date:20210802

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-14b73e38cb has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-14b73e38cb`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-14b73e38cb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985399] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210722 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-878dadd90d has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-878dadd90d`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-878dadd90d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985448] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210723 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-a289b57cd0 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-a289b57cd0`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a289b57cd0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL8 and EPEL7: Introduce %py3_check_import - review needed

2021-08-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:57:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 08. 21 2:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import
> > > to EPEL8 and EPEL7:
> > > 
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/32
> > > 
> > > So far, there has been no response. Is there anybody willing to merge 
> > > them?
> > > They are manually tested, as indicated in the comments.
> > > 
> > > When we introduce new macros to Fedora, I strive to backport them to EPELs
> > > if possible, so package maintainers don't need to think "may I use this?" 
> > > if
> > > they desire EPEL compatibility. However, I don't want to merge my own pull
> > > requests to epel-rpm-macros (unless they are urgent bug fixes).
> > 
> > I can merge them...
> 
> Thank you! Both updates now exist:
> 
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dfd462a782
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e3b1cc2b6e

I deliberately didn't do the epel8 build because I wanted to wait for:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/33
to get rebased, but ok. ;) 

> > > A meta question: Should the epel-sig group co-maintain the package?
> > 
> > They could if desired.
> 
> I think it is desired. Why wouldn't it be?

Beats me. I don't want to speak for the epel-sig without the folks in it
speaking up first. :) 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1988415] perl-experimental-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-4bd90f66be has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-4bd90f66be`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4bd90f66be

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1986640] perl-PDF-API2-2.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986640

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-8a4511c414 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-8a4511c414`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8a4511c414

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1986347] perl-Archive-Tar-2.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986347

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-d338a8500f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-d338a8500f`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d338a8500f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985399] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210722 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-c4f27aedfd has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-c4f27aedfd`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c4f27aedfd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985448] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210723 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-3053418b23 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2021-3053418b23`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3053418b23

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Font Awesome version 5

2021-08-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:35 PM Jerry James  wrote:
>
> In the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997), the
> fact that our FontAwesome font packages are on version 4.x came up.
> That new package needs version 5.x.  I tried to make it work with 4.x
> ... no luck.
>
> I do not want to take over the existing fontawesome-fonts package, nor
> do I want to be involved in porting anything from version 4.x to
> version 5.x.  I am willing, however, to maintain a
> parallel-installable version 5.x of the fonts, so that applications
> can migrate on their own schedules (with an eye to eventually
> deprecating and/or removing the existing package).  I have filed a
> review request:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300

How sensible! This is how packages should be named, consistently and
simply. Unfortunately, the package does not match the name of the
tarball, nor of the tarballs over at pypi.org. Why not simply use the
pypi.org tarall name of "fontawesomefree" ?

> It uses the name fontawesome-free-fonts for two reasons:
> - To be different from the existing package name for parallel
> installability; and
> - To distinguish the Fedora package from the Pro version of the fonts.

What are the "Pro" versions called, or what is their tarball called?


> I have two misgivings about this package and would appreciate some
> input from the community on these points.
> 1. Does the name rationale make sense?
> 2. Do we actually need the web subpackage?  The font guidelines say
> NOT to package svg, woff, etc. versions of a font because modern
> browsers can read the otf versions.  On the other hand, the web
> subpackage also contains JavaScript versions of the fonts (which
> cannot be built from source using only Fedora packages, alas!).  On
> the gripping hand, the existing package has a web subpackage, and it
> seems to be used (by 8 packages).
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Rebasing nlohmann_json to 3.6.1 in EPEL7

2021-08-02 Thread Kyle Knoepfel

Hi all,

I am rebasing nlohmann_json from 3.3.1 to 3.6.1 in epel7 to agree with the 
version in epel8. This change is necessary for supporting a new epel7 package 
jsonnet.

Bodhi update: 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b95dc99fad

Assuming no issues or objections I will push it in to the stable when possible.

Thanks,
Kyle
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL8 and EPEL7: Introduce %py3_check_import - review needed


On 03. 08. 21 2:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:

Hello,

I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import
to EPEL8 and EPEL7:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/32

So far, there has been no response. Is there anybody willing to merge them?
They are manually tested, as indicated in the comments.

When we introduce new macros to Fedora, I strive to backport them to EPELs
if possible, so package maintainers don't need to think "may I use this?" if
they desire EPEL compatibility. However, I don't want to merge my own pull
requests to epel-rpm-macros (unless they are urgent bug fixes).


I can merge them...


Thank you! Both updates now exist:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dfd462a782
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e3b1cc2b6e


A meta question: Should the epel-sig group co-maintain the package?


They could if desired.


I think it is desired. Why wouldn't it be?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2021-08-02 Thread Steven A. Falco

Under the File menu in Konversation is "Server List". Select that, and there will be a
"New" button in the upper right. For the Network name put in irc.libera.chat and then
click the Add button in the middle of the dialog. You'll get a new dialog. Enter irc.libera.chat
for the Server and set the port to 6697. Select Secure Connection and Use global proxy. You can
leave the password blank at this point. Connect to the server.

Once you have that much working, you can select a nick. Type:

/nick whatever_nick_you_want_to_use

Then you can register the nick to protect it from being claimed by someone else:

/msg NickServ REGISTER your_desired_password your_email_address@where_ever.com

You will get an email at your_email_address@where_ever.com and can then enter
the command it tells you to enter. That will complete the basic setup.

You may also want to set up for SASL, which will help you avoid entering your
password over and over. The instructions are here:

https://libera.chat/guides/sasl

Steve

On 8/2/21 3:53 PM, Silvia Sánchez wrote:

Hello all!

I still don't understand how to add the server. None of the links explains it.
I don't use IRC except for these meetings. I do use Konversation, I'm on KDE,
but I don't know how to set it up to use the new server and channels.
I'm sorry!

Kind regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah

On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 at 21:15, Chris Murphy mailto:li...@colorremedies.com>> wrote:

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:21 AM Silvia Sánchez mailto:bhkoh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel. Can anyone give me a
guide for dumbs about how to join it in IRC?
> Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience!

It's not a channel. It's a completely separate set of servers. We were
on irc.freenode.net and now we're on
irc.libera.chat - the channel
names are still the same. You will need to register your nick with
libera.chat.

--
Chris Murphy

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL8 and EPEL7: Introduce %py3_check_import - review needed

2021-08-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import
> to EPEL8 and EPEL7:
> 
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/32
> 
> So far, there has been no response. Is there anybody willing to merge them?
> They are manually tested, as indicated in the comments.
> 
> When we introduce new macros to Fedora, I strive to backport them to EPELs
> if possible, so package maintainers don't need to think "may I use this?" if
> they desire EPEL compatibility. However, I don't want to merge my own pull
> requests to epel-rpm-macros (unless they are urgent bug fixes).

I can merge them... I just didn't notice them somehow. I guess because
they were while I was on PTO and I missed them when catching up. 

Usually a ping in PR would let me know about them... 

> A meta question: Should the epel-sig group co-maintain the package?

They could if desired. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] EPEL8 and EPEL7: Introduce %py3_check_import - review needed


Hello,

I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import to 
EPEL8 and EPEL7:


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/32

So far, there has been no response. Is there anybody willing to merge them? 
They are manually tested, as indicated in the comments.


When we introduce new macros to Fedora, I strive to backport them to EPELs if 
possible, so package maintainers don't need to think "may I use this?" if they 
desire EPEL compatibility. However, I don't want to merge my own pull requests 
to epel-rpm-macros (unless they are urgent bug fixes).


A meta question: Should the epel-sig group co-maintain the package?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Retire unused nose plugins?


Hello,

python-nose is deprecated in Fedora since F32:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose

The following nose plugins appear unused in Fedora:

python-django-nose
python-nose-exclude
python-nose-progressive
python-nose-testconfig
python-nose_fixes

Should we retire them?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Font Awesome version 5

2021-08-02 Thread Aleksei Bavshin


On 8/2/21 2:35 PM, Jerry James wrote:

In the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997), the
fact that our FontAwesome font packages are on version 4.x came up.
That new package needs version 5.x.  I tried to make it work with 4.x
... no luck.

I do not want to take over the existing fontawesome-fonts package, nor
do I want to be involved in porting anything from version 4.x to
version 5.x.  I am willing, however, to maintain a
parallel-installable version 5.x of the fonts, so that applications
can migrate on their own schedules (with an eye to eventually
deprecating and/or removing the existing package).


Thanks for doing this!


4 and 5 (and 6) are not backward compatible. Glyphs are missing, 
replaced, changed codepoints, etc... Not all things could be ported and 
I don't believe we'll ever get rid of 4.




Good thing is that _some_ of the packages with `Requires: 
fontawesome-fonts` already require v5 and work with v4 only partially.



Not so good thing is that someone need to go through about 30 packages 
and update dependencies to `font(fontawesome)` and 
`font(fontawesome5free)`. I started looking at the packages last month, 
but got distracted with work and never finished. Can return to that in a 
couple of weeks.



I have filed a review request:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300

It uses the name fontawesome-free-fonts for two reasons:
- To be different from the existing package name for parallel
installability; and
- To distinguish the Fedora package from the Pro version of the fonts.


One potentially confusing thing is that FA5 consists of two fonts: Font 
Awesome 5 Free and Font Awesome 5 Brands. fa-free-fonts could be 
interpreted as containing only the former one.
Another is the whole parallel-installable thing and a need to guess 
which package is 4 or 5 (and 6 in a not-so-distant future).


I'd suggest fontawesome5-fonts, or at least something with explicit 
version in the package name.



I have two misgivings about this package and would appreciate some
input from the community on these points.
1. Does the name rationale make sense?
2. Do we actually need the web subpackage?  The font guidelines say
NOT to package svg, woff, etc. versions of a font because modern
browsers can read the otf versions.  On the other hand, the web
subpackage also contains JavaScript versions of the fonts (which
cannot be built from source using only Fedora packages, alas!).  On
the gripping hand, the existing package has a web subpackage, and it
seems to be used (by 8 packages).

Thanks!



--
With best regards,
Aleksei Bavshin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[389-devel] please review: PR 4856 -CLI - Errors from certutil are not propagated

2021-08-02 Thread Mark Reynolds


https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4856

--
Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

2021-08-02 Thread Neal Gompa

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Stephen Gallagher  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:11 AM Simo Sorce  wrote:
> >
> > I think at this stage it may be safer to defer to F36, and land OpenSSL
> > 3.0 in rawhide right after F35 forks out.
> >
>
> I'm generally in agreement here; I think it's too much risk too late
> in the cycle. Could you re-propose the Change for F36?

I'm not sure I agree, but the Change owners can request the proposal
to be deferred to F36, which I *personally* would accept if
they intended to import OpenSSL 3.0 into Rawhide *right* after
branching. No more delaying it since it's clearly being done in RHEL
(which is already super-backwards to begin with). This Change has
already been deferred once (it was originally planned for F34). I
don't want it deferred again without a plan to work on it *in Fedora*.

Otherwise, just abandon the Change entirely.

--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

2021-08-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:11 AM Simo Sorce  wrote:
>
> I think at this stage it may be safer to defer to F36, and land OpenSSL
> 3.0 in rawhide right after F35 forks out.
>

I'm generally in agreement here; I think it's too much risk too late
in the cycle. Could you re-propose the Change for F36?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Font Awesome version 5

2021-08-02 Thread Jerry James

In the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997), the
fact that our FontAwesome font packages are on version 4.x came up.
That new package needs version 5.x.  I tried to make it work with 4.x
... no luck.

I do not want to take over the existing fontawesome-fonts package, nor
do I want to be involved in porting anything from version 4.x to
version 5.x.  I am willing, however, to maintain a
parallel-installable version 5.x of the fonts, so that applications
can migrate on their own schedules (with an eye to eventually
deprecating and/or removing the existing package).  I have filed a
review request:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300

It uses the name fontawesome-free-fonts for two reasons:
- To be different from the existing package name for parallel
installability; and
- To distinguish the Fedora package from the Pro version of the fonts.

I have two misgivings about this package and would appreciate some
input from the community on these points.
1. Does the name rationale make sense?
2. Do we actually need the web subpackage?  The font guidelines say
NOT to package svg, woff, etc. versions of a font because modern
browsers can read the otf versions.  On the other hand, the web
subpackage also contains JavaScript versions of the fonts (which
cannot be built from source using only Fedora packages, alas!).  On
the gripping hand, the existing package has a web subpackage, and it
seems to be used (by 8 packages).

Thanks!
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

FedoraRespin-34-updates-20210802.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 2/43 (x86_64)

ID: 939827  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939827
ID: 939838  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939838

Soft failed openQA tests: 3/43 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 939825  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939825
ID: 939828  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939828
ID: 939834  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939834

Passed openQA tests: 38/43 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2021-08-02 Thread Silvia Sánchez

Hello all!

I still don't understand how to add the server.  None of the links explains
it.
I don't use IRC except for these meetings.  I do use Konversation, I'm on
KDE, but I don't know how to set it up to use the new server and channels.
I'm sorry!

Kind regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah




On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 at 21:15, Chris Murphy  wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:21 AM Silvia Sánchez  wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel.  Can anyone give me a
> guide for dumbs about how to join it in IRC?
> > Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience!
>
> It's not a channel. It's a completely separate set of servers. We were
> on irc.freenode.net and now we're on irc.libera.chat - the channel
> names are still the same. You will need to register your nick with
> libera.chat.
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Murphy
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[389-devel] please review: PR 4855 - UI - Migrate Replication & Schema tabs to Patternfly 4

2021-08-02 Thread Mark Reynolds


https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4855

--
Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2021-08-02 Thread Chris Murphy

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:21 AM Silvia Sánchez  wrote:
>
>
> I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel.  Can anyone give me a guide 
> for dumbs about how to join it in IRC?
> Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience!

It's not a channel. It's a completely separate set of servers. We were
on irc.freenode.net and now we're on irc.libera.chat - the channel
names are still the same. You will need to register your nick with
libera.chat.



-- 
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2021-08-02 Thread louzaoh

In the Liber.chat webpage you can find all the information to select
and IRC program and how to join to a channel

How to choose and IRC client

https://libera.chat/guides/clients

Guides:

https://libera.chat/guides

after that:

Connect by pointing your IRC client to irc.libera.chat:6697 (TLS)

## More INFO here:

https://libera.chat/

Regards.,


El lun, 02-08-2021 a las 19:21 +0200, Silvia Sánchez escribió:
> 
> I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel.  Can anyone give me
> a guide for dumbs about how to join it in IRC?
> Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 at 02:26, Adam Williamson
>  wrote:
> > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> > # Date: 2021-08-02
> > # Time: 15:00 UTC
> > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> > # Location: #fedora-meeting on ** irc.libera.chat **
> > 
> > Greetings testers!
> > 
> > We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, so let's get together and
> > check
> > in. I don't have much specific for the agenda.
> > 
> > If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
> > email and suggest them! Thanks.
> > 
> > == Proposed Agenda Topics ==
> > 
> > 1. Previous meeting follow-up
> > 2. Fedora 35 status and Change check-in
> > 3. Test Day / community event status
> > 4. Open floor
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2021-08-02 Thread Steven A. Falco


Check out this page for instructions: https://libera.chat/guides/connect

I used the KDE konversation app and it worked fine.

Steve

On 8/2/21 1:21 PM, Silvia Sánchez wrote:


I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel.  Can anyone give me a guide 
for dumbs about how to join it in IRC?
Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience!





On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 at 02:26, Adam Williamson mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2021-08-02
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto 
)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on ** irc.libera.chat **

Greetings testers!

We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, so let's get together and check
in. I don't have much specific for the agenda.

If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
email and suggest them! Thanks.

== Proposed Agenda Topics ==

1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 35 status and Change check-in
3. Test Day / community event status
4. Open floor
-- 
Adam Williamson

Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net 

___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org 

To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 

List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure 

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 

To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 

List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure 



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2021-08-02 Thread Silvia Sánchez

I'm still confused at how to join Libera channel.  Can anyone give me a
guide for dumbs about how to join it in IRC?
Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconvenience!





On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 at 02:26, Adam Williamson 
wrote:

> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2021-08-02
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on ** irc.libera.chat **
>
> Greetings testers!
>
> We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, so let's get together and check
> in. I don't have much specific for the agenda.
>
> If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
> email and suggest them! Thanks.
>
> == Proposed Agenda Topics ==
>
> 1. Previous meeting follow-up
> 2. Fedora 35 status and Change check-in
> 3. Test Day / community event status
> 4. Open floor
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
> https://www.happyassassin.net
>
> ___
> test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Orphaning rubygem-hashie

2021-08-02 Thread Vít Ondruch


Hi,

I don't have any use for rubygem-hashie package, therefore I orphaned it.


Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1989200] New: perl-Log-Any-1.710 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989200

Bug ID: 1989200
   Summary: perl-Log-Any-1.710 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Log-Any
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ticot...@gmail.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, st...@silug.org,
ticot...@gmail.com, xav...@bachelot.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.710
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.709-3.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Any/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6480/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers


The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-08-02.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

8sync orphan   5 weeks ago
HdrHistogram  acaringi, almac, hhorak, 6 weeks ago
  jvanek, orphan
JSCookMenuorphan   6 weeks ago
WebCalendar   orphan   6 weeks ago
ant-contrib   java-maint-sig, mizdebsk,0 weeks ago
  orphan
apache-ivyjava-maint-sig, mizdebsk,2 weeks ago
  orphan
biboumi   louizatakk, orphan   6 weeks ago
jboss-annotations-1.2-api cfu, ckelley, dmoluguw,  6 weeks ago
  jmagne, mharmsen, orphan
jmc   almac, orphan, sasiddiq  6 weeks ago
jmc-core  almac, orphan, sasiddiq  6 weeks ago
js-gl-matrix  orphan   5 weeks ago
jsemver   orphan   0 weeks ago
libcommuniatim, orphan 0 weeks ago
libi40iw  orphan, tatyana  3 weeks ago
linuxcnc  orphan   3 weeks ago
lz4-java  orphan   6 weeks ago
mate-applet-softupd   orphan   6 weeks ago
maven-license-plugin  orphan   0 weeks ago
mvel  orphan   6 weeks ago
nekohtml  fnasser, mizdebsk, orphan1 weeks ago
olpc-netutils orphan   0 weeks ago
owasp-java-encoderalmac, orphan, sasiddiq  6 weeks ago
php-PHPMailer orphan, remi 6 weeks ago
php-captchaphporphan   6 weeks ago
php-hkit  orphan   6 weeks ago
php-pear-Auth-Yubico  orphan   6 weeks ago
python-django-braces  orphan   0 weeks ago
python-jsonrpcserver  orphan   5 weeks ago
python-nose-cov   orphan   5 weeks ago
python-nssjmagne, orphan   6 weeks ago
python-opentelemetry  orphan   1 weeks ago
python-pytest-helpers-namespace   orion, orphan, python-sig3 weeks ago
python-ruamel-std-pathlib orphan   2 weeks ago
python-setuptools-lintorphan   5 weeks ago
python-testfixtures   orphan   2 weeks ago
python-urlobject  orphan   5 weeks ago
python-vsc-installorphan   3 weeks ago
qtile cicku, orphan5 weeks ago
rubygem-expression_parser orphan   5 weeks ago
rubygem-fssm  orphan   5 weeks ago
rust-line_drawing orphan, rust-sig 2 weeks ago
rust-tower-test   orphan, rust-sig 2 weeks ago
rust-tower-util   orphan, rust-sig 2 weeks ago
rust-tzfile   orphan, rust-sig 2 weeks ago
spectrwm  larsks, lsm5, orphan 2 weeks ago
xmms-pulseorphan

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers


The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-08-02.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

8sync orphan   5 weeks ago
HdrHistogram  acaringi, almac, hhorak, 6 weeks ago
  jvanek, orphan
JSCookMenuorphan   6 weeks ago
WebCalendar   orphan   6 weeks ago
ant-contrib   java-maint-sig, mizdebsk,0 weeks ago
  orphan
apache-ivyjava-maint-sig, mizdebsk,2 weeks ago
  orphan
biboumi   louizatakk, orphan   6 weeks ago
jboss-annotations-1.2-api cfu, ckelley, dmoluguw,  6 weeks ago
  jmagne, mharmsen, orphan
jmc   almac, orphan, sasiddiq  6 weeks ago
jmc-core  almac, orphan, sasiddiq  6 weeks ago
js-gl-matrix  orphan   5 weeks ago
jsemver   orphan   0 weeks ago
libcommuniatim, orphan 0 weeks ago
libi40iw  orphan, tatyana  3 weeks ago
linuxcnc  orphan   3 weeks ago
lz4-java  orphan   6 weeks ago
mate-applet-softupd   orphan   6 weeks ago
maven-license-plugin  orphan   0 weeks ago
mvel  orphan   6 weeks ago
nekohtml  fnasser, mizdebsk, orphan1 weeks ago
olpc-netutils orphan   0 weeks ago
owasp-java-encoderalmac, orphan, sasiddiq  6 weeks ago
php-PHPMailer orphan, remi 6 weeks ago
php-captchaphporphan   6 weeks ago
php-hkit  orphan   6 weeks ago
php-pear-Auth-Yubico  orphan   6 weeks ago
python-django-braces  orphan   0 weeks ago
python-jsonrpcserver  orphan   5 weeks ago
python-nose-cov   orphan   5 weeks ago
python-nssjmagne, orphan   6 weeks ago
python-opentelemetry  orphan   1 weeks ago
python-pytest-helpers-namespace   orion, orphan, python-sig3 weeks ago
python-ruamel-std-pathlib orphan   2 weeks ago
python-setuptools-lintorphan   5 weeks ago
python-testfixtures   orphan   2 weeks ago
python-urlobject  orphan   5 weeks ago
python-vsc-installorphan   3 weeks ago
qtile cicku, orphan5 weeks ago
rubygem-expression_parser orphan   5 weeks ago
rubygem-fssm  orphan   5 weeks ago
rust-line_drawing orphan, rust-sig 2 weeks ago
rust-tower-test   orphan, rust-sig 2 weeks ago
rust-tower-util   orphan, rust-sig 2 weeks ago
rust-tzfile   orphan, rust-sig 2 weeks ago
spectrwm  larsks, lsm5, orphan 2 weeks ago
xmms-pulseorphan

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-08-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:28:07PM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Currently, we are trying to stay away from the compat package and with the
> help of other package maintainers trying to fix the failures. We will give
> time to react accordingly and see other possible steps in a few weeks time.
> 
> Currently multiple FTBFS bugs in bugzilla were created according to
> autoconf-2.71. More information available here:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271

Whats the current status of this Change?

It didn't land before mass rebuild. Is it still planned for f35?

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20210802.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud

Failed openQA tests: 14/139 (aarch64), 5/203 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210731.n.0):

ID: 939398  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939398
ID: 939416  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_nfs_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939416
ID: 939423  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939423
ID: 939429  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939429
ID: 939458  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz unwanted_packages@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939458
ID: 939461  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz evince@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939461
ID: 939462  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939462
ID: 939465  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_terminal@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939465
ID: 939467  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_background@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939467
ID: 939490  Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939490
ID: 939511  Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939511
ID: 939526  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939526
ID: 939570  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939570
ID: 939571  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939571
ID: 939596  Test: aarch64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939596

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210731.n.0):

ID: 939357  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939357
ID: 939406  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939406
ID: 939487  Test: x86_64 universal memtest
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939487
ID: 939581  Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939581

Soft failed openQA tests: 22/203 (x86_64), 19/139 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210731.n.0):

ID: 939531  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939531
ID: 939553  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939553

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210731.n.0):

ID: 939262  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939262
ID: 939263  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939263
ID: 939320  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939320
ID: 939321  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939321
ID: 939378  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939378
ID: 939388  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939388
ID: 939397  Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939397
ID: 939445  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939445
ID: 939474  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939474
ID: 939479  Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939479
ID: 939489  Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939489
ID: 939495  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939495
ID: 939497  Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939497
ID: 939501  Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939501
ID: 939502  Test:

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

2021-08-02 Thread Simo Sorce

I think at this stage it may be safer to defer to F36, and land OpenSSL
3.0 in rawhide right after F35 forks out.

Simo.

On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 15:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Sahana, Ben, other Fedorans,
> 
> We have an accepted change proposal to include OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35:
> 
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenSSL3.0
> 
> The contingency deadline is "Before release" which is not very specific.
> 
> At this point, we are not yet on OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35.
> What is the plan regarding the upgrade?
> 
> The change tracking bugzilla has a question posted in June: "OpenSSL3 beta is 
> out, do we have some updated repository for testing in Fedora? What's the 
> plan 
> now?" But there is no answer.
> 
> The mass rebuild is over. Branching is in 1 week.
> "Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable)" is in 1 week.
> The beta freeze is in 3 weeks.
> 
> Do we still plan to upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35? Should we defer this 
> change to Fedora 36 instead?
> 
> -- 
> Miro Hrončok
> -- 
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

2021-08-02 Thread Neal Gompa

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 10:31 AM Florian Weimer  wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > For reasons that are unclear to me, it seems that all the work for
> > this feature happened in CentOS Stream 9 development[1] instead of
> > Rawhide.
>
> OpenSSL developers were under the impression that the Alpha snapshots
> could not be imported into rawhide for policy reasons.  And in the end,
> there was an ABI break between 3.0 Alpha and 3.0 Beta, which is why c9s
> currently has a custom dual OpenSSL ABI (compatible with both Alpha and
> Beta).
>

As proven time and again with glibc, this is obviously not true. Every
time an ABI break occurs, you need to plan a targeted mass rebuild,
but otherwise it's fine.

In any case, the OpenSSL ABI stabilized upstream with the 3.0 beta
release, didn't it?

OpenSSL 3.0 beta 2 was just tagged last week:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/openssl-3.0.0-beta2

> > From what it can tell, the feature is fairly well-developed there, so
> > I would hope it can be easily brought over to Rawhide for F35.
> >
> > [1]: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/openssl/-/commits/c9s/
>
> This view misses the distribution-wide work to enable this, which still
> hasn't concluded.
>
> “Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete” is 2021-08-24.  I probably won't
> have time to help out with this in the coming weeks.  Not sure about the
> OpenSSL maintainers themselves.
>
> We also need a different approach for Fedora with a compat -devel
> package because there is just no way we can port everything within one
> release cycle.
>

We already have the compat package:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl1.1

It is not required to port everything already.


--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1989155] New: perl-Software-License-0.104001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989155

Bug ID: 1989155
   Summary: perl-Software-License-0.104001 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Software-License
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: berra...@redhat.com, emman...@seyman.fr,
iarn...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.104001
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.103014-13.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Software-License/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3325/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1989153] New: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.078 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989153

Bug ID: 1989153
   Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.078 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.078
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.076-478.fc35
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Tiny/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2982/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

2021-08-02 Thread Florian Weimer

* Neal Gompa:

> For reasons that are unclear to me, it seems that all the work for
> this feature happened in CentOS Stream 9 development[1] instead of
> Rawhide.

OpenSSL developers were under the impression that the Alpha snapshots
could not be imported into rawhide for policy reasons.  And in the end,
there was an ABI break between 3.0 Alpha and 3.0 Beta, which is why c9s
currently has a custom dual OpenSSL ABI (compatible with both Alpha and
Beta).

> From what it can tell, the feature is fairly well-developed there, so
> I would hope it can be easily brought over to Rawhide for F35.
>
> [1]: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/openssl/-/commits/c9s/

This view misses the distribution-wide work to enable this, which still
hasn't concluded.

“Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete” is 2021-08-24.  I probably won't
have time to help out with this in the coming weeks.  Not sure about the
OpenSSL maintainers themselves.

We also need a different approach for Fedora with a compat -devel
package because there is just no way we can port everything within one
release cycle.

Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Plan to orphan (retire ?) the Horde stack

2021-08-02 Thread Remi Collet


Le 30/07/2021 à 09:00, Remi Collet a écrit :

Hi,

https://www.horde.org/

The horde stack is a huge set of >100 packages
Lot of them are FTBFS as not ready for PHP 9

The project is not very active, and their seems to
be a major rewrite, with namespace, and using composer.

The project is still maintained for security
but using old PHP (so fine for Fedora <=34 and EPEL)


I plan to orphan all the package in the next day
or perhaps only retire them from rawhide


112 packages retired from Rawhide

php-channel-horde and php-horde-*


Remi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1988711] perl-Linux-Inotify2-2.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988711

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Linux-Inotify2-2.3-1.f
   ||c35
Last Closed||2021-08-02 13:30:31




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1988813] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988813

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Fixed In Version||perl-DBD-SQLite-1.70-1.fc35
 Status|NEW |CLOSED
Last Closed||2021-08-02 13:28:36




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Linux-Inotify2] PR #1: Tests


jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Linux-Inotify2` that 
you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Linux-Inotify2/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?

2021-08-02 Thread Neal Gompa

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 9:01 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> Hello Sahana, Ben, other Fedorans,
>
> We have an accepted change proposal to include OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35:
>
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenSSL3.0
>
> The contingency deadline is "Before release" which is not very specific.
>
> At this point, we are not yet on OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35.
> What is the plan regarding the upgrade?
>
> The change tracking bugzilla has a question posted in June: "OpenSSL3 beta is
> out, do we have some updated repository for testing in Fedora? What's the plan
> now?" But there is no answer.
>
> The mass rebuild is over. Branching is in 1 week.
> "Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable)" is in 1 week.
> The beta freeze is in 3 weeks.
>
> Do we still plan to upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35? Should we defer this
> change to Fedora 36 instead?
>

For reasons that are unclear to me, it seems that all the work for
this feature happened in CentOS Stream 9 development[1] instead of
Rawhide.

From what it can tell, the feature is fairly well-developed there, so
I would hope it can be easily brought over to Rawhide for F35.

[1]: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/openssl/-/commits/c9s/



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Is OpenSSL 3.0 still planned for Fedora 35?


Hello Sahana, Ben, other Fedorans,

We have an accepted change proposal to include OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35:

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenSSL3.0

The contingency deadline is "Before release" which is not very specific.

At this point, we are not yet on OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35.
What is the plan regarding the upgrade?

The change tracking bugzilla has a question posted in June: "OpenSSL3 beta is 
out, do we have some updated repository for testing in Fedora? What's the plan 
now?" But there is no answer.


The mass rebuild is over. Branching is in 1 week.
"Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable)" is in 1 week.
The beta freeze is in 3 weeks.

Do we still plan to upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0 in Fedora 35? Should we defer this 
change to Fedora 36 instead?


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210802.n.0 changes

2021-08-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210731.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210802.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images:  7
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages:   168
Downgraded packages: 3

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:208.83 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   10.11 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 17.43 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   1.12 GiB
Size change of downgraded packages: -40.52 KiB

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Comp_Neuro live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Comp_Neuro-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210802.n.0.iso
Image: Astronomy_KDE live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210802.n.0.iso
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le
Path: 
Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20210802.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz
Image: Robotics live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Robotics-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210802.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20210731.n.0.s390x.qcow2
Image: Server boot s390x
Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-s390x-Rawhide-20210731.n.0.iso
Image: Server dvd s390x
Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-Rawhide-20210731.n.0.iso
Image: Container_Base docker s390x
Path: 
Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20210731.n.0.s390x.tar.xz
Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20210731.n.0.s390x.raw.xz
Image: Everything boot s390x
Path: 
Everything/s390x/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-s390x-Rawhide-20210731.n.0.iso
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x
Path: 
Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20210731.n.0.s390x.tar.xz

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: OpenEXR-2.3.0-9.fc35
Summary: A high dynamic-range (HDR) image file format
RPMs:OpenEXR OpenEXR-devel OpenEXR-doc OpenEXR-libs
Size:16.56 MiB

Package: golang-github-docker-compose-on-kubernetes-0.5.0~alpha1-2.fc34
Summary: Deploy applications described in Compose onto Kubernetes clusters
RPMs:golang-github-docker-compose-on-kubernetes 
golang-github-docker-compose-on-kubernetes-cmd-controller-devel 
golang-github-docker-compose-on-kubernetes-devel
Size:192.27 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  CTL-1.5.2-17.fc35
Old package:  CTL-1.5.2-16.fc35
Summary:  The Color Transformation Language
RPMs: CTL CTL-devel CTL-docs OpenEXR_CTL
Size: 6.74 MiB
Size change:  -1.59 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Aug 01 2021 Richard Shaw  - 1.5.2-17
  - Move to openexr2 compat package.


Package:  Field3D-1.7.3-12.fc35
Old package:  Field3D-1.7.3-11.fc35
Summary:  Library for storing voxel data
RPMs: Field3D Field3D-devel
Size: 9.44 MiB
Size change:  5.92 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Jul 31 2021 Richard Shaw  - 1.7.3-12
  - Add minimal patch for OpenEXR/Imath 3.


Package:  OpenImageIO-2.2.16.0-3.fc35
Old package:  OpenImageIO-2.2.16.0-2.fc35
Summary:  Library for reading and writing images
RPMs: OpenImageIO OpenImageIO-devel OpenImageIO-iv OpenImageIO-utils 
python3-openimageio
Size: 21.26 MiB
Size change:  -67.30 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Jul 31 2021 Richard Shaw  - 2.2.16.0-3
  - Rebuild for OpenEXR/Imath 3.


Package:  R-procmaps-0.0.3-4.fc35
Old package:  R-procmaps-0.0.3-3.fc35
Summary:  Portable Address Space Mapping
RPMs: R-procmaps
Size: 163.68 KiB
Size change:  622 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Jul 21 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.0.3-4
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild


Package:  YafaRay-3.5.1-13.fc35
Old package:  YafaRay-3.5.1-12.fc35
Summary:  A free open-source ray-tracing render engine
RPMs: YafaRay YafaRay-blender YafaRay-devel YafaRay-lib python3-YafaRay
Size: 4.46 MiB
Size change:  -2.60 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Aug 02 2021 Richard Shaw  - 3.5.1-13
  - Add patch for OpenEXR 3.


Package:  aqsis-1.8.2-45.fc35
Old package:  aqsis-1.8.2-44.fc35
Summary:  Open source 3D rendering solution adhering to the RenderMan 
standard
RPMs: aqsis aqsis-core aqsis-data aqsis-devel aqsis-libs
Size: 14.21 MiB
Size change:  -6.37 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Jul 31 2021 Richard Shaw  - 1.8.2-45
  - Move to openexr2 compat package.


Package:  arpwatch-14:3.1-26.fc35
Old package:  arpwatch-14:3.1-24.fc35
Summary:  Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network
RPMs: arpwatch
Size: 1.55 MiB
Size change:  6.81 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Aug 01 2021 Benjamin A. Beasley  14:3.1-25
  - Generate ethercodes.dat from latest oui.csv

  * Sun Aug 01 2021 Benjamin A. Beasley  14:3.1-26
  - Add ???Wants=network-online.target??? to systemd unit file (fixes
RHBZ#1988849)


Package:  assimp-5.0.1-3.fc35
Old package:  assimp-3.3.1-30.fc35
Summary:  Library to import various 3D model formats into applications

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

2021-08-02 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel


On 02/08/2021 08:56, Chris Murphy wrote:

Does this apply to the current 5.31 beta? I guess it's also a bit
beside the point, because any modern Intel and AMD processor also has
UEFI firmware. In order to enable the legacy/CSM you have to disable
UEFI Secure Boot which... it's not good to advise this.


Tested with memtest86+-5.31-0.3.beta.fc34 on Intel Core i7 10700 - hangs 
on start.


Tested on AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - it starts, works, then system hangs. Need 
to press Reset button.


--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

2021-08-02 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel


On 02/08/2021 14:34, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
The memtest86+, included in the Fedora install media works. AMD Ryzen 9 
5900X here, with 128 GB RAM. Unfortunately, it was recently removed from 
the install media.


Intel Core i7 10700 - hangs on start in legacy mode even from the Fedora 
LiveUSB.


--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Linux-Inotify2] PR #1: Tests


jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Linux-Inotify2` 
that you are following:
``
Tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Linux-Inotify2/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

2021-08-02 Thread Nikolay Nikolov



On 8/2/21 9:15 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:

On 02/08/2021 04:04, Chris Murphy wrote:

I'm definitely not attached to keeping things the same. The bios
memtest86+ is still these days installed to /boot but there hasn't
been a menu entry for it for a very long time; in fact maybe it was
only ever on netintall or dvd images? I can't remember that far back


memtest86+ doesn't support UEFI. It only has a menu entry if the 
Legacy boot is used.


Also memtest86+ doesn't support modern Intel and AMD processors. It 
will hang on start.


The memtest86+, included in the Fedora install media works. AMD Ryzen 9 
5900X here, with 128 GB RAM. Unfortunately, it was recently removed from 
the install media.


The memtest86+, installed on your computer in Legacy boot mode and then 
added to the Grub boot menu, doesn't work and crashes on start on the 
same computer.


That's why I install in UEFI mode, but keep my Fedora 33 install DVD+R 
disk around and boot it in Legacy mode to run memtest86+ when I need it. 
The fact that the OS is installed in UEFI mode doesn't matter.


Nikolay
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Bad checkout problem after mass rebuild?

2021-08-02 Thread Richard Shaw

On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 9:53 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade <
quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 21:12, Richard Shaw  wrote:
> >
> > I can see my commit in the log but it's not actually "there":
> >
> > commit 49efbd8bc23b44e5bdf417a96ef174c31ccca359 (HEAD -> rawhide,
> origin/rawhide, origin/HEAD)
> > Author: Richard Shaw 
> > Date:   Sun Aug 1 19:57:58 2021 -0500
> >
> > Bump release for bad mass rebuild commit.
> >
> > But this does not show here even though I've pushed it:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freeimage/commits/rawhide
> >
> > WTF?!?!?
> >
>
> Your 'origin' remote points to your fork, which does contain the commit:
>
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/hobbes1069/rpms/freeimage/c/49efbd8bc23b44e5bdf417a96ef174c31ccca359?branch=rawhide
>
> You've never pushed to the 'real' repo, and presumably your rawhide
> branch was tracking your fork, so when you pulled, you only pulled
> from your fork as well, which never would have the releng commits
> without intervention.
>

Whoops. I had forgotten I had initially tried a fork approach on a few
packages before figuring out that wasn't going to be a very good workflow
for the mess that the ASWF created and decided on the PP approach.

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1988711] perl-Linux-Inotify2-2.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988711

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|iarn...@gmail.com,  |
   |jples...@redhat.com |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1988415] perl-experimental-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-14b73e38cb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-14b73e38cb


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1988415] perl-experimental-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-experimental-0.025-1.f
   ||c35
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210802.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210731.0):

ID: 939135  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939135
ID: 939145  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939145

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1988415] perl-experimental-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988415

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com, |
   |ppi...@redhat.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1986640] perl-PDF-API2-2.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986640



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-8a4511c414 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8a4511c414


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

SCons 4.2.0

2021-08-02 Thread Antonio T. sagitter


Hi all.

SCons will be updated in Rawhide to the release 4.2.0 in a week.
If you need to test it, use these rpms:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/2356678/

SCons-4.2.0 release notes:
https://github.com/SCons/scons/blob/rel_4.2.0/CHANGES.txt

Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/


OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[HEADS UP] Bugzilla search results are now paginated (scripts are broken)


Hello,

if you run some scripts that query bugzilla,
beware that the results are now paginated.

If you would get more than 1000 bugs, you'll only get the first 1000. This 
might lead to surprises, such as duplicate automated bugzillas opened.


See https://github.com/python-bugzilla/python-bugzilla/issues/149

Also, if you just got a duplicate F35FailsToInstall bugzilla from me, this was 
the reason, sorry about that.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1986640] perl-PDF-API2-2.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986640

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-PDF-API2-2.041-1.fc35
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1986347] perl-Archive-Tar-2.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986347



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-d338a8500f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d338a8500f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

2021-08-02 Thread Marek Kasik


Hi,

On 7/26/21 10:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 18:06, Marek Kasik wrote:

Hi,

I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag
"f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in
it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Monday (2nd of August).


Shouldn't you wait for the mass rebuild to complete first?


I've probably should but there is not much time left this summer. I was 
on vacation in the meantime and now I have to contact maintainers of the 
packages which have not been rebuilt yet to do the rebuilds before 
branching.



Regards,
Dominik


Regards
Marek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1986347] perl-Archive-Tar-2.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986347

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Archive-Tar-2.40-1.fc3
   ||5




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Archive-Tar] PR #1: Tests


jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Archive-Tar` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Archive-Tar/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

2021-08-02 Thread Milan Crha

On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 09:50 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> As the %_vpath_builddir macro is what you're supposed to use _anyway_
> when monkeying around with build directories with CMake and Meson...

Hi,
that fixed it. Thanks for the hint. I did not find it myself, possibly
due to using a wrong search term.
Thanks and bye,
Milan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

No FESCo Meeting today (2021-08-02)

2021-08-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm cancelling the meeting.
I'll chair the next one.

= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =

#2651 F35 Change: Enhanced Inscript as default Indic IM
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2651
APPROVED (+5,0,-0)

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1986640] perl-PDF-API2-2.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986640

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|jples...@redhat.com |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Archive-Tar] PR #1: Tests


jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Archive-Tar` that 
you are following:
``
Tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Archive-Tar/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 02 August (Today)

2021-08-02 Thread Ankur Sinha

Hello everyone,

Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 2nd
August (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The meeting
is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us
over:

IRC:
https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neuro

Matrix: https://tinyurl.com/matrix-neurofedora

You can convert the meeting time to your local time using this command
in a terminal:
$ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1300 today'

or you can use this link:
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Open+NeuroFedora+Meeting=20210802T13=%3A=1

The meeting will be chaired by @ankursinha. The agenda for the
meeting is:

- New introductions and roll call.
- Tasks from last week's meeting:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/neurofedora/neurofedora.2021-07-19-13.02.html
- Open Pagure tickets:
https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issues?status=Open=S%3A+Next+meeting
- Package health check:
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/neuro-sig
- Open package reviews check:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=fedora-neuro
- Koschei packages check:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/groups/neuro-sig
- CompNeuro lab compose status check for F35:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=30691
- Neuroscience query of the week
- Next meeting day, and chair.
- Open floor.

We hope to see you there!

You can learn more about NeuroFedora here:
https://neuro.fedoraproject.org


-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210802.0 compose check report

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210801.0):

ID: 939006  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939006
ID: 939016  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/939016

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Azure CLI + SDK packaging update and review swap request

2021-08-02 Thread Sandro Mani


Hi

On 27.07.21 22:50, Major Hayden wrote:


  python-azure-appconfiguration (required SDK component)
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981573

  python-azure-devtools (for testing the Azure CLI/SDK)
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986414

  python-azure-mgmt-insights (required SDK component)
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981574


I can start with these. Can you take some of the following in exchange?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985637 - 
perl-Regexp-Pattern-DefHash: needed to update perl-Hash-DefHash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982171 - pyephem: review to 
revive package

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988701 - mingw-python-pyephem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988685 - mingw-qt6-qtbase
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988686 - 
mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988688 - mingw-qt6-qtactiveqt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988690 - 
mingw-qt6-qtimageformats

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988692 - mingw-qt6-qtcharts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988693 - mingw-qt6-qt3d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988695 - mingw-qt6-qtsvg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988697 - 
mingw-qt6-qtquickcontrols2


Thanks
Sandro

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1986347] perl-Archive-Tar-2.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986347

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 CC|caillon+fedoraproject@gmail |
   |.com, jples...@redhat.com,  |
   |ka...@ucw.cz,   |
   |mspa...@redhat.com, |
   |rhug...@redhat.com, |
   |rstr...@redhat.com, |
   |sandm...@redhat.com,|
   |st...@silug.org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985865] perl-PDL-2.054 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985865

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-PDL-2.54.0-1.fc35
Last Closed||2021-08-02 07:33:49




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

2021-08-02 Thread Chris Murphy

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 12:15 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
 wrote:
>
> On 02/08/2021 04:04, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I'm definitely not attached to keeping things the same. The bios
> > memtest86+ is still these days installed to /boot but there hasn't
> > been a menu entry for it for a very long time; in fact maybe it was
> > only ever on netintall or dvd images? I can't remember that far back
>
> memtest86+ doesn't support UEFI. It only has a menu entry if the Legacy
> boot is used.

Yeah I mentioned that in the first post.


> Also memtest86+ doesn't support modern Intel and AMD processors. It will
> hang on start.

Does this apply to the current 5.31 beta? I guess it's also a bit
beside the point, because any modern Intel and AMD processor also has
UEFI firmware. In order to enable the legacy/CSM you have to disable
UEFI Secure Boot which... it's not good to advise this.



-- 
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985448] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210723 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-a289b57cd0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a289b57cd0


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985448] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210723 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-3053418b23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3053418b23


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985448] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210723 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021
   ||0723-1.fc35




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Retiring python-pyinsane2

2021-08-02 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade

I have just retired python-pyinsane2; it has been archived by upstream
in favour of its replacement libinsane. I believe all users in Fedora
have also moved on to using libinsane as well. Since tests have
broken, it is also FTBFS in Rawhide, and I don't intend to invest any
time into fixing it.

-- 
Elliott
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985448] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210723 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985448

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|jose.p.oliveira.oss@gmail.c |
   |om, jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com, |
   |spo...@gmail.com,   |
   |st...@silug.org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985399] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210722 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-c4f27aedfd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c4f27aedfd


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985399] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210722 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2021-878dadd90d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-878dadd90d


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985399] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210722 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985399

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   ||0210722-1.fc35
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

2021-08-02 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel


On 02/08/2021 04:04, Chris Murphy wrote:

I'm definitely not attached to keeping things the same. The bios
memtest86+ is still these days installed to /boot but there hasn't
been a menu entry for it for a very long time; in fact maybe it was
only ever on netintall or dvd images? I can't remember that far back


memtest86+ doesn't support UEFI. It only has a menu entry if the Legacy 
boot is used.


Also memtest86+ doesn't support modern Intel and AMD processors. It will 
hang on start.


--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1985399] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210722 is available