On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:57 PM Tom Seewald wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Does zswap actually keep the data compressed when the DRAM-based swap is
> full, and it writes to the spill-over non-volatile swap device?
>
> I'm not an expert on this at all, however my understanding was that zswap
> must dec
Hi Chris,
Does zswap actually keep the data compressed when the DRAM-based swap is full,
and it writes to the spill-over non-volatile swap device?
I'm not an expert on this at all, however my understanding was that zswap must
decompress the data before it writes to the backing swap. But perhap
Zbyszek,
Do you have any advice on how to assess 'swap on ZRAM' versus 'zswap'
by default for Fedora Workstation? They're really too similar from a
user point of view, I think it really comes down to the technical
arguments.
1a. 'swap on ZRAM' compresses only that which goes to the ZRAM device
1b
I just submitted a Bodhi update for varnish-6.0.4-2.fc29, [
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8a85a90af6 |
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8a85a90af6 ]
It fixes a medium risk security update, VSV3 aka CVE-2019-15892. Please
test and add karma.
br,
I
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Wor
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> So... building multilib packages is still very much supported. You cannot
> *run* a pure-i686 environment, but you can 32 bit development.
You have to configure a slow, non-mirrored repository for that instead of
just using the same mirrored URL pattern (with
I want to keep "old" stuff in, because there's no reason to drop the support
for systems that we already support, if we can do so without breaking anything.
On September 18, 2019 7:07:30 PM UTC, "Anderson, Charles R"
wrote:
>So, not only do you want to keep "old" stuff in Fedora (i686), but now
Now that Modularity is available for all Fedora variants, it's time to
address issues discovered and improve the experience for packagers and
users. The Modularity team identified a number of projects that will
improve the usefulness of Modularity and the experience of creating
modules for packager
So, not only do you want to keep "old" stuff in Fedora (i686), but now you want
to revert/remove "new" stuff (modules) too? I'm beginning to think that Fedora
just isn't a good fit for you.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 06:22:52PM +, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
> Removing modules is a potential so
On 9/18/19 1:38 PM, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
Thank you for this link, looks like there's not a lot of issues, and most are
closed.
Don't assume closed = fixed. You'll see some of them are closed due to lack of input
from the reporter and some are closed due to being reported against EOL ver
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 14:32, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
>
> These "obsolete" stacks you refer to can easily coexist with newer software,
> or newer hardware. They currently do, for example. I really don't understand
> why there is so much hostility against anything perceived as being old here.
u2f-hidraw-policy is obsoleted by an upstream systemd change. Thanks to
the systemd people for doing this!
I have asked systemd to obsolete u2f-hidraw-policy in all branches when
they apply the update:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753381
and I'll be retiring u2f-hidraw-policy in
Thank you for this link, looks like there's not a lot of issues, and most are
closed.
On September 18, 2019 4:59:33 PM UTC, Michael Cronenworth
wrote:
>On 9/17/19 7:01 PM, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
>> The thing is, i686 still works. The kernel still builds as well,
>without issue. I
>> have n
These "obsolete" stacks you refer to can easily coexist with newer software, or
newer hardware. They currently do, for example. I really don't understand why
there is so much hostility against anything perceived as being old here.
On September 18, 2019 10:24:31 AM UTC, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szm
Agreed, especially when there is little to no call for such a thing.
For example, Python 2 and Python 3 can and do coexist. i686 builds can coexist
with x86_64 builds.
On September 18, 2019 9:56:49 AM UTC, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
>John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
>> These are generic servers. I can prov
Removing modules is a potential solution to this, as it would simplify package
management.
On September 18, 2019 8:29:49 AM UTC, Petr Pisar wrote:
>On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Error:
>> Problem 1: package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires
>> libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but no
Hey,
Speaking as someone who understands a little bit of all the pieces
involved here, but without claiming to be an expert in anything ...
I would expect Flatpak containers to consume Kerberos in roughly the
same way as Toolbox [1] containers do.
First, the host must be configured to use KCM cr
mcatanz...@gnome.org writes:
> Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
>> Can you link the bug you've filed about this?
>
> I don't even know where to file a bug. Which component? kerberos?
> xdg-desktop-portal?
When filing bugs that you don't know the cause of, it's best to start
with the highest level compone
On 9/17/19 7:01 PM, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
The thing is, i686 still works. The kernel still builds as well, without issue. I
have no idea what the issues that have been mentioned are, and I've kept asking.
Nobody has given me an answer. Nobody has pointed me to an issue, or I'd be
working o
Hi,
thank you for all the testing and comparisons between different
approaches. It looks really interesting.
> The ideal scenario is to get everyone on the same page, and so far it
> looks like systemd's zram-generator, built in Rust, meets all the
> requirements. That needs to be confirmed, but
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019, 11:21 Felipe Borges, wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:07 AM wrote:
> >
> > Hello, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question.
> > Btw, on Fedora 31, in the Online Accounts list there is a "Fedora"
> > voice alongside "Google", "Nextcloud" and so
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:06:21AM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 19:15 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > fork it and make Memdora for low memory systems.
>
> If you make Memdora, then you will also need to think of four values
> that start with M:
>
> Mriends
> Mreedom
>
This is the Minimization Objective [0] update.
Status: Discovery phase
== systemd-sysusers ==
Many packages pull in Systemd because of systemd-sysusers to create new
users. This is fine in traditional setups where there already is Systemd,
but for containers, that means pulling additional 60MB j
Michal Schorm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Q:
> Is it needed to explicitly list (or pack) license (files) of a library
> that a package bundles? [1]
> And if yes, what's the right way to do so?
>
> The built package only contain 1 binary (and it's manpage and license
> file). In this case - when no sourc
On 2019-09-18, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Is it needed to explicitly list (or pack) license (files) of a library
> that a package bundles? [1]
If the bundled library code is part of the binary package, then yes, you
need to list and to package the license.
> And if yes, what's the right way to do so
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-18/minimization.2019-09-18-15.01.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-18/minimization.2019-09-18-15.01.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-18/minimization.2
On 2019-09-18, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hm, did perl get moved to the modular repo? That sounds like it is going
> to cause more issues than solve as it's not a leaf package. Why can't it
> stay as a regular package?
>
Perl is still a regular package and until Fedora allows modules in
a build root
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:43 am, Robbie Harwood
wrote:
Can you link the bug you've filed about this?
I don't even know where to file a bug. Which component? kerberos?
xdg-desktop-portal?
It's seems less like a bug in any Fedora component, rather something
that's never been designed to wor
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 09:15 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 9/17/19 4:04 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> > Since this is a Beta release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or
> > missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the
> > Fedora QA team via the mailing list or i
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 12:11 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 9/18/19 10:29, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is
> > > excluded
> >
> > Funnily DNF finds out that you could actually get that package
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.59 is released.
Currently, just Fedora 31 packages are eligible to be moved into the stable
repository, feel free to
try other waiting distributions in Bodhi.
The release contains new features and bug fixes as well. Among considerable
new features are new commands to
mcatanz...@gnome.org writes:
> Felipe Borges wrote:
>
>> The "Fedora" account is just a branded Kerberos account. By adding a
>> Fedora account in GNOME Online Accounts you would get automatically
>> signed on whenever you'd need to enter your FAS credentials. This
>> means while accessing Pagure
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:34 AM Daniel Walsh wrote:
>
> On 9/17/19 8:04 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >> systemd-sysusers seeks to unify user creation[1]. It also has the
> >> benefit of being able to create users on bootup. But, it pulls
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 19:15 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> fork it and make Memdora for low memory systems.
If you make Memdora, then you will also need to think of four values
that start with M:
Mriends
Mreedom
Mirst
Meatures
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:18 am, Felipe Borges
wrote:
The "Fedora" account is just a branded Kerberos account. By adding a
Fedora account in GNOME Online Accounts you would get automatically
signed on whenever you'd need to enter your FAS credentials. This
means while accessing Pagure, particip
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190917.n.2):
ID: 45 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/45
ID: 453334 Test: x86_64 Serve
OLD: Fedora-31-20190917.n.2
NEW: Fedora-31-20190918.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 131
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 147.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
> Featuritis? Actually, do not see any usefulness in any module.
*any* module ?
Maybe you just haven't met the right use case yet.
I maintain packages of MariaDB and MySQL projects. There's no better
way I can imagine, to develop two version of the packages of the DB,
than modules.
Fedora have Mar
Hi guys,
I am orphaning the git-remote-bzr package. Regarding the repoquery,
there are not any other rpms depending on that package.
Cheers,
--
Petr Stodulka
OS & Application Modernization
IRC nicks: pstodulk, skytak
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
_
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 8:03 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> You also have to pre-build your filesystems to have a place to copy
> the files into at installation time. If you're going to go to that
> much work, why are you bothering with yum? Why not just pre-build and
> install a base operating s
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 13:52 +0200, Sheogorath via devel wrote:
> On 9/18/19 11:18 AM, Felipe Borges wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:07 AM wrote:
> > > Hello, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this
> > > question.
> > > Btw, on Fedora 31, in the Online Accounts list
On 9/18/19 12:11 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 9/18/19 10:29, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is
excluded
Funnily DNF finds out that you could actually get that package satisfied
if you enabled a modula
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:49 AM wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 09:57 -0400, James Cassell wrote:
> > In general, I'd prefer to extend the ks repo command.
> >
> > My main concern is that the original-ks.cfg or anaconda-ks.cfg might
> > no longer provide a complete description of ho
Can you also unretire and build lv2-mdala-plugins?
It is needed for pulseeffects but lv2-mdala-plugins use python2 in
build script and I do not have knowledge how to rewrite it to python3.
I can only add python2 to BR and correct shebang but it seems wrong
because python2 will be erased soon.
--
On 9/18/19 11:18 AM, Felipe Borges wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:07 AM wrote:
>>
>> Hello, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question.
>> Btw, on Fedora 31, in the Online Accounts list there is a "Fedora"
>> voice alongside "Google", "Nextcloud" and so on. What is
Hello,
Q:
Is it needed to explicitly list (or pack) license (files) of a library
that a package bundles? [1]
And if yes, what's the right way to do so?
The built package only contain 1 binary (and it's manpage and license
file). In this case - when no sources are packed - I'd understand that
it i
Hello everyone,
You are invited to attend the Open NeuroFedora team meeting this week
on Thursday at 1500UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode):
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro
You can convert the meeting time to your local time using:
$ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1500 next Thu'
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 31 Branched 20190918.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:56:49AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
> > These are generic servers. I can provide a link to the vendor's website
> > when I get home. It is not Dell, Lenovo or similar, those are currently
> > selling mostly x86_64. Additionally, many users don'
On 9/18/19 10:29, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is
excluded
Funnily DNF finds out that you could actually get that package satisfied
if you enabled a modular Perl. Unfortunatelly DNF does not report
John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
> These are generic servers. I can provide a link to the vendor's website
> when I get home. It is not Dell, Lenovo or similar, those are currently
> selling mostly x86_64. Additionally, many users don't want to buy a new
> computer just because a software project made th
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:21 AM Felipe Borges wrote:
The "Fedora" account is just a branded Kerberos account. By adding a
Fedora account in GNOME Online Accounts you would get automatically
signed on whenever you'd need to enter your FAS credentials.
Love it.
--
Ismael Olea
http://olea.or
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 11:18 +0200, Felipe Borges wrote:
> The "Fedora" account is just a branded Kerberos account. By adding a
> Fedora account in GNOME Online Accounts you would get automatically
> signed on whenever you'd need to enter your FAS credentials. This
> means while accessing Pagure, pa
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:07 AM wrote:
>
> Hello, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question.
> Btw, on Fedora 31, in the Online Accounts list there is a "Fedora"
> voice alongside "Google", "Nextcloud" and so on. What is its purpose?
The "Fedora" account is just a brande
Hello, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question.
Btw, on Fedora 31, in the Online Accounts list there is a "Fedora"
voice alongside "Google", "Nextcloud" and so on. What is its purpose?
Thanks,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@list
Since the pre release version ~b11 (last was ~b08) some files in the
directory "/api/src/main/java/javax/el" no longer contain two licenses
(CDDL and ASL 2.0) but only ASL 2.0. Therefore I am adding ASL 2.0 as an
additional license.
--
Marián Konček
___
The license of python-asgiref has been changed from "BSD" to "BSD and ASL 2.0"
(due to bundling).
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-asgiref/c/cb241f277fdc2f3042dfade0b942df8c6a7acd0f?branch=master
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
Hi James,
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 09:57 -0400, James Cassell wrote:
> In general, I'd prefer to extend the ks repo command.
>
> My main concern is that the original-ks.cfg or anaconda-ks.cfg might
> no longer provide a complete description of how a particular system
> was installed, so it'd like th
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 09:47:49AM +0800, Robin Lee wrote:
> Hi, Richard!
>
> Any plan to push 4.08.1 final to F31?
Unfortunately the scripts I use to do the whole rebuild cannot cope
with updates and overrides, so I can only run them against Rawhide, so
no. I need to rewrite them anyway because
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the explanation. See my comments below.
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 09:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 9/17/19 8:04 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 17. 09. 19 17:00, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > If that is not doable what about taking last Rawhide compose and
> > > mark
> > > t
On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>- package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0), but none of the providers can
On 9/17/19 4:04 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Since this is a Beta release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or
missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the
Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode.
Some not so pleasant results:
# dnf system
Dne 17. 09. 19 v 18:28 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
Branching is not just "oh, make a new compose". There's a ton of
steps/work that happens then, including:
* Making a new branch on all active rpms
* Switching to a new signing key in rawhide.
* New pungi-fedora config, new comps, new kickstarts.
* Se
63 matches
Mail list logo
