Hi.
Can anyone contact with maintainers of lazarus
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lazarus ?
Because they unresponsive to my requests few month. I just want add qt5pas
subpachage by this pull-request
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lazarus/pull-request/3
--
Best regards,
Vaasiliy Glazov
___
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:12 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 08/02/2018 05:04 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > This might surprise you, but I actually prefer the current way. It
> > makes activating Rawhide an explicit action that can stay carried
> > forward.
>
> The same for the proposed change, once you
Rex Dieter wrote on Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:14:13AM -0500:
> Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > In practice, `pkg-config --cflags foo` will only fetch cflags for
> > dependencies listed in Requires, not Requires.private
>
> pkg-config --cflags foo
> fetches cflags of Requires.private items in foo.pc fo
On 08/02/2018 05:04 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> This might surprise you, but I actually prefer the current way. It
> makes activating Rawhide an explicit action that can stay carried
> forward.
The same for the proposed change, once you install fedora-release from
rawhide you are on rawhide until an
On 08/01/2018 01:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The list of ImageMagick CVEs is horrific - 59 open CVEs - for something
> that is often going to be used in a scenario where it is fed untrustworthy
> images. exiv2 is pretty concerning too with 19 open CVEs, again for
> something often used wit
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 02:45:54PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
> >There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that need
> > more than individual work, most notably the Go packaging guidelines and
> > tooling. I think that sho
On 08/02/2018 12:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
>> There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that
>> need more than individual work, most notably the Go packaging
>> guidelines and tooling. I think that should be one of the first
On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that need more
than individual work, most notably the Go packaging guidelines and tooling. I
think that should be one of the first tasks for the SIG.
I'm not looking to join the SIG, but
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 49/138 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180801.n.0):
ID: 262899 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/262899
ID: 262901 Test: x86_6
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default:
System load changed from 0.28 to 0.44
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/262638#downloads
Current test data: https://openq
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180801.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180802.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 115
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 321.33 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
The real problem here is when you have complex frameworks like gtk.
pkg-config basically will link you against gdk, gdk-pixbuf, gtk and a lot
of other stuff. But in practice, not every application need to link against
all of them.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 6:11 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
> Dominique Mar
Dominique Martinet wrote:
> In practice, `pkg-config --cflags foo` will only fetch cflags for
> dependencies listed in Requires, not Requires.private
pkg-config --cflags foo
fetches cflags of Requires.private items in foo.pc for me.
I've patched many packages to use that feature, and haven't not
Rex Dieter wrote on Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 08:37:34AM -0500:
> > Wearing a lib developer hat, I don't see how you can make a .pc that
> > doesn't overlink if you provide something a bit entangled with other
> > libs.
> > The problem is that if your headers use any sub-lib type you need to add
> > tha
Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote on Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 01:17:29PM +0200:
>> Well, --as-needed is workaround and nothing else. The real problem is
>> mess in makefiles and .pc (pkg-config) files.
>>
>> It would be better to use --as-needed for testing purpose only, and
>> ask maintain
On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 10:49 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you Huzaifa for bringing that up. I have a talk on fedora
> > > and
> > > crypto in flock, and my recommendation will be towards having
> > > some
> > > process to remove old packages from fedora. CVEs were not the
> >
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 2:07 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > Hello devel list,
> >
> > this is a request for comments for a recent proposal I filed at releng
> tracker:
> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7445
> >
> > In short, package managers on
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> Hello devel list,
>
> this is a request for comments for a recent proposal I filed at releng
> tracker:
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7445
>
> In short, package managers on Rawhide would no longer replace $releasever
> variable with a num
Dne 31.7.2018 v 15:04 Kamil Paral napsal(a):
> In short, package managers on Rawhide would no longer replace $releasever
> variable with a numerical value (like '29' at
> this moment, soon '30'), but with 'rawhide' string instead. I hope this
> change will make life a bit easier for
> third-party
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 01:54:21PM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> On 08/01/2018 02:16 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:40:20AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> >> On 07/31/2018 08:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >>> Then, from that list of packages, do we have
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:45:00AM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Wearing a lib developer hat, I don't see how you can make a .pc that
> doesn't overlink if you provide something a bit entangled with other
> libs.
> The problem is that if your headers use any sub-lib type you need to add
> that
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 01:49:13PM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> On 08/01/2018 01:19 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 09:09 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I was asked to bring this issue[1] to the developer community before
> >> FESCO make
Karel Zak wrote on Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 01:17:29PM +0200:
> Well, --as-needed is workaround and nothing else. The real problem is
> mess in makefiles and .pc (pkg-config) files.
>
> It would be better to use --as-needed for testing purpose only, and
> ask maintainers why the result with --as-nee
FPC decided [1] that Java packages must require javapckages-filesystem
instead of javapackages-tools. I've just updated [2] upstream code
generator code to comply with updated packaging guidelines and
backported [3] the patch to rawhide.
[1] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/781
[2] http
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> and even further than that, if
> there is no update (upstream release) for 5 years, the
> package+dependencies is marked for removal as well. Cancelling that
> process would have to go through a fedora committee.
It may be rare but there is such a thing as stable
On 08/01/2018 02:16 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:40:20AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>> On 07/31/2018 08:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Do we have any analysis showing what would be the fallout if we applied
>>> these purge rules today ? ie what pack
On 08/01/2018 01:19 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 09:09 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was asked to bring this issue[1] to the developer community before
>> FESCO makes a decision.
>>
>> In several instances[2] there exists packages in Fedora, in w
On 08/01/2018 01:41 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:33:11AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>> On 07/31/2018 08:33 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
1. If a CRITICAL or IMPORTANT security issue is open against a package
in Fedora-X and by the time X is EOL and the issu
29 matches
Mail list logo
