https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956364
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974093
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974101
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973900
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
NOTE: This is the third meeting we'll have on IRC.LIBERA.CHAT
NOTE2: The version draft is back on the agenda.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-07-01 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 04:21:03PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29 2021 at 11:05:26 PM +0200, Dan Čermák
> wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for this Michel!
>
> Yes, this will reduce packager pain and suffering. Nice!
>
You're welcome :) If affected package owners want to help, I'm happy
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:26 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 30/06/2021 14:44, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > Setting up an independent non-profit, and maintaining it's non-profit
> > status is a quite involved activity. (details depend on the country,
> > of course!)
>
> If Flathub want to be
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:57:18PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 5:43:10 AM EDT Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > >radamsa huzaifas, mrniranjan
> > > >Fedora 32>
> > > Has no bugzillas, the mass rebuilds builds never finished
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> > * There is a fedora-third-party package with a
> > fedora-third-party script with
> > enable/disable/refresh/query subcommands. The status is
> > stored in /etc/fedora-third-party.conf
> > * Packages like
LAPACK & BLAS are going to 3.10.0 in rawhide. The sover on the shared libs
is still at .3, so it _should_ not break anything, but there is a history
of this not always being true.
Please file bugs if things stop building against LAPACK/BLAS.
Thanks,
~spot
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 04:25:13PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
>
> == Summary ==
> Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's
> [https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints
> memory-constraints]), for
On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 5:43:10 AM EDT Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >radamsa huzaifas, mrniranjan
> > >Fedora 32>
> > Has no bugzillas, the mass rebuilds builds never finished (they hang for
> > days)
>
> It'd be sad to lose radamsa from the
On 16/06/2021 11:17, Florian Weimer wrote:
glibc-2.33.9000-18.fc35 with the first set of changes has been tagged
into Fedora rawhide.
Please take a look at this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977878
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 30/06/2021 16:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
But ... do we have here someone willing to do packaging and maintenance
of package in Fedora/EPEL for money? Will anyone be interested in such
list of people available for hire?
Looks interesting. But who will pay for this job?
--
Sincerely,
On 6/30/21 2:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
In the scenario I'm discussing, we would take those final PackageA and
PackageB from Fedora and have them in the buildroot for the ELN
builds. That would mean that the bootstrap step wouldn't be needed. If
there's a case you know of that this won't
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Gconv_package_split_in_glibc
== Summary ==
Most Gconv modules with the exception of unicode and similar essential
ones have been split into a separate package called glibc-gconv-extra.
Currently, the core package glibc has a strong (Requires) dependency
on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Gconv_package_split_in_glibc
== Summary ==
Most Gconv modules with the exception of unicode and similar essential
ones have been split into a separate package called glibc-gconv-extra.
Currently, the core package glibc has a strong (Requires) dependency
on
Dne 30. 06. 21 v 15:54 Justin Lamp napsal(a):
want to request a new package to be added to the fedora repos.
Actually... I wonder... Do we have packager(s) available for hire here? I know
that we have Package maintainers wishlist:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853802
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-639b8bfb6e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803711
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-639b8bfb6e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853802
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from
Dne 30. 06. 21 v 15:54 Justin Lamp napsal(a):
Hey there,
I hope I am at the right place: I want to request a new package to be added to
the fedora repos.
I'd like kubectx kubens to be added. They are really nice Kubernetes tools to
change the cluster or the namespace respectively.
The source
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:11:38AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
Dne 30. 06. 21 v 15:04 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
In unrelated news, what happened to the -ow...@fedoraproject.org
email addresses? They seem to be bouncing for me.
Please see the "package maintainer email aliases, now with more epel"
email from Kevin. The -owner alias was deprecated
Hey there,
I hope I am at the right place: I want to request a new package to be added to
the fedora repos.
I'd like kubectx kubens to be added. They are really nice Kubernetes tools to
change the cluster or the namespace respectively.
The source can be found under kubectx.dev.
Thank you!
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 02:03:22PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > > Our definition of source-git is:
> > > * upstream release tarball
> > > * downstream code changes applied as patches during %prep
> > > * additional
On 30/06/2021 14:44, Owen Taylor wrote:
Setting up an independent non-profit, and maintaining it's non-profit
status is a quite involved activity. (details depend on the country,
of course!)
If Flathub want to be a trustworthy repository, it should be done.
Hopefully this
provides some
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 03:48:54PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > > On
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (August
2021).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages
On 30/06/2021 14:30, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Well that's required for anything not present in the runtime.
That's why I prefer classic RPM packages over Flatpaks.
I use Flatpaks only for proprietary software like Steam (with a lot of
permission hardening overrides).
I believe hardening
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It seems to affect only qemu for some reason.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975693#c13
So it's a genuine bug: if you are using glibc from Rawhide and
seccomp, and your seccomp rules are blocking the
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:44 AM Ian McInerney wrote:
>> Roughly speaking, the criteria for including software is a) will not
>> cause legal or other problems for Fedora to point to b) does not
>> overlap Fedora Flatpaks or software in Fedora that could easily be
>> made into a Flatpak c) works
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:42 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 29/06/2021 22:25, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Enabling third-party repositories will now create a Flathub remote
> > that is a filtered view of Flathub.
>
> I don't trust Flathub at all, because they don't want to register a
>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 2:31 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> I believe hardening flags are added in by flatpak-builder. I think they
> somehow come from the runtime, though I'm not sure exactly how.
> (Anybody know?)
>
Yes: there's a flatpak-builder config file in
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 02:09:19PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 30. 06. 21 v 13:52 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >For packaged stuff, please do:
> >
> > s|/etc/fedora-third-party.conf|/usr/lib/fedora-third-party.conf|
> >
> >We shouldn't add yet more stuff in/etc/.
>
> I guess
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 2:34 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On 6/28/21 5:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> > the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> > rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback
On 30. 06. 21 14:21, Miro Hrončok wrote:
If you see the following error in a Rawhide mock build:
...
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WFxggi: line 65: /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink: No
such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from
On 30. 06. 21 14:21, Miro Hrončok wrote:
If you see the following error in a Rawhide mock build:
...
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WFxggi: line 65: /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink: No
such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:59 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Would these rawhide builds go out in ELN composes?
> Or would you block composes until you had only eln rpms in it?
They would go out in the composes until they are successfully rebuilt.
This is to ensure that Content Resolver continues to
Randy, thank you for providing such detailed information! A few comments
inline.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:01 AM Randy Barlow via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 15:36 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > On the "uni-repo" counter proposal: there's a bunch of
It seems to affect only qemu for some reason.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975693#c13
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual
On Wed, Jun 30 2021 at 12:41:17 PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
They
bundle lots of libraries,
Well that's required for anything not present in the runtime.
don't use C/C++ build hardening flags, etc.
I believe hardening flags are added in by flatpak-builder. I think they
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:59 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021, at 4:25 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's
> >
If you see the following error in a Rawhide mock build:
...
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WFxggi: line 65: /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink: No
such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WFxggi (%install)
Update your mock chroot
If you see the following error in a Rawhide mock build:
...
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WFxggi: line 65: /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink: No
such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WFxggi (%install)
Update your mock chroot
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 8:09 AM Ian McInerney wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:43 AM Ian McInerney
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
Dne 30. 06. 21 v 13:52 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
For packaged stuff, please do:
s|/etc/fedora-third-party.conf|/usr/lib/fedora-third-party.conf|
We shouldn't add yet more stuff in/etc/.
I guess that /usr/lib is typo and you meant /var/lib/
Miroslav
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:43 AM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications
> >>
> >> == Summary ==
> >> Enabling third-party
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> > Our definition of source-git is:
> > * upstream release tarball
> > * downstream code changes applied as patches during %prep
> > * additional configs for sake of building and testing
>
> But that describes dist-git
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021, at 4:25 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
>
> == Summary ==
> Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's
> [https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints
> memory-constraints]), for optionally
> == Technical implementation ==
>
> * There is a fedora-third-party package with a
> fedora-third-party script with
> enable/disable/refresh/query subcommands. The status is
> stored in /etc/fedora-third-party.conf
> * Packages like fedora-workstation-repositories that
> include third-party
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:50 AM Lars Seipel wrote:
> >[Find out
> >more...](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_Party_Software_Repositories)
> >* If the user leaves the box checked, GNOME Initial setup runs
> >`fedora-third-party enable`.
>
> Leaves the box checked? Either I'm
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:43 AM Ian McInerney wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> Enabling third-party repositories will now create a Flathub remote
>> that is a filtered
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications
>
> == Summary ==
> Enabling third-party repositories will now create a Flathub remote
> that is a filtered view of Flathub.
>
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> 'Note that
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:46:59PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 30. 06. 21 v 12:29 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >The OP talks exclusively about "RAM". And I think RAM is what we need
>
> From:
>
>
Hi folks,
One of our NeuroFedora packages has added a new dep in its new version,
which FTBFS as a result. Would someone like to swap reviews please?
1976640 – Review Request: python-lfpykit - Electrostatic models for
multicompartment neuron models
On 30/06/2021 12:57, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Similar situation as with the Fedora Project, I must say.
Yes. Fedora's infra belongs to Red Hat, Inc.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
On 30. 06. 21 12:41, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
I don't trust Flathub at all, because they don't want to register a non-profit
organization. They can easily sell their business like FreeNode did recently.
Similar situation as with the Fedora Project, I must say.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone:
Dne 29. 06. 21 v 22:24 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
''Note that this proposal is about a change to how third-party
repositories are enabled, not about including anything new in
Fedora.'
I completely missed the "Third party repos" thing. I had to google it. To save
you some time:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 04:24:58PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
* We add a new page to GNOME Initial Setup that asks a single
question, *along the lines of*:
'''Enable Third Party Software repositories?'''
☑ Access additional software from selected third party sources. Some
of this software is
Dne 30. 06. 21 v 12:29 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
The OP talks exclusively about "RAM". And I think RAM is what we need
From:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints/memory-constraints.macros?expand=1
max_swapmem=$(awk '/SwapTotal/ { print
Hello,
License changed from "MIT" to "ASL 2.0" for rubygem-websocket-driver package.
Pavel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 29/06/2021 22:25, Ben Cotton wrote:
Enabling third-party repositories will now create a Flathub remote
that is a filtered view of Flathub.
I don't trust Flathub at all, because they don't want to register a
non-profit organization. They can easily sell their business like
FreeNode did
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977713
Bug ID: 1977713
Summary: perl-Data-Dumper-2.182 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-Dumper
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:08:44PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 29. 06. 21 v 22:25 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> >When this proposal is implemented, they can instead declaratively
> >specify the amount of RAM needed per build thread, e.g.
> >
> > %limit_build -m 8192
> >
> >for declaring a build
Dne 29. 06. 21 v 22:25 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
When this proposal is implemented, they can instead declaratively
specify the amount of RAM needed per build thread, e.g.
%limit_build -m 8192
for declaring a build thread should be allocated 8GB of RAM.
Do I understand it correctly that
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 3:38 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> * Can you imagine maintaining Fedora's 30k+ packages in a single repo?
> Without some git-fetch magic it would be unbearable to perform a
> git-pull.
I cannot imagine *not* doing this, maintaining a distro
and preserving any sanity in the
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 01:36:40AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 30. 06. 21 1:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >Dear maintainers.
> >
> >Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> >will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before
> >branching (August
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210629.0):
ID: 919343 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 04:25:13PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
>
> == Summary ==
> Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's
> [https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints
> memory-constraints]), for
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 03:48:54PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 24. 06. 21
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:57:46PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/firewalld-1.0.0
>
> == Summary ==
> Firewalld upstream is about to release v1.0.0. As indicated by the
> major version bump this includes behavioral changes.
A major new version sounds good… New
This is a super update report, thanks for sharing
CPE have activated an open source license for Gitlab to trial out some of
the workflows and features. This is their top level SaaS offering which
they grant to all open source projects so it has all the features we would
need for testing.
Stephen
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4819
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, Identity and Access Management
SUSE Labs, Australia
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
It seems working on aarch64 version of Fedora 32 and 33 which lacks usd
dependency.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/luya/blender-egl/build/2305553/
Maybe usd needs some trimming.
On 2021-06-24 10:04 a.m., Benjamin Beasley wrote:
The “pyconfig.h” header lives in a
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210629.0):
ID: 919327 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977590
Bug ID: 1977590
Summary: perl-Inline-Python-0.56-16.fc35 FTBFS: all tests fail:
Parse errors: Bad plan
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
For context:
https://groups.google.com/g/golang-dev/c/hGwvCceDr14/m/wbyNWwgNBgAJ
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:02 PM Alejandro Sáez Morollón wrote:
>
> According to upstream, they are not going to deprecate GOPATH yet in this
> version.
>
> I built etcd with 1.17beta1 and everything went fine.
>
>
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/06/30/report-389-ds-base-2.0.6-20210630git6b10f1795.fc34.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
80 matches
Mail list logo
