No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201201.0):
ID: 733694 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Dne 01. 12. 20 v 13:07 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
> I'm pleased to announce that there's a new Mock release. Except for
> several bugfixes, this release introduces a new
> "External Build Requires" feature (by Miroslav Suchý)
I want to ask you for feedback on this feature.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902861
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-a027dc1c6a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902728
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ba9ea7701d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821879
Bug 1821879 depends on bug 1821881, which changed state.
Bug 1821881 Summary: CVE-2013-7488 perl-Convert-ASN1: allows remote attackers
to cause an infinite loop via unexpected input [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821881
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902861
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894917
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6a8efe1256 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:38 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> On 12/1/20 8:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 13:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>> Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
> False
Hi all,
I need a little help. Sagemath packages up through version 9.1
bundled mathjax (several times! with 1 png file for every single
glyph in every single font!), which made the documentation very large.
When I built version 9.2, I attempted to unbundle mathjax, replacing
the relevant
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 18/180 (x86_64), 18/109
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 21:30 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20201201.n.0.
A note: this compose still has the systemd crasher bug. The next
compose should have it fixed.
--
Adam Will
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201130.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201201.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 16
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 226
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 39.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20201201.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 6:01 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2020-12-02 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
>
> The meeting will be about:
> Evaluation meeting
>
> More
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1903205
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1903205
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:18:42PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi ,
> Fedpkg wrote "Create package.cfg to specify build targets to build. "
> , where I can read more about this subject , should I add package.cfg
> to the package ? can package.cfg be in master branch and in Fedora
> branches ?
On 12/1/20 12:05 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This Rawhide build:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56536942
> seems to have failed because of LTO running out of memory on armv7.
> The error is:
>
> lto1: out of memory allocating 104 bytes after a total of 2966994944
On 11/30/20 4:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will
be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed.
If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on your
own,
I kicked off another build with LTO disabled:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56543496
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds
This Rawhide build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56536942
seems to have failed because of LTO running out of memory on armv7.
The error is:
lto1: out of memory allocating 104 bytes after a total of 2966994944 bytes
lto-wrapper: fatal error: gcc returned 1 exit status
On 12/1/20 8:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 01. 12. 20 v 13:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the
(at the time)
Hi ,
Fedpkg wrote "Create package.cfg to specify build targets to build. "
, where I can read more about this subject , should I add package.cfg
to the package ? can package.cfg be in master branch and in Fedora
branches ? etc .
Thank you.
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 12:58, Jon Moroney wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Is there a reason both the el7 and 8 repo rpms are returning 403s? Are
> they expected to return or is there a migration occurring?
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-7.noarch.rpm
>
I think that our PR is ready to merge.
I'm not sure about thg. Are things progressing there?
Adding Mads to CC, so he sees this.
Best regards,
Ondra
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 11/30/20 11:05 PM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 30. 11. 20 18:31, Miro Hrončok
Hey folks! Just sending a heads-up that I orphaned bip (an IRC proxy).
I'm testing out switching to Matrix instead; if that doesn't stick,
I'll probably switch to ZNC for IRC proxying since it seems the much
more popular and maintained option. That's what I'd suggest to any
remaining bip users, if
I am the new volunteer maintainer of the orphaned xalan-c package (Xalan XSLT
processor for C/C++). On 2020-12-08, I plan to submit a build of the new
upstream version, 1.12.0, to Rawhide. Those interested may already inspect the
new spec file in Pagure, and a Koji scratch build is available at
Dne 01. 12. 20 v 13:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the
(at the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1903205
Bug ID: 1903205
Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-6.10.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:41:59PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 1, 2020 1:49:59 PM CET Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, VÃÂt Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
> > > >
> > > > False positive because
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:22:26PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> [I posted to the Fedora Council list, but reposting here for wider
> distribution.]
Looks like Thursday at 4pm US/Eastern works best for most people (Everyone
who responded but @pingou and @davdunc — sorry.)
We’ll meet at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902699
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902861
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6c3985436d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6c3985436d
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902861
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6c3985436d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6c3985436d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hi,
Le 30/11/2020 à 23:06, Tom Stellard a écrit :
If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your
packages on your own, please do so before Dec 14, which is when I will
begin doing the mass update.
php is done.
For all php-*, as they require "php-devel" which requires
On Tuesday, December 1, 2020 1:49:59 PM CET Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, VÃt Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
> > >
> > > False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at
> > > the time) missing make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902861
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com |jples...@redhat.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902861
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
CC|
Dne 30. 11. 20 v 23:06 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
>
> If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on
> your own, please do so before Dec 14, which
> is when I will begin doing the mass update.
python-satyr is false positive as it is EPEL only package
> abrt
On 30.11.2020 23:06, Tom Stellard wrote:
aircrack-ng argyllcms aseman-qt-tools earlyoom foo2zjs ghostwriter git-subrepo
goldendict hashcat ht kiwix-desktop lcms pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications
pidgin-toobars purple-discord purple-hangouts purple-libsteam purple-matrix
purple-skypeweb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902719
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:16:35 -
"Ondra Kalousek" wrote:
> Hello. I want to buy myself Dell XPS 13 9310 (2020). The unit will
> arrive in few weeks, so I used the time to ask this questio. It has a
> fingerprint sensor Goodix 27c6:533c. But official driver is for
> Ubuntu and no RPM. There is
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
> >
> >False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the
> >(at the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages missing
> >BuildRequires: gcc ?
> >
> >
>
> Do I
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, VÃt Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
> >
> > False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at
> > the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages missing
> > BuildRequires: gcc ?
> >
> >
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902719
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902852
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at
the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages missing
BuildRequires: gcc ?
Do I understand correctly, that gcc requires make [0]? Therefore at this
stage, it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902852
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902697
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Have you considered to keep using the "xorg-x11-server-Xwayland" package
name?
Vít
Dne 30. 11. 20 v 20:05 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XwaylandStandalone
== Summary ==
Move Xwayland to a standalone package built from current code upstream
rather than the
On to, 26 marras 2020, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On to, 26 marras 2020, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On ke, 25 marras 2020, Tomáš Popela wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:51 PM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
Screencasting
I'm pleased to announce that there's a new Mock release. Except for
several bugfixes, this release introduces a new
"External Build Requires" feature (by Miroslav Suchý), and the new
`rpkg_preprocess` spec templating plugin (by Michal Novotný).
Feedback/patches welcome! See the upstream release
>
> Consider using https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros and
> generating the buildrequires from pyproject.toml (setuptools_scm is listed
> there).
Thanks, I tried pyproject-rpm-macros, but it seems that using
%generate_buildrequires + %pyproject_buildrequires and then
Hi everyone,
This was a bit of a late announcement. So much I thought we were skipping
the meeting again and I missed it. Too bad, I have a few bugs to discuss.
Hope for next time!
Regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 07:16, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:05:55PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> This change is about moving Xwayland to a separate package from the
> rest of Xorg, built from git snapshots of the current code upstream
> rather than the stable branch.
Sounds like the reasonable thing to do in the situation where
Sorry for the slipup. The issue should be fixed in systemd-247.1-fc34
that was built today.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:45:39PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 21:11 +, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > I wonder how upstream missed this in testing their release candidates. I'm
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902728
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4a49e3b0ab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4a49e3b0ab
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902728
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4a49e3b0ab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4a49e3b0ab
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902728
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:10 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
> If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages
> on your own, please do so before Dec 14, which is when I will begin
> doing the mass update.
Checking packages linked to my name...
pamix: only calls %cmake macros,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:06 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/XwaylandStandalone
>
> == Summary ==
> Move Xwayland to a standalone package built from current code upstream
> rather than the stable branch.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:ofourdan| Olivier Fourdan]],
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902728
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201130.0):
ID: 732930 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
65 matches
Mail list logo
