[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2020-03-21 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-658581cb5f php-horde-Horde-Form-2.0.20-1.el6 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-81c37f8ff5 tomcat-7.0.100-2.el6 1

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-03-22 - 94% PASS

2020-03-21 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/03/22/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.4-20200322gitd1b746b.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1813197] t/load-slides.t contains a non-free document

2020-03-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813197 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-YAML-1.30-2.fc33 |perl-YAML-1.30-2.fc33

Re: CoC

2020-03-21 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Friday, March 20, 2020 6:09:51 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote: > This thread is off-topic and not in the spirit of our Friends > foundation. Please refrain from further replies. > > -- > Ben Cotton > He / Him / His > Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream > Red Hat >

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

2020-03-21 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/21/20 7:25 PM, Tony Nelson wrote: On 20-03-21 08:45:09, Andreas Tunek wrote: I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved. However, I

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

2020-03-21 Thread Tony Nelson
On 20-03-21 08:45:09, Andreas Tunek wrote: I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved. However, I still have the problem and I wonder

Fedora-IoT-31-20200321.0 compose check report

2020-03-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

2020-03-21 Thread Andreas Tunek
Den lör 21 mars 2020 kl 15:24 skrev Stephen John Smoogen : > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:46 Andreas Tunek > wrote: > >> I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the >> start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some >> kind of bug or some

CPE Weekly: 2020-03-21

2020-03-21 Thread Aoife Moloney
--- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- # CPE Weekly: 2020-03-21 Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep core servers and services running and maintained,

Fedora-IoT-32-20200321.0 compose check report

2020-03-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200320.0): ID: 552562 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Help with cfitsio update in epel6, proven packager needed

2020-03-21 Thread Troy Dawson
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:40 AM Sergio Pascual wrote: > > Hello. I would like to update cfitsio in epel6. The current version here has > longstanding bugs. > > My first question is the correct repoquery command. I'm doing, in a centos 6 > machine, > > repoquery --whatrequires cfitsio

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200321.n.0 changes

2020-03-21 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-32-20200320.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200321.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 11 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 34.83 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Fedora-32-20200321.n.0 compose check report

2020-03-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200320.n.0): ID: 552445 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/552445 ID: 552450 Test: x86_64

Fedora-Rawhide-20200321.n.0 compose check report

2020-03-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 6/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in

[Bug 1814011] perl-Mojolicious-8.35 is available

2020-03-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814011 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mojolicious-8.34 is|perl-Mojolicious-8.35 is

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 21. 03. 20 16:41, Pete Walter wrote: Thanks for asking nicely (instead of demanding like Neal Gompa did ...). Neal actually asked you nicely several times, including the original Buzgilla. It seemed like you were not there, so he rightfully initiated the non-responsive policy. Please

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Pete Walter
21.03.2020, 10:15, "Neal Gompa" : > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote: >>  For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I >> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment. > > In that case, I'd be happy to take on co-maintainership (admin)

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Pete Walter
Sure, I've bumped the access level and please go ahead. Thanks for asking nicely (instead of demanding like Neal Gompa did ...). Pete 21.03.2020, 15:20, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" : > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:02:18AM +, Pete Walter wrote: >>  For months!? This is the first email I get from

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:02:18AM +, Pete Walter wrote: > For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I > am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment. Hi Pete, The infra-sig group has already commit access to pygit2, however, to request a new

Fedora-IoT-33-20200321.0 compose check report

2020-03-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 0.18 to 0.30 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/551996#downloads

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200321.n.0 changes

2020-03-21 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200320.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200321.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 147 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 16.89 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Review swap

2020-03-21 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:39 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I can look at it later today. I'll also check if I have a pending package > review for you :) Thank you, Fabio! This will help me finally get rid of all the broken deps reports for the coq stack. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Re: Review swap

2020-03-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 15:32 Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jerry James wrote: > > I have one more review I would like to swap with somebody. This is > > one of the last 2 packages I need to be able to update the coq stack. > > The other is already under review. Who needs

Re: Review swap

2020-03-21 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jerry James wrote: > I have one more review I would like to swap with somebody. This is > one of the last 2 packages I need to be able to update the coq stack. > The other is already under review. Who needs a review? > > ocaml-ppx-deriving-yojson:

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

2020-03-21 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:46 Andreas Tunek wrote: > I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the > start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some > kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved. > > However, I still have the problem

Slow boot on F32 Workstation

2020-03-21 Thread Andreas Tunek
I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved. However, I still have the problem and I wonder if this a problem unique to my hardware or a

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200321.0 compose check report

2020-03-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote: > > For months!? This is the first email I get from you. > That's really surprising. I had CC'd you on each email requesting for assistance on getting pagure's dependencies into EPEL 8 from December through now, and I filed the bug asking for an

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote: > > For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I > am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment. > In that case, I'd be happy to take on co-maintainership (admin) or even take over the package

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Pete Walter
For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment. Pete 21.03.2020, 08:41, "Neal Gompa" : > Hello all, > > I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now > w.r.t. python-pygit2[0].

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Igor Gnatenko
This would be nice. It is blocking from upgrading tokei and bunch of other Rust-based packages in F31. I am out of time and not willing to do anything related to pushing new libgit2 in F31, so would be happy to assist anybody who will pick this work up. On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:45 AM Fabio

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 09:42 Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hello all, > > I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now > w.r.t. python-pygit2[0]. Unfortunately, he hasn't been responding to > my emails[1][2][3] (he was CC'd to all of those) or the bug I filed > requesting pygit2

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Sqlite RpmDB

2020-03-21 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 3/20/20 9:25 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:06 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: On 3/16/20 6:25 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: I'm glad to *finally* see this happen, so congratulations to the RPM team for finally making this a reality! I look forward to trying this out in Rawhide as

Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

2020-03-21 Thread Neal Gompa
Hello all, I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now w.r.t. python-pygit2[0]. Unfortunately, he hasn't been responding to my emails[1][2][3] (he was CC'd to all of those) or the bug I filed requesting pygit2 for EPEL 8[4]. I've also filed the requisite non-responsive

Re: Pagure for EL8 (EPEL8)

2020-03-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:16 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 05:37:16PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > I've done an early build locally to determine

Re: Help needed to get dependencies in EPEL 8 for pagure

2020-03-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 9:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I've been trying to get Pagure into EPEL 8 for a couple of months now > > so that we can upgrade our Pagure instances to RHEL 8[1]. > > > > Thankfully, most of

Re: Help needed to get dependencies in EPEL 8 for pagure

2020-03-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 9:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I've been trying to get Pagure into EPEL 8 for a couple of months now > > so that we can upgrade our Pagure instances to RHEL 8[1]. > > > > Thankfully, most of

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200321.0 compose check report

2020-03-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to