On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:20:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 05:25:47PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > * libguestfs
> > * ntfs-3g-system-compression
>
> I will do these two packages.
Dammit, side tags ...
Here are the builds:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:20:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 05:25:47PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > * libguestfs
> > * ntfs-3g-system-compression
>
> I will do these two packages.
Dammit, side tags ...
Here are the builds:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-37aab93b64
libss7-2.0.1-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-bf4abce815
libopenmpt-0.5.11-1.el7
The following builds have been
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 05:25:47PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> * libguestfs
> * ntfs-3g-system-compression
I will do these two packages.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 05:25:47PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> * libguestfs
> * ntfs-3g-system-compression
I will do these two packages.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996273
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996267
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996267
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 31.8.2021 klo 11.43:
Dne 31. 08. 21 v 7:39 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a):
Greetings,
Some months ago, I announced [0] that I will move the package
maintainer docs from wiki to docs.fedoraproject.org.
Thx a lot.
All changes to the documentation is intended to happen
Hey all,
ntfs-3g 2021.8.22 was released yesterday to resolve multiple CVEs[1].
With permission from Tom Callaway (the ntfs-3g maintainer), I am
preparing updates for Fedora and EPEL now for Tom.
As part of this, I'll rebuild all reverse dependencies for this. Based
on a repoquery, that is:
*
Hey all,
ntfs-3g 2021.8.22 was released yesterday to resolve multiple CVEs[1].
With permission from Tom Callaway (the ntfs-3g maintainer), I am
preparing updates for Fedora and EPEL now for Tom.
As part of this, I'll rebuild all reverse dependencies for this. Based
on a repoquery, that is:
*
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 7:43 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:21:54PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > While it might take a good bit of time to sit down and figure out
> > exactly what is *useful* from a multilib standpoint, I don't think
> > that is necessary at this time.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/45 (x86_64)
ID: 964322 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/964322
ID: 964333 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/964333
ID:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:54 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
> build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
> This seems like a waste of resources and time.
>
> I know it's somewhat complicated
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> >
>
> We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary.
> Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet?
Almost two years ago (how time flies!), when the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999019
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:21:54PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> While it might take a good bit of time to sit down and figure out
> exactly what is *useful* from a multilib standpoint, I don't think
> that is necessary at this time. It really could be simplified to "do I
> build a library or
* Justin Forbes:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:14 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> * Matthew Miller:
>>
>> > This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
>> > build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
>> > This seems like a waste of
Le mar. 31 août 2021 à 19:22, Justin Forbes a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:14 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
..
> While it might take a good bit of time to sit down and figure out
> exactly what is *useful* from a multilib standpoint, I don't think
> that is necessary at this time. It really
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:53:55PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
> build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
> This seems like a waste of resources and time.
>
> I know it's somewhat
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:14 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Matthew Miller:
>
> > This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
> > build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
> > This seems like a waste of resources and time.
> >
> > I
* Matthew Miller:
> This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
> build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
> This seems like a waste of resources and time.
>
> I know it's somewhat complicated (for example, there's actually a library
>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:27:50AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 31/08/21 07:39, Otto Urpelainen ha scritto:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Some months ago, I announced [0] that I will move the package maintainer
> > docs from wiki to docs.fedoraproject.org. I am happy to announce that
> >
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:25:37AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> No, this was added to one build at the request of releng because
> composes are randomly failing in kernel-core %post. As we just call
> kernel-install, we first tried calling kernel-install -v, but that
> doesn't give much useful
This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
This seems like a waste of resources and time.
I know it's somewhat complicated (for example, there's actually a library
package in libreoffice,
On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Hello Antonio,
Hi Alexander.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:03 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
openbabel-3.1.1 is ready for Rawhide branch. 'libopenbabel' soname is
updated from 5 to 7, all dependent packages will need a rebuild at least:
What
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-09-01 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
Hello Antonio,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:03 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> openbabel-3.1.1 is ready for Rawhide branch. 'libopenbabel' soname is
> updated from 5 to 7, all dependent packages will need a rebuild at least:
What about the packages that haven't been ported to work with Open
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 9:41 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:29:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:13 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:07:38AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
Hi all.
openbabel-3.1.1 is ready for Rawhide branch. 'libopenbabel' soname is
updated from 5 to 7, all dependent packages will need a rebuild at least:
$ repoquery --whatrequires openbabel-devel --disablerepo=*
--enablerepo=*-source
IQmol-0:2.15.0-3.fc34.src
ghemical-0:3.0.0-16.fc34.src
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:07:21 -
"Nils K" wrote:
> I recently had to perform a bit of development/research where I often
> had to take a look in the kernel documentation.
>
> Most of the time was spend offline so I wanted to download the
> `kernel-doc` package however it does not seem to
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:29:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:13 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:07:38AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74840901
> > >
> > > How should I
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:13 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:07:38AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74840901
> >
> > How should I interpret this?
>
> Very odd
>
> Looking at the parent task:
>
>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:07:38AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74840901
>
> How should I interpret this?
Very odd
Looking at the parent task:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74840893
and picking ppc64 arch
On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 14:00 +0200, Juanjo Rubio via devel wrote:
>
>Hi!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>My name is Juanjo Rubio, I am 32 and currently working in data
> science and machine learning engineering related topics. Long time
> linux user, familiar with open
Hello, Juanjo!
On Tuesday, 31 August 2021 at 14:00, Juanjo Rubio via devel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My name is Juanjo Rubio, I am 32 and currently working in data science
> and machine learning engineering related topics. Long time linux user,
> familiar with open source software and programming (mainly
Hi!
My name is Juanjo Rubio, I am 32 and currently working in data science and
machine learning engineering related topics. Long time linux user, familiar
with open source software and programming (mainly Python) but I have personally
never contributed to a Linux distro.
I have been following
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:17:18AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 11:13:40 +0200
> Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:07:38 +0100
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74840901
> > >
> > > How should I
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 10:43:26 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Everybody whose PR was accepted should get commit bit IMO. Also, it would
> probably help it there was explained how to get some attention if nobody
> responds to PR.
+1.
I've filed a tracker ticket where folks can comment if they'd
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 08. 21 11:17, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > dnf builds well after building all OpenSSL dependent packages (in
> batches)
> > with the compat package and OpenSSL 3.0.0 beta2 version.
> > You can have a look at [1] with
On 31. 08. 21 11:17, Sahana Prasad wrote:
Hi everyone,
dnf builds well after building all OpenSSL dependent packages (in batches)
with the compat package and OpenSSL 3.0.0 beta2 version.
You can have a look at [1] with the side-tag f36-build-side-44794
Hello Sahana,
I am afraid the side tag
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210829.0):
ID: 963808 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 12:35 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 8/30/21 12:08 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> > I checked the entry on a Windows multiboot system and it does not
> > have the
> > "insmod chain" line, maybe droppint that helps?
>
>
> Same result. GRUB returns immediately to its
Hi everyone,
dnf builds well after building all OpenSSL dependent packages (in batches)
with the compat package and OpenSSL 3.0.0 beta2 version.
You can have a look at [1] with the side-tag f36-build-side-44794
I think we are in a good state to merge OpenSSL 3.0.0 and compat packages
into
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 11:13:40 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:07:38 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74840901
> >
> > How should I interpret this?
>
> something is killing the build in progress (like oomd?) and
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:07:38 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74840901
>
> How should I interpret this?
something is killing the build in progress (like oomd?) and inspection
of the builders (looks at least x86_64 + ppc64le + s390x are
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74840901
How should I interpret this?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny
HEADS_UP:
The Change of autoconf to version 2.71 is built and done. F36FTBFS bugs are
created [1] for failed builds of packages. Most of them are caused by minor
issues and not merged pull-requests of fixes regarding autoconf-2.71
change. Hopefully have this done in a short time.
Thanks for
Dne 31. 08. 21 v 7:39 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a):
Greetings,
Some months ago, I announced [0] that I will move the package
maintainer docs from wiki to docs.fedoraproject.org.
Thx a lot.
All changes to the documentation is intended to happen through pull
requests. However, following the
V Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:22:05PM +0200, Silvia Sánchez napsal(a):
> Hello everyone,
>
> I was trying to file a bug following last QA meeting and turns out I
> can't. I moved from an old laptop to a new one and in the new one I can't
> login. I'm using the correct password and everything, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999019
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-403225049a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-403225049a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210830.0):
ID: 963477 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999019
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Storable-3.25-1.fc36
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Storable` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Storable/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Il 31/08/21 07:39, Otto Urpelainen ha scritto:
> Greetings,
>
> Some months ago, I announced [0] that I will move the package maintainer
> docs from wiki to docs.fedoraproject.org. I am happy to announce that
> this task is complete and the docs are public in their new location now
> [1].
I see there are systems where you need to explicitly link wirh gcc exception
handling libs with -lgcc_eh
Have been any change in the compiler stack since the last time you built it?
I am not at home right now, but in the evening I can try to build it if you
need it.
Just let me know.
En 31
Looks like a linker error due to missing exception functions.
Does link with --fno-exceptions helps?
En 31 ago. 2021 3:37, en 3:37, Michael Cronenworth escribió:
>Hi,
>
>I've had some life events keep me from pushing package updates for
>about a month. My
>attempt at pushing the latest wine
58 matches
Mail list logo
