On 8/2/21 8:38 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm trying to fix vigra to work with OpenEXR 3 via the CONFIG method.
In the OpenEXR config it has a "find_dependency(Threads REQUIRED)" and there's no
complaint, but then building fails[1] with no such library as "Threads::Threads" which
means it's not
I'm trying to fix vigra to work with OpenEXR 3 via the CONFIG method.
In the OpenEXR config it has a "find_dependency(Threads REQUIRED)" and
there's no complaint, but then building fails[1] with no such library as
"Threads::Threads" which means it's not getting translated into the library
name,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-14b73e38cb has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-878dadd90d has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-a289b57cd0 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:57:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 08. 21 2:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import
> > > to EPEL8 and EPEL7:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986640
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986347
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:35 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> In the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997), the
> fact that our FontAwesome font packages are on version 4.x came up.
> That new package needs version 5.x. I tried to make it
Hi all,
I am rebasing nlohmann_json from 3.3.1 to 3.6.1 in epel7 to agree with the
version in epel8. This change is necessary for supporting a new epel7 package
jsonnet.
Bodhi update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b95dc99fad
Assuming no issues or objections I will
On 03. 08. 21 2:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import
to EPEL8 and EPEL7:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
Under the File menu in Konversation is "Server List". Select that, and there will be a
"New" button in the upper right. For the Network name put in irc.libera.chat and then
click the Add button in the middle of the dialog. You'll get a new dialog. Enter irc.libera.chat
for the Server and
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import
> to EPEL8 and EPEL7:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
>
Hello,
I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import to
EPEL8 and EPEL7:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/32
So far, there has been no response. Is there anybody
Hello,
python-nose is deprecated in Fedora since F32:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose
The following nose plugins appear unused in Fedora:
python-django-nose
python-nose-exclude
python-nose-progressive
python-nose-testconfig
python-nose_fixes
Should we retire them?
--
On 8/2/21 2:35 PM, Jerry James wrote:
In the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997), the
fact that our FontAwesome font packages are on version 4.x came up.
That new package needs version 5.x. I tried to make it work with 4.x
... no
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4856
--
Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:11 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > I think at this stage it may be safer to defer to F36, and land OpenSSL
> > 3.0 in rawhide right after F35 forks out.
> >
>
> I'm generally in agreement here; I think it's too
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:11 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> I think at this stage it may be safer to defer to F36, and land OpenSSL
> 3.0 in rawhide right after F35 forks out.
>
I'm generally in agreement here; I think it's too much risk too late
in the cycle. Could you re-propose the Change for F36?
In the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997), the
fact that our FontAwesome font packages are on version 4.x came up.
That new package needs version 5.x. I tried to make it work with 4.x
... no luck.
I do not want to take over the
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/43 (x86_64)
ID: 939827 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939827
ID: 939838 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939838
Soft
Hello all!
I still don't understand how to add the server. None of the links explains
it.
I don't use IRC except for these meetings. I do use Konversation, I'm on
KDE, but I don't know how to set it up to use the new server and channels.
I'm sorry!
Kind regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah
On Mon,
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4855
--
Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:21 AM Silvia Sánchez wrote:
>
>
> I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel. Can anyone give me a guide
> for dumbs about how to join it in IRC?
> Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience!
It's not a channel. It's a completely separate set of servers.
In the Liber.chat webpage you can find all the information to select
and IRC program and how to join to a channel
How to choose and IRC client
https://libera.chat/guides/clients
Guides:
https://libera.chat/guides
after that:
Connect by pointing your IRC client to irc.libera.chat:6697 (TLS)
Check out this page for instructions: https://libera.chat/guides/connect
I used the KDE konversation app and it worked fine.
Steve
On 8/2/21 1:21 PM, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel. Can anyone give me a guide
for dumbs about how to join it in
I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel. Can anyone give me a
guide for dumbs about how to join it in IRC?
Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience!
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 at 02:26, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2021-08-02
> # Time:
Hi,
I don't have any use for rubygem-hashie package, therefore I orphaned it.
Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989200
Bug ID: 1989200
Summary: perl-Log-Any-1.710 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Log-Any
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:28:07PM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Currently, we are trying to stay away from the compat package and with the
> help of other package maintainers trying to fix the failures. We will give
> time to react accordingly and see other possible steps in a few weeks time.
>
>
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA tests: 14/139
I think at this stage it may be safer to defer to F36, and land OpenSSL
3.0 in rawhide right after F35 forks out.
Simo.
On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 15:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Sahana, Ben, other Fedorans,
>
> We have an accepted change proposal to include OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35:
>
>
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 10:31 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > For reasons that are unclear to me, it seems that all the work for
> > this feature happened in CentOS Stream 9 development[1] instead of
> > Rawhide.
>
> OpenSSL developers were under the impression that the Alpha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989155
Bug ID: 1989155
Summary: perl-Software-License-0.104001 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Software-License
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989153
Bug ID: 1989153
Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.078 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
* Neal Gompa:
> For reasons that are unclear to me, it seems that all the work for
> this feature happened in CentOS Stream 9 development[1] instead of
> Rawhide.
OpenSSL developers were under the impression that the Alpha snapshots
could not be imported into rawhide for policy reasons. And in
Le 30/07/2021 à 09:00, Remi Collet a écrit :
Hi,
https://www.horde.org/
The horde stack is a huge set of >100 packages
Lot of them are FTBFS as not ready for PHP 9
The project is not very active, and their seems to
be a major rewrite, with namespace, and using composer.
The project is still
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988711
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988813
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Linux-Inotify2` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Linux-Inotify2/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 9:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello Sahana, Ben, other Fedorans,
>
> We have an accepted change proposal to include OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35:
>
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenSSL3.0
>
> The contingency deadline is "Before release" which is not very
Hello Sahana, Ben, other Fedorans,
We have an accepted change proposal to include OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenSSL3.0
The contingency deadline is "Before release" which is not very specific.
At this point, we are not yet on OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210731.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210802.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 168
Downgraded packages: 3
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:208.83
On 02/08/2021 08:56, Chris Murphy wrote:
Does this apply to the current 5.31 beta? I guess it's also a bit
beside the point, because any modern Intel and AMD processor also has
UEFI firmware. In order to enable the legacy/CSM you have to disable
UEFI Secure Boot which... it's not good to advise
On 02/08/2021 14:34, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
The memtest86+, included in the Fedora install media works. AMD Ryzen 9
5900X here, with 128 GB RAM. Unfortunately, it was recently removed from
the install media.
Intel Core i7 10700 - hangs on start in legacy mode even from the Fedora
LiveUSB.
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Linux-Inotify2`
that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Linux-Inotify2/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 8/2/21 9:15 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 02/08/2021 04:04, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm definitely not attached to keeping things the same. The bios
memtest86+ is still these days installed to /boot but there hasn't
been a menu entry for it for a very long time; in fact maybe it was
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 9:53 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade <
quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 21:12, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > I can see my commit in the log but it's not actually "there":
> >
> > commit 49efbd8bc23b44e5bdf417a96ef174c31ccca359 (HEAD -> rawhide,
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988711
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-14b73e38cb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-14b73e38cb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-experimental-0.025-1.f
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210731.0):
ID: 939135 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986640
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8a4511c414 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8a4511c414
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hi all.
SCons will be updated in Rawhide to the release 4.2.0 in a week.
If you need to test it, use these rpms:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/2356678/
SCons-4.2.0 release notes:
https://github.com/SCons/scons/blob/rel_4.2.0/CHANGES.txt
Regards.
--
---
Hello,
if you run some scripts that query bugzilla,
beware that the results are now paginated.
If you would get more than 1000 bugs, you'll only get the first 1000. This
might lead to surprises, such as duplicate automated bugzillas opened.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986640
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PDF-API2-2.041-1.fc35
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986347
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-d338a8500f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d338a8500f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hi,
On 7/26/21 10:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 18:06, Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag
"f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in
it and I will ask to merge it to main
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986347
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Archive-Tar` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Archive-Tar/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 09:50 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> As the %_vpath_builddir macro is what you're supposed to use _anyway_
> when monkeying around with build directories with CMake and Meson...
Hi,
that fixed it. Thanks for the hint. I did not find it myself, possibly
due to using a
There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm cancelling the meeting.
I'll chair the next one.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2651 F35 Change: Enhanced Inscript as default Indic IM
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2651
APPROVED (+5,0,-0)
___
devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986640
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Archive-Tar` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Archive-Tar/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 2nd
August (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The meeting
is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us
over:
IRC:
https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neuro
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210801.0):
ID: 939006 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi
On 27.07.21 22:50, Major Hayden wrote:
python-azure-appconfiguration (required SDK component)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981573
python-azure-devtools (for testing the Azure CLI/SDK)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986414
python-azure-mgmt-insights
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986347
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985865
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 12:15 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 02/08/2021 04:04, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I'm definitely not attached to keeping things the same. The bios
> > memtest86+ is still these days installed to /boot but there hasn't
> > been a menu entry for it for a very long
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-a289b57cd0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a289b57cd0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-3053418b23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3053418b23
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
I have just retired python-pyinsane2; it has been archived by upstream
in favour of its replacement libinsane. I believe all users in Fedora
have also moved on to using libinsane as well. Since tests have
broken, it is also FTBFS in Rawhide, and I don't intend to invest any
time into fixing it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jose.p.oliveira.oss@gmail.c |
|om,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-c4f27aedfd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c4f27aedfd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-878dadd90d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-878dadd90d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
On 02/08/2021 04:04, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm definitely not attached to keeping things the same. The bios
memtest86+ is still these days installed to /boot but there hasn't
been a menu entry for it for a very long time; in fact maybe it was
only ever on netintall or dvd images? I can't remember
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
86 matches
Mail list logo
