug 1467608, which changed state. Bug 1467608 Summary: CVE-2017-10788 CVE-2017-10789 perl-DBD-MySQL: various flaws [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467608 What|Removed

[Bug 1467606] CVE-2017-10789 perl-DBD-MySQL: Possible MITM attack when mysql_ssl=1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467606 Bug 1467606 depends on bug 1467608, which changed state. Bug 1467608 Summary: CVE-2017-10788 CVE-2017-10789 perl-DBD-MySQL: various flaws [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467608 What|Removed

[Bug 1467608] CVE-2017-10788 CVE-2017-10789 perl-DBD-MySQL: various flaws [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467608 Jan Kurik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

i request a new token ! https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/attachments/pagure-api-token.png ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 05:18:48PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 29 May 2018 at 15:24, Till Maas wrote: > > This is also not a serious security threat. > > > > And this claim bases on what kind of facts? > Can you prove this? Sure, there is no logo or catchy name for it. Kind regards Till

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

On 29.5.2018 15:56, Martin Gansser wrote: Thanks all for your feedback. the Pagure API that i am using in ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf is Valid until: 2018-07-27 but the request branch gives me this message: $ fedpkg request-branch f28 Could not execute request_branch: The following error

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29 May 2018 at 15:24, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 01:44:00PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > > Just try to grep across /usr for /usr/local. This is not only about > $PATH. > > Many scripts, programs or configuration files have HARDCODED checking > > availability of

VM in a logical volume

For work reasons, I need a Fedora 28 VM. I've got a bunch of disk space set aside to create logical volumes (LVM) for exactly this purpose, with several existing VMs. On this occasion, I decided that I no longer needed an older Fedora VM and decided to recycle it. I got the Fedora 28 x86_64

VirtualGL license changed

The license in VirtualGL has changed from wxWidgets in version 2.4 to wxWindows in version 2.5.2. Thanks, ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Python 3.7 status in Fedora

On 29.5.2018 17:16, Neal Gompa wrote:> Mock and its dependencies should be included in there, too. I recall that> at least there was one issue encountered by OpenMandriva during their> Python 3.7 transition in which one of Mock's dependencies broke due to a> newly reserved keyword. I don't

[389-devel] Revised: please review Ticket 49683 - Add JSON option for lib389 CLI tools

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49699 On 05/17/2018 10:34 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49683 > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49699 > ___ > 389-devel mailing list --

Re: Python 3.7 status in Fedora

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, this is just a summary about what is currently happening with Python > 3.7 in Fedora [0]. > Upstream has delayed the first RC a bit [1]. So we are not pushing > anything to rawhide just yet. However I'm working on a "topsort rebuild" >

Python 3.7 status in Fedora

Hi, this is just a summary about what is currently happening with Python 3.7 in Fedora [0]. Upstream has delayed the first RC a bit [1]. So we are not pushing anything to rawhide just yet. However I'm working on a "topsort rebuild" in Copr [2] on 3.7.0b3 to see what order [3] we'll need once

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29.5.2018 16:22, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On 29 May 2018 at 13:57, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 29.5.2018 14:44, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: This connected with using env in many current packages adds next batch of possibilities. Agreed. Hence we

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Hi, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 01:44:00PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Just try to grep across /usr for /usr/local. This is not only about $PATH. > Many scripts, programs or configuration files have HARDCODED checking > availability of some resources or executables in /usr/local before start >

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29 May 2018 at 13:57, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29.5.2018 14:44, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > >> This connected with using env in many current packages adds next batch of >> possibilities. >> > > Agreed. Hence we try to fight env shebangs by brp scripts. Problem is that this bpr script brs been

[389-devel] Re: Revised: Ticket 49675 - latest coverity fixes

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49729 On 05/22/2018 12:51 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49675 > ___ > 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

Thanks all for your feedback. the Pagure API that i am using in ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf is Valid until: 2018-07-27 but the request branch gives me this message: $ fedpkg request-branch f28 Could not execute request_branch: The following error occurred while creating a new issue in Pagure:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 51 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-5aca1d385d remctl-3.14-1.el6 48 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-dd6e4a3f0b python34-3.4.8-1.el6 6

[Bug 1583659] perl-Test-Warn-0.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583659 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1557667] perl - Config_heavy.pl uses redhat-hardened-cc1 without depending on redhat-rpm-config

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557667 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.2-412.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-05-29 - 59% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/05/29/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.9-20180528git6bfe74f.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29.5.2018 14:44, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: This connected with using env in many current packages adds next batch of possibilities. Agreed. Hence we try to fight env shebangs by brp scripts. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29 May 2018 at 10:37, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:44AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > > distribution binaries is extremely dangerous, and I'm really surprised > that > > no one looks on those already discussed here issues (and few similar or > > related) as

[Bug 1499505] perl XS files including /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/ gtk.h fail with ATK_MINOR_VERSION redefined

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499505 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > i tried to update a few of my packages for f28, but this fails with this > message: > > $ fedpkg clone nuvola-app-jango; cd nuvola-app-jango; git merge master > $ fedpkg switch-branch f28 > Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28 > >

Re: Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

On 29.5.2018 13:49, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi, i tried to update a few of my packages for f28, but this fails with this message: $ fedpkg clone nuvola-app-jango; cd nuvola-app-jango; git merge master $ fedpkg switch-branch f28 Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

[Bug 1583659] New: perl-Test-Warn-0.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583659 Bug ID: 1583659 Summary: perl-Test-Warn-0.33 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Warn Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1583657] New: perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583657 Bug ID: 1583657 Summary: perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.14 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 694496] rpm requirements - provides/requires (tracker)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694496 Bug 694496 depends on bug 742478, which changed state. Bug 742478 Summary: Perl dependency generator: Moose `with' keyword not recognized as pulling dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742478 What|Removed

[Bug 694496] rpm requirements - provides/requires (tracker)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694496 Bug 694496 depends on bug 742478, which changed state. Bug 742478 Summary: Perl dependency generator: Moose `with' keyword not recognized as pulling dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742478 What|Removed

[Bug 1557667] perl - Config_heavy.pl uses redhat-hardened-cc1 without depending on redhat-rpm-config

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557667 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1576617] perl-Net-HTTP-6.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576617 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1577682] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577682 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28

Hi, i tried to update a few of my packages for f28, but this fails with this message: $ fedpkg clone nuvola-app-jango; cd nuvola-app-jango; git merge master $ fedpkg switch-branch f28 Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28 f29 package builds fine:

[Bug 1410774] perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-3.fc26 FTBFS: crash in plplot on 64-bit PowerPC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410774 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: flowblade: how to determine the cause of a segmentation fault?

Hello John, May I share your assessment of debug messages with the flowblade mailing list? Many thanks for your examination. Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1384434] perl-Audio-Beep build is interactive

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384434 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1414996] please stop sending email to root in build tests

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414996 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29.5.2018 12:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:02AM +0100, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: I ended up creating https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UserPathPrioritization and I invite others to improve its description. A very nice description. Can you add some

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:02AM +0100, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: > > I ended up creating > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UserPathPrioritization and I invite > > others to improve its description. A very nice description. Can you add some hints on what needs to change (/etc/profile?).

Re: Updates to mathematical software

On Mon, 28 May 2018 21:03:34 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Paul Howarth > wrote: > > > Do what you need to for pari; your maths stack is the main (only?) > > consumer of pari in Fedora. I originally took pari as I needed it > > for perl-Math-Pari but that's dead

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Hi, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:02AM +0100, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: > I ended up creating > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UserPathPrioritization and I invite > others to improve its description. awesome, I was about to do the same, therefore I added myself as second owner to express that

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Hi, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:19:44AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > distribution binaries is extremely dangerous, and I'm really surprised that > no one looks on those already discussed here issues (and few similar or > related) as SERIOUS SECURITY TREAT to whole distribution. IIRC enough

Re: Would be possible to add freerdp2 package only for EPEL?

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:58:37AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > I thought that this would not be a problem as epel is built on Fedora > infra which is not same as rhel one. The problem is that koji needs to know about the RHEL packages to be able to create buildroots for EPEL. This is were

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29 May 2018 at 09:25, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 29.5.2018 09:34, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: > >> What do we need to do to make Fedora do the right thing (add it to the >> top of the list), just like Debian/Ubuntu. I am sure that they had similar >> discussions and in the end they decided to do

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

I ended up creating https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UserPathPrioritization and I invite others to improve its description. -- /sorin On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 29.5.2018 09:34, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: > >> What do we need to do to make Fedora do the right

Re: Would be possible to add freerdp2 package only for EPEL?

W dniu 29.05.2018 o 01:21, Kevin Fenzi pisze: > Nope. koji operates on source packages. If it sees a 'freerdp' source > package in epel that will completely and totally override any freerdp > package in epel and any subpackages it has will be ignored. The name > must be different between epel and

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 29.5.2018 09:34, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: What do we need to do to make Fedora do the right thing (add it to the top of the list), just like Debian/Ubuntu. I am sure that they had similar discussions and in the end they decided to do the right thing. A Fedora change proposal.

Re: Firefox with native Wayland backend at updates

On 05/29/2018 08:48 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:56:27AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: We have Firefox 60.0.1 with native Wayland backend at Fedora updates now: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c0674d672f

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Does this discussion had any outcomes? I tried to find any conclusions in the thread but I missed to spot them. I am asking this because I was redirected to this thread after I opened a bug on RHEL for the same issue, bug that was closed hours later as NOTABUG, something I do not agree with.

Re: Firefox with native Wayland backend at updates

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:56:27AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > We have Firefox 60.0.1 with native Wayland backend at Fedora updates now: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c0674d672f > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1f788d5c09 >

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:54:24PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-05-28 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 10:42 +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben

[Bug 1557667] perl - Config_heavy.pl uses redhat-hardened-cc1 without depending on redhat-rpm-config

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557667 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.2-406.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eb868d383c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1557667] perl - Config_heavy.pl uses redhat-hardened-cc1 without depending on redhat-rpm-config

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557667 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.26.2-412.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-08197bc14f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list