vtk is generating the following rpaths errors like this:
ERROR 0008: file
'/usr/lib64/mpich/lib/vtk/libvtkFiltersParallelGeometryJava.so' contains
the $ORIGIN runpath specifier at the wrong position in
[/usr/lib64/mpich/lib:$ORIGIN:$ORIGIN/../]
The notes on the errors state:
*0x0008
After reading the Phoronic's article about the AMD improvements baked in
the 5.15 kernel I decided to give it a try on my F34 desktop.
Bootup was OK but after logging in I saw some small screen corruption on my
secondary monitor but Gnome still logged in fine. But after it fully loaded
(showing
Hello,
I am a reviewer of a new Python package. [1]
As I am far from being proficient, I seek another pair of eyes, a
second opinion.
I am an experienced packager, I am just new to Python packaging specifics.
I'm looking for someone who will be able to help both the newcomer who
submitted the
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210912.0):
ID: 986477 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/986477
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 8:21 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> EPEL Next[1][2] is meant for machines running CentOS Stream.
> We currently have epel8-next, and are working on getting epel9-next setup so
> that maintainers can build on it.
> Technically epel9-next will be a "Pre-Release" of epel9, but
On 16.09.21 19:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:02:08AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I believe ansible-core includes a "dependency manager" depending on your
definition. The ansible-galaxy command in ansible-core can install ansible
collections so that's you can install
On 16. 09. 21 23:26, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 16. 09. 21 22:03, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 /
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 09. 21 22:03, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >>> For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer
> >>> support for
On 16. 09. 21 22:03, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer
support for it are installed as weak dependencies with post-GA package
updates.
Why
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer
> > support for it are installed as weak dependencies with post-GA package
> > updates.
>
> Why exactly is this a problem?
>
On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer
support for it are installed as weak dependencies with post-GA package
updates.
Why exactly is this a problem?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:22 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 3:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
> >
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak
> > dependencies
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 3:04 PM Eric Curtin wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> As per:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
>
> here is my introduction. I am the upstream maintainer of inotify-tools
> and recent hire at Red Hat. I would like to join
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 3:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
>
>
> == Summary ==
> exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak
> dependencies (Recommends or Supplements) of installed packages and
> blocks installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
== Summary ==
exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak
dependencies (Recommends or Supplements) of installed packages and
blocks installation of packages satisfying already unmet dependencies.
In other
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
== Summary ==
exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak
dependencies (Recommends or Supplements) of installed packages and
blocks installation of packages satisfying already unmet dependencies.
In other
Hello!
I have been recently hired to help maintaining the GDB package. I have a bit of
experience with open source development, having contributed for a few month to
the QEMU project. I am very excited to help in the near future!
--
Cheers!
Bruno Larsen
Due to outstanding blocker bugs, we do not have an F35 Beta RC. As a
result, F35 Beta is NO-GO by default and tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting
is cancelled.
The next Fedora Linux 35 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[1] will be held at 1700
UTC on Thursday 23 September in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for the
Hi Guys,
As per:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
here is my introduction. I am the upstream maintainer of inotify-tools
and recent hire at Red Hat. I would like to join the Fedora Package
Maintainers.
Is mise le meas/Regards,
Eric
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:18:30PM +0200, Leon Fauster wrote:
> On 16.09.21 19:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:02:08AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > I believe ansible-core includes a "dependency manager" depending on your
> > > definition. The ansible-galaxy command in
On 16.09.21 14:22, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Just a heads up that ansible-core (the engine part of ansible) is now in
CentOS stream 9:
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/ansible-core
Note that this is the engine, you will likely want to
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:02:08AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I believe ansible-core includes a "dependency manager" depending on your
> definition. The ansible-galaxy command in ansible-core can install ansible
> collections so that's you can install modules that you may need.
>
> It is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003640
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858048
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
rt-5.0.2-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75798911
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858048
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1823610
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1823610=edit
[patch] Update to 5.0.2 (#1858048)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858048
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|rt-5.0.1 is available |rt-5.0.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002422
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005058
Bug ID: 2005058
Summary: perl-PDF-API2-2.042 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDF-API2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 4:04 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:31 AM Nils K wrote:
> >
> > I found the origin of this change to be the following commit:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/c/b65f9ed036fca30c0684bfc6fe72d72a53e9867a?branch=f21
> > (which is a revert
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210915.0):
ID: 985689 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/985689
ID: 985695 Test: x86_64
I believe ansible-core includes a "dependency manager" depending on your
definition. The ansible-galaxy command in ansible-core can install ansible
collections so that's you can install modules that you may need.
It is similar in scope to pip, rubygem, cargo, or any other of the language
package
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-09-16 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2021-09-16 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2021-09-16
EPEL Next[1][2] is meant for machines running CentOS Stream.
We currently have epel8-next, and are working on getting epel9-next setup
so that maintainers can build on it.
Technically epel9-next will be a "Pre-Release" of epel9, but saying it is a
"pre-release" implies that it will go away.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:11 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:38 AM Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks to people on the CentOS mailing list.
> > We managed to get CentOS Stream 9 pre-release with updates working on a VM.
> > Is there also a pre-release
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:10 AM Leon Fauster
wrote:
>
> On 16.09.21 14:22, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >> Just a heads up that ansible-core (the engine part of ansible) is now in
> >> CentOS stream 9:
> >>
> >>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:38 AM Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to people on the CentOS mailing list.
> We managed to get CentOS Stream 9 pre-release with updates working on a VM.
> Is there also a pre-release version of EPEL 9 we can use?
>
Not just yet, I'm hoping that'll be
Hello,
I seek a clarification on the "Users and Groups Guidelines" [1]
chapter of the "Fedora Packaging Guidelines" [2]
Please note I want such case to be clear to newcomers too.
While I am an experienced packager who has a fair idea how to navigate
in Fedora documentation, the same issue might
OLD: Fedora-35-20210915.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210916.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hi,
Thanks to people on the CentOS mailing list.
We managed to get CentOS Stream 9 pre-release with updates working on a VM.
Is there also a pre-release version of EPEL 9 we can use?
Thanks
---
Lee
___
epel-devel mailing list --
On 16. 09. 21 14:36, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list of
all retired packages by scanning dist-git. But if I want it for one release of
Fedora? And I do not want to do that manually; I rather want to script it.
Hello.
Do
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210915.0):
ID: 984971 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi
URL:
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
Hi,
I am a computer science student from Germany and have used Fedora for
at least 2 years by now.
Using COPR I gained some experience in buidling packages but recently I
wanted to try building packages conforming to the guidelines and
getting them into Fedora. My interest is mostly in Rust and
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list
> of all retired packages by scanning dist-git. But if I want it for one
> release of Fedora? And I do not want to do that manually; I rather want
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 8:37 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list
> of all retired packages by scanning
> dist-git. But if I want it for one release of Fedora? And I do not want to do
> that manually; I rather want to
Hi.
What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list of all retired packages by scanning
dist-git. But if I want it for one release of Fedora? And I do not want to do that manually; I rather want to script it.
Miroslav
___
g-i-s is still broken in the Workstation iso for Rawhide today btw just
fyi, crashing after install in a Virtualbox VM for me
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:20 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 7:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 16. 09. 21 v 13:23 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > the question is, can I remove Epoch tag ? or should I put Epoch in
> > every branch, i.e epel 8 ?
> >
> > Thank you .
>
> Once you introduce the epoch, you have to keep it. And only
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Just a heads up that ansible-core (the engine part of ansible) is now in
> CentOS stream 9:
>
> https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/ansible-core
>
> Note that this is the engine, you will likely want to install
> collections for
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
> wrote:
> > = ADDED PACKAGES =
> > Package: atkmm2.36-2.36.1-1.fc36
> > Summary: C++ interface for the ATK library
> > RPMs:atkmm2.36 atkmm2.36-devel atkmm2.36-doc
> >
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
> = ADDED PACKAGES =
> Package: atkmm2.36-2.36.1-1.fc36
> Summary: C++ interface for the ATK library
> RPMs:atkmm2.36 atkmm2.36-devel atkmm2.36-doc
> Size:1.35 MiB
(...)
> Package: glibmm2.68-2.68.1-1.fc36
> Summary:
Dne 16. 09. 21 v 13:23 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
the question is, can I remove Epoch tag ? or should I put Epoch in
every branch, i.e epel 8 ?
Thank you .
Once you introduce the epoch, you have to keep it. And only increment it.
There is no way to get it rid of it. At least no way I can
Hi,
In practice, after bug [1] I decided rollback update on epel 7 with one
epoch bump [2]. Now after one year and half and after testing, we know
if we removing one line it works, so I want rollback the rollback and
update debmirror on epel7 to support Ubuntu 20.04 ...
the question is, can I
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210915.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210916.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 118
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 41.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Am 15.09.21 um 14:38 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
On 10. 09. 21 18:50, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Hi,
since a few days, loading the enter_bug.cgi for "Product=Fedora" on
RH BZ takes very long.
It's quite possible, that it's happening for any other product too ;)
It's over a minute ATM.
I have the
I have already submited "pyhton-liblarch" for review, I didn't
submited "gtg" yet because to be able to run "gtg" and check if
everything is ok, I need first to re-add "liblarch", as it is a
dependency of "gtg".
This is the review request link:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210915.0):
ID: 984533 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:20:06AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:13:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:13:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sahana,
> > >
> > > it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote:
>
> > Hi Sahana,
> >
> > it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to
> > watch the progress. Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892743
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210915.0):
ID: 984525 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/984525
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:26 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 9:40 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > Thanks, that did the trick.
> > But of course somebody built stuff during the side-tag window and now
> > it can't be pushed. *le big sigh*
>
> This seems to happen every time
63 matches
Mail list logo
