On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 18:28, Christopher
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:10 PM Alexander Scheel
wrote:
> [snip]
> > The Java SIG is here:
> >
> > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java
>
> Is there anything special one must do to "Join" the Java SIG? I would
> like to join.
No, it
On 7/31/19 4:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 7/31/19 12:05 PM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
And, just to provide another data point, we tried this month to make
the network install iso talk to https dnf repos (a reposync of fedora
devel x86_64, without x86 packages, because we don't have the
Hi.
I get a FTBFS with micropython that I fail to parse.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736114
Does anybody know what this means and how shall I fix this?
May it be a glibc regression?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 2019-07-31 21:35, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"NG" == Neal Gompa writes:
NG> You just set localpkg_gpgcheck=1 in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
NG> That said, you probably don't want to do that, since most downloaded
NG> packages aren't signed...
Cool! I wasn't even aware of this setting. Can we set
> "KK" == Kaleb Keithley writes:
KK> The firewalld packager doesn't seem to know how to add an
KK> ExcludeArch: to the .spec or how to remove the 'Requires: kernel
KK> ...' line.
KK> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733602
KK> Maybe someone with some authority on the subject
On 7/31/19 10:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 7/31/19 4:18 PM, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f0f74bf64a and
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fb3b2a2164 have been
>> stuck in "pending" status for several hours now. Can
Dear all,
The Fedora Infrastructure is planning to retire the infinote [0]
service. This service allows text collaboration using the Gobby
client[1] and was mainly used by the Infrastructure team to coordinate
our weekly meeting and the mass update & reboot of the machines.
The service will be
Dear all,
The Fedora Infrastructure is planning to retire the infinote [0]
service. This service allows text collaboration using the Gobby
client[1] and was mainly used by the Infrastructure team to coordinate
our weekly meeting and the mass update & reboot of the machines.
The service will be
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 03:52, Björn Persson wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >Changes in
> >authentication methods require a lot of dedicated work because it affects
> >all workflows somewhere.. and because it would mean so much downtime.. it
> >has never gotten the resources in time and
I've got a package of Zabbix 4.0.5 going to epel-testing:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/zabbix40-4.0.5-1.el7
feedback appreciated.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane
Le jeudi 01 août 2019 à 14:19 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> On Do, 01.08.19 10:14, Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Since these things are both the case, a simple 1:1 mapping from "-"
> > to
> > "~" (and even back) is exactly correct.
> > So I think the systemd.spec is
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:43 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 7/31/19 12:01 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733602
> >
> > One of the suggestions there is to "drop the arch." I.e. i686.
> >
> > If that ends up being the solution that pretty much would
Hi Matthew,
I have submitted a new package and the details are below.
The main purpose of this daemon is to add FC network intelligence in host
and host intelligence in FC network. This daemon would interoperate with
Brocade FC fabric in order to improve the response time of the MPIO
failovers. In
On Do, 01.08.19 10:14, Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Since these things are both the case, a simple 1:1 mapping from "-" to
> "~" (and even back) is exactly correct.
> So I think the systemd.spec is doing exactly the right thing here.
>
> The only issue I see is the arbitrary
On Do, 01.08.19 05:31, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 4:16 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > So ... prerelease versions are usually tagged with an "-rc1" suffix
> > (or similar), which is a valid value for git tags, but RPM doesn't
> > allow versions to
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 06:31, Phil Wyett wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 11:16 +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Trying to install EPEL 8 on RHEL 8.1 Beta.
> >
> > I did
> >
> > $ yum install
> >
>
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 01:47, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to install EPEL 8 on RHEL 8.1 Beta.
>
> I did
>
> $ yum install
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/e/epel-release-8-1.noarch.rpm
>
> and doing
>
> $ yum update
>
> gives the error
>
> failed
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 6:57 AM Matus Honek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:57 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:45 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenLDAPwithBerkleyDBasModule
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > > Change the
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:57 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:45 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenLDAPwithBerkleyDBasModule
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Change the ''openldap-servers'' package so that BDB and HDB backends
> > are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734372
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 11:16 +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to install EPEL 8 on RHEL 8.1 Beta.
>
> I did
>
> $ yum install
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/e/epel-release-8-1.noarch.rpm
>
> and doing
>
> $ yum update
>
> gives the
Dave Love wrote:
> I forget the details, but libxsmm is something that depends on an
> instruction introduced with SSE3, and is a good example of portable
> performance engineering over a wide range of (x86_64) processors.
According to the documentation, libxsmm actually also supports a
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 05:12:17PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> So that now i686 is no longer exists (I mean as an image), is there
> reason to produce i686 binaries for applications written in Rust? That
> also would mean we would stop testing i686 as a platform for crates,
> but I honestly love
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 4:16 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> So ... prerelease versions are usually tagged with an "-rc1" suffix
> (or similar), which is a valid value for git tags, but RPM doesn't
> allow versions to contain hyphens.
> In RPM versions, prereleases can be tagged with an "~rc1" suffix
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:32:06PM +0530, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote:
> My name is Muneendra Kumar, I’m working for Broadcom . I have been working
> in Linux for more than 15 years and submitted couple of commits to open
> source.
Hi, and welcome! I'm definitely glad to see more open
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:05:01PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Also, when people are running an -rc kernel, some issues are expected.
> In the beginning it wasn't even clear if the change in the kernel will
> be reverted or not.
Well, also -- systemd-networkd isn't the default for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735227
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:14:06AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:48 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mi, 31.07.19 20:52, Fedora Development ML
> > (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> >
> > > Instead, as Lennart explained, systemd has no strong release
>
On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard code the old sematics so that
all packages do the right thing. It seems that python3 equivalents have been
introduced. They do the right thing with the python migration. But there are
things that are expectd to
I've already done some experiments with that. I used multi-stage builds
with podman, but it's the same in principle. And yes, the sizes are
smaller. What was interesting though that some additional packages (ones
that wouldn't appear in the images using the Fedora base image) has been
dragged in
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:48 AM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Mi, 31.07.19 20:52, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
> wrote:
>
> > Instead, as Lennart explained, systemd has no strong release
> > discipline. systemd didn't provide anyone a fixed version (requiring
> >
Thanks all of you who want to join! Welcome!
I'll add you to the team page [1] and follow up with some organisational
stuff — we might want a weekly meeting to sync, etc. I proposed some
communication channels on the team page as well, let me know if that works
for you.
Cheers!
Adam
[1]
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>Changes in
>authentication methods require a lot of dedicated work because it affects
>all workflows somewhere.. and because it would mean so much downtime.. it
>has never gotten the resources in time and engineers to do.
Obviously replacing an authentication protocol
On Mi, 31.07.19 20:52, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
wrote:
> Instead, as Lennart explained, systemd has no strong release
> discipline. systemd didn't provide anyone a fixed version (requiring
> fishing the fix in its git, and wasting integrator time). And when,
>
Le jeudi 01 août 2019 à 00:27 -0700, Samuel Sieb a écrit :
> On 7/31/19 11:41 PM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> > Le mercredi 31 juillet 2019 à 16:10 -0700, Brian C. Lane a écrit :
> > > If so you can pass
> > > inst.noverifyssl to anaconda to tell it to ignore the error but
> > > still
> > >
Le mercredi 31 juillet 2019 à 21:05 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 08:52:36PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> wrote:
> > And when,
> > finally, systemd makes a new release, it does not even use
> > integrator
> > and automation-friendly semver
On 7/31/19 11:41 PM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
Le mercredi 31 juillet 2019 à 16:10 -0700, Brian C. Lane a écrit :
If so you can pass
inst.noverifyssl to anaconda to tell it to ignore the error but still
use https.
Thanks for the suggestion, I had forgotten about it. Is it possible to
Greetings,
My name is Muneendra Kumar, I’m working for Broadcom . I have been working
in Linux for more than 15 years and submitted couple of commits to open
source.
I need to submit a new package in the FEDORA which I am working on which is
completely based on FC(fibre channel).
I've never
Le mercredi 31 juillet 2019 à 16:10 -0700, Brian C. Lane a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:05:21PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> wrote:
> > Le mercredi 31 juillet 2019 à 12:25 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a
> > écrit :
> > > > > > > > "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
> > >
> > > KF> * If you
Le mercredi 31 juillet 2019 à 13:34 -0700, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> On 7/31/19 12:05 PM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> > Le mercredi 31 juillet 2019 à 12:25 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a
> > écrit :
> > > > > > > > "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
> > >
> > > KF> * If you use metalinks, rpm
40 matches
Mail list logo
