OpenColorIO 2 along with OpenImageIO and Blender have now been built for
f35 & f36. I'm just waiting until krita finishes before submitting the
side-tag as an update.
WHEW!
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Thanks for the explanation, Adam. I'll let the process play out as it will...
Steve
On 8/24/21 5:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 16:47 -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote:
Yesterday I produced a fix for the KiCAD packages, and made builds for f33, f34, f35 and
rawhide.
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
ID: 953020 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/953020
ID: 953034 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 16:47 -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> Yesterday I produced a fix for the KiCAD packages, and made builds for f33,
> f34, f35 and rawhide. In f34, it got enough karma to move to "stable". In
> f33, it is likely to have to sit for a week. The f35 and rawhide builds went
>
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 06:06, Mattia Verga wrote:
>
> The extras macro expands to %package, %description, and %files; you
> have put it in between a %package and %description, which will surely
> confuse rpm somewhat.
>
Oh, I've missed that. Thanks.
>
> You need to ensure that tox is
Yesterday I produced a fix for the KiCAD packages, and made builds for f33, f34, f35 and
rawhide. In f34, it got enough karma to move to "stable". In f33, it is
likely to have to sit for a week. The f35 and rawhide builds went straight to stable
yesterday.
Should I edit the criteria in f33
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 09:44:12PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 08. 21 3:40, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Should I create an epel8 branch but then retire it just to create a
> > bugzilla component?
>
> AFAIK this wont work. Packages retired on EPEL have the components blocked.
Right.
On 24. 08. 21 3:40, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Should I create an epel8 branch but then retire it just to create a bugzilla
component?
AFAIK this wont work. Packages retired on EPEL have the components blocked.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 8/23/21 5:49 AM, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
Sure. Crypto-policies are there to give you control of what's enabled,
ideally what's enabled by default.
1) There's a blanket `update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY`
2) There's a possibility to reenable disabled algorithms with custom policies,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-08-25 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
> More information available at:
>
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 7:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
I got a test package almost built but still working out the last few
problems.
1. For some reason we need to link with the Boost boost_python component
but that hasn't been required before. I don't have time to determine why so
I'm using the big stick method to make it work.
To make matters
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-08-25 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 9:22 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 6:41 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> The "zabbix" package exists in EPEL8 in two forms:
>>
>> zabbix40 - non-module 4.0 package.
>> zabbix - module with 5.0 stream.
>>
>> Because the "zabbix" dist-git does not
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
That one is "fixed", now the next problem:
/usr/include/boost/python/converter/arg_to_python.hpp:205: error: undefined
reference to
'boost::python::converter::detail::arg_to_python_base::arg_to_python_base(void
const volatile*, boost::python::converter::registration const&)'
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 6:41 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> The "zabbix" package exists in EPEL8 in two forms:
>
> zabbix40 - non-module 4.0 package.
> zabbix - module with 5.0 stream.
>
> Because the "zabbix" dist-git does not have a epel8 branch, there is no
> "zabbix" component in bugzilla for
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 7:20 AM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote on 2021/08/24 20:59:
> > Figured out that was a missing include, ImfFrameBuffer.h, now on to the
> > next issue:
> >
> >
> /builddir/build/BUILD/blender-2.93.3/source/blender/python/mathutils/mathutils.c:
> > In function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997123
Bug ID: 1997123
Summary: Upgrade perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap to 2021.0814
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997118
Bug ID: 1997118
Summary: Upgrade perl-Proc-ProcessTable to 0.611
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Proc-ProcessTable
Assignee:
Hi all,
Today's an important day on the Fedora 35 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all, today is the Bodhi updates-testing
activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 35 packages must
be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant
requirements[3]
Hi all,
Today's an important day on the Fedora 35 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all, today is the Bodhi updates-testing
activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 35 packages must
be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant
requirements[3]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997116
Bug ID: 1997116
Summary: Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 12.30
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Image-ExifTool
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997117
Bug ID: 1997117
Summary: Upgrade perl-MooseX-App to 1.42
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MooseX-App
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997113
Bug ID: 1997113
Summary: Upgrade perl-Data-Validate-Domain to 0.15
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-Validate-Domain
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997110
Bug ID: 1997110
Summary: Upgrade perl-Carp-Assert-More to 2.0.1
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Carp-Assert-More
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
Richard Shaw wrote on 2021/08/24 20:59:
Figured out that was a missing include, ImfFrameBuffer.h, now on to the
next issue:
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-2.93.3/source/blender/python/mathutils/mathutils.c:
In function 'mathutils_array_hash':
Figured out that was a missing include, ImfFrameBuffer.h, now on to the
next issue:
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-2.93.3/source/blender/python/mathutils/mathutils.c:
In function 'mathutils_array_hash':
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-2.93.3/source/blender/python/mathutils/mathutils.c:98:24:
error:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976778
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-SNMP-Info-3.73 is |perl-SNMP-Info-3.74 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976778
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:48 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 01:20 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > On 2021-08-23 12:46 a.m., Josef Řídký wrote:
> > > There should not be any reason to have the ilmbase package as separate
> > > one, because this package has been incorporated
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:07 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Alexander Sosedkin said:
> > Sure. Crypto-policies are there to give you control of what's enabled,
> > ideally what's enabled by default.
> >
> > 1) There's a blanket `update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY`
> > 2) There's a
On 24/08/2021 00:06, Chris Adams wrote:
Missing #4 is what makes a lot of this not as useful. I understand the
effort that has gone into this and appreciate stepping up security,
but... what matters as a user is "can I get to this site in Firefox",
"does this VPN work"
It's Cisco's problem if
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210823.0):
ID: 955901 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 8/16/21 11:18 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 8/16/21 12:25 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:14:57PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via
[...]
%make_build %{limit_build -m 4096} -- with %limit_build used as a
%function that spits out the relevant -j override
Hello,
In the near future, there is a plan to merge autoconf-2.71 to rawhide. Due
to the size of the change and possible breakage of multiple packages going
FTBFS. The number of these packages should not be many, currently we have
~32 opened FTBFS trackers according to autoconf-2.71, where the
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Thanks - I made this change to nbdkit:
>
> https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/commit/8972831aa2a32d4b5820465d37c1827eb76450e4
>
> Will the .0 ever change?
I can't see a reason for it to ever change; I'd say it's unlikelier
than the .6
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:42:32AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Anyway this is not the reason why I'm writing this email on Fedora
> > devel list. In the Fedora package we have:
> >
> > $ rpm -qf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870778
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870776
Bug 1870776 depends on bug 1870778, which changed state.
Bug 1870778 Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-IO-Interactive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870778
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 01:20 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 2021-08-23 12:46 a.m., Josef Řídký wrote:
> > There should not be any reason to have the ilmbase package as separate
> > one, because this package has been incorporated into the openexr
> > package itself (in version 3).
> >
> >
42 matches
Mail list logo
