Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> To be clear, I am reading every single reply to this thread very
> carefully. We *will* be taking all of this feedback into consideration,
> but please understand that we're also trying to balance things. As Neal
> noted upthread, we do have a responsibility to our downst
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:35 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Randy Barlow wrote:
> > Why have branches at all if you are going to have the file be the same
> > in all branches?
>
> Because the policies require them, and the tooling (fedpkg) is designed for
> them.
>
If I could, I'd drop branches for
Randy Barlow wrote:
> Why have branches at all if you are going to have the file be the same
> in all branches?
Because the policies require them, and the tooling (fedpkg) is designed for
them.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 02:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> No. Resolving conflicts implies that you need to do an actual merge,
>> NOT a fast forward. Fast-forwarding means that I am shipping the SAME
>> commit on all branches, so the changelog must be identical (unless I play
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:49:15PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:45:23AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Just can fyi but at least two packages were missed in the updates:
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2a4f82aa58
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:45:23AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Just can fyi but at least two packages were missed in the updates:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2a4f82aa58
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-80800c5c83
>
> I can rebuild both (I maintain
Hi,
The change proposal submitted here lists the Pi 4 among the supported
devices, whereas the wiki page does not. I checked the
SUPPORTED-BOARDS file in the accompanying documentation of
arm-image-installer and there is no rpi4 in the list of target boards.
Will the the Pi 4 be supported at Fedor
Thank you for clarifications.
It's somewhat disheartening to hear responses that largely boil down to "If
> you can't get it perfectly right, stop trying!".
>
I am sorry if this is what you feel about my comments. I never wanted to
say that you should stop trying if you cannot get it perfectly ri
Hi. I like the idea. Is that really needed? What are the benefits to such a
map?
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, 10:18 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Just a random thought I had but I actually have no idea which
> contributors/packagers are closest to me here in Mississippi, USA.
>
> That got me thinking it wo
hi,
Am 12.10.19 um 22:38 schrieb Silvia Sánchez:
>
> I don't think the Ambassadors map is still working. I opened it but it
> shows only the geography, not Ambassadors or contributors pinpointed.
> I couldn't even see myself.
>
It does work,sort of, but some graphics are missing. The positions a
Hello folks!
I don't think the Ambassadors map is still working. I opened it but it
shows only the geography, not Ambassadors or contributors pinpointed. I
couldn't even see myself.
Regards,
Lailah
On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 01:28, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:59:19PM -0600
Just can fyi but at least two packages were missed in the updates:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2a4f82aa58
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-80800c5c83
I can rebuild both (I maintain hedgewars) but can someone rebuild and push
them directly in?
Thanks,
Ri
OLD: Fedora-31-20191011.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20191012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 3
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20191011.n.0):
ID: 468270 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/468270
ID: 468280 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191011.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 21
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 221.34 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
16 matches
Mail list logo
